Slashdot Mirror


US Warns of Problems In Chinese SCADA Software

alphadogg writes "Two vulnerabilities found in industrial control system software made in China but used worldwide could be remotely exploited by attackers, according to a warning issued on Thursday (PDF) by the US Industrial Control Systems Cyber Emergency Response Team. The vulnerabilities were found in two products from Sunway ForceControl Technology, a Beijing-based company that develops SCADA software for a wide variety of industries, including defense, petrochemical, energy, water and manufacturing. Sunway's products are mostly used in China but also in Europe, the Americas, Asia and Africa, according to the agency's advisory. SCADA software has come under increasing attention from security researchers, as the software has often not undergone rigorous security audits despite its use to manage critical infrastructure or manufacturing processes. SCADA systems are increasingly connected to the Internet, which has opened up the possibility of hackers remotely breaking into the systems. Last year, researchers discovered a highly sophisticated worm called Stuxnet that was later found to target Siemens' WinCC industrial control software."

9 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. Anyone surprised? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Informative

    I mean, there's a security flaw in the Siemens S7. Now let's all take a wild guess what the Chinese copied.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Anyone surprised? by barik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I mean, there's a security flaw in the Siemens S7. Now let's all take a wild guess what the Chinese copied.

      I'd say that there are flaws in just about every major PLC (Allen-Bradley, Modicon, GE, and so on, to name a few) . Most are just legacy serial protocols that have been wrapped in Ethernet, so these controllers accept arbitrary packets from any source. With protocols like MODBUS, it is fairly easy to construct such packets by hand even.

  2. Idiots by sycodon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whoever bought Chinese software to control industrial plants should be fired and made to work in a Microsoft call center.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Idiots by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah buy it from an American company...that outsourced the programming to China or India.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  3. Re:I've said it before and I'll say it again by RatPh!nk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No need to unfairly single out the Chinese. I feel confident to extend that out to pretty much any nation. Wasn't our bestest friend (sarcasm) Israel found to have the biggest espionage ring yet uncovered rigth here in the US of A?

    --
    Argh. The laws of science be a harsh mistress.
  4. Re:This may be a stupid question... by Silverhammer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not necessarily. SCADA is "Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition", which simply means collecting process data for presentation and analysis. Yes, many packages (disclosure: including the one I work on) allow SCADA functions to be performed over TCP/IP networks, but it is not a fundamental part of SCADA. Everything can be done on a single workstation, if that's how you're set up.

  5. Re:Newsflash: Vulnerabilities on software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The entire slashdot piece is formulated as an us-vs-them issue. There are thousands of vulnerabilities discovered all the time in all kinds of software, and the submitter just happened to pick one in software sold by a Chinese company and that was discovered by US-based researchers, insinuating that there is something wrong with the Chinese. The nationalities are a red herring. They could have titled the story "Security team warns of problems with SCADA software" but that wouldn't lead to a jingoistic us-vs-them discussion.

  6. Re:I've said it before and I'll say it again by RatPh!nk · · Score: 4, Informative

    I didn't realize the source was sh*tty (i still have no idea who or what rense is) it happened to be the first 2 or so hits on Google. However this is established that Israel spies on the US just as much, if not more than anyone. If different sources make you feel better:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Franklin_espionage_scandal http://www.alternet.org/world/130891/breaking_the_taboo_on_israel's_spying_efforts_on_the_united_states/
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24256527/ns/us_news-security/t/american-charged-giving-secrets-israel/

    You could list *any* country here. No need to get your vagina's up in arms because someone said something bad about Israel. The point was China is just the next in a long line of countries spying. Now, it might be much worse given how much they make for the US.

    --
    Argh. The laws of science be a harsh mistress.
  7. Re:This may be a stupid question... by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You'd be surprised but I bet many maybe most US manufactures have their shot floor networks connected to the their other networks for one reason or another. Do they firewall the crap out them, well probably but that is no air gap?

    In my experience this is how its usually evolved on the networks I've seen

    1. Shop floors started off with some proprietary network, not connected to anything else
    2. Equipment got upgraded and replaced with cheaper ethernet or token over ethernet solutions
    3. Management eventually decides that simplifying and increasing statistics gather and reporting is worth the risk of connecting the shop floor networks to the rest of the corporate networks, even though IT warned them of the potential risks. They tell IT "Just don't let that happen"
    4. IT installs good a good firewall with strong rules, and establishes solid procedures around what, how, when, and who connects anything to the shop floor. This works well at time.
    5. The vendor, who has never properly documented the communications requirements of their software, sends some techs out to do an upgrade or change or something. Said techs run into problems and lacking any documentation assume its IT's security measures causing them. Management is upset because the line has stopped and they are paying these consultants by the hour on top of that. They demand IT relax the rules.
    6. The consultants get the shop floor running again but they never really circle back and tell IT what the issue was, perhaps it was unrelated, who knows.
    7. You might think IT will sniff packets for awhile and see what actually could be tightened back down but they won't because, they have other problems and have spent a week being interrupted by the consultants already, management wants to see those other projects getting done. All the procedures don't get updated either. The security measures while still in place are mostly ineffective.
     

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html