Slashdot Mirror


Massachusetts Lottery Broken

wiredog sends in a story about how knowledge of lottery rules and statistics has allowed opportunistic players in Massachusetts to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on tickets while being assured of a massive payoff. Quoting: "Because of a quirk in the rules, when the jackpot reaches roughly $2 million and no one wins, payoffs for smaller prizes swell dramatically, which statisticians say practically assures a profit to anyone who buys at least $100,000 worth of tickets. During these brief periods — 'rolldown weeks' in gambling parlance — a tiny group of savvy bettors, among them highly trained computer scientists from MIT and Northeastern University, virtually take over the game. ... Srivastava calculated that a gambler who bought 200,000 Cash WinFall tickets during four rolldown weeks in a year would win enough to cover the $1.6 million investment and earn a profit of $240,000 to $1.4 million — without ever winning the jackpot."

3 of 376 comments (clear)

  1. Wait, what? by Jeng · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought the lottery was for those who were bad at math?

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    1. Re:Wait, what? by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apparently Massachusetts thought that meant people who are bad at math should be running the lottery. A critical mistake in the state that's home to Stanford.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  2. You all laughed when .... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Funny

    Guys, you were all laughing when I bought the lottery tickets from Dogbert 50% off. He assured me that the odds of winning are just one one millionth less, but the price was 50%, count them full fifty percent off. You guys were taunting me for buying the previous day's tickets. Ha! Who is laughing now?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact