Slashdot Mirror


TSA Announces Pilot of Trusted Traveler Program

Bob the Super Hamste writes "CNN reports that the TSA has announced the pilot of their trusted traveler program. This is the program where an individual gives up additional information to the government and then gets expedited security. The pilot program will only be available to certain frequent fliers on Delta passengers flying out of Atlanta and Detroit, and to American Airlines passengers flying out of Miami and Dallas. Plans are in the work to expand this to other airports and other airlines as well."

15 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Implying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All other travelers presumed guilty.

    1. Re:Implying by BagOBones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      None of the current tech really addressed the inability of the TSA preventing people from taking box cutters on plains as illustrated by things like this http://www.blackmediascoop.com/2011/06/17/chef-gets-by-tsa-onto-a-plane-with-4-knives-in-bag/ .

      Since 2001 the door to the cockpit has been improved and the procedures for the pilots... Nothing on the ground has really fixed the issue.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
  2. Lovely by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a perfect solution that balances the public wish for appearance of freedom, with the government and corporate wish for the appearance of security.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Lovely by gearsmithy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now that's what I call freedumb!

  3. Bad idea by DanTheStone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We all know how this will go. Fewer lines will be allocated to normal lines, pushing people to give up tons of personal information in order to return to the speeds they previously had (as everyone will want the faster lines), instead of the skyrocketing time of the normal lines. It's the carrot approach to getting people to give up all their rights and personal information.

    1. Re:Bad idea by Lust · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And there is no guarantee the system will not be revoked in future - personal information cannot suddenly become private again.

  4. I Am Trusted Traveler by lordDallan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Until I am PROVEN GUILTY of not being one. I don't have to "opt in" for what should be my no-questions-asked constitutional rights.

  5. Multi-Step Approach by ThinkWeak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Step 1: Create new "elite program" requesting additional privacy invasion
    Step 2: Initially limit ability into "elite program" to create artificial demand
    Step 3: Make it more painful for those not in "elite program" to travel
    Step 4: Create new "platinum elite program" requesting even more privacy information
    ....
    Step n: All your base are belong to us

    In all seriousness, this is the slippery slope everyone talks about.

  6. This is worse than the current system by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any terrorist with half a brain trying to plan an attack on an airplane now knows exactly how to do it: Forge an identity or recruit a new terrorist that can meet the Trusted Traveler requirements. Then use the Trusted Traveler identity to bypass the security that might catch your terrorist plot. Bruce Schneier writes a great deal about this: If you create an easier-than-standard path through security constraints, the bad guys, just like the good guys, will take the easier route, every single time.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:This is worse than the current system by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, any terrorist with half a brain knows to bypass the passenger cabin completely. You know all of those people that service the plane? That have access to all manner of hidden spaces in the plane and the airport? Those people who are given a cursory background check and even more cursory supervision.

      The next terrorist attack will not the the same as the last terrorist attack.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  7. WTF? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's like watching all of the scariest bits of 1984 and Brave New World all coming together.

    A world in which citizens have no liberties, and think that's how it should be. The state controls everything and tells you what to think. McCarthyism meets the Keystone Kops.

    If the Americans are voluntarily giving up all of their liberties for this farce of security ... then the rest of the world us screwed. Because governments which have slightly less compunction about running roughshod over their citizens will be quite willing to do this as well ... in fact, they'll be required to in order to allow a flight into the US. Give it time, and the US will require these like the other heightened security measures.

    So, the great bastion of personal liberties is essentially leading the charge to stripping them away from themselves and dragging everybody else along with them. All in the name of protecting those very liberties they're giving up.

    I grieve for what America used to stand for. I also grieve for how it bodes for the rest of us.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  8. Divide and conquer by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, it's a little bit of "divide and conquer" in the works here. 10, 15, perhaps 20% of air travelers get this "trusted" status. The rest of the herd has to tolerate the indignities, and obviously they deserve it. If they were "trustworthy", after all, they would be like "us", cutting in at the head of the line.

    So, with a special class of elites to show off, the TSA will get away with yet greater indignities imposed on the unwashed masses.

    Didn't Orwell work this same thing into his story?

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:Divide and conquer by slick7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Didn't Orwell work this same thing into his story?

      Trust in a government that doesn't trust its own people? Trust in a government that has so many secrets that it can't trust its own people to keep them. Trust in a government that gives more money to its enemies than it does to its own people. Hmmmm....Let me get back to you on that.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  9. Another "class" of citizen. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are absolutely correct. This is simply more government blackmail in disguise.

    This system would establish a new class of people who are allowed to travel without question while most of the people are left to undergo "screening".

    The system, even as ideally envisioned, is a breeding ground for abuse, because people who give even decently manufactured information to the TSA will get privileged access. Just like RFID passports, it gives the illusion of more security while actually reducing real security, because intelligent criminals will then be trusted without question.

    The TSA needs to be abolished, not allowed to create discriminatory, security-harming policies.

  10. Re:Higher Risk Areas by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right.

    You realise that, from a purely statistical perspective, airline terrorism is non-existent.

    If risk mitigation were an aim, why create the giant, soft-target of a couple thousands - bottled up in airport queuing areas?when they can

    Governments feel secure completely control behaviour. Corporations feel secure, when they have governments captive.

    All of them advance their agenda, without the slightest real concern for your individual or collective "safety".

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."