Slashdot Mirror


Anonymous Releases 90,000 Military E-Mail Accounts

jjp9999 writes "Anonymous Operations posted 90,000 military email addresses and passwords to the Pirate Bay on July 11, in what they're calling 'Military Meltdown Monday.' They obtained the emails while hacking government contracting and consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton. They hinted at other information obtained during the breach, which they describe as 'maps and keys for various other treasure chests buried on the islands of government agencies, federal contractors and shady whitehat companies.' The breach comes just days after Anonymous hacked government contractor IRC Federal. Both breaches are linked to the new AntiSec movement, which LulzSec joined forces with shortly before disbanding."

29 of 319 comments (clear)

  1. Yeh by sortius_nod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think I'll be grabbing that torrent...

    1. Re:Yeh by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

      A. Information falls under copyright law, and possession of such things is not legally considered theft. That distinction is absolutely relevant here.
      B. Actually, it's not so relevant, because the government can't own copyrights - anything they own belongs to the people.

      In no way, shape, or form would downloading this amount to possession of stolen goods. As a matter of fact, it's not even a crime. Hacking the computers to obtain the info was a crime. After that the cats out of the bag.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:Yeh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite simply, the fact that this is happening indicates that the impacted are not capable of defending our freedoms or anything else according to modern realities of engagement. We may wish it were otherwise, but it is not. I'm sorry.

    3. Re:Yeh by SpecialFred · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, there isn't. The US does not have an Official Secrets Act. Unless there are special circumstances (like agreeing to submit to contract or military law), it is not a crime to share or acquire secret information. See the Pentagon Papers case. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers#Legal_case

  2. A Military Contractor Named Booz? by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    That name itself just screams trustworthiness, doesn't it? I know I would happily hand over my secrets to someone named Booz to keep confidential and secured.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:A Military Contractor Named Booz? by zill · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not as ironic as Standard & Poor's.

  3. Not sure when this is going to end.. by darkc0der · · Score: 2

    Not sure when this is going to end. Maybe Operating Systems needs to be redesigned with built in security.

    1. Re:Not sure when this is going to end.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not sure when this is going to end.

      You don't? I'll be glad to tell you.

      Maybe Operating Systems needs to be redesigned with built in security.

      Wait, it sounds to me like you do know. Just remember that "security" in this case doesn't mean "security from outside attackers" it means "security from users."

      This is going to end with iOS. Programmers will be required to license their compiler and IDE from official government sources and only be allowed to enter code into "secure" disconnected computers. You will only be allowed to run programs that have been signed off by the Government, and you will have to provide your Government Internet License on demand.

      Think I'm just paranoid? Remember, this is only the end state. We've got quite a few steps to make it there. But with things like iOS, and Sony being allowed to remove OtherOS without penalty, we can already see we're walking down that path.

      And when you read stories like "Ex-NSA Chief Supports Separate Secure Internet," you know where we're headed:

      Expect more and more invasive laws and less and less anonymity. You will be required to give up your liberty in exchange for security, friend consumer.

  4. I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anonymous has an agenda. That's fine. Originally they were after Scientology. If they've shifted focus, I have no problem with that. If they're trying to become another Wikileaks and expose government wrongdoing, that also makes sense.

    What I don't understand is the wholesale posting of email addresses and passwords. What are they trying to accomplish? Military or not, these are email addresses of real people. This is no longer a crusade against "bad guys" whoever they may be, or even against bad activities. This is now a crusade against privacy. You know, the concept that keeps Anonymous, well, anonymous.

    If we use exactly the same standard that they use to judge what should be public information, then the names, email addresses, and passwords of everyone who calls himself/herself Anonymous should be public as well.

    1. Re:I don't get it. by dcollins · · Score: 4, Funny

      Surely there's some free-market economic explanation for all this. That shit can explain anything (or so I'm told).

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    2. Re:I don't get it. by afabbro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anonymous has an agenda. That's fine.

      It's the same agenda a 3-year-old has: "look at me! look at me!"

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Not sure I see the point of this. by cvtan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How does releasing email addresses and passwords aid the fight for good and thwart evildoers? They should go back to the Scientology thing.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    1. Re:Not sure I see the point of this. by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Didn't you hear? The US is and in turn US army is full of evil. I mean just skip Iran murdering gay's, or the years of things going on in Sudan with religious persecution. Or the pakistan military being so corrupt that they've been infiltrated by terrorists. It's the US that's evil.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Not sure I see the point of this. by andb52 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The obvious logical fallacy with your statement is that, just because other regimes may be evil and corrupt, it does not mean that the US is not.

    3. Re:Not sure I see the point of this. by LordLucless · · Score: 2

      How does releasing email addresses and passwords aid the fight for good and thwart evildoers?

      Maybe next time, they won't hire contractors relying on porous security, able to be penetrated by any script kiddy with a modem, increasing the security of the US Defense Force in the process. But more likely, they'll just send goons after script kiddies - goon security is easier than real security.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:Not sure I see the point of this. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      The obvious logical fallacy with your statement is that, just because other regimes may be evil and corrupt, it does not mean that the US is not.

      Especially since two of the three cases he cited the US was complicit by providing the country military aid (Sudan was the 6th largest recipient of US military aid and everybody knows about the billions given to Pakistan).

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Not sure I see the point of this. by blackraven14250 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US has had, and will have, bad presidents who muck around in shit they shouldn't be. That doesn't make the US an evil regime; it makes the people idiots for electing people willing to get us into sticky situations.

    6. Re:Not sure I see the point of this. by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How does releasing email addresses and passwords aid the fight for good and thwart evildoers?

      If LulzSec/Anonymous can do it, so can our enemies and allies.

      The fact that these guys are so prolific and haven't been caught yet, strongly implies that others have done the same thing.
      And probably gotten away with it because they didn't announce it to the world.

      The fact is, this will go on for as long as LulzSec/Anonymous feels like doing it.
      Between government agencies and contractors, there's just too much low hanging fruit.

      BUT, all things being equal, I'd rather it was blackhats humiliating us in public instead of China silently doing it for economic gain or espionage.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    7. Re:Not sure I see the point of this. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Because they'd want that information for themselves instead of having it released to the public? Because they'd want the US to feel safe and secure so they have it easier if they want to hack and cripple the infrastructure?

      C'mon, what's their gain? Humiliation? Please, gimme a break. The US are quite capable of internationally letting their pants down without foreign aid, they're quite self sufficient in that area.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. They sure have some bawlz. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    You got to hand it to them: These blackhat/lulz Hacker types sure do have some balls. I'd be scared shitless to pull such a stunt, even if I *did* have the information. I'd be super-ultra-extreme paranoid and cover my tracks many times over. I actually wouldn't know where to start when attemting that.

    Probably something like this:
    1. Multiple levels of undetected low-profile unix breakins to start off a botnet.
    2. Multiple levels of botnets on top of that to finally hack the systems involved in the attack and breach, using totally different malware strategies as to go undetected among the usual hodge-podge of criminal botnets.
    3. Low-profile IDS on all levels to scout for detection or suspicious tracing activity 24/7.
    4. Encrypted, low-profile bit-by-bit intrusion and trickle-data-grab over weeks or months.
    5. Complete rollback and teardown of the entire network with IDS remaining on the last lines of defense (see 1.) ready to send out signals if someone comes for you.
    6. Wait. A long time.
    7. Release data and press release over simularly complex channels.

    Imagine what happens to you if the CIA or some other 3-letter blackops finds out where you're at. Your life is pretty much over then.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:They sure have some bawlz. by Shark · · Score: 2

      This type of knowledge has been deemed dangerous. Please report to your local intelligence agency for evaluation and risk assessment.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    2. Re:They sure have some bawlz. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      you're more or less right-- the OP is just gonna get busted tinkering with IDS on his botnet or whatever crazy crap and never get to his actual target.

      Just go to a coffee shop you've never been to on the other side of town and pop a wifi AP in the area. Just be mindful to not do stupid shit like log into your facebook account and treat it sorta like an OTP-- dough-nut re-use.

      This last part is crucial, go check max butler's 2nd case, they figured out what APs were available, and then cross-referenced them with login's on boxes he controlled.

      It's easiest to just make a separation in your life, and when it's show time, do your one task and do it well, and then return to the other part of your life.
      The trick is to never give them a reason to look at you as a person in the first place.

      Past that, it's making sure you don't get caught with physical evidence. I like to find cheap old laptops I can buy in person used from places like goodwill and pc repair stores/etc and one-time use them as well then wipe and donate back to a thrift store. Once you're through that, you should be more or less bullet proof.

  8. Age of Assholes by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2

    On the one hand, the military and its contractors are assholes for exposing tens of thousands (and surely more) of military people's accounts to cracking and outing.

    On the other hand, Anonymous is assholes cracking and outing tens of thousands (and surely more) of military people's accounts.

    That's both hands assholes. Have you noticed that everyone in public life these days is an asshole?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  9. "Pearl Harbor" by sarku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't some top ranking official recently say something about an internet "Pearl Harbor?" You see, this isn't Anonymous, or any other basement hackers looking for lulz in all the wrong places. This is the fucking government working to tighten control over the internet.

  10. Re:holy crap!! by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmm... odd, I live in a country not too different from what you describe. We have "free" health care (read: I pay for it with my taxes), we have one of the lowest crime rates in the western world, unemployment is manageable (and you can actually survive on your unemployment aid), I am looking at 4 weeks of paid vacation (mandatory, not 'cause I am so incredibly qualified that I can afford asking for it), 2 extra salaries per year (mandatory again), my retirement is taken care for (again, taxes)... yet I do not pay 120% taxes or can't get any goods in our stores because nobody wants to produce or sell anything here. Odd, ain't it?

    And know what? While the economy crisis did hit my country too, it didn't hit it by any kind of margin as hard as it did hit the US or other countries that subscribed to the ideal of "letting the market sort crap out". Why? Because people here actually do have money to buy crap. More to the point, to buy services. And since my country, like most of the "civilized" world, depend heavily on services for its GDP, our economy is still fairly stable. Services is the first thing people cut back when money is tight. A haircut? Put that off another few weeks. Fix the plumbing? Hell, let that faucet drip. Go out for dinner or the pub? Rather cook at home or watch the game with friends in your living room. That's what crippled the economy in most other countries, because people lack the MONEY to buy those services. You cannot cut back on food. You have to eat. You cannot cut back on your rent, you have to squat somewhere. But you can cut back on "vanity" like haircuts, repairs or a night on the town. We didn't have to. We still got money in the pockets of our working class people.

    So please, keep your perfect system. I like the US, the dollar's weaker than a chocolate coin in the hot summer sun and that means I get to buy cheap electronics with my, despite all odds, fairly stable currency.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Re:holy crap!! by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Congratulations on unearthing the case where "our" system failed.

    One thing this system does is to increase the workload on you, the patient. That's the unfortunate truth and that means that you actually have to be more self-dependent than in a system where you pay for the operations and hence call the shots. Not less. You have to take care that you went to the right doctors at the right time to get the right diagnosis so they know that you actually need that operation. It's true that you cannot simply go up to your MRT tech and demand an examination. Why? Because you don't pay for it, and the entity paying for it wants to make sure that you're not going there because you think "phhht, not my money, why should I care?". You go to your general practitioner, have him examine you and send you there. The same applies to operations. You don't go to the hospital and demand one, you get the necessary examinations done and if the need exists you get your operation. My guess can only be that she didn't do that.

    The system certainly isn't perfect. No system is. Still I'm fairly convinced that this is a very rare case compared to cases where people have to pay for operations themselves, cannot afford them and die because of it, or have the operation performed and go bankrupt over it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Re:Nothing as dangerous as ignorance in action by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Don't think so. I could China see say "Dammit, why did they have to? Now they might tighten their security and when we need to get in it's gonna be harder".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  13. Do it! by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 2

    And *you* could win a special meeting with the boys from Seal Team Six in the comfort of your very own home.