Slashdot Mirror


UK Police Charge Suspected Anonymous Spokesman

An anonymous reader writes "Scotland Yard has tonight charged 18-year-old Jake Davis, who was arrested in the Shetland Islands last week, with five offenses including unauthorized computer access and conspiracy to carry out a DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) attack against the SOCA (Serious Organized Crime Agency) website. When announcing his arrest on Wednesday, police said that they believed Davis used the online nickname 'Topiary' and acted as the spokesperson for the Anonymous and LulzSec hacking groups. Topiary's final twitter message said 'You can't arrest an idea' just before his arrest."

11 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. You can arrest the person by DreamMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You may not be able to arrest an idea, but it seems you can arrest the person.

  2. Today's lesson by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Today's lesson: You aren't V. Neither the British or US government is an evil fascist state which brutally subjugates the populace. This isn't to say that they are perfect. Far from it. But the basic point is clear. Moreover, if either of the governments were so bad as to deserve fighting back then the method to respond would not involve hacking every single website you can most of whom are corporations which have nothing to do with anything. Sure it is probably fun to convince yourself that you are doing good, but your just a bunch of script kiddies who aren't being helpful while real activists spend their time and sometimes lives improving the governments and saving lives.

    1. Re:Today's lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Going to get troll modded for this but whatever.

      You agree that the governments are not brutally subjugating the populace. You agree they are far from perfect also.

      Then you claim that if they were brutally subjugating the populace hacking, defacing, and dossing websites would not be the correct response.

      I'm sorry but I think you just proved anons point and their methods (while claiming contrary). Anon is using defacing and dos attacks as a form of peaceful protest. I wouldn't condone them going much further at the current time but denial of service and high profile defacing in form of protest seems like the perfect response to freedoms, rights, and liberties being slowly eroded.

      If you ask me, sure they are a bunch of script kiddies, but I am certain what they are doing is required with the current state of things. I also applaud taking action, now, and peacefully, before shit really hits the fan and people in the US / Britain are required to pick up arms to fight for real. (I think we all agree getting to that point would suck)

    2. Re:Today's lesson by DurendalMac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh bullshit. This kind of skiddie hacktivism is what spineless yobs do when they're too scared to go out and try to make a difference in the real world. It's just another breed of armchair combat, and a pretty sorry one as well. If you want to make a difference then do something out in the real world. Most people can actually relate to that. Do it through a computer and far less people will give a shit. Those who think they do are deluding themselves into believing that they're actually doing something great from the basement. It's lazy self-justification. Get your ass out into your community and do something in the real world. Few people give a shit about your online community.

    3. Re:Today's lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I'm guessing you are under 30 and smoke a lot of weed.

      When you grow up and become and adult, we can talk about real, lasting change. None of which involves "riots", violence, fighting, vandalism, or other things you seem to enjoy.

      Anarchy has never benefited a single country on the face of the planet.

    4. Re:Today's lesson by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What alternative would you suggest? I have tried writing to my MP several times and either get fobbed off or nothing changes. Peaceful protest is pointless - 2 million marched against invading Iraq but where completely ignored. The only political party offering any real reform sold out the second they got into power. Corporations are even worse.

      On the other hand violence does work. The Poll Tax protests were ignored until people starting throwing things and smashing stuff up. It had to be sustained for weeks though, not just a one-off.

      The only non-violent thing that works is leaking evidence, such as in the MP's expenses scandal. Since most people are not in a position to leak information then hacking to get it is somewhat legitimised. Aside from anything else it lets us know which companies have a clue about security and can be trusted, and in several cases it has exposed law-breaking (ACS:Law, HB Gary, MediaDefender etc). I can appreciate the irony of hacking to expose law-breaking but if leaking data with no criminal intent is justified by the content of said data then acquiring it by hacking is not far off.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Re:Remember, remember by Nursie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny that, but prison rape isn't so much of a problem in the UK as it is in the great old US of A, where it seems to actually be encouraged as part of the punishment.

  4. Re:Do they have any evidence by Nursie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe the logic is that he knows *something* about the group, whatever it is, and the best way to get it out of him is haul him far from home and trump up a bunch of charges. He's only 19 after all.

  5. Re:Darn kids these days by Tasha26 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess there isn't really much to do in the Shetland Islands!

  6. Re: 'You can't arrest an idea' by ibsteve2u · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, but you can declare that corporations are people and their wealth is free speech and drown that idea in an ocean of propaganda...

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  7. Re:Remember, remember by Anonymus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The two-year study, commissioned by the U.S. Justice Department for $939,233, has come under withering attack from other experts. The department has not endorsed the study, saying Fleisher has yet to turn over his data for closer examination.

    Cindy Struckman-Johnson, professor of psychology at the University of South Dakota and one of nine commission members, said Fleisher's 155-page study is not in scientific form. She said there is no literature review, no raw data, and no in-depth explanation of his subjects or research methods.

    So, when the Department of Justice gives you a million dollars, obviously you're supposed to lie and tell them what they want to hear, but this guy went so far overboard with it (essentially, nobody in prison is ever raped and anyone who claims they are is lying), even the sponsor will say "hold on a sec..."