GPU-Powered Planetarium Renders 64MP Projection
MojoKid writes "The Adler Planetarium has finished a major two-year upgrade project that's replaced the facility's forty year-old Zeiss Mark VI projector with a 'Digital Starball' system designed by Global Immersion Ltd. The new digital system is powered by an array of NVIDIA Quadro GPUs. The specs behind the system are impressive. The 71-foot dome of the Grainger Sky Theater now contains a score of military-grade projectors with an 8kx8k resolution. The final 64 megapixel image is generated by an array of 42 NVIDIA Quadro GPUs and offers an unprecedented degree of real-time modeling horsepower. The planetarium's model of the universe was created in part from high-definition photos captured around the world and via the Hubble telescope."
What's with everything being "military grade" nowadays, from motherboards to video projectors? Is it some kind of fashion, or did US army have a huge sale?
Or do these components actually refer to North Korea's high standards?
Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.
... is a military-grade projector, and why would you want one?
OK so scores of Nvidia chips are cool but a Zeiss Mark VI is wayyyy more cool...
can the planetarium now withstand a bombarding and still show its beautiful model of the universe?
... but can it run Crysis?!?
What's next, GPU-powered OpenGL?
Why do people throw out the term "military grade" as though it somehow confers magical powers. Just because the military bought it doesn't mean it's great or even good. The military buys the cheapest one ply toilet paper. So what.
I want a planetarium at home. Is there a short throw projector that can fill a reasonable ceiling with a half decent resolution? I can make the assets myself for it, but I'm suprised there isn't more of this done. Movie on the ceiling, maybe, but planetarium for the kids is a very cool piece of kit.
Rendering a 2D 64MP display is nothing. Sounds like it's just displaying a raster image. Big deal, you could do that with low-end hardware from 20 years ago.
What's the point of using 3D hardware to render a 2D display? This isn't impressive, it's wasteful.
Now if it was rendering some giant number of polygons plus texturing and shading in real time then that might be impressive.
What's the point of using 3D hardware to render a 2D display? This isn't impressive, it's wasteful.
Just a hunch, but I bet it actually is rendering this in 3D, which means you'd be able to perform fly-bys to the other planets, solar systems, etc. Y'know, the type of thing you'd want to do to get people impressed with your giant planetarium.
That would be a hell of a mining rig.
I'll be impressed when it's in 3D. Wait — are they calling 3D without glasses 4D these days? That would be better. No, wait — why don't we just have holodecks already? We've got the tech... http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/cliff-kuang/design-innovation/holograms-you-can-actually-touch
Life is sleep. Death is a dream. Wake up.
I don't get the math....
Is it a score (20) of 8k by 8k projectors, or a score of projectors, totaling 8k by 8k.
And how exactly do you divide 8k x 8k by 20?
8k / 4 = 2k, 8k / 5 = 1.6k, so they have projectors that have a resolution of 2000 x 1600. Impressive if right - vs 1920x1080 projectors.
BSOD!
They could farm a lot of Bitcoins in their downtime, and sell them to pay for all that overpriced equipment o:
And my favorite, A device used to simulate the blinking light on the Agena which was used in the Gemini project for rendevous and docking. This was a light with a rotating shutter, who needs 'fancy' electronics.
For what it is worth, I think this is the "overhead projector" that John McCain cited in a presidential debate as a $3 million example of government earmark abuse by Obama. Gosh, it's amazing what ordinary office equipment is capable of these days! It's nice to know the government has absolutely no interest in inspiring and educating children, advancing technology, and attracting tourism.
(By the way, that earmark, and the bill it was attached to, never became law)
No password is safe lol.
The essential difference between the Zeiss "dumbell" and the GPU-farmed projectors is the teenage Joe from the basement of his parents' house. I have yet to see a Zeiss electro-mechanical star machine print "In a distant galaxy, a long, long time ago - All your base are belong to us!" over the projection of the Milky Way. Not so sure about the newest generation "unhackable" digital planetariums. Don't be suprised if the UFO of Elvis flies across the dome sometime during the performance.
The purpose of a planetarium is to show the night sky, and for that, the Zeiss is much better than a CGI system. A real night sky has a very high contrast ratio between the stars and the background. The Zeiss can come very close to that--no projector is in the ballpark. The difference is very clear to the audience.
Do you want a night sky that makes the audience gasp (the way a real night sky would), or do you want an IMAX?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Military_Standard
Finally.. something that can play Crysis!
Most other countries don't have military grade militaries.
I8-D
Too bad they destroyed the airport, or I'd fly in to see the show.
this is the infamous $3 million "overhead projector" from the 2008 election.
One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
Well, dumbass: The hardware is designed to render to a 2D display. Maths beyond your comprehension take the "giant number of polygons" represented by 3D points in a make-believe space and shit out 2D points with some other perspective-corrected coordinates. With these other coordinates it makes a "raster image" with "texturing and shading" and it does this in "real time". Probably has something to do with y-mx+b.
Fucking idiot.
I can hear the little kids on a field trip to the planetarium... "the stars are bright! I can see the Milky Way! Wow, the stars are hot and LOUD..."
I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
Maybe I'm missing something, but 8000x8000 doesn't seem like a terribly impressive resolution, especially stretched across a 71-foot dome (is that radius or diameter? No, I DRTFA, why do you ask?). Hell, my monitor at home's 2048x1152, so this 'amazing' projection system is the equivalent of 8 of my home monitors?
I'd love to update my asteroid discovery movie for this, I've rendered a 4kx4k version for some lesser planetariums, but 8kx8k will mean upgrading my disk storage I think.
I just see a lot of equipment that will break, become obsolete, and have to be maintained more than the previous projector that lasted 40 years.
It sounds cool, but try to replace a video board when one burns out twenty years from now. I'd rather have the Zeiss.
pending committee review
A clearer close up view of Uranus. Did you know that Uranus has a gassy atmosphere?
Nobodies Prefect
Tidbits for Techs Technology Blog
What exactly is a "military-grade" projector?
Are there particularly robust presentations needed for military purposes?
Do the troops in the field need especially high-powered and durable light shone to display movies, or perhaps graphics?
It sounds as impressive as hell, perhaps a giant searchlight mounted on a trundle-carriage like a WWI tank?
-Styopa
Somebody mentioned wanting a planetarium at home. This is very doable. The current version of WorldWide Telescope:
http://www.worldwidetelescope.org/
supports a very straightforward remapping onto a dome through multiple projectors (don't know about the military grade nonsense). There's a calibration screen that handles all the geometry. Just need some baffling to minimize the overlap between projectors.
Navigating through the Sloan galaxies is very impressive on a planetarium dome. WWT also displays a half million objects in the asteroid belt, Kuiper belt, etc in real-time (or in accelerated motion) using that space-age GPU technology. (Of course, "real-time" is another overused buzzword.)
Supports Kinect controls for the game addicts.
Neat - anyone been to the show yet? I'd love to see a first hand report - it will be a while before I can get down there myself.
As a roughneck, any tool I hold in my hand is hammer or a prybar, not sure why people insist on making hammers and prybars in so many impracticable shapes or why the push keeps buying them.
SmartLikeTruck
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope will use a 3.2 Gigapixel camera to take 15 second images of a 9.6 square degree view (~50x the area of the moon) in 6 color bands. This will image the entire night sky in 3 days with amazing detail (30 terabytes a night) for 10 years. This upgraded planetarium seems like a great way to view some of these images and movies of the real night sky.
http://www.lsst.org/
I'm sure they put on some great shows, but these modern "overhead projectors" often lack the dynamic range of the best discrete planetarium projectors out there.
Even among dedicated planetarium projectors, only the best are able to replicate the differences in brightness between mag 1 and mag 6 stars with any convincing accuracy. Many of them project such a "flat" sky in terms of brightness that it's difficult to recognize even familiar constellations. The old Morrison Planetarium projector had dedicated lamps for particular bright guide stars, and the projector at Chabot Science Center is very good at that.
It's discouraging to see a run-of-the-mill college planetarium with "bright" stars that are just smears of bigger dots.
So they aren't pixelating, but I bet their Spica is nearly the same brightness as their Porrima.