Slashdot Mirror


EFF Stops Accepting Bitcoin, Regifts All Donations

Gendou writes "The EFF issued a statement that it will no longer accept Bitcoin donations, has not used any of the donations, and will transfer all past donations to The Bitcoin Faucet. See also additional and forum threads."

40 of 391 comments (clear)

  1. No surprises here by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

    Hm, following news of high volatility, major security problems, and the fact that one compromised account panicked an entire exchange, can anyone claim they are surprised by this?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:No surprises here by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The news here is that they were foolish enough to accept them in the first place. I had no idea that their judgment was that bad.

    2. Re:No surprises here by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do realize it doesn't work that way, right? You can't just go "give me my dollars for bitcoin" and you instantly get it. There have to be enough requests on whatever exchange you like and depending on how much you trade you risk causing a price swing which ends up netting you less money in return.

    3. Re:No surprises here by jonbryce · · Score: 2

      The problem is that they could be left open to future legal claims from the people they sold these worthless magic numbers to; and to all sorts of criminal charges.

    4. Re:No surprises here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the implementation was pretty sound. Nobody has cracked the Bitcoin blockchain transfer protocol. Some websites dealing with the stuff got hacked, but that happens all the time. It's the idea that sucked. Satoshi got the crypto right but fucked up the human element, economics.

    5. Re:No surprises here by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Foolish to accept them? They might not be worth much of anything but if someone offers you a bitcoin what exactly is the harm in accepting it? I suppose the EFF might have taken bitcoin from a few people who might otherwise have given dollars, but in the grand scheme of things I doubt they lost out on much if anything.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    6. Re:No surprises here by Abstrackt · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't think they were foolish to accept Bitcoins. Even selling them at a low rate gets them more money than they had before the donation (presuming that it covers costs). But setting a preference for something of more stable value is also within their rights.

      It seems their concerns were legal: "While EFF is often the defender of people ensnared in legal issues arising from new technologies, we try very hard to keep EFF from becoming the actual subject of those fights or issues. Since there is no caselaw on this topic, and the legal implications are still very unclear, we worry that our acceptance of Bitcoins may move us into the possible subject role."

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    7. Re:No surprises here by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Less money than what? Than nothing? Than no money you have with your assets frozen as bitcoin? Would they get less for selling it than by giving it to "the tap"?

      Say, EFF tomorrow receives a donation of one trillion Mozambique dollars. Should they exchange it to USD as soon as possible or worry that selling them all now may earn them less money?

      If EFF sets the policy: "sell ASAP at current price" then there is no worry. They are not a currency trade company, they are a charity. They can freely treat Bitcoin as "donation of other goods" and it's their duty to keep the assets in a safe form, not to speculate and wait for best offer for unsafe/volatile goods.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    8. Re:No surprises here by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aluminum cans have other uses besides exchange for money.

      Aluminum cans can be used as tools for cutting, scooping, of course holding things and many other things I don't have on the top of my head.

      Monopoly money and Pokeman cards can be used to play the games they came from, so they have value on their own.

      Bitcoin has absolutely no use other than as a fiat currency.

      The fact that they took bitcoins in the first place puts serious doubts into my mind about the understanding of technology at the EFF. Typically its clear they have a clue, however this is one of those moves that makes you wonder. Well not this one, this one makes sense. It was the accepting them in the first place part that boggles my mind.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:No surprises here by dnaumov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then add in the fact that there are already money laundering and dope dealing going on with i

      You mean exactly like with the real, traditional, cold hard cash?

    10. Re:No surprises here by idontgno · · Score: 2

      Sure, the gift might be worthless, but I wouldn't think it would be likely to have a large negative value.

      I think the EFF would be properly hesitant to accept donations in "Liberty Dollars" or counterfeit US cash.

      I suspect that Bitcoin is close to the former in legal status, and some commentators have implied the latter (probably in borderline slander, but whatever). Statute law on alternate currencies seems inconsistent, but the authorities have been energetic applying what law is available to any exchange currency in the borders of the U.S. which might compete with the official currency. The EFF is not in the habit of making itself the guinea pigs of law like this, so avoiding nonstandard currency makes sense. (This is not the EFF's fight; it might help the occasional Don Quixote tilt at the occasional windmill, it's not going to be getting up on Rosinante itself.)

      IANAL. I just google a lot.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:No surprises here by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here is a fun fact.... the same can happen to the Euro and US dollar. All fake currency suffers from this potential.Hell the Federal Reserve is printing money so fast that the US dollar is going to go flat almost as fast...

      GO back to coins made of real copper, nickel, silver and gold. suddenly the currency regains it's value and cant be destroyed..... Unless someone perfects alchemy and turns lead into gold or synthesizes gold.

      For the naysayers complaining about carrying coins... do you realize how much a 1 troy oz gold coin is worth?

      What intrinsic value do precious metals have that makes them so valuable? Many of them can be made into shiny jewelry, which has some value; there's also some value for use in electronics and other products. Apart from that, the only value they have - just like any other piece of property, physical or otherwise - is their desirability to others.

      I don't care for shiny jewelry, and I have no intention of manufacturing products that would use precious metals. Therefore, the only value those metals have to me is their scarcity and the fact that others find them useful. How is this different than the paper money I have in my wallet?

      I have no problem with your decision that precious metals are a safer currency for you than USDs or Euros. I fail to understand, however, how government-issued money is a "fake currency". My USDs are accepted in trade for all the products and services I desire, meeting the only criterion - ability to be freely traded - necessary to fulfill its role as a "real" currency.

      Any form of currency - USD, Bitcoins, precious metals, seashells, etc. - is simply a shortcut to enable trade without the hassles of bartering. I agree that governments aren't always stable, but neither are commodities markets. Perhaps the USD is about to collapse - but the gold bubble could also pop at any minute. If you want to avoid any currency with the possibility of instability, go back to bartering. Alternatively, trade in your preferred currency with the realization that it is not a panacea.

    12. Re:No surprises here by Nursie · · Score: 2

      Agreed.

      Limited supply, deflation, absurdly huge difference in 'mining' speeds between first adopters and the comparatively early adopters on the thing now, various other weirdnesses... these all counted against it.

      As a P2P crypto currency system it's pretty cool. It just had a few things wrong.

      Oh, and the morans on the bitcoin forum. Dear god is that place 'live with 'em.

    13. Re:No surprises here by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      What intrinsic value do precious metals have that makes them so valuable?

      Scarcity and the fact that it's works well for 900,000,000 years... I'm guessing history puts more weight behind it. Plus history also shows how the fake money systems collapse... History is riddled with how Fiat Money systems fail over and over throughout time.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:No surprises here by Agent0013 · · Score: 2

      Monopoly money and Pokeman cards can be used to play the games they came from, so they have value on their own.

      Bitcoin has absolutely no use other than as a fiat currency.

      The fact that they took bitcoins in the first place puts serious doubts into my mind about the understanding of technology at the EFF. Typically its clear they have a clue, however this is one of those moves that makes you wonder. Well not this one, this one makes sense. It was the accepting them in the first place part that boggles my mind.

      It's kind of like buying and selling stock. The only reason it has value, is because someone else is willing to buy it from you. The stock market makes no sense. The money you put into the stock does not go to that company in any way. It's like Monopoly money in that it is only usefull while playing that game.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    15. Re:No surprises here by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bitcoin has absolutely no use other than as a fiat currency.

      Bitcoins are not a fiat currency. A fiat currency, as should be obvious from its name, has its value set by fiat (decree). No one is decreeing that bitcoins have value, any more than anyone decrees that monopoly money has value. It's fashionable for libertarians to use the word 'fiat' to mean 'worthless', but the two words are not interchangeable.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:No surprises here by marcosdumay · · Score: 3, Funny

      "it's works well for 900,000,000 years"

      Funny, I didn't know that dinossaurs traded on gold.

  2. They still take WOW gold though? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Damn, I was just about to gift them enough for an Epic Mount.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:They still take WOW gold though? by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think anyone who has invested any substantial amount of money in bitcoin as an "investment" has already been on the receiving end of an "epic mount".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:They still take WOW gold though? by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

      So far, I've gotten more USD out of Bitcoin than I've put in by about 250%. And I still own a bunch of bitcoins. I will be using them to buy actual physical goods and not USD as much as possible. I think there are enough people like me that the currency will succeed.

      It's certainly a heck of a lot more 'real' than WoW gold, which only exists on WoW servers and is completely controlled by the server you're on, which generally means Blizzard.

  3. Re:EFF is not a defender of freedom by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those who won't realize before clicking the link the story is to an objectivist periodical that was co-founded by Ayn Rand. Take that as you will.

  4. Re:Currency not accepted is currency no more? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fiat currencies are backed by faith in a government. That is to say, faith that the government will continue to provide essential services, or more pessimistically faith that the government will arrest people who do not pay their taxes. Fiat currency derives its value from its utility as a means of paying taxes and government fees, and legally settling debts.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  5. Please stop posting Bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please stop posting Bitcoin stories. No one cares about Bitcoin. We don't give a rat's ass about Bitcoin. We could not care less about Bitcoin. We have no interest in Bitcoin. Bitcoin does not concern us.

    1. Re:Please stop posting Bitcoin stories by sqrt(2) · · Score: 4, Informative

      I care about Bitcoin, I like seeing some news about it. I find it interesting.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    2. Re:Please stop posting Bitcoin stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >We have no interest in Bitcoin.

      But a few Slashdot higher-ups have *financial* interests in Bitcoin. That's the only logical explanation for the stupid thing suddenly having articles all over /. and for it having its own goddamned icon.

  6. Bitcoin ended up as a pyramid scheme by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Bitcoin thing has gone off in a different direction than its promoters anticipated. They were thinking "payment system", like gift cards. The idea was that most Bitcoins would be tied up in people's "wallets", and spent slowly. All that static value would anchor the currency.

    That's not what happened. Bitcoins turned into a speculative vehicle, with "miners" grinding away solving hashes and generating more Bitcoins, and flaky "exchanges" offering on-line trading. The exchanges are tiny; today's worldwide Bitcoin trading volume is comparable to the sales of one supermarket. The daily volatility is huge, even on days when there isn't a break-in. So no major retailer can accept Bitcoins; they don't know what they will be worth at the end of the day, let alone the end of the month.

    In a speculator-dominated system, Bitcoins are a pyramid scheme. The scheme by which it becomes harder over time to generate Bitcoins favored early adopters by a huge margin.

    It's already too late to get in. The difficulty level has reached the point where buying and powering the new hardware is not cost-effective. And that was before the price of Bitcoins crashed. (The current price is around $13.)

    Then there's the flaky exchange problem. Mt. Gox (formerly Magic, the Gathering Online Exchange) turns out to be two people in Tokyo. Tradehill is some company in Chile. All the other exchanges are too dinky to matter. Not one of them has the organization and resources of a typical small-town bank. Worse, they're not just "exchanges". They're depositary institutions, holding customer balances. Mt. Gox customers are now very aware of this, because they can't get at their money while Mt. Gox is down. Some people are worried over whether the money will be there when Mt. Gox comes back up.

    The "exchanges" represent a mis-design of Bitcoin. There should have been a way to do an exchange in a distributed way, without the exchange holding customer assets. The NYSE and NASDAQ don't hold customer balances. Brokers do, but you can have your cash swept from a brokerage into a bank daily, or more often if the numbers get big. The Bitcoin exchanges are slow at delivering money - Mt. Gox has a daily transfer limit, and even when they were up, many users reported delays.

    The EFF was right to bail.

    1. Re:Bitcoin ended up as a pyramid scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:Bitcoin ended up as a pyramid scheme by rmstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Haha, good one.

      Bitcoin is a decentralised computer currency designed by self-righteous Ayn Rand-reading nerds who despise looters and parasites like, er, you. It is used to purchase Internet services, illegal drugs and pictures of naked women holding video cards.

      ...and it only gets better!

    3. Re:Bitcoin ended up as a pyramid scheme by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      How exactly can a transaction system that broadcasts all of your transactions to the network "make the world a little better place".

      Because it's not Paypal ;)

      Seriously though, I'm not saying that Bitcoin is perfect. That's kind of the point of geek things, we're trying to break some new ground here. But the specific point of broadcast transaction seems quite essential if you want to keep things distributed, so that other peers will verify your transaction.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:Bitcoin ended up as a pyramid scheme by arevos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Bitcoin thing has gone off in a different direction than its promoters anticipated. They were thinking "payment system", like gift cards. The idea was that most Bitcoins would be tied up in people's "wallets", and spent slowly. All that static value would anchor the currency.

      Citation?

      That's not what happened. Bitcoins turned into a speculative vehicle, with "miners" grinding away solving hashes and generating more Bitcoins,

      Which in general is good. The more miners there are, the more secure the currency is against double-spending.

      The exchanges are tiny; today's worldwide Bitcoin trading volume is comparable to the sales of one supermarket. The daily volatility is huge, even on days when there isn't a break-in. So no major retailer can accept Bitcoins; they don't know what they will be worth at the end of the day, let alone the end of the month.

      There's no reason retailers have to wait until the end of the month or even the end of the day before cashing out their bitcoins. A retailer could cash out their bitcoins immediately, or after the first confirmation block. The volatility of Bitcoin is only a problem for speculators.

      The difficulty level has reached the point where buying and powering the new hardware is not cost-effective. And that was before the price of Bitcoins crashed. (The current price is around $13.)

      No it isn't. An average ATI graphics card will still net you $100 per month profit, even at the current difficulty.

      Worse, they're not just "exchanges". They're depositary institutions, holding customer balances. Mt. Gox customers are now very aware of this, because they can't get at their money while Mt. Gox is down. Some people are worried over whether the money will be there when Mt. Gox comes back up.

      Why anyone would store money in Mt. Gox and not immediately take it out after a trade is beyond me. Clearly some people do, but that seems like asking for trouble.

      The "exchanges" represent a mis-design of Bitcoin. There should have been a way to do an exchange in a distributed way, without the exchange holding customer assets.

      It's not a "mis-design". Acting as an exchange is beyond the scope of the Bitcoin protocol. If you want a distributed exchange, that's an entirely separate project.

      However, I can't see how a distributed exchange would work, unless it was just some manner of trust network and actually making the trades was up to the individuals. That doesn't seem particularly user-friendly to me, so I suspect that exchanges will have to be centralized websites.

      That said, it would be better if (a) people used alternative exchanges more, and (b) the exchange source code was open sourced.

      The EFF was right to bail.

      The EFF bailed for entirely different reasons. If the future legality of bitcoin is contested, they want to be able to fight without also being the one of the ones being prosecuted.

  7. Re:The bitcoin faucet is already empty? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

    If you had read the articles linked, you would have seen that yes, they are slowly releasing them so they aren't flooding the market.

  8. Re:EFF is not a defender of freedom by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

    The source code has nothing to do with Bitcoin being a scam. The fact that Bitcoin was designed to generate tremendous returns for its developers and early adopters, and siphon other currencies away from late adopters, is what makes Bitcoin a scam. You are talking about a currency that is inherently deflationary, and which will only see inflation at the very end of its life when the last adopters find themselves holding worthless tokens. The value of Bitcoin is based on speculation about how many more people will buy into the system.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  9. Re:EFF is not a defender of freedom by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

    That the US can coin money doesn't mean that others can't make their own currencies. Other private currencies do exist, but generally in more limited contexts. Wii, Xbox, Kool-Aid, and Pepsi all have or have had points systems which can be used as currency by those that accept them, and nobody has cracked down on them.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  10. Endorsing bitcoin by Permutation+Citizen · · Score: 2

    When accepting bitcoin, EFF gave credibility to this money and as any fiat money credibility is what it needs. Now EFF doesn't accept anymore, they take back this credibility.

    I think in both case, this was on purpose by EFF. They did the first move because they though bitcoin was an interesting experiment. They do the second move because bitcoin is now an ugly mess.

  11. Some Actual Text From The Announcement by trappa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1. We don't fully understand the complex legal issues involved with creating a new currency system.

    2.We don't want to mislead our donors. When people make a donation to a nonprofit like EFF, they expect us to use their donation to support our work. Because the legal territory around exchanging Bitcoins into cash is still uncertain, we are not comfortable spending the many Bitcoins we have accumulated.

    3. People were misconstruing our acceptance of Bitcoins as an endorsement of Bitcoin. We were concerned that some people may have participated in the Bitcoin project specifically because EFF accepted Bitcoins, and perhaps they therefore believed the investment in Bitcoins was secure and risk-free. While we’ve been following the Bitcoin movement with a great degree of interest, EFF has never endorsed Bitcoin. In fact, we generally don’t endorse any type of product or service – and Bitcoin is no exception.

  12. Re:EFF is not a defender of freedom by nhaehnle · · Score: 2

    Your grocer is not obliged to accept the notes printed by the government

    This is false in many countries. Learn about legal tender laws. Not all countries have them, but many (most?) do.

  13. Re:If we don't talk about it... by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

    Well... actually, it's anybody's guess what it's worth right now, or what they'll be worth 24 hours after MtGox is back online. My guess is that they'll end up somewhere around $5-10. The only reason the price dropped to 1c was because someone basically stole a half-million bitcoins and dumped them all simultaneously on a market that normally would only have enough buyers (at its recent trading prices) to buy a tiny fraction of that amount.

    If you showed up at a flea market (far from the nearest ATM), set up a table, and proceeded to liquidate a million $1 bills at whatever price people were willing and able to pay in order to liquidate every single one of them within 20 minutes, with a rule that people could only buy them with crisp $20 bills that were devoid of external markings, tears, folds, or other signs of use (roughly simulating the difficulty of getting funds into and out of MtGox, starting with the week it takes to get your checking account verified with Dwolla and for the funds to make the trip from your checkign account to Dwolla to Mtgox), after a while THEIR price would probably fall to a penny or two per dollar bill, too. You'd have lots of people who WANTED to buy them at 80 or 90 cents apiece, but because you were determined to sell them instantly, at any price, and only to buyers able to pay immediately with money they had on hand in a specific form, the price would crash to almost nothing.

    There's nothing inherently fraudulent about Bitcoins themselves. If I sold you 10 Bitcoins on the premise that they were the cash equivalent of $200, it would be fraud, because there's no guarantee you could convert them into $200, $100, or even a penny at any specific moment in time. On the other hand, if you think a bitcoin is a fair exchange for a large pizza, and you're happy to accept one from me in exchange for it, that's a private matter entirely between two consenting adults.

    That said, I've become less enthused about them over the past couple of weeks. Originally, I thought they were a cool way for anyone with a web site to accept micropayments without the cost and ceremony of dealing with credit cards, but now I'm inclined to say most people would be better off just using Dwolla and skipping the Bitcoins. In fact, Dwolla is likely to end up as the big Bitcoin winner, simply BECAUSE lots of people are going to use them to get dollars into and out of MtGox, and realize at some point along the way that Dwolla itself is a perfectly good alternative to Paypal that solves most of the complaints people have had about Paypal that motivated them to look at Bitcoins in the first place.

  14. Re:Currency not accepted is currency no more? by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

    > At least a token lets me play Skee-ball. Are there any skee-ball machines that take bitcoins?

    There's probably one somewhere in Silicon Valley, existing mainly for the amusement and satisfaction of a dotcom billionaire, but you can only play it if you have an Android phone with the proper app installed, already spent a week getting funds from your checking account to Dwolla to MtGox to buy the bitcoins, and you're willing to wait 20-40 minutes for the transaction to be published and verified before the machine releases the balls and allows you to actually play ;-)

  15. Oh! It's just a Soap Opera... by psydeshow · · Score: 2

    I just figured this out: spoiler alert.

    This whole BitCoin thing is fiction. An over-zealous Slashdot editor got the idea to produce original episodic content for the site, and signed up some hardware vendors and electric utilities to sponsor it. BitCoin doesn't actually exist, and anyone who claims it does is obviously part of the production team. Or one of the sponsors.

    Now I can sit back and enjoy the daily BitCoin story, secure in the knowledge that it is all just entertainment, and not actually a Glenn Beck-style ploy to involve gullible Slashdot readers in an elaborate Ponzi scheme. I was starting to get worried about unnecessary power consumption and the misapplication of scientific computing clusters, but it's all just CGI, isn't it? Bravo!

    Anyway, good luck guys, it's been a great series so far. Hope you win that Emmy!

  16. bitcoin just gettting more popular by z_gringo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Soon we'll see guys standing on streetcorners with signs.

    Homeless. Hungry. 11 kids to feed. Please help. 1BYjEs25Eo2Bz7MS4wnN81EkEjD5S2KXPV

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.