Slashdot Mirror


Dutch To Introduce Net Neutrality By Law

An anonymous reader writes "Big news out of the Netherlands this week, where a government minister announced plans to guarantee network neutrality by law. If Parliament approves the amendment to Dutch telecommunications law, and it expected to do so, it would become one of the first countries in the world to legislate against Internet providers who want to charge more for using particular applications or services."

39 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. first =) by jaunkst · · Score: 2

    Go Net Neutrality!

  2. Wonderful. by Zedrick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Netherlands is truly a developed country. Too bad it's so overcrowded.

    1. Re:Wonderful. by Ironhandx · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm seriously considering moving there asap. Find a decent town with low crime rate and ik vil nederlandse les het goed!

    2. Re:Wonderful. by Squiddie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but you would think that the "Land of The Free" would have guaranteed internet freedom much earlier than anyone else. Instead, they are busy trying to lock it down.

    3. Re:Wonderful. by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The US has always been behind the times.
      Heck we didn't even invent the Bill of Rights concept. It was taken from the British, after we won the civil war. Or the concept of natural rights (invented by the Greek Stoics and Roman Senator Cicero). We're all just a a bunch of plagiarists. ;-)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Wonderful. by SilentStaid · · Score: 2

      And if we adopt this from the Dutch, I'll continue to think that even if we're stealing ideas - at least we steal some of the good ones.

    5. Re:Wonderful. by kosty · · Score: 2

      "Land of The FEE..." FTFY.

      --
      "Democracy." It's just a slogan.
    6. Re:Wonderful. by dainbug · · Score: 2

      WTF? "Other people's property"? I was under the impression that the internet was developed by ARPA (DARPA) in 1969. (and a bunch of universities -- go bruins) with my tax dollars. Can the part that is owned by the tax payer (Government, Military, Public Universities, and the parts that were built with government subsidies) all be run the way "I" want? (We want)

    7. Re:Wonderful. by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So it's instead the land where the landowners are free to do whatever they want, and those without capital have no rights?

    8. Re:Wonderful. by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2

      Of all the arguments you chose, you chose that one? Seriously, man. His argument is going to be that the ISPs own their own wire, routers, and access to them (that part of the internet) is not public anymore than your personal router and wireless or ethernet is public.

      By arguing THAT, you show you don't really understand what the overall issues are about.

    9. Re:Wonderful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How does network neutrality let anyone use someone else's property without an agreement? Everyone pays their ISP for service. The services work out how to fulfill their contracts with peering agreements, etc. . Why should the fact that I am asking for data from Google be handled any differently than if it was from Yahoo, or my next door neighbor?

    10. Re:Wonderful. by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depending on how you look at it, the Revolutionary War WAS a civil war, as at that time we were part of Britain and were fighting with the main British forces. It's just that the "civil war" tag is usually only applied when the side wanting to break away loses the fight. :)

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    11. Re:Wonderful. by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you are under the wrong impression.

      DARPA took ideas from existing POTS, which already was using packet switching, then it took existing computer networks, which didn't use packet switching, and applied the packet switching and created TCP/IP.

      That was the contribution - the protocol.

      Now, AT&T was certainly declared a "national resource", it was given all sorts of monopoly powers by the federal government, so that was totally wrong.

      However you are arguing about your ISP, not the protocol and not even the AT&T specific lines, so when you look at the fact that most of the Internet (99% of it probably) is private networks, then you can try and ask your question again.

    12. Re:Wonderful. by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll continue to think that even if we're stealing ideas - at least we steal some of the good ones.

      Good ideas should be stolen with pride!
      That was one of the things we learned during a week-long "team-building group brainstorm" (I jest not).

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    13. Re:Wonderful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ideas can't be stolen. They can be copied and you can [falsely] claim to be the inventor. But the original creator is not deprived of the idea; merely the credit.

    14. Re:Wonderful. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was never the "land of the free to use other people's property the way I want."

      Really? The history of 19th century America is the history of one group wanting to use another group's property, and doing so over, and over, and over. You must be a real American to be so ignorant of your own country's history. Off the top of my head:

      Repeated relocation of Native Americans to steal their land.
      Chattel Slavery (using some else's body the way I want without their consent).
      Grazing rights conflicts in the west.
      Water rights conflicts in the west.
      Mineral/oil rights conflicts.
      Railroad right-of-way conflicts.

      I'm sure a few dozen more specific cases could be added.

      In short, America was ALWAYS the "land of the free to use other people's property the way I want."

    15. Re:Wonderful. by Xiph1980 · · Score: 2

      Well, I have no idea how many murders you've got annually, but on a country of 16.7 million inhabitants, we had the following numbers of murders from 2010 to 2005: 170 / 178 / 161 / 143 / 149 / 201 so that's not too bad I think :)

      --
      Manuals are your last resort only
    16. Re:Wonderful. by Xtifr · · Score: 2

      Given that the "Land of the Free" was heavily influenced by the Dutch Republic (1581-1795), maybe it's not so surprising. Note that this was the period when, despite the lack of rule by royalty or church, the Dutch became a major world power, confounding all expectations at the time. Since the Republic was still a going concern at the time of the American Revolution, I think that there's little doubt that it was a major influence on the Founding Fathers' decision to try something similar. Of course, there's some irony in the fact that the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Dutch Republic was probably a factor in the Pilgrims' decision to leave Holland (where they'd fled from England) and colonize America, where they would be free to hate both royalty and Catholics.

      Anyway, given Holland's long (if interrupted) history of freedom, perhaps it isn't so surprising that they'd be first here. We can only hope that the US doesn't take 195 years to follow the Dutch lead this time! :)

    17. Re:Wonderful. by billstewart · · Score: 2

      Finland's easy to explain - "Why did you kill him?" "I've been stuck in the cabin for two months while it's been dark and snowing, and he just pissed me off!"

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  3. Ok, that settles it by Hermanas · · Score: 2

    I'm moving to the Netherlands!

  4. Good Job! by milbournosphere · · Score: 2

    US congress, I pray that you pay attention to this. Your constitutions actually WANT this type of legislation!

  5. Re:Leave it to the Dutch! by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2

    Not so sure about that. We (the Dutch) are leading in telephone taps in the world. And local regulation is already wasting gigbaytes on mandatory ISP communications monitoring. And there have been numerous plans for CP filters and what not.

    So, this is just one win in the battle.

  6. chile was the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/13/2056218/Chile-First-To-Approve-Net-Neutrality-Law

  7. Uh Oh by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You won't like it you yank. Our beer got taste, our cheese is not just a barely edible plastic, our food isn't genetically manipulated, the soda contains real sugar, the women are the easiest in the world, the pot is so cheap just anyone can smoke it... eh... oh wait, I got it. We are SOCIALIST. You got to pay taxes here. Sales tax? 21%. (might 20% they keep on raising it recently).

    That should scare of the Americans... well apart from the beer having taste etc etc. America is an interesting place to visit, just don't eat or drink anything that wasn't prepared by a first generation immigrant.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Uh Oh by keytoe · · Score: 2

      Our beer got taste

      Oakshire Brewery: 5 minutes away.

      our cheese is not just a barely edible plastic

      Rogue Creamery and Tillamook: Both 3 hours away.

      our food isn't genetically manipulated

      Horton Road Organic: Just one of many CSAs in town.

      the soda contains real sugar

      I cut out soda at the same time I cut out GMO food and other 'fake foods'. So high five to you on that one :)

      the women are the easiest in the world

      Debatable. There's something about 9 months of rain that causes promiscuity when the sun finally arrives.

      the pot is so cheap just anyone can smoke it...

      Not Legal, but not exactly rare either if you're into that sort of thing.

      Lumping all of the states into a blanket statement like that is akin to me making claims about 'All of Europe'; They're bound to be inaccurate and make me look ignorant.

    2. Re:Uh Oh by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      Hei**ken (sorry, I'm not allowed to curse) is not "real beer", it misses the crucial ingredient "taste" and they replaced it with "headache".
      I do agree Belgium has way better beers (no contest) but please compare with a decent Dutch beer like Hertog Jan. Not as good as a decent Belgian beer, but it gets closer. For a good beer the special types are way more interesting anyway, and Hei***en doesn't have many.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    3. Re:Uh Oh by mcvos · · Score: 2

      No, up to 52% goes to taxes via income tax

      That's only the highest scale, paid over only part of your income. With all the tax deductibles, nobody actually pays more than 40% tax here.

  8. Re:Does this still work if it is not ubiquitous by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

    so if an ISP is discriminating in the US (where your favorite services houses their servers) you service will still be throttled or potentially cut off.

    It's pretty hard for a Dutch person to have their ISP be located in the US. Unless they use a satellite service or have a leased, undersea cable. But yes, for a US user, this DUTCH law would have no effect.

    This law deals with the ISP, not the servers you deal with. Where do you get the idea that "your favorite services" are required to provide service to you? If the iTunes store or whoever wants to block your IP, they have that right. What this law, and net neutrality in general, deals with is the ISP blocking your access to certain destinations, not those destinations blocking your access to their services.

    For the life of me, I have no idea why a poster upthread thought this had something to do with "copyright owners". Net neutrality has nothing to do with copyright. Zip. Nada.

  9. Good thing is... by MonoSynth · · Score: 2

    This idea comes frome one of the most corporate-friendly governments the country has had in a long time. The three ruling parties are all right-wing:
    1. VVD: liberal, capitalist, pro privatization of state-run companies;
    2. CDA: christian democrats. They're the initiators of this law;
    3. PVV: anti-muslim, anti-immigration, populist. Not really part of the government, but they promised to agree on most things (except for their anti-Muslim stance).

    The opposing parties are labour, socialist, environmentalist, liberal and two small christian parties.

    I can't imagine why any of those parties would vote against this law (except for one or two small ones), so I would be very, very surprised if this law won't be passed.

    1. Re:Good thing is... by MonoSynth · · Score: 2

      Correction:

      The law was initiated by the opposing left-wing parties (as I expected). The (CDA)minister is very supportive, but the two biggest parties both say that they will await EU research on the matter. So it's not done yet.

      The telco's are not happy.

  10. Re:Moot point. by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

    Telecom companies will just move to charging by bandwidth if they need to. Telecom companies should just give up fighting net neutrality here in the US too and just say "OK, fine. We'll just raise prices considerably."

    You think ISPs are against net neutrality for bandwidth reasons? HA! They see hugely popular sites like YouTube, and FaceBook and see an opportunity for profit by charging more to access those sites. They also seem to think that they have a right to hold the bandwidth of sites that they have no agreements with hostage if they aren't paid. Or the ISP also operates their own cable network or VoIP service and wants to charge their competitors more. This is all about seeing a way to squeeze every drop of profit out of consumers and competitors that they can.

  11. Sign me up! by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2

    Legalized prostitution -and- net neutrality? Immigrating to another country has never been quite so attractive.

  12. In depth on the amendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just copied and pasted the first paragraph from the link in the article when submitting, but I didn't think it would be posted this way. I think some more information is required for a proper news article/discussion. Therefore, a short summary of the law in question.

    For Dutch readers, here is the amendment in Dutch: https://www.bof.nl/live/wp-content/uploads/Amendement-van-het-lid-Verhoeven-c.s..pdf

    Summary for English readers:

    It will be forbidden by law to block or induce a bandwidth limitation on select internet IP addresses/websites/applications. Unless:
    - the blocking or capping reduces congestion, but every type of service still has to be treated equally
    - for the integrity or safety of the network and service of the provider
    - to block unwanted communication stated that the client has explicitly asked so
    - has to be done by court order

    There is some more in depth information what internet access really means, and it also states that providers may block everything, providing it's for example a VoIP only subscription. It's not allowed to offer an internet subscription while blocking certain stuff, but the other way around thus still will be legal. Also it's ofcourse still allowed to give an overall bandwidth cap or monthly data cap.

    All in all I think it's a pretty solid amendment. Submitted by the four left wing parties: D66, PvDA, SP and Groenlinks

  13. Re:Great job by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm Dutch.

    Sorry to inform you, you are wrong on much of what you state.

    We do have great social services, second only to scandinavia AFAIK.
    Taxes are not flat but range roughly from 33% to 50% depending on income with a tax-free bottom sum.
    Can't compare disposable income, but from what I've know it's pretty much equal considering in the US you have to pay for a lot of things that are paid through taxes here; the amount of money we have left at the end of the month is probably quite close. More significantly we have far less economic "outliers" around here; few billionairs and few people living in poverty.
    Houses ARE more expensive and since the economic crisis, credits have become somewhat more difficult.
    As for dull; life is what you make of it; if your friends prefer to live a dull live around here, they can do so ;)
    Cars are more expensive, but not by much (OTOH, fuel IS a lot more expensive than in the US).
    Consumer goods aren't twice as expensive, perhaps some 10%-20% more expensive. Mostly because of corporate taxes. As I understand it, many US companies are able to pay $0 taxes due to creative accounting. Tax laws are a little less pro-corporate around here.
    Internet isn't free, neither wired nor mobile. I don't quite know what you get for $80/mo with AT&T, but the most expensive mobile subscription for iPhone4 around here is roughly $55 a month.
    AFAIK, most of the above is similar for the rest of the north and west European countries.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  14. Re:Great job by meburke · · Score: 2

    Thanks for the info. I decided to check what you said and what I thought against the "Pocket World in Figures" on my shelf. Most of what you said is much more accurate than the impressions I got from friends in the Netherlands. I don't know why I thought that internet connection was free; I found references from friends living in other countries where it was free, but not from the Netherlands. (A friend of mine in Italy waited six months between ordering and getting hooked up.)

    I checked the used car prices on autotrack and found that the price is a little higher, the cars are usually lower mileage, and the taxes quite a bit higher. Insurance is higher and NL has a pretty expensive road tax. Actual quantification eludes me.

    The OECD database seems to indicate that disposable income is about 80% of a comparable US citizen's disposable income. However, it seems that Americans have a greater amount to blow away due to the much lower cost of consumer items. I guess I'm saying that a comparable sum will, at this time, buy more goods in the USA than in NL, because less of it goes to consumer taxes.

    Browsing past editions of the PWiF, I see that the USA has dropped quite a bit in the past few years. In 2000, we had more disposable income than Germany, Japan and GB combined. As we adopt more socialistic practices and gather more debt, I suspect that the USA economic miracles will be at an end in few years.

    There is nothing like a lot of facts to blow away my favorite presuppositions...

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  15. Funny thing... by thrill12 · · Score: 2

    ...before you move over here we expect you to learn Nederlands goed ;=) (you even have to do an exam in a Dutch Embassy of your choice)

    Dumb idea though. But the good news is: as long as you are higher educated and have a good income nobody gives a f... if you only talk English.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Funny thing... by FST777 · · Score: 2

      The exam is only for non-"western world" immigrants. That includes Japan but excludes Mexico and our former colony Indonesia. Basically, "western world" is defined based on wealth.

      Live is good here, but immigration laws are highly discriminatory.

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    2. Re:Funny thing... by mcvos · · Score: 2

      But the good news is: as long as you are higher educated and have a good income nobody gives a f... if you only talk English.

      Let's be honest. We speak English (or something we think resembles English) to everybody. Dutch is practically impossible to learn because no Dutchman will speak it to you.

  16. Re:Great job by mcvos · · Score: 2

    You'll also find a lot of posts complaining we Dutch are rude.

    We're honest and direct. That's what we like to call it. But we're honest and direct to the point of rudeness, and sometimes that gets a bit out of hand. We're also some other things to the point of rudeness. Although some Dutchmen can be very polite and considerate. Mostly we're all different, though. The thing that anooys Dutchmen most of all is other Dutchmen, except for the ones that are somewhat like us.