Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Russia Launches Delayed Radiotelescope

Posted by Unknown on from the us-declares-satellite-communist-deception dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Yesterday the Radioastron Spektr-R satellite was successfully launched from Baikonur cosmodrome. It became first launch of an astronomical satellite in 25 years for Russia. Its mission is to search the Universe for black holes, quasars, pulsars, and other mysterious objects. Using a highly elliptical orbit of around 340,000 km it will conduct interferometer observations (in conjunction with the global ground radio telescope network) with the extraordinarily high angular resolution. The project's life expectancy is 5 years but its creators are hoping for it to work at least twice as long."

6 of 35 comments (clear)

  1. In non-Soviet Russia by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Spy satellite turned *away* from earth.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  2. Correct link by saurongt · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.russianspaceweb.com/spektr_r.html

  3. Re:Well done by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Shit, they CREATED astronautics.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Much delayed VLBI satellite by mbone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    VLBI fans, rejoice ! Really, after the Japanese VSOP mission, it has been a long wait for this one (first proposed in the 1980's). Together with antennas on the ground, RadioAstron should provide the highest resolution of any human telescope, anywhere, at any wavelength. (Here are some more technical details.)

    The USA pioneered the use of this technology (the first space VLBI, in the 1980's, used a NASA TDRSS communication satellite that was underused after the Challenger disaster), and Irwin Shapiro suggested putting VLBI terminals on the Moon well before that, but here is another case where the USA can't seem to actually get its stuff into the orbit.

  5. The Russians??!?! by Frangible · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm shocked. If only we could form some sort of giant national space agency to compete with Russia in space. Nah, it'd be expensive, and we'd probably need a bunch of German scientists or something.

  6. Re:Well done by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well done Russia. Finally some competition in space research area.

    Here in this reality, there's never been a lack of competition - the ESA, among many others, has been launching research birds for decades. Hell, even Canada has launched a small space telescope.
     

    Maybe this will also get NASA some badly needed funds.

    NASA has plenty of funds. What NASA doesn't have is consistently competent management, accounting, or engineering. Yes, engineering. If they don't do their jobs rights, including cost and risk estimation and development planning, then the others can't do theirs either. (Yes, bean counting is part of engineering.) Exacerbating the impact of NASA's inability to consistently and reasonably project cost and schedule is Congress and the general public insisting that each and every NASA project be groundbreaking and cutting edge, be on budget and on schedule, and have a 100% success rate. (In the real world, you get to pick two as the saying goes.)
     
    When you expect an agency to accomplish three impossible things before breakfast (and NASA is nearly unique among US government agencies in this respect) - you're setting the stage for problems. It shouldn't surprise anyone therefore when problems regularly occur.