Slashdot Mirror


WikiLeaks In New Legal Battle

geegel writes "The US Justice Department is now fighting in court demands from three WikiLeaks associates to disclose the names of several electronic service platforms that received requests to hand over user information. This comes after Twitter obtained a court order to unseal the demands in order to notify the three persons. The current legal row has seen both the ACLU and the EFF provide legal assistance to the WikiLeaks associates."

5 of 86 comments (clear)

  1. Re:EFF by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And regular newspapers absolutely never do that...

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  2. Re:EFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And people who aren't Freemasons can't wear the Freemason ring. However, since I'm not a Freemason, their prohibition doesn't affect me; therefore, I can wear their ring if I want to. The US's jurisdiction isn't supposed to reach outside its borders (even if it does in fact).

  3. Re:EFF by rainmouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe in the EFF. I wish they never defended wikileaks. What they did was illegal. You can't post classified and / or stolen information. Pretty simple.

    As your privacy is gradually stripped away, how many times have you heard the words "If you have done nothing wrong then you have nothing to fear."

  4. The real question here is... by SuperCharlie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would the justice dept want to hide who it is asking records from.

    If they are in the right.. well.. why hide it.

  5. National Defense is Different by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have no sympathy for Wikileaks when it comes to National Defense secrets. There is a whole magnitude of difference from corporate malfeasance in these leaks.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."