Slashdot Mirror


UK Police Charge Suspected Anonymous Spokesman

An anonymous reader writes "Scotland Yard has tonight charged 18-year-old Jake Davis, who was arrested in the Shetland Islands last week, with five offenses including unauthorized computer access and conspiracy to carry out a DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) attack against the SOCA (Serious Organized Crime Agency) website. When announcing his arrest on Wednesday, police said that they believed Davis used the online nickname 'Topiary' and acted as the spokesperson for the Anonymous and LulzSec hacking groups. Topiary's final twitter message said 'You can't arrest an idea' just before his arrest."

48 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. Darn kids these days by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    Back in the day we had fun stealing cars for joy rides and doing jewlery store heists. These days kids have fun attacking computers, much more victim less crime.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Darn kids these days by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in the day we had fun stealing cars for joy rides and doing jewlery store heists. These These days kids have fun attacking computers, much more victim less crime.

      I think that Sony would disagree with you there. I doubt that the total value of your stolen cars and jewellery would add up to anywhere near what Sony has lost due to its recent hacks.

    2. Re:Darn kids these days by poena.dare · · Score: 2

      I think that Sony would disagree with you there. I doubt that the total value of your stolen cars and jewellery would add up to anywhere near what Sony has lost due to its recent hacks.

      I'll bet every person who was infected by a Sony rootkit or anyone who wants to mod or run a second OS on their Playstation will say it was just deserts.

    3. Re:Darn kids these days by Tasha26 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess there isn't really much to do in the Shetland Islands!

    4. Re:Darn kids these days by oreaq · · Score: 3, Informative

      "It was estimated by internet security expert Dan Kaminsky that XCP was in use on more than 500,000 networks". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootkit_scandal

  2. You can arrest the person by DreamMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You may not be able to arrest an idea, but it seems you can arrest the person.

    1. Re:You can arrest the person by mat+catastrophe · · Score: 5, Interesting
      --
      sig not found
    2. Re:You can arrest the person by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It wouldn't be the first time. The UK police have no problem arresting people based on the flimsiest of evidence and then hoping they will crack during questioning. Unfortunately what tends to happen is that the person doesn't admit to something they didn't do and they end up dragging it out for as long as possible and then trying to bullshit their way to a conviction in court. If the defence lawyer is any good they get some experts in to refute the evidence, but unfortunately there is a tendency not to do that if the prosecution has already decided to use an expert witness because it is assumed that said witness will be impartial and objective.

      Operation Ore is the most notorious example of police relying on clearly flawed evidence, but there are many others. In Operation Ore they received a large number of credit card numbers that had been used to pay for child pornography from US police and simply arrested all the card holders. They didn't bother to check if the card details had been stolen, they just rushed in and destroyed dozens of lives for a few easy headlines.

      The only Omagh bombing suspect's trial collapsed because all they had was weak DNA evidence which matched him and a schoolboy in England. Barry George did several years in prison based on a single spec of gunpowder found on his clothes, which were stored in a room containing other garments with gunpowder on them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Today's lesson by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Today's lesson: You aren't V. Neither the British or US government is an evil fascist state which brutally subjugates the populace. This isn't to say that they are perfect. Far from it. But the basic point is clear. Moreover, if either of the governments were so bad as to deserve fighting back then the method to respond would not involve hacking every single website you can most of whom are corporations which have nothing to do with anything. Sure it is probably fun to convince yourself that you are doing good, but your just a bunch of script kiddies who aren't being helpful while real activists spend their time and sometimes lives improving the governments and saving lives.

    1. Re:Today's lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That does not matter.
      Do you think the riots which resulted in many death in other countries were the "right way" to do it? Probably not.
      The point is that no other way works. You can't spend 30 years of your life trying to get a big political party and get shot down by your own guys after those 30 years. What you can do is protest. And if you protest, it's not going to be an email or a blog post, even not a public performance.
      You protest with things that everyone is going to _care_ about.

      Riots. Hacking high level web sites. Whatever else. At least, they don't kill people or destroy their lives - the government does that, daily, if you haven't noticed. That the proven way to change things, so far.

      What I find the most sad, is such arguments as "real activists" "saving lives". It sounds like "and also they capture pedophiles" and such crap. They don't save lives. They also don't do shit. If you haven't noticed that either, the governments, corporations haven't changed, and never do, until a revolution rise. How long do your real activists need, 100, 200, 500 years? Please, get a fucking clue.

      Revolutions started by riots, and other such acts,once again. Hacking is part of that, now.

    2. Re:Today's lesson by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Neither the British or US government is an evil fascist state which brutally subjugates the populace"

      You haven't been watching their actions lately, have you? Teahadists and Republicrats alike essentially holding our asses hostage over non-existent fucking money, acting like the world fucking police, and trying to undermine the foundation of their governments for the profit of their friends.

      Take your blinders off.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Today's lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Going to get troll modded for this but whatever.

      You agree that the governments are not brutally subjugating the populace. You agree they are far from perfect also.

      Then you claim that if they were brutally subjugating the populace hacking, defacing, and dossing websites would not be the correct response.

      I'm sorry but I think you just proved anons point and their methods (while claiming contrary). Anon is using defacing and dos attacks as a form of peaceful protest. I wouldn't condone them going much further at the current time but denial of service and high profile defacing in form of protest seems like the perfect response to freedoms, rights, and liberties being slowly eroded.

      If you ask me, sure they are a bunch of script kiddies, but I am certain what they are doing is required with the current state of things. I also applaud taking action, now, and peacefully, before shit really hits the fan and people in the US / Britain are required to pick up arms to fight for real. (I think we all agree getting to that point would suck)

    4. Re:Today's lesson by DurendalMac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh bullshit. This kind of skiddie hacktivism is what spineless yobs do when they're too scared to go out and try to make a difference in the real world. It's just another breed of armchair combat, and a pretty sorry one as well. If you want to make a difference then do something out in the real world. Most people can actually relate to that. Do it through a computer and far less people will give a shit. Those who think they do are deluding themselves into believing that they're actually doing something great from the basement. It's lazy self-justification. Get your ass out into your community and do something in the real world. Few people give a shit about your online community.

    5. Re:Today's lesson by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      If you let everybody speak, and let everybody listen, the truth will be known.

      However, the mass media is controlled by a very small group... While everyone may be able to speak, only the mass media will be listened to by any significant proportion of people and thus their agendas are furthered and everything else ignored.

      If someone were to put up their own website explaining their side, how would anyone even learn of the existence of that site?

      There is no way to be heard without money and power, and the only way to get money and power is to be a part of the current system and thus have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo.

      The vast majority believe what they hear on the media, and never bother to question it... If they heard an alternative viewpoint they might believe that too, but why would those who control the media ever publish a viewpoint that weakened themselves?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:Today's lesson by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      I could not help but think of this woody guthrie quote:


      I never stopped to think of it before, but you know, a policeman will just stand there and let a banker rob a farmer; or a finance man rob a working man. But if a farmer robs a banker, you would have a whole dern army of cops out a shooting at him. Robbery is a chapter in etiquette.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:Today's lesson by risom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anarchy has never benefited a single country on the face of the planet.

      I am not a fan of Anarchism as a political system, but that sentence is empirically wrong. In early 20th century europe there were at least two cases I know of, Ukraine and Spain, where Anarchism lasted for a while, and was pretty successful in economical terms. For Spain for example it's more or less proven that the anarchist period saw a sharp rise in worker productivity.
      Both didn't last long in the grand scale of things, but their military defeat does not relate to them being anarchist regions - they were just small and didn't have a chance against their much more powerful enemy (Spain: The spanish fascist movement with support from other fascist movements from all over Europe; Ukraine: the Red Army).

    8. Re:Today's lesson by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What alternative would you suggest? I have tried writing to my MP several times and either get fobbed off or nothing changes. Peaceful protest is pointless - 2 million marched against invading Iraq but where completely ignored. The only political party offering any real reform sold out the second they got into power. Corporations are even worse.

      On the other hand violence does work. The Poll Tax protests were ignored until people starting throwing things and smashing stuff up. It had to be sustained for weeks though, not just a one-off.

      The only non-violent thing that works is leaking evidence, such as in the MP's expenses scandal. Since most people are not in a position to leak information then hacking to get it is somewhat legitimised. Aside from anything else it lets us know which companies have a clue about security and can be trusted, and in several cases it has exposed law-breaking (ACS:Law, HB Gary, MediaDefender etc). I can appreciate the irony of hacking to expose law-breaking but if leaking data with no criminal intent is justified by the content of said data then acquiring it by hacking is not far off.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Today's lesson by Phrogman · · Score: 3, Informative

      The major purpose of Bush in Iraq was to advance US corporate interests and secure control over oil etc. The secondary purpose was to test new weapon systems and ensure vast sums of money were either "lost" or awarded to US military contractors and other companies. Most of the huge sums of money spent on the war went directly into corporate pockets.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    10. Re:Today's lesson by sgbett · · Score: 2

      Ah, the the government approved form of demonstration! That'll learn 'em.

      --
      Invaders must die
    11. Re:Today's lesson by Troed · · Score: 2

      real, lasting change. None of which involves "riots"

      On the contrary, that's the basis for most real lasting changes. Look it up. Women's rights movements, blacks, end of slavery, overthrowing kings etc.

    12. Re:Today's lesson by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      Are you saying that gas prices have gone down since we've been in Iraq? But the petroleum industry has been making record profits.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    13. Re:Today's lesson by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      In response to an earlier post claiming that the purpose of our war in Iraq was to advance the interests of certain US businesses and secure oil, you replied saying that even individuals in the US would like to see gas prices be lower.

      I was pointing out that if one of the reasons to invade Iraq was to lower the price of gas, it has backfired spectacularly. But this hasn't particularly harmed the US businesses that the earlier poster thought were the intended beneficiaries of the war. This suggests that either lower gas prices was never an objective or that it came a distant second in terms of priorities for the Bush administration, which, typically, fucked it up.

      In any event, I'd just as soon see our energy use reduced through greater efficiency and reduced demand, and more of our energy provided by safe, clean, domestic sources. Sadly, there seems to be little collective will in getting this done, or at least little evidence of it. If it takes continued increases in the price of gas to get us going in that direction, then I'm all for it, though I would certainly prefer to use whatever cheap energy we have left in a wise manner so as to get ready for the future, rather than to waste it on frivolous driving. But as long as we make the transition, I suppose it'll work out.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  4. Re:Remember, remember by Nursie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny that, but prison rape isn't so much of a problem in the UK as it is in the great old US of A, where it seems to actually be encouraged as part of the punishment.

  5. Re:Because thats how to handle things. by bakarocket · · Score: 5, Funny

    You really have to work on shortening your revolutionary slogan. Try something catchy like "Corruption Shmorruption!!" or "Stupid Government, We Hate You!"

  6. Re:Do they have any evidence by Nursie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe the logic is that he knows *something* about the group, whatever it is, and the best way to get it out of him is haul him far from home and trump up a bunch of charges. He's only 19 after all.

  7. Evidence suggests wrong person by rickzor · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=22280
    Evidence such as previously leaked information, IRC logs, and the age, identity and location of the suspect arrested suggest that they caught the wrong person.

  8. Re:Do they have any evidence by Artifakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, we're talking Britain here. There's still splinter groups out there from the IRA who also have spokespersons. There's people who blow up subway cars who have spokespersons. The idea here is to use a route that still protects the real core of damage causers, meaning your spokesperson doesn't really know all that much. Maybe one or more of those meatspace groups won't bother to call in and take 'responsibility' for the next atrocity and the British government will be left wondering just which group did it. A government that goes after spokespersons better have reason to think they can provide important, even vital data, or there's a big downside. Going after one for possibly knowing 'something' is simultaneously saying the group you are after isn't a real threat and you're confident your actions won't provoke them more than the info the spokesperson gives you is worth. Do you see any reason why the British government can make such a claim to its citizens?

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  9. Re:Too young to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tor will successfully hide your IP from every node except your entry point. However, by inspecting the actual data, you can sometimes learn something about the origin of the packet. Just because an envelope has no return address, that doesn't mean you can't figure out who sent it by reading the actual letter.

  10. Re:Remember, remember by smelch · · Score: 2

    Prison rape is played up in the states. Of all the people I've talked to in and out of prison, you almost never see that kind of thing unless its consensual. They always play it as rape though because getting caught having sex with another inmate will get you a pretty hefty punishment, and definitely doesn't sit well with a lot of the other inmates.

    --
    If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
  11. Re: by taiwanjohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Played up or not, it is a problem.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
  12. Re:Because thats how to handle things. by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

    This post is exactly an example of someone who has become a parrot for the latest political memes, without doing research to find out how the world actually is.

    Note the example he picks of an 'evil' oil company: BP. Of course everyone knows why, and before that the political meme was Exxon. But why do you ignore the full-on corruption, crime, and murder, of oil companies that are truly evil, like Gazprom? It's because you only have a shallow understanding of the subject.

    Likewise, it is easy to get mad at Murdoch (since no one likes him anyway), but are you aware that many UK newspapers were doing the same kind of thing? The story there isn't about Murdoch, it's about a corrupt political/police system in the UK.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  13. Re:Remember, remember by rtfa-troll · · Score: 2

    Of all the people I've talked to in and out of prison

    I guess you are American, and that means you know quite a few former prisoners because of this, but as the meme goes, the plural of Anecdote is not "statistic". Prison rape tends to happen to more normal / weaker prisoners in violent prisons. It is more common in state prisons than federal. It's also very area specific. The target group is unlikely to be a main group of friends of the average Slashdot reader. It's completely likely that it's happening and that the people that you know don't know about it.

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  14. Re:Do they have any evidence by Nursie · · Score: 2

    Well firstly - there's no danger of Lulzsec not calling it in, they love publicity.
    Secondly, no, I don't consider them a 'real' threat. They're not threatening lives.

  15. POWER VACUUM! by idbeholda · · Score: 2

    Just like the last several times, another will take his place. I neither condone or condemn the actions of these groups, but I would like to point out the facts as they've unfolded.

  16. Modern day "Zorro" by mcrbids · · Score: 2

    Remember that movie a few years back, "Zoro" with Antonio Banderas? (If not, it's probably up on Netflix Instant Play or a torrent someplace)

    The movie was all about the "passing of the guard" - a new, younger man taking the role of "Zoro", the anonymous masked crime fighter of the previous generation. It's a good movie, so I recommend it highly. But it also does a passable job of showing the difference between an identity and an idea.

    I'm guessing that there are, in fact, a half dozen or more actual people who have had the identity of "Topiary". They may have shared the pseudo-identity concurrently, so, who did what?

    I'm getting out the popcorn and getting ready to watch the show!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  17. Re: 'You can't arrest an idea' by ibsteve2u · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, but you can declare that corporations are people and their wealth is free speech and drown that idea in an ocean of propaganda...

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  18. Why are most of these evil hackers teenagers? by Froeschle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lately it seems that most of the hackers getting caught are not even 20 years old, many of them still juveniles. Is this because it's juvenile behaviour and there are less adults out there doing the same type of thing or are the older (more experienced?) hackers just a lot more careful to not get caught?

  19. Extraordinary rendition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is completely crazy. They guy was in Shetland, in Scotland, and the Met Police flew up from London in a light aircraft, landed, raided his house and flew him out on the same aircraft to London, England. He was arrested in one legal jurisdiction and is being held in another. This is like the FBI flying from Washington DC to Oregon, arresting someone, and flying them straight out to Washington again. It's not legal. Add to that that in Scotland he can only be held for 24 hours without charge but in England he can be held, it seems, indefinitely with court approval and you have an extraordinary rendition. The human rights court is going to have a nightmare with this one, and the UK is alreadytearing itself apart due to the incompatibilities of one sovereign state having two seperate 'sovereign' legal systems.

    Anyway, I asked for an answer from the Scottish First Minister. He's already fighting with the 'federal' UK government over this.

    Free @Topiary!

  20. SOCA? by DryGrian · · Score: 2

    SOCA (Serious Organized Crime Agency)

    Is this really an organization? In other words, are they srs?

    --
    For optimal comment enjoyment, take red pill now.
  21. Re:Do they have any evidence by Aceticon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The modus operandi of government in the UK is "we must be seen to act, so do something, anything".

    This applies as much to the police as with politicians, since in the last 10 or 15 years the police has progressivelly been politicised (with any high-level manager that didn't dance to the tune being sidelined) and they're usually called upon to be the tool that does the some kind of action for the cameras.

    The outcome is that they cannot be trusted: have they got the right man? Have they got the wrong man? Who knows.

    They got somebody and the media reported they're doing something, so the real objective of the operation has already been achived. Probably in 2 or 3 months time when this guy finally faces a court (the only part of the system that actually cares about finding out the truth, rather than convicting somebody) it's quite possible that he's found innocent (or maybe all they manage to pin on him is something minor) and they will quietly release him, since by then the media would have moved on.

    As the recent News of The World debacle has shown, in the UK the press has a huge amount of influence and both the politicians and high-level management inside the police have been trained to quickly find somebody to sacrifice whenever the press demands blood.

  22. Re:What idea? by muffen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thats the idea!

  23. Re:Remember remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    How the fuck did you get modded up?

    Look, I realise that you people generally dropped out of your education aged 14 convinced that you were twenty times as intelligent as everyone else in your class and that you know everything already, but there's a few things your mighty intellects don't quite understand. I'll try and put it in simple bullet points.

    * We live in a society with particular laws
    * Like them or not, we abide by those laws, or we run foul of them
    * DDoS is a crime in both the States and the UK, as is unauthorised access of a computer
    * In the UK, these crimes carry a hefty fine, a year's imprisonment, or both
    * Whether or not this guy from the Shetlands actually is Topiary and therefore ran the Twitter feed or not is irrelevant. If they're charging him then they believe they have enough evidence that he is guilty of crimes as laid out in the Computer Misuse Act. For that purpose, if he's Topiary he's implicated in a large number of attacks on sensitive computers. In this case, SOCA is particularly irritating the authorities
    * The same goes for Ryan Cleary, who wasn't arrested for hosting an IRC channel but for offenses as defined in the Computer Misuse Act

    If he's guilty of the charges he has absolutely no defence unless he can prove that he was just the spokesman. Since that's extremely unlikely (and the chatlogs that have leaked suggest that Topiary was rather more involved than merely as a mouthpiece, although chatlogs are trivial to spoof) he's done for.

  24. Re:Remember, remember by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2
    You say:

    Studies have shown the problem is, in fact, very limited

    And then link to a page that says:

    The two-year study, commissioned by the U.S. Justice Department for $939,233, has come under withering attack from other experts. The department has not endorsed the study, saying Fleisher has yet to turn over his data for closer examination.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  25. Re:Remember, remember by Anonymus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The two-year study, commissioned by the U.S. Justice Department for $939,233, has come under withering attack from other experts. The department has not endorsed the study, saying Fleisher has yet to turn over his data for closer examination.

    Cindy Struckman-Johnson, professor of psychology at the University of South Dakota and one of nine commission members, said Fleisher's 155-page study is not in scientific form. She said there is no literature review, no raw data, and no in-depth explanation of his subjects or research methods.

    So, when the Department of Justice gives you a million dollars, obviously you're supposed to lie and tell them what they want to hear, but this guy went so far overboard with it (essentially, nobody in prison is ever raped and anyone who claims they are is lying), even the sponsor will say "hold on a sec..."

  26. Re:Do they have any evidence by ledow · · Score: 2

    "only 19"

    Which means he's old enough to have sex (by three years in the UK), have children, marry, have a house, a mortgage, a credit card, a car, drink alcohol (18 in the UK), enter pubs, represent himself in court, sign legally-binding contracts (18), get loans, gamble, smoke and (most importantly) understand the standard police caution which states he's doesn't have to say anything and is entitled to access to a lawyer (even a free one appointed by the government if necessary).

    This *MAN* isn't a kid. He's legally responsible and has been for quite a while. And I doubt the police would go to such public and extraordinary lengths if they couldn't pin a convictable offence on him already - especially when it involves the co-operation of many different police sections across country borders and legal systems (England/Scotland have different legal systems - the Shetlands are in Scotland).

    My guess would be that he was caught either encouraging others to DDoS or as a major part of the DDoS itself and now they have charges they can squeeze him for names /identities of others involved (I would guess they have reasonable expectation that he knows or organised others, thus he was more of a "ringleader" than his mother would like to make out). Also, they probably want to seize his computer because he's more likely to have information about his own sources and contacts which could lead to others in the group (a private message / email from someone else discussing the attacks could be evidence enough to convict them upon, for instance).

  27. Re:Remember, remember by horza · · Score: 2

    People in England don't quite have the same obsession with male anal sex as Americans seem to. I doubt anybody would get ass-raped in an English prison, and pretty much zero chance for somebody in a low security prison. Interesting Reddit article on coping in prison here.

    Phillip.

  28. Re:Do they have any evidence by S.O.B. · · Score: 2

    FREE TOPIARY???

    Sounds like they just don't want to pay for their sculpted shrubbery. The plants just want to be free.

    --
    Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  29. Re:Remember, remember by smelch · · Score: 2

    Well seeing as how I've been in prison myself and did quite a bit of research on it, and spent a lot of time on forums where former and soon-to-be inmates post on topics just like this, I'll take my research over your assertions. And I'm not saying there is never any prison rape, I'm just saying it is exaggerated. A very low percentage of people in prison are raped, the impression a lot of people have is that it is almost inevitable. That's just not true, and from what you're saying we agree on this, so I don't know why you felt the need to act like I was wrong for saying it is played up, then going on to say it happens to very specific groups in very specific places. So, uh, how is that not played up when everybody always immediately jumps to "Ohhhh! Butt rape!" when they hear "prison"?

    --
    If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.