Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Story Behind Recent Patent Reform

Posted by timothy on from the ain't-pretty-ain't-sufficient dept.

rmstar writes "In an article titled 'The Spoilsmen: How Congress Corrupted Patent Reform,' Huffington Post reporter Zach Carter takes a look at the story behind the recent patent reform effort. It is an interesting and scary account of just how broken the legislative process is when it comes to intellectual property."

5 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. ...when it comes to intellectual property. by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like it stops there?

    --

    I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    1. Re:...when it comes to intellectual property. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you can own tangible things, like a share in a company, or a debt someone owes to you.

      I think you're confusing intangibility with non-rivalry. If something is non-rivalrous, it means that multiple people can possess the whole of it without lessening the possession of anyone else. An idea is not rivalrous because if Alice tells her idea to Bob, she doesn't lose it, but rather they now both have it.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  2. Is there an area where legislative process is OK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seems to me that Congress is bought and paid for by the oligarchy, ditto every state legislature, therefore democracy doesn't work any longer.
    Ditto all of our chief executives -- it isn't an accident that Obama is little different than Bush in most of his policies, actually worse in civil liberties for US citizens.

    US governments at all levels no longer adhere to the US Constitution.

    US governments are therefore completely illegitimate, as bad as any Middle Eastern gov controlled by an obvious strongman.

    The problem is no longer left vs right. It is us ordinary citizens against the oligarchy. This is the fundamental reason for all of the laws tightening the screws on dissenters of every kind.

  3. Pathetic. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow... That article has left me aghast, but I'd be lying if I said I was surprised.

    What really surprises me is that anyone can remain loyal to either party. But I know what the mindset is for most people; "my guy might be bad, but at least he's not as bad as the other guy." So while people continue to delude themselves politicians keep screwing everyone.

    By reveling in their own ignorance Americans have abrogated their responsibility to politicians, sometimes intentionally sometimes not. And when that happens the government starts making decisions for us, and inevitably they're going to do what's in their own best interests. So we get stuck with crap.

    And the sad thing is that patent reform should be a no-brainer for anyone, regardless of political ideology. I mean, even a staunch believer in the free market should fully support the revocation of most patents. If a corporation can't remain competitive without the government stepping in to protect every little idea they come up with then they deserve to fail.

  4. IP == Immoral Property by Dog-Cow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can not see a moral, nor ethical, reason for honoring IP laws in the US. I've held this view for a while, but articles such as this simply reinforce the idea. Every citizen has a moral obligation to ignore laws which have been bought and paid for by corporations. Every single politician in Washington has accepted bribes and they have made sure that the Supreme Court allows them under the name "campaign contributions". The entire system is corrupt and no longer has a mandate to govern.