Slashdot Mirror


Was .NET All a Mistake?

mikejuk writes "The recent unsettling behavior at Microsoft concerning .NET makes it a good time to re-evaluate what the technology is all about. It may have been good technology, but with the systems guys building Windows preferring to stick with C++, the outcome was inevitable. Because they failed to support its way of doing things, .NET has always been a second-class Windows citizen unable to make direct use of the Windows APIs — especially the latest. .NET started out as Microsoft's best challenge to Java but now you have to ask: what has the excursion into managed code brought the Microsoft programmer, and indeed what good has it done Microsoft? From where we are now, it begins to look very much like an unnecessary forced detour, and Windows programmers are going to be living with the mess for years to come."

10 of 688 comments (clear)

  1. Was .NET all a mistake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you really need an entire article to give you the answer to that one?

    1. Re:Was .NET all a mistake? by somersault · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now I don't feel that bad for never being interested in .NET.. and yet, I suppose if you get in on all the bullshit early it can give you a few years worth of work.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  2. Signs point to by jra · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Yes".

  3. Messy by flaming+error · · Score: 4, Funny

    > Windows programmers are going to be living with the
    > mess for years to come.

    It's a dirty job, and every other Friday I cry all the way to the bank.

  4. A mistake? by Brummund · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, look at the flop that is asp.net, or how hard doing protocol agnostic services with WCF is. *sigh* .NET is a huge success in the corporate world, and hopefully c# will be one of the last nails in VB's coffin.

    If you measured Java's success based on the non-proliferation of applets, it too is a flop.

    (And if you are a Java programmer, I hope you get something similar to Linq soon :-)

  5. Re:Not For My Company by Psychotria · · Score: 3, Funny

    cosm didn't specify it was 10 million DOLLARS a year; perhaps it's 10 million new applications a year, although I do think that would be a heavy workload

  6. Re:Was this article all a mistake? by ThePiMan2003 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thank god. VB 6 is horrid. I am still trying to rehabilitate people who spent to many years programming in it.

  7. Re:What?! On the contrary: .NET is becoming releva by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm looking forward to the Year of the .Net Desktop.

    That, Strong AI, and flying cars.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  8. Windows? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Funny

    Windows?

    What are these "windows" of which you speak, strange visitor?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  9. Re:No? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, but secure website programming in C fucking well is.