Slashdot Mirror


Weather Satellites Lose Funding

ianare writes "Federal budget cuts are threatening to leave the US without some critical satellites, and that could mean less accurate warnings about events like tornadoes and blizzards. In particular, officials at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are concerned about satellites that orbit over the earth's poles rather than remaining over a fixed spot along the equator. These satellites are 'the backbone' of any forecast beyond a couple of days, says Kathryn Sullivan, assistant secretary of commerce for environmental observation and prediction, and NOAA's deputy administrator. It was data from polar satellites that alerted forecasters to the risk of tornadoes in Alabama and Mississippi back in April, Sullivan says. 'With the polar satellites currently in place we were able to give those communities five days' heads up,' she says."

4 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Got our priorities straight! by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So let me get this straight. We're paying billions upon billions and sacrificing our constitutional rights to guard our airports from purely theoretical terrorist threats. Meanwhile, we're cutting funding for satellites that warn us about very real weather threats. Glad to see we've got our priorities straight.

    --
    Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
    1. Re:Got our priorities straight! by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Calculate the number of people dying from terrorist attacks, compare to number of people dying from natural disasters, compare the funding.

      Is it me or is there something off the mark?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. Re:One has to wonder by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many fighter bombers would have to be decommissioned to pay for them?

    Defence is one thing, being the number one spender, by far, on the military on earth is something else entirely.

    I'm guessing one*. F-18 Hornets cost $80 million per plane. The proposed NOAA budget cut is $57 million. There are 128 of these craft on order. So just buy 127 and NOAA can keep its budget levels intact.

    *You're not actually going to save much decommissioning them. But you can cut back on how many you buy year to year.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  3. Re:Cause of shortfall? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People are not paying taxes, that's actually the problem. The middle class is being eliminated, poor people have no money to pay tax with and the rich get tax exemption.

    Where do you think the money should come from?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.