Slashdot Mirror
How Apple's iOS Went From Insecure To Most Secure
GMGruman writes "There's no such thing as a perfectly secure operating system, but security experts agree — somewhat grudgingly in some cases — that iOS, Apple's mobile operating system, is the most secure commercial OS today, mobile or desktop. It didn't start that way of course, and Robert Lemos explains what Apple did to go from insecure to most secure."
Wait... aren't we talking about the same iOS that gets jailbroken like clockwork still?
Most Secure? And the security is in the App Store? I don't know why the author's trying so hard to bullshit his way through. Sensationalist headlines just to get a few more ad impressions, eh.
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.
Any expert that holds a grudge like that is no expert I ever care to hear from.
"In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson
Apple is going after the market of users who are sick of dealing with security issues/malware/etc. They've done it by created a closed system. And while us geeks hate that, it has a strong appeal to most people. When they go to a closed system on Mac's (and they will), that's who they're going to be appealing to. "Buy a computer where all your software is pre-screened through our App Store and you don't have to worry about viruses" is a powerful (and potentially very profitable) message in a time when malware and assorted hacks have become so common.
SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
Although iOS has a lot of security going on underneath the hood, its safety could be due in large part to the fact that attackers have not focused on compromising the devices because there is no economic incentive to attack them, says Lookout's Mahaffey.
Really? No economic incentive?
Unlike PCs and Macs, every cell phone is directly associated with a credit card. Essentially a cell phone IS money. Bad actors can - and do - monetize this with malware that places calls to sketchy and high-cost phone numbers, or send texts to subscribe to "information services," resulting in (fraudulent) charges showing up each month. And good luck trying to dispute charges with your cellular provider on those. They will just tell you that their hands are tied by federal law and that they can't help you, but nonetheless will turn around and threaten you with collection if you don't pay.
There's definitely economic incentive to attack mobile phones.
Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
OpenBSD has been at it a lot longer. Even as a Linux Zealot, I would choose OpenBSD for security. IOS is a closed Black-Box that nobody but Stevie knows what's inside. Historically we tend to find *cough*siemens*cough* that closed source, proprietary *cough*secureid*cough* offerings do not necessarily equate to a trustworthy or "secure" system. What seems to happen is closed source options provide a layer of obscurity which allow the governing company *cough*dropbox*cough* to take inexcusable risks with customers assets because, basically, they don't need to show anybody. As long as they never get caught, they save a lot of money not having to implement a system to keep them honest.
Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
It updates without asking people.. it disables things without asking people... certain types of useful software are internally prevented from ever running on it.. it steals information about me - such as my geographical location and uploads it to a server without me asking.. it won't work unless it has my credit card number..
if a hacker did that to my laptop, I'd hunt him down and punch his fucking head in.
I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.