Slashdot Mirror


Hijacked Fox News Twitter Account Falsely Claims Obama Shot Dead

Frankie70 writes with word of a Twitter-account hijacking that's raised eyebrows today, supplying a link to the account in question. From the Telegraph's account: "'The Twitter account of the American Fox News Politics team was compromised and used to falsely announce the death of the U.S. president. Hackers, who identified themselves as 'The Script Kiddies' and said they shared the spirit of prominent hacking group Anonymous, used the account to write: 'BREAKING NEWS: President @BarackObama assassinated, 2 gunshot wounds have proved too much. It's a sad 4th for #america. #obamadead RIP.'"

55 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. HOW? by sortius_nod · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is your corporate account. How does this happen?

    1. Re:HOW? by waddgodd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is your corporate account. How does this happen?

      I suggest it didn't. They just had to really quickly gin up a "hacker group" to cover their sick joke

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
    2. Re:HOW? by Inda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hello Mr Corporate Account User, I'm from the password police and I need to inspect your password!

      I joke around here that this month's password is July2011 as it passes all the company's password requirements (1 upper, 2 digits, +7 length). I know for a fact that the boss uses it and 10 quid says others do too.

      Listen to the IT Expert (moi?) when he's having a bad day? You may as well play with matches.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:HOW? by ricky-road-flats · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is your corporate account. How does this happen?

      I suggest it didn't. They just had to really quickly gin up a "hacker group" to cover their sick joke

      It's sad, but what you said rings more true than anything that so-called news organisation comes out with....

    4. Re:HOW? by Fauntleroy · · Score: 2

      That's amazing. I've got the same combination on my luggage.

    5. Re:HOW? by mrsurb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Their owner, being Australian, has somehow confused American Independence Day with April Fool's Day... given the mix of stupidity and false patriotism Fox broadcasts, it wouldn't surprise me if he considered the two days one and the same.

      FORMER Australian, thank you. We're glad to be rid of him. You wanted him (and gave him citizenship), you've got him.

    6. Re:HOW? by RevWaldo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Words go in, tweets come out. Never a miscommunication. You can't explain that.

      .

    7. Re:HOW? by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 2

      Yes, and then when Reagan's attempt at altering the course of history (during a microphone TEST) backfired, he destroyed all the evidence of the law and quickly ginned up a "ventriloquist hacker" group to blame. Yup, same thing exactly.

      P.S. WTF would it even mean to "outlaw Russia forever?"

    8. Re:HOW? by H0p313ss · · Score: 3, Funny

      Burmashave?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    9. Re:HOW? by DevConcepts · · Score: 2

      Password = 12345
      Thats the same as my luggage!

    10. Re:HOW? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Well as we saw here a few days ago there IS a pretty nasty porn bug going around ATM. Would it surprise me that somebody high up at Fox was looking for some fresh whacking material and got infected? Or that when they saw what data they had some script kiddie decided to go for the LULZ? Let me think......nope, wouldn't surprise me a bit. If anything working on PCs belonging to those in all walks of life I've found that that rail on about family values usually have the largest porn collections.

      So I really wouldn't be surprised if they put out a "hacker group" story to cover up somebody in their org with keys to the kingdom looking at teh titties (or penis if they have a wide stance like Larry Craig) and got pwned. You'd be surprised how many PCs I've seen that the infections could be traced back to porn, hell people STILL fall for that "You need a codec to watch the hot action! Just run this Iz_Not_Bug_Iz_Codec.exe to see all the hot banging!" and how many years has that lame one been floating around?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:HOW? by ricky-road-flats · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Take a breath, man, Jesus.

      I am not an american, I don't support either of your two parties. I made no comment on Obama, or any of the other news outlets. None are perfect, and I didn't say any were. However, in my eyes, what thankfully little I see of Fox News is the worst example of biased shrill fearmongering bullshit which twists facts, ignores common sense, and generates maximum anger, fear and hate - and leads to rants like yours, which so beautifully illustrates the problems that are making the US political system so badly uncompromising, reactive and broken.

      Whether you agree with Fox's agenda (and you cannot realistically deny they have one) or not, the fact is they fucked up on a matter of IT security here, and it takes down a peg or two, and I think that's a good thing, are enjoying it. I could hope that they might start to take themselves a little less seriously, but it's a little to much to ask.

    12. Re:HOW? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      If anything working on PCs belonging to those in all walks of life I've found that that rail on about family values usually have the largest porn collections.

      Your neighbors and family members don't count as a statistically relevant sample group.

    13. Re:HOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I had mod points I'd be modding it down. It's just an ad hominem rant aimed at a general group of people, using an altered version of what was really said. The parent was Trolling and caught himself another Troll.

    14. Re:HOW? by RMingin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Entertainingly, that's exactly how I'm selecting my password at work currently. The one system expires my password every month, and demands upper, lower, and number. Last month was June2011, before that May20112011 (eight char minimum), and April2011. These are atrocious and horrible passwords, but I fed it good ones like g0g0g4dg3tp4$$w0rd until I couldn't remember them anymore, That and the one time I got PUNISHED, PUBLICLY, for forgetting the horrible new password I'd been required to choose.....

      If you're going to implement password cycling, keep it reasonable. The system I access has nothing more sensitive than the last four digits of a credit card number. We really don't need monthly cycling unless we're dealing with something really secure.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    15. Re:HOW? by hedwards · · Score: 2

      At bare minimum that really ought to be 1 upper, 2 digits, 7+ length and no words. And that's an extremely low standard at this point given the state of affairs these days. It always bothers me when sites require me to use no more than 16 characters. It's not realistic to expect people to memorize all these unique passwords so you may as well require them to use a 30 character password.

    16. Re:HOW? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 2

      Solution?

      *) Choose a master password.
      *) Never forget it, never disclose it
      *) Concatenate it with "MonthYYYY"
      *) Calculate its SHA1 in base 64
      *) Ensure that the 8 first chars contain upper, lower, number. If not, concatenate i+=1 to the master password and keep hashing

      It looks like this In Ruby: http://www.pastie.org/2163871
      An example with P4SSW0RD as master password gives : OWRhNGE5

  2. nt by shentino · · Score: 3, Informative

    In all fairness, Fox News did claim (accidentally) that the president was dead in Afghanistan.

    1. Re:nt by The13thSin · · Score: 2

      Ehm, I think they actually said: "President Obama is dead" (note the "president" part). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMP7Ys57ha4
      Though it seems like an honest mistake... then again, they are Fox News, so...

      --
      "This should be fun, and by fun, I mean a wholly depressing insight into the cognitive ability of some grown adults."
  3. I refuse to believe it by imadork · · Score: 5, Funny

    until I see the long form death certificate....

    1. Re:I refuse to believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Won't happen anytime soon, following strict Christian Laws they dropped his body over the Atlantic ocean.

  4. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    what's the point of hacking fox news to spread disinformation? Just leave them alone and they will do it by themselves.

  5. Re:Not even trying, are we? by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, you can tell it's an obvious fake as they call it a "sad day". Fox would never do that.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  6. Why aren't they deleted yet? by bigjarom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't understand why these tweets have not yet been deleted 6-7 hours after they were posted. Does Fox News not know you can delete tweets?

    1. Re:Why aren't they deleted yet? by forand · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They actually replaced an old tweet saying they had regained control of the account. Fox has also addressed the issue in mass media outlets Why haven't they addressed it on their account? Who knows.

    2. Re:Why aren't they deleted yet? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First, hack the account. Change the password.
      Second, post a fake tweet or five, make them obvious and crass.
      Third, post that the account has been brought back under the control of Fox News and locked down while the hack is investigated. Change the password again.
      Finally, start posting some more fake tweets an hour or so later, but be more subtle about it.

    3. Re:Why aren't they deleted yet? by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      This reminds me of the Mark Foley incident where he was repeatedly labeled as a Democrat during a show, and that show was re-run three times at least before the text was edited out (without explanation). Just like with Twitter content, Fox News probably didn't know that it could edit video content either.

  7. false flag! by Titan1080 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every one of these 'hacker' news stories brings us one step closer to an internet kill switch. The government knows that the riots will begin soon in the US, and they are trying to set things up to make it hard to communicate. Beware.

    1. Re:false flag! by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      You think big media doesn't want an internet kill switch? You should only be viewing authorized content which you have paid for, and which is generating suitable ad revenue.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:false flag! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really not even funny to joke about. Although I dislike the messages of MSNBC, I would NEVER suggest their censorship. People like you will lead to the destruction of our 1st amendment rights.

    3. Re:false flag! by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Funny

      So the government is unable to prevent people leaking sensitive diplomatic cables and embarrassing videos and documents yet they can pull off massive false flag operations without a single person leaking the fact that it's a government operation? Umm, yeah right.

    4. Re:false flag! by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Funny

      The government knows that the riots will begin soon in the US, and they are trying to set things up to make it hard to communicate. Beware.

      Of course the most insidious part of the government's plan was the pre-planting of paranoid conspiracy theories on all the major tech sites, so that when the time came, the Internet's system operators would turn on each other in a ferocious bloodbath of nerd terror.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  8. Official Fox News reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/04/foxnewspolitics-twitter-feed-hacked/

  9. And congress said... by 3seas · · Score: 2, Funny

    no problem, we'll just attach more strings...

  10. Shame it's only the one account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When content falsely attributed to LulzSec started showing up on Pastebin, and their response was essentially "it's not real unless we tweet it", I really, *really* wanted someone to crack their Twitter account. A Twitter credentials dump could lead to some some serious lulz.

  11. Better ways of getting them by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Come on kids, everyone knows the only real way to get back at an evil media mogul is to broadcast him on his own channel saying that his viewers mean as much to him as a festering bowl of dog snot does. Bonus points if you get the reference.

  12. Re:Only news because it is Fox, not CNN or MSNBC.. by Xest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So I guess you're voting for the Republican candidate in 2012 then?

  13. Sounds like a phish-fest in the making. by game+kid · · Score: 2

    "You may have heard of recent incidents involving compromised accounts on major Web sites, including Twitter. To strengthen the integrity of our systems and accounts and ensure compliance with Federal cybersecurity laws and recommendations, we at Twitter are now instituting a stronger authentication system. In order to continue posting after 11:59:59 PM 2011-07-04, we require your full name, address, Social Security Number (SSN), Date of Birth (DOB), and valid US credit card information. Click Here to verify and secure your account.

    We hope you continue to use Twitter.

    --The Management"

    Insert logo, sidebars, random tips about hashtag and @ usage, and cute birdies as needed.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  14. Back on planet earth... by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    it is a major headline and an opportunity for the childlike masses to stroke themselves into a frenzy of Fox bashing and demonizing

    Those of us who actually read the headline for this slashdot article noticed it started with "hijacked fox news twitter account". If slashdot was actually looking to make fox news look bad, they would have chosen a less-friendly headline. Both news outlets are on the payroll of newsmax.com/townhall.com.

    Palin

    Is not officially running for anything right now. We just know she loves being in front of a camera.

    Bachmann

    Is running, but writes her own jokes.

    Trump

    Has already dropped out of the running.

    unclever anti-fox KOS memes.

    Do you honestly believe that the daily Kos is the only website ever to make a joke at fox news's expense?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  15. Something's fishy here by Dracos · · Score: 2

    Why would someone "hack" a Fox news twitter account and promptly announce something that the followers of that account would cheer at, or at least be mildly glad of it? Why Tweet something huge like that?

    Everything about the Tweet that was sent screams immature and/or amateur, but the content of it hints at some twisted intent that no real hackers would have.

    "The Script Kiddies"? Come the fuck on.

    If I were going to hack a Fox Twitter account, I'd send a message that was contrary to Fox's agenda. Something like "Boehner, Cantor, McConnell found performing gay satanic ritual in Capitol basement. Nervous goats on scene, US flags burning."

  16. Re:ironically it's not far from the truth... by mcavic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or rather, just reduce spending until the debt goes away. Whatever you do, don't raise my taxes, because the economy isn't my problem.

  17. Re:Hacker's Kill Switch by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

    I'd rather the hackers' USB rights were revoked, and they were forced to revert to RS-232-C.

  18. Re:Hacker's Kill Switch by Caraig · · Score: 2

    Are you serial about that?

    --
    "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
  19. Re:ironically it's not far from the truth... by Dishevel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you always add shitloads of crazy stuff to the posts you comment on or is that just when you do not have a leg to stand on?
    I can not really see in my post where I advocated killing all Muslims.
    I do though agree that any Christian church that keeps its mouth shut when Christians do horrible things should be looked at closely and trusted not at all.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  20. Re:ironically it's not far from the truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because you blame the religious tensions on terrorists. The religious tensions have absolutely nothing to do with the actual 9/11 attack, and everything to do with America (as a whole, not as in every individual) started equating Muslim and Terrorist afterwards. If instead, people had been intelligent and gone "Religion is only an excuse for their actions, not the reason," and not decided that bombing the fuck out of every country the terrorists had a camp in, there wouldn't be the rise in religious tension.

    So, you yourself are just as guilty as the "bomb the fuck out of everyone" crapheads in promoting religious intolerance by saying "They came and killed us and that increased religious tensions." You are laying the blame for the attacks at the foot of their religion, instead of where it belongs. On the attackers, and their POLITICAL AND MORAL ideology. Their religion may have helped form those, but to blame their religion is to also lump every Christian in with Westboro Baptist Church.

  21. Re:Not even trying, are we? by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Informative

    So true. That's one stroke of genius by President Obama. By selecting Biden for VP he made sure even the KKK pray for the health of the President every night.

  22. Very dissapointed... by RL78 · · Score: 2

    I just received mod points and I was torn on whether to mod a comment up for a sentiment I agree with regarding this topic, or to post myself. I don't really want to mod down those I disagree with, I would like to. but I will be satisfied if their score remained 0. I understand the diversity in political opinions, and realize people's opinions of this will cover the spectrum, myself included, however I think a lot of these opinions lack objectivity. I understand Fox is a right leaning news org, and most of their employees have opposite ideals and political leanings than that of the President, however I highly doubt that the disgusting msgs tweeted from their account originated from anyone at Fox News. It would do nothing to serve their interests, and they stand to gain nothing from this, they could only lose. Their enemies are a many, and seek to discredit them in anyway they can. Go to Media Matters website. The last time I was there, not ONE story was about anything other than Fox News, and not one was positive, nor would I expect it to be knowing the sources behind it. It stands to reason that this is a result of the ideology behind sites such as that as opposed to Fox News using their brand and power to shout out something so obviously untrue. Think about it. Even if you hate Fox, it just doesn't make sense for anyone working their to think that this would serve any agenda. If I could believe that someone at Fox did this, it is an incredible stretch to think that anyone in a management or supervisory role would think this was a good idea. The most likely offense they are guilty of in this situation, is having a weak password protecting their twitter account. Of course I can't say with certitude who is responsible for this, but this stinks of opposition tactics, and it's not even well done. I am disappointed in many of the comments I am seeing here, but I will save my mod points for comments more worthy of them.

  23. Re:ironically it's not far from the truth... by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2

    the religious tensions i'm sure have nothing to do with the fact that your government convinced the taliban to fight a proxy war against the USSR, then after the commies went back home, you just left them with the country in ruins, the economy colapsed and not even a "thank you" note.

    oh, the inconditional support to israel's near genocidal policies have nothing to do with it either.

    you know, there's only so much bullying and lying you can get away with before someone slams an airplane or three in your buildings.

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  24. Re:ironically it's not far from the truth... by m50d · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tax revenue raises itself, when the economy grows, and is more likely to do if the economy isn't being bled by government and kept from growing.

    All the money that comes into the government goes out again, usually into economic circulation. So while it's in the interests of the economy to cut taxes on economic activity, it's also worth taxing money that would otherwise be taken out of circulation. And yet it's tax cuts on the income of the rich (which contributes far less to economic activity than that of the poor) which the republicans are most strongly advocating.

    --
    I am trolling
  25. Wrong Forum by Bob9113 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think you are posting on the wrong forum. This site, through the surprisingly effective moderation system, leans heavily toward rational analysis when compared to most.

    While there is a significant bias in favor of a fairly strict interpretation of the Bill of Rights (though at times the second gets shorter shrift than I might prefer) on this site, that is a bias that would serve my nation (and, I believe, most nations) quite well. And it may be that the offenses to the first and fourth have been most heavily observed to come from the side of the aisle you seem to prefer (at least until Obama took that ball and ran with it). But your post seems targeted at forums which play host to leftists. Certainly the amount of rational disdain that this forum focuses on the left-oriented oligarchs in the health care, law, and copyright industries should be more than adequate evidence of the lack of partisan line-toe-ing here.

    Save your implications of dupery for people who do not engage in critical thinking. Your attempt to induce stigma-based inhibition to identifying and publishing cases of media bias and politicians who generate more heat than light are neither warranted nor productive in this place.

    If you must pander to one side, do it by pointing out factual errors or examples of emotionalism on the side you do not like. Engage in creative destruction by rational deconstruction; leave your emotionalist inhibition mongering at home.

  26. Re:ironically it's not far from the truth... by Ricwot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Except the rich have to do something with their money, usually putting it in a bank, or investing it, which is used to fund loans to other businesses or individuals, which generates jobs or allows people to get mortgages.

    Rich people are not Scrooge McDuck, they don't build a massive vault and just hoard all their money. If they actually did that, the effective amount of money in circulation would decrease, and the spending power would increase. The way to misallocate resources in the economy is to pay people to do things they shouldn't be doing, like overly high unemployment benefit, fraudulent disability benefits, useless jobs, or excessive numbers of prison places.

    Money the government spends on things people wouldn't buy on their own (agricultural subsidies, bank bailouts) create inefficiency in the economy and slow growth.

  27. Re:ironically it's not far from the truth... by jpate · · Score: 2

    Ah, yes, in funding Catholic parishes to care for children in utter safety, the Salvation Army to provide equally for straight people and GLBT people, and for missionary organizations to civilize the heathen hordes. Right. Based on your sig, you're none too enthusiastic about religious causes, but the vast majority of social charities are mainly fronts for religious organizations to evangelize and push their own social agenda . Government-run social programs at least have some semblance of accountability to society at large. At the very least, your response merits a big fat [citation needed]

  28. Re:people who did this can face some hard time for by russotto · · Score: 2

    It's a crime just to make a joke about killing the President and it's federal time without parole.

    Find me the statute which makes it a federal crime to joke about the president having been killed, and I'll find you the part of the Constitution which makes it invalid.

  29. Re:Not even trying, are we? by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So true. That's one stroke of genius by President Obama. By selecting Biden for VP he made sure even the KKK pray for the health of the President every night.

    Well, if it's a tactic it's a bipartisan one. If McCain had won you could swear every democrat would pray for his health too, or there'd be President Palin...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  30. Re:ironically it's not far from the truth... by jkauzlar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    putting it in a bank, or investing it, which is used to fund loans to other businesses or individuals, which generates jobs or allows people to get mortgages.

    Rich people are not evil, but the free market is not perfect. Take a look at How Markets Fail. We've seen over the past ten years (or actually since 1980) that as the wealthy accumulate a greater and greater share of the wealth, average wages and employment figures do not improve. Also, there's no requirement that they invest or loan the money in the U.S. Whenever we given money to an investor, a lot of that money will end up overseas.