Slashdot Mirror


Iran Plans To Put a Monkey Into Space

arisvega writes "Iran plans to send a live monkey into space in the summer, the country's top space official said after the launch of the Rassad-1 satellite, state television reported on its website on Thursday. 'The Kavoshgar-5 rocket will be launched during the month of Mordad (July 23 to August 23) with a 285-kilogramme capsule carrying a monkey to an altitude of 120 kilometres (74 miles),' said Hamid Fazeli, head of Iran's Space Organisation. No mentioning on retrieving the monkey, though."

92 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds good by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Troll

    But do they really think they can get a member of the US congress to cooperate with their space progra...

    Oh, wait, you meant the OTHER kind of monkey. Oh, right. Go on then.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Sounds good by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Oh, I think that we out to send them a member. Personally, I would send shelby. He is the one that is busy pushing for the new jobs bill, Senate Launch System.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  2. I didn't know that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is an astronaut!

    1. Re:I didn't know that... by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's such an offensive thing to say. I demand you apologize to the monkeys!

    2. Re:I didn't know that... by martin-boundary · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh yes! Him and George Bush Jr trained together for the space missions back in '82.

    3. Re:I didn't know that... by jd2112 · · Score: 2

      Oh yes! Him and George Bush Jr trained together for the space missions back in '82.

      I misread as Ham (the first chimp in space) and Bush trained for space missions...

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  3. You're a little late to the party, Iran. by DurendalMac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This was done fifty years ago. Then again, I seriously doubt this kind of thing has anything to do with an actual space program and more a flimsy facade for a rocket test.

    1. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I doubt that any space program in history has been run without thought for the military applications of the technology.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    2. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      And back then no humans had gone into space so it made sense to send animals first. Now that people are living in space long term there is no way Iran can justify sending an animal. If they want to measure acceleration, temperature, vibration, life support, etc, then they can do that with instruments.

    3. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by rhook · · Score: 2

      Yep, the entire space race was about showing off our ICBM technology. All the early rockets were developed with nuclear warheads in mind.

    4. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      In mind? BOTH, Atlas and R5 were developed for ICBM use. It just happened that they could also carry some other payload into orbit, and whether that's a human being or a nuclear bomb, does the rocket care as long as mass is roughly similar?

      The whole manned space program (at least 'til Kennedy decided to up the ante) was just to test (and show the other side) how much mass they could send into orbit. And it's more agreeable to population, UN and whoever else might be looking if you put men up there instead of warheads.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Mmhmmm.... if the US or the USSR... sorry, Russia, are willing to share their insights with them. If they are not, and at least with the US it seems highly unlikely, it makes a lot of sense to send some creatures up there to check whether they can handle certain conditions before you try it with a human.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You think the USSR didn't have other problems to worry about but to send various manned space stations into space in the 70s?

      Don't think prestige projects are only done if you have no other worries. Actually, history shows me at least that the most harebrained prestige projects were done in times when the money would really have been better invested in other, more important things.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I really just meant the general idea that living things had never been beyond the atmosphere and it would have been hard to convince some people to change their thinking enough to accept the idea. A bit like how when the first trains were built which could do 20, 30 miles per hour, some people believed that it would be impossible for humans to live while doing that. The Iranians know that people live in space. The details (like how much air do they need, how much acceleration can they take) are well understood.

      So this bit about sending a monkey is just a show, and one in poor taste at that.

    8. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The Russians wanted to put men in space for military purposes. It was thought they could spy on earth better than an automated satellite, and the put up serveral military space stations for that purpose. Most of them failed and eventually they abandoned the idea.

      The Germans had plans for sub-orbital bombers to hit the USA but never got them past early prototypes.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by arisvega · · Score: 1

      does the rocket care as long as mass is roughly similar?

      It does not, but the developing team does. Different payloads place different acceleration limits.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    10. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Somehow I don't think that anyone is going to lend them that technology, so they have to build and test their own.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by Medevilae · · Score: 1

      There was a lot more to their space stations than "prestige." All of them had (or were supposed to have) a practical purpose, spying being a major motivator.

    12. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If they were shooting for prestige, their population probably has other worries.

      Well, I'm sure the next election result will reflect the populace's conscerns!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:You're a little late to the party, Iran. by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      WHAT'S THE POINT ????

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  4. This is how you signal ICBM capability by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This sounds all scientific and stuff, but basically the sending of larger mammals (plus life support gear) into space also indicates that you can send a nuclear warhead to any place on Earth. The Soviets first did this with Laika aboard Sputnik II, and this basically started a new phase of the cold war.

    1. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by MrQuacker · · Score: 1

      I thought Laika was to determine if something "alive" could survive the trip into space through the EM belts?

    2. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

      No, Laika was sent up purely for propaganda.

    3. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by rhook · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of the Van Allen radiation belt. The existence of which was not even confirmed until sometime in 1958, the year after Laika was sent into space.

    4. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Laika was sent up for science. It was funded for propaganda.

    5. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by mutherhacker · · Score: 1

      Yes, and your point is what? The US already has that kind of technology. The US should disarm it's missiles to avoid a cold war. Makes sense, right?

    6. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be holocaust if they did it, silly!

    7. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those living in glass houses should not cast stones... (Someone from USA accusing others of religious zealotry?!)

    8. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reading pre-1958 science fiction is really enlightening about the mindset of the time. No man, no animal had ever gone to this very strange place where the stars always shine, where the air is not there, where gravity takes a break. At this time, no one ever saw a picture of the earth as a blue marble. Space was not the place around earth, it was the place above the clouds, the place from which God and gods had recently been chased in the intellectual pictures of the days.

      In one novel, they were imagining that so far from Earth, human minds can not hold. Various craziness appearing. The only way to travel would be to be in a form of coma, half dead.

      It is right, they did not know many things about how it was, but their imagination was working at full speed and they surely expected unexpected things. Sending a mammal to be sure that it doesn't get instantly fried by some then unknown effects was a really reasonable step.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    9. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Those living in glass houses should not cast stones... (Someone from USA accusing others of religious zealotry?!)

      Not everyone in the US is a religious zealot. It's just that the zealots are well-funded, loud, annoying, and all over the airwaves.

      Besides, it's the religious zealots who insist on supporting Israel in *absolutely everything* they do, even if it insane or completely against our interests. This is all because their bizarre interpretation of Revelations and various Old Testament prophets.

    10. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you've shown yourself to be retarded.

    11. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      In one novel, they were imagining that so far from Earth, human minds can not hold. Various craziness appearing. The only way to travel would be to be in a form of coma, half dead.

      Wow. They had commercial air travel nailed way back then.

      Impressive.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      herding Palestinians into ghettos and slaughtering them

      Which is why all the surrounding Arab nations welcome the Palestinian refugees with open arms and... oh... wait. Nevermind.

    13. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by SpaceCracker · · Score: 1

      And they would want to signal this because...?
      Iran has already stated it wants to obliterate the "large devil" (US) and the "small devil" (Israel). Why should they signal anything if they're serious about it? Are they just playing the ol' "somebody please hold me down before I hurt someone" game.

      --
      sigo ergo sum
    14. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by SpaceCracker · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're just trying to say: "My ICBM is larger than yours..." or "Hey babe, check out my ICBM. I don't have a diamond on its tip, I've got a monkey!"

      --
      sigo ergo sum
    15. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Because nobody has ever invaded a country with nuclear-tipped ICBMs. They're eager to join the "don't fuck with" club, and this is a big part of the membership qualifications. Now they just need to test a warhead - but unlike the ICBM, there's no way to do this "innocently".

    16. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by SpaceCracker · · Score: 1

      They can test it in some remote corner of the Pacific or up in space, try to cover their tracks and deny the whole thing (or put the blame on the Israelis, as they like to do). More likely, as they want everyone to know about it, they will probably boast their successful nuclear blast.

      BTW, the "don't fuck with" club members are assertive about their membership but are very sensible and wouldn't actually dare to use their capabilities unless they will be very hard pressed against the wall. The Iranian government, on the other hand uses different rhetoric and seem eager to utilize any such capacity they achieve.

      --
      sigo ergo sum
    17. Re:This is how you signal ICBM capability by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      "country that is herding Palestinians into ghettos and slaughtering them"
      Let me guess, if I will research more about it, it will end up like any other radio Yerevan news?

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  5. Anyone can send a monkey up by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

    The question is, can you get it down alive?

    1. Re:Anyone can send a monkey up by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The monkey might be drift off/be guided off course, be rescued and be taught how to sign. After that it might describe the other "capsule" it saw. Thats a huge security risk.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  6. So ICBM research? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

    Thats all heavy lift like that is at that point, testing ICBMs and throw-weight under the cover of "civilian" or "scientific" research.

  7. What about Mrs. Monkey? by ashvagan · · Score: 1

    Send Mrs. Monkey to accompany him as well. He will be bored to death otherwise for not having someone by his side to pick tasty morsels out of his hair! or vice versa of course.

    1. Re:What about Mrs. Monkey? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Females in space? In Iran? Think again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Re:Yeah, Africa has about a billion monkeys, and t by jon_doh2.0 · · Score: 1

    I know, i know dont feed the trolls. But, i need to ask, is it just this one crazy racist (i refrain from harsher language as i dont want to get it exited) that spams up Slashdot or...?

  9. Re:Yeah, Africa has about a billion monkeys, and t by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    You're going to find a lot of racists in this thread. Already very nearly every post is "ZOMG THE IRANIANS ARE MONKEYS LOL!"

  10. ...all us Europeans are wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...how they kidnapped George W. Bush in the first place.

    1. Re:...all us Europeans are wondering... by PPH · · Score: 1

      And how they managed to fold up that "Mission Accomplished" banner so small.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  11. Re:Yeah, Africa has about a billion monkeys, and t by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What did you expect? There's been a war against the middle east going on for quite some years. Dehumanizing the enemy is always part of the plan, seems it has caught on well.

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  12. One way trip into space for a heavy capsule. ICBM by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 2

    Space exploration or ICBM reasearch? Like another post said, putting a 285+ Kg into space demonstrates that they now have the capability to launch rockets that can reach anywhere on Earth (although maybe not accurately, yet). Furthermore, the fact that they are sending it up into space, controlling its free orbit trajectory, but not planning to recover the capsule suggests they are more interested in the launching and in-flight capabilities of the rocket than any of the other data that may be associated with the 'passenger.' Perhaps I am reading too much into this, but this just screams of ICBM research to me.

  13. What did he do? by dadioflex · · Score: 1

    Poor monkey, shoulda just taken the lashes.

  14. I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Did Microsoft's board contract with Iran to launch Ballmer?

  15. Very smart monkey by dmesg0 · · Score: 1

    It would be a monkey specially trained to guide the ICBM (disguised into a space ship) to a particular place on earth and then activate its nuclear warhead. Using a trained monkey is the only way to make sure no computer worm will interfere with their nuclear program.

  16. Re:One way trip into space for a heavy capsule. IC by rhook · · Score: 1

    Nuclear warheads do not require precise accuracy to be effective.

  17. Simian munitions mount by AnotherScratchMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    They don't mention the type of warhead the monkey will have in his arms.

    1. Re:Simian munitions mount by arisvega · · Score: 1

      Kegs?

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  18. Re:One way trip into space for a heavy capsule. IC by AGMW · · Score: 1

    ... but not planning to recover the capsule ...

    So does the monkey get to die of thirst or suffocate?

    Nice.

    --
    Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
    handmadehands.co.uk
  19. Re:Yeah, Africa has about a billion monkeys, and t by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    ...dehumanizing the victim makes things simpler
    It's like breathing with a respirator
    It eases the conscience of even the most conscious
    and calculating violator
    Words can reduce a person to an object,
    something more easy to hate
    An inanimate entity, completely disposable,
    no problem to obliterate.

    But death is the silence
    in this language of violence

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Seems risky by DataDiddler · · Score: 1

    The monkey might go off course and land outside of Iran. The Iranian leadership would then run a great risk of the monkey defecting and giving up all their secrets.

    --
    Working...
  21. this would be a good time for the USAF by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    to test their airborne laser weapon

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:this would be a good time for the USAF by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      i am an atheist you stupid IslamoWhacko

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:this would be a good time for the USAF by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      Airborne Laser programs in the United States are dying in the near-term. Maybe a good old demonstration would put some enthusiasm back into the research.

  22. Oh yeah? by atomicbutterfly · · Score: 1

    Iran Plans To Put a Monkey Into Space

    I hope Iran upgraded Photoshop to support the features required this time.

  23. Re:One way trip into space for a heavy capsule. IC by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    So? The US and Russia both have a lot of nukes, and they're by some margin more precise than whatever Iran could test.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. Jacket? by indytx · · Score: 1

    Any chance the "monkey" will be wearing a cheap tan jacket? Now that would be progress.

    --
    Make love, not reality television.
  25. Re:Bye-Bye Ahmadinejad by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    A true leader, he takes his people onto the next level!

    Too bad Georgie wasn't that much of a monkey. I would have voted for the funding, and I bet a lot of people would have so too, if NASA had only promised to pull a Columbia on reentry.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. Re:Monkeys into space by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Why not? Are they on the export restriction list now, too?

    Fuck, may we at least sell some kind of crap to Iran without the US starting to stir up a stink?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  27. Re:Yeah, Africa has about a billion monkeys, and t by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Shall we remind them the 'monkeys' are winning...?

    --
    No sig today...
  28. Re:READ AS: by gtall · · Score: 1

    It is a MONKEY they are sending. Clearly it is Ahmadinejad and not Khamenei.

  29. Re:One way trip into space for a heavy capsule. IC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Laika (Sputnik 2) experiment says that the monkey will die of overheat.

  30. Re:Yeah, Africa has about a billion monkeys, and t by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Just a handful of trolls. They're probably not even really racist, it's just to stir up nerd rage.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  31. Honestly, I was expecting more (or less) from /. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    You know...
    From self-deprecating humor like "I think of volunteering..." to movie/book references like Starship Troopers (Come on, you apes! You wanna live forever?) or Planet of the Apes...
    I mean there's one of those coming up just around the corner.

    Instead, the thread is full of "ZOMG THE IRANIANS ARE MONKEYS LOL!" as you've put it.
    I mean... FFS... It's such a lame xenophobic approach, particularly since the first monkey in space was American.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  32. Machmud, we hardly knew ya by gavron · · Score: 1

    It's about time Achmedinejad got his first space flight.

    Hasta la vista, baby.

    E

  33. This could backfire big time by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    No, I am not like you...I AM SIMION!

    .

    1. Re:This could backfire big time by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      When I worked in the electricity industry, I had to call various companies and ask how their meter readers had got a six-digit read off a five-digit meter, whether they really thought an irrigation pump could have burned 999,999kWh in a month, etc.

      One of these companies was so dreadful that we just called them "the chimps". (Scary part is, they weren't the worst.) Imagine how hard it was to keep a straight face the day a bloke called Simeon answered the phone...

  34. But will it survive? by Targon · · Score: 1

    Sending something into space isn't the biggest problem, it is keeping it intact and getting it back in one piece that is where the biggest challenge is.

  35. Re:Monkeys into space by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Whoa, whoa, what pooped into your breakfast cereal?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  36. Why? by koan · · Score: 1

    Just sounds like little kids sticking firecrackers in frogs or something.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  37. Live astronauts by TuringCheck · · Score: 1

    Why not? Aren't they gonna get their 72 virgins?

  38. Re:Honestly, I was expecting more (or less) from / by Niedi · · Score: 1

    >

    Instead, the thread is full of "ZOMG THE IRANIANS ARE MONKEYS LOL!" as you've put it. I mean... FFS... It's such a lame xenophobic approach, particularly since the first monkey in space was American.

    Most I've seen so far are comments about two very specific Iranians being monkeys. Seeing how there seem to be quite a few Iranians who wouldn't mind seeing at least one of these two accompany the unfortunate animal, preferably strapped to the outside of the rocket, I wouldn't call it racism. Or is it racism against Americans to call Bush Jr. an idiot?

  39. poor little monkey by paiute · · Score: 1
    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  40. They are just asking the USA to back off... by fantomas · · Score: 1

    The USA and allies invaded a neighbouring country recently (Iraq). They are just warning the USA etc off thinking of invading them, just wanting to remind potential invaders that they've got the ability to drop a bomb (maybe nuclear) anywhere else on the planet if they need to.

    What would the USA do if a country it didn't like had successfully invaded Mexico or Canada and was sitting just off its borders?

  41. This just in: by Thraxy · · Score: 1

    Next year Iran is expected to unveil something they call a "wheel".

  42. Iran is sending its President into space? by stating_the_obvious · · Score: 1

    /EOM

  43. Allahu akbar! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    Presumably the monkey will carry the word of Prophet Mohammed into the vasty deeps?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  44. Re:Monkeys into space by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Either a monkey an Iranian.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  45. Re:READ AS: by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Iranutangs are apes, strictly speaking.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  46. Re:Yeah, Africa has about a billion monkeys, and t by cavreader · · Score: 1

    The wealthy outsiders were already there. Or at least those who where able to escape from Europe or the ones who were forced out of all the Arab countries. Of course I don't think wealthy is the term I would use to describe them seeing as all their possessions were either stolen or destroyed. The state creating actions of the UN were SOP at the time. No doubt the British and UN passed the state creating declaration because they were counting on the Arabs to render the declaration null and void by killing anyone who pushed for the agreement. Unfortunately things didn't work out quite as planed. Arab's are the only ones on earth who get a free pass on racism and are immune from criticism so their delicate sensibilities are not offended. They demand respect from the world but the have never offered any in return. They also get a pass on initiating 3 outright and offensive attempts at genocide. Since they got their assess handed to them militarily they have spent the past 40 years repeating lies and practicing deceit in an attempt to re-write history. They shout their bigotry and genocidal goals without reservation on a daily basis. The Arabs have worked hard to earn the hate and disdain sent thier way. But since they always blame their problems on someone else I doubt the situation will ever improve.

  47. Re:Yeah, Africa has about a billion monkeys, and t by jon_doh2.0 · · Score: 1

    Initially i was interestedly reading your reply, but it didn’t take me long to realise you’re an ignoramus.

  48. Re:Yeah, Africa has about a billion monkeys, and t by cavreader · · Score: 1

    Show me one fact that contradicts anything I said. I have worked in both Israel, Egypt, and Kuwait over the past 15 years and am entitled to my opinions based on direct observation.

  49. Helpless creature... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    You know, for useless acts of war they have no problems sacrificing themselves, over nothing, yet for an important discovery or monumental action like going into space, they can't be bothered to use their own species, they have to send in a monkey....please tell me why they can't send a human up, everyone has done so already, why send a defenseless creature up in space.....oh yeah....their f*cken scared stiff of their own technology!

  50. 1959 called... by torgis · · Score: 1

    ...and it wants its headlines back. I mean seriously, there's so much junk up there it's like an orbital junkyard. This is not stuff that launched itself up there. It was carried. On rockets. The type we've been flinging into space for over half a century. But now it's news because Iran decides it wants to doom a few rhesus monkeys in an experiment that consists of 5 steps:

    1) Build rocket
    2) Strap monkey into chair
    3) Put chair into rocket
    4) Fling into space
    5) ...profit?

    Nothing to see here.

  51. Re:Yeah, Africa has about a billion monkeys, and t by MaDeR · · Score: 1

    "Other are doing it too" is most shittest excuse in existence, Get lost, monkey without most of hair.

    --
    What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".