Slashdot Mirror


Has LHC Seen a Hint of the Higgs?

gbrumfiel writes "Researchers at two detectors at the Large Hadron Collider are seeing something unusual. The signal is faint, but it could be from the long-sought Higgs particle. The Higgs is part of the mechanism that gives other particles mass, and it also unifies the electromagnetic and electroweak forces. No one is willing to declare it found just yet, but the new data from the CMS and ATLAS detectors are an independent, 'tantalizing' hint of what's to come. The results were presented today at HEP-2011 in Grenoble, France."

4 of 96 comments (clear)

  1. Electromagnetic and electroweak by mtinsley · · Score: 3, Informative

    it also unifies the electromagnetic and electroweak forces

    Doesn't electroweak already encompass electromagnetic? Should that be 'unifies the electromagnetic and weak forces'?

    1. Re:Electromagnetic and electroweak by mswhippingboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe you are correct. Electroweak IS the unified description of the electromagnetic and weak forces.

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
  2. Re:Uh Huh by The_Wilschon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nobody who is a scientist (except possibly for inflammatory gossip addicts like Dorigo) is claiming anything remotely resembling a discovery. Nature is, in my opinion, highly irresponsible for posting things like this, precisely because it leads to reactions like yours. It isn't screwy instrumentation or glitches, it isn't a discovery, it isn't an exclusion, it isn't a bird or a plane or superman, it's just a result that is not yet conclusive.

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  3. Not even found the Higgs yet by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Informative

    It hasn't opened a wormhole to another dimension yet...

    We also have not found the Higgs yet there is not enough data to distinguish this from a fluctuation in the background. Frankly I'm appalled at Nature for printing wild, inflammatory speculation like this. If their editors have this level of ignorance of science you have to question what sort of decisions they are making regarding the journal itself...not that many particle physics papers are typically submitted there: perhaps this is why!