Court Filing On How 2004 Ohio Election Hacked

chimpo13 writes "A new filing in the King Lincoln Bronzeville v. Blackwell case includes a copy of the Ohio Secretary of State election production system configuration that was in use in Ohio's 2004 presidential election when there was a sudden and unexpected shift in votes for George W. Bush."

Comments

Re:Funny how

[bluefoxlucid]

Barrack Obama is going to take "Worst President," Bush did pretty good until he started a war. War is a necessary thing, but expensive and economically crippling; warfare must be precise, effective, efficient, and carefully considered. This was not a war we needed to fight--at least not so viciously. It should have been easier to pull off our global political goals without bumbling around like retards..

Still, I'm looking at these asses running our country and what do we get? Republicans raving about crazy vicious communist liberals, democrats trying to look more professional while lobbing a constant stream of low-brow attacks at conservatives. All of you shut the fuck up and get some work done.

Re:Funny how

[ArcherB]

Umm... The unemployment numbers have always been garbage. The length of time that unemployment could be collected has been increased, so the numbers went up.

The Republicans would drop it to a month, and the numbers would be down to a couple of percent, and they'd say "Look how we improved things! Low unemployment!" while people are jobless, starving in the streets.

The unemployment numbers are not based on how many people are drawing unemployment. They are based on how many people are actually looking for a job that don't currently have one. If they were based on what you think they are, wouldn't that make Democrats morons for extending benefits and artificially inflating the statistics?

You are correct that the numbers are skewed, and unemployment benefits are a likely cause, but not in the reason you would think. See, as long as people can live their lives without having a job, many won't. Another problem is that many will continue to receive unemployment benefits while working "under the table". While these people may be gainfully employed, they will gladly be counted as unemployed to leech off the government tit for as long as possible.

Another problem is that when people give up on finding a job, they are no longer counted as being "unemployed", even though they may not actually be employed. There is a reason for that, however. You don't want every house-wife/husband, parents on maternity leave, retirees, students, children, and those working "under the table" counted. On the other hand, you DO want to count all these /.'ers that are sitting in their mom's basement playing WOW all day who don't have jobs, and don't really care to get one. (I envy those bastards!)

Glad to set you straight, but I'm sorry that I've taken away one of your made up justifications for hating Republicans. I'm sure you will hate them no less, regardless of the facts you run across that disprove your bias. Besides, your facts are so much more convenient as they help justify the hatred you already feel and make you feel OK for hating someone. It would kinda make you an asshole if you were to find out that Republicans really don't want to see people starving in the streets and still hated them like you do, now wouldn't it.