Microsoft Developer Made the Most Changes To Linux 3.0 Code

sfcrazy sends this quote from the H: "The 343 changes made by Microsoft developer K. Y. Srinivasan put him at the top of a list, created by LWN.net, of developers who made the most changes in the current development cycle for Linux 3.0. Along with a number of other 'change sets,' Microsoft provided a total of 361 changes, putting it in seventh place on the list of companies and groups that contributed code to the Linux kernel. By comparison, independent developers provided 1,085 change sets to Linux 3.0, while Red Hat provided 1,000 and Intel 839."

Comments

Linux fanboys, all of you.

[BitZtream]

And thats all you are.

As I post this, there are 34 comments, and 33 of them are just ignorant anti-microsoft flames. I don't like MS as much as the next guy, but you're just showing how pointless it is to care what any of you think, you are unpleasable. Nothing is good enough for you.

You're acting like a bunch of asshole teenagers, and you know what happens to asshole teenagers, everyone else ignores them and lets them dick around in their own idiotic little world until they grow out of it.

So what if MS is making patches for interoperability with their systems, if you had have a fucking clue you'd be happy for that since its practically impossible to not deal with Windows.

Whats better, is the code is code they've already submitted ... but wasn't up to your standards ... so they fixed all the issues to make it fit into the retarded little world of idiotic artificial restrictions placed on kernel code just to appease a bunch of GPL zealots ... did everything you want, and you still bitch.

These patches might make it easier for you little puds to run Linux under the MS hypervisor so you can have your Linux jerk fest even at a majority MS based company ...

Instead of looking like a bunch of angsty teenage morons, why don't you shut the fuck up and be thankful for a change.

I'm not a Linux fanboy, clearly, but I'm certainly pro-open source, my preference is FreeBSD, and never once have I bitched about an MS contributed patch. Its not like they can sneak something in, the patches are reviewed by everyone ... open source, remember? What do you think they're trying to do, run you out of existence via 'good compatibility'?

What the fuck is wrong with you people?

I should note, that almost all of these posts so far are 1million UIDs or AC, so it probably really is teenage angst, but holy shit no wonder no one commercially supports Linux, you guys are just ungrateful fucks.