Slashdot Mirror


Hackers Expose 26,000 Sex Website Passwords

An anonymous reader writes "Passwords and email addresses of almost 26,000 members of adult website Pron.com have been released on the internet by the notorious hacking group LulzSec. To add to the victims' humiliation, LulzSec called on its followers to try the email/password combinations against Facebook, and tell friends and family of the users that they were subscribers to a pornographic website. In addition LulzSec released passwords belonging to the administrators of dozens of other adult websites, and highlighted military and government email addresses that had signed up for the xxx-rated services."

40 of 497 comments (clear)

  1. I swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    i only read it for the articles.

  2. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who signs up with a government issued email or even real info to a sex site? Who even pays for that? Amazing. So much free stuff to watch who would bother?

    1. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      These idiots keep the porn 'industry' in business so we can download new content for free.

    2. Re:Dumb by silentcoder · · Score: 5, Funny

      #/bin/bash
      for I in `cat ~/lulsec_passwords.txt | awk '{print $1}'` ; do
        echo "I wanted to personally thank you for paying for porn and thereby funding the creation of the content I download for free. Sincerely P. R. Vert" | sendmail -s "Thank you very much" $I
      done

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    3. Re:Dumb by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, that's what the poster that you quoted said in the sentence immediately after the one you quoted.

      lol the guy must have a really short attention span.

  3. Re:Who cares who they belong to by Haedrian · · Score: 4, Funny

    so we can see some pron for free...

    You're new to this whole 'internet' thing aren't you?

  4. Re:Gimme, gimme by zonky · · Score: 5, Informative
  5. Two minds by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On one hand, I couldn't agree more with one of the posters who said something along the lines the how people make a bog deal out of sex between consenting adults, including the watching of it. The Victorian-esque morality that most aspects of sex are something that people should be ashamed of, including porn, is not something I can relate to.

    That said, I have to wonder about the kind of people who would be paying for porn. Even if you are particularly desperate, there's so much free porn on the Internet that it's almost pointless to pay for porn. Plus, if you're that desperate, just how hard is it to pick girls up at a bar (or if you're a geek Don Juan, Craigslist)? Paying for sex in any shape or form has to be one of the silliest things, given how easy it is to find women who are more than willing if you just looked around.

    1. Re:Two minds by cc1984_ · · Score: 5, Funny

      On one hand....

      You never told us what you're doing with the other...

    2. Re:Two minds by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's going to cost, one way or another. The cheapest I ever had cost a draft beer, the most expensive cost me a house, a car, and part of my pension. Granted, that last one lasted 27 years...

      But porn? Paying for porn is like paying for kittens.

    3. Re:Two minds by rollingcalf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Paying for sex in any shape or form has to be one of the silliest things, given how easy it is to find women who are more than willing if you just looked around."

      90% of men are incapable of getting sex for free. At a minimum, they have to pay at least for a few drinks or dinner at a restaurant. Usually multiple times, and with no guarantee of their effort and expenditure resulting in sex. Not to mention the costs of marriage and divorce.

      "Plus, if you're that desperate, just how hard is it to pick girls up at a bar (or if you're a geek Don Juan, Craigslist)?"

      How hard? This is Slashdot, where understanding quantum cryptography is easier than picking up women at a bar. Random sluts on Craigslist or sex-only online dating sites? ... can you say STDs?

      Free sex is often the most expensive kind of sex.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    4. Re:Two minds by rwv · · Score: 4, Funny

      Paying for porn is like paying for kittens.

      How so? And exchange of dollars for a little bit of pussy?

    5. Re:Two minds by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's so much porn on the internet I just sit there shaking my fist.

    6. Re:Two minds by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You must be in your twenties and project an aura of some financial success (not rich, but not struggling 20-something).

      Sex partners weren't impossible to come by when I was in my 20s, but it wasn't always easy, and quite often the girls who were the easiest to get also were the least pleasant to be with.

      o Weird self-esteem issues
      o More convenient than attractive
      o Unbalanced desire/need that usually left me feeling guilty (ie, they always wanted 'more')

      I found that that most of the 'desirable' women -- ie, complete package, smart, good-looking, sexually engaged -- when I was in my twenties all were looking for way more than sex and at a minimum expected a relationship with some kind of long-term status, generally marriage, and they really favored people with some sense of financial success (good job/income).

      I don't think that changes a ton as you get older. I think there may be some golden age between about 35-50 where women are divorced or decide that they don't want to be married and feel less sexually constrained.

      This may be different "now" than it was when I was in my 20s, 25 years ago, but probably not a lot on average.

  6. Pathetic Lamers by bjourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason why you never hear about porn sites getting cracked is because it is fucking easy. Most porn sites are vulnerable as hell and almost anyone with some technical proficiency can exploit them. They are run by low budget companies who often just cant afford to secure their sites. Cracking porn sites are for pathetic script kiddies with little to no skill what so ever. Also what's up with trying to shame owners of porn site memberships? Fucking puritans.

  7. WeinerGate by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think it'd be nice to relate this to the latest "scandal" in the US:

    azmeal@cmc.gov.my | ilovedyna
    flag@whitehouse.gov | karlmarx
    kamarudinalias@mmea.gov.my | 814550
    james.ben.hopkins@us.army.mil | j347576
    wade.quigley@ang.af.mil | mywife01
    aaron.c.sewell@us.army.mil | 3689817

    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    1. Re:WeinerGate by MimeticLie · · Score: 3, Funny

      flag@whitehouse.gov | karlmarx

      I think Andrew Breitbart just had an orgasm.

    2. Re:WeinerGate by geogob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm finding the Irony of using "mywife" as a password for a porn site quite delectable.

    3. Re:WeinerGate by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      CMC & MEA: Malaysian communications and multimedia commission. It is possible that these accounts are for research purposes.

    4. Re:WeinerGate by rich_r · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. Research purposes. Honest!

    5. Re:WeinerGate by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I feel a profound sense of pity for that person. To me, that choice of passwords suggests an unhealthy attachment to pornography.

      I feel a profound sense of pity for you, as your post suggests you think an interest in media depicting the rich breadth of sexuality as entertainment and adjunct is unhealthy. But I forgive you, because I presume you were brought up in a social and/or religious environment that has profoundly crippled your sexual nature, as well as skewing your sense of perspective such that you incorrectly think you can infer anything significant about people you don't know, from a password.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    6. Re:WeinerGate by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why don't you use dude@example.com or nospam@example.org? Almost no sites filter it, and there's no chance of it causing spam for anyone.

  8. Simple vandals and criminals by GauteL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After they exposed loads of username/password combinations off some Sony service, I thought to myself; who are they actually hurting? It seemed to me they just made it loads easier for criminals without the skills to do this sort of thing themselves.

    Yes, it is possible that some more sinister hackers already had this data without telling anyone, just secretly exploiting them, but actually publishing the combinations makes it many times more likely that someone will exploit your personal data.

    I consider this hacking group no more than simple vandals and criminals at this stage. There is no "honour" in it, and exposing porn clients are extremely likely to be hypocritical. I don't believe for a second that all members of this hacker group has a "clean conscience" about porn.

    1. Re:Simple vandals and criminals by Anubis350 · · Score: 4, Informative

      to play devils advocate for a sec, exposing such a breach means that pron.com *has* to notify their subscribers in addition to patching the vulnerability, whereas a similar breach using the same exploit for direct criminal reasons might get hushed up in order to avoid losing business

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  9. Re:So what? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People watch porn... so what?

    Depends. Are they legislators who are campaigning against obscenity on the Internet?

    Do we live in the Dark Ages and masturbation is a sin?

    A lot of elected representatives in the US would like us to...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  10. Re:Not funny by gmhowell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What are you on about? This could help people who like to masturbate. I'm told that a significant part of the population engages in that activity.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  11. That's it. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now they've gone too far.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  12. Re:The most popular passwords... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 5, Funny

    I kind of feel for this guy:

    uanzmg@fpfzxc.com | tZxHgJNlpRERQEkK

    as he clearly put some effort into a difficult password and still got fucked.

  13. Okay... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    marvelcash@gmail.com | Slashdot69

    Anybody owning up to this one?

    1. Re:Okay... by marvelcash · · Score: 5, Funny

      No

    2. Re:Okay... by ustolemyname · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder how many people are going to check your uid...

    3. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the funniest thing I've read all morning.. still can't stop laughing.

  14. What makes it different is the threat by elucido · · Score: 5, Informative

    They are telling people to go and destroy peoples lives.
    Telling them to log into their Facebook accounts and tell their families about their porn habit?

    So if a guy or girl is secretly going to gay porn sites, and his or her parents are religious, what kind of damage could that do?

    1. Re:What makes it different is the threat by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ding ding ding! You just figured out what's wrong with 4chan, /b/, Anonymous, etc.
      There is no "they" there. Some are do-gooders. Some are do-badders. Some do anything for "lulz", even if it hurts someone. Some are "white-knights".
      So while on the one hand "they" fight to expose corporate and governmental corruption, on the other hand "they" are laughing because some naive kid's life just got ruined.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  15. Re:Imagine if Google got hacked similarly .... by elucido · · Score: 3, Funny

    They must have a phemonenal amount of personal info on people based on web search alone, never mind everything else they do.

    Some Google engineers must have the ability (if not necessarily permission) to track the porn surfing habits of the vast majority of the world's internet surfers. Think how many powerful people that they could blackmail with this information.

    Don't fuck with Google ...

    If Anon hacked Google they'd have the dirt to blackmail the entire internet. They'd know who was researching how to kill their husband. They'd know who thinks what and who watches what porn.

    This is why your Google password should be at least 100 characters long, random, and impossible to remember.

  16. You did not disappoint me. by ethoxyethaan · · Score: 3, Funny

    root@host:~# strings pronz.txt |grep -o "[^ ]*$" | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | head
            671 123456
            212 123456789
            111 12345
              75 1234
              72 12345678
              65 1234567
              62 password
              52 1234567890
              49 123
              41 123123

  17. Re:Gimme, gimme by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Am I like everyone else who viewed that document?

    Namely that even though I don't subscribe to any porn sites, I did just have to check that my email addresses weren't in there - just in case! :-)

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  18. Will this be the first time... by DemonGenius · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... that porn sites everywhere get Slashdotted?

  19. Re:So what? by blackbeak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do we live in the Dark Ages...?/p>

    Uhm, yes. We could make a very good argument that we're in or entering another dark age. Education is on the wane while the disparity between wealthy and poor rapidly accelerates toward complete serfdom. The middle class is fast disappearing. Science is riddled with political agenda and strangled by the patent and copyright system, while many "peer reviewed" studies are really just simple corporate propaganda. The public domain (water, minerals, parks, roads, etc.) is being sold off to wealthy private and corporate interests. Draconian laws proliferate, making almost everything a serf might do a potential offense. (Steal a loaf of bread and you may well serve hard time, but wipe out someone's retirement, or foreclose on a home without a mortgage and you'll probably laugh about it on the golf course.) The haunting specter of "terrorism", real or imagined, has allowed many hard won personal rights to be effectively repealed, while a virtual witch hunt is in process. Virtually anyone is subject to a home invasion by authorities at any time without notice or significant recourse. The courts are stacked with political cronies, and few can afford a decent lawyer anyway. Fraud is rampant, yet rarely punished at the highest (most significant) levels. Government regulatory agencies are all captured and worse than ineffective. Naked resource wars are initiated unilaterally, as oil and other important resources dwindle. Unemployment and homelessness are rapidly rising, with no relief or government fix in the works. Retirement programs are in the sights for drastic cuts, as the moneyed interests refuse to cut bloated military budgets. The media is not obligated to tell the truth, so the masses are less informed then if they consumed no news. Resistance groups interested in not being in a dark age are infiltrated and rendered impotent in various other ways. The international moneyed powers are rapidly changing the governance of the world into something more hideous than anything the world has ever seen, while all eyes are on the insignificant spectacle of something else.

    Looks kinda dark to me!

    --
    Everything and its opposite is true. Get used to it.
  20. Re:Sexual blackmail? by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is looking like a blackmail mechanism.

    How so? Blackmail is threatening to expose something unless the victim pays or does something for you. There's no suggestion that is happening. They're simply being published.No payment is being asked for.