Slashdot Mirror


Drought-Stricken Texas Town Taps Urine For Water

An anonymous reader writes "Texas is in the midst of a drought so severe that local water management teams have decided to distribute reclaimed wastewater (aka urine). The Colorado River Municipal Water District in West Texas has broken ground on a $13 million plant that will capture treated wastewater and ready it for redistribution. After being run through microfilters and undergoing reverse osmosis, slimy sewage is cleansed with peroxide and ultraviolet light. This intense process ensures that any pharmaceuticals and carcinogens are removed, and that the H2O stands up to drinking water regulations."

212 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Bear Grylls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bear Grylls is happy to have this first post and taste!

    1. Re:Bear Grylls by residieu · · Score: 1

      The first time I saw his show, the Cable Box described the episode as "Bear escapes from a burning vehicle." I was so disappointed when I actually put it on.

    2. Re:Bear Grylls by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you watched his recent show Worst-Case Scenario, which was a bit naff. He is better known for the far superior Man vs. Wild. It is worth giving that one a try.

    3. Re:Bear Grylls by HarrySquatter · · Score: 2

      He is better known for the highly staged Man vs. Wild.

      FTFY.

    4. Re:Bear Grylls by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Well, of course it is. It's "reality TV" after all...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    5. Re:Bear Grylls by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      Well, originally it was going to be called "Man vs. Marriot", but that just didn't have the same ring to it.

    6. Re:Bear Grylls by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Well for every conveniently located boat he runs into, he has 2 or 3 genuine near run-ins with death, so I call that a good deal.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    7. Re:Bear Grylls by Desler · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he's always so close to death. I heard in one episode that his room in the hotel had the air conditioner stuck at 76 degrees and the macadamia nuts can was empty. He practically starved and froze to death.

  2. If your town gets its water from a river... by bmo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...then you're drinking filtered sewage anyway.

    Not news.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by vlm · · Score: 1

      ...then you're drinking filtered sewage anyway.

      Not news.

      --
      BMO

      Wells are also fundamentally the same concept.

      I suppose if you reclaimed some cometary ice, it might be "organic free"... or maybe not.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      Consider how much water you use during a day that goes down a drain (shower, laundry, dishes, flushing toilets, etc). Compare that to how much water you drink a day. That puts an upper bound on how much "urine" you're looking at.

      Most wastewater treatment plants put water back in the river that's cleaner than the rest of the river, anyway. Environmental regulations and the like.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Moryath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What would be news is if the USA would get their heads out of their asses regarding greywater systems. I tried to see about getting one set up in my house only to be shown a local ordinance (they seem to be just about universal round my state) banning them because it LESSENS usage of the sewer system. The bullshit reason given was that they are worried about the sewer system "drying out" and developing problems if the water levels in the sewer pipes "get too low." Meanwhile, they altered the rates to a tiered system so that if you use an average amount of water (enough even to keep your foundation from cracking and shifting you wind up paying the excessively high "overuse" rate, ostensibly to "encourage people to use less water".

      Yes, that's right. I can't install a system to use greywater to water my lawn and garden plants because the local water monopoly (bought and paid for a decade ago when the Republicans took over my county and sold off the public utility to private hands) want to FORCE ME TO USE MORE WATER and bribed the local government to pass an anti-greywater ordinance.

    4. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by camperdave · · Score: 2

      If they're turning to urine, given it's relatively insignificant volume, then that tells you how bad the drought is there.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      They're not turning to just urine, they're using all waste water.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    6. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by ender- · · Score: 1

      First I've ever heard of *wanting* water against a foundation. I suppose down south you guys have different problems than us up north. Here we do everything and anything to get water as far away as fast as possible.

      It's not so much that we want 'standing water' at the foundation. The issue is the soil. Down here [I'm in the DFW area] the soil is mostly clay. So when it gets wet it expands, and when it dries out, it contracts considerably. As an example, within the space of about 2 months, I watched a sidewalk slab move a good 1.5" away from a driveway slab because the ground dried out.

      A constant cycle of expanding and contracting is hell on a concrete foundation, which is standard in these parts. So many people set up a trickle hose around the house and attempt to keep the soil around the foundation at some constant level of wetness to prevent their foundation from cracking.

    7. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Desler · · Score: 1

      The reason to water the ground around your foundation is to keep it from shrinking and expanding constantly as it gets wet and dries out which causes your foundation to rise and fall and eventually cause issues. This is why you water around that area to keep the soil in a more consistent state and it keeps your foundation in better shape too.

    8. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Consider how much water you use during a day that goes down a drain (shower, laundry, dishes, flushing toilets, etc). Compare that to how much water you drink a day. That puts an upper bound on how much "urine" you're looking at.

      Most wastewater treatment plants put water back in the river that's cleaner than the rest of the river, anyway. Environmental regulations and the like.

      That doesnt stop it from being piss... Did you know that water leaving via the wastewater plan is never actually filtered? Just rendered into clearer and clearer forms via patience and a few odd chemicals along the way. To get it back out and turn it to drinking water the same rules apply; no filters, just time and a few parts per million of chlorine. All that piss must be in there *somewhere*. Don't forget, animals have been drinking water for millions of years. The odds that the H20 you are drinking right now weren't peed out of some creature at some time are pretty low.

    9. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Golddess · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What I find even more amusing are the people who are all "eww yuck" over stories about recycling urine for drinking, and then go on to consume an alcoholic beverage (aka, yeast urine).

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    10. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by NFN_NLN · · Score: 2

      They're not turning to just urine, they're using all waste water.

      No. I think they're rebuilding the entire infrastructure:
      - Outbound general waste water
      - Outbound urine
      - Inbound clean water
      - Inbound cleaned urine water for drinking only

      You are required by law to urinate and only urinate into the outbound urine line. And all water destined for direct human consumption must come from the "Inbound cleaned urine" line. ... you wanted internal infrastructure and jobs for Americans. If you don't drink urine then you hate America!

    11. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Moryath · · Score: 2

      I get the idea of maintaining enough water in the sewer. I really do.

      What I find fucking stupid is the contradictory way they go about it.

      Step #0: sell the public water utility off to a Republican robber baron.

      Step #1: Robber baron institutes a pricing scheme designed to punish people for using more water (if I use less than 1,000 gallons in a month I pay the lowest rate, each "tier" above that is doubled. If I go from 1,000 to 2,000 gallons I pay triple the price, 1,000 to 3,000 I pay 7x the price, and onwards).

      Step #2: Robber baron's corrupt stooges in city government block people from instituting meaningful technological solutions that would allow them to cut their water usage.

      If they need to put more water through the sewer system, I can think of better ways to do it. They could start by rescheduling the yearly Fire Hydrant Flush (currently done in the middle of the fucking wet season) for during the dry season and kill two birds with one stone, for instance. Right now, all it's proven to me is that Republicans don't give a crap about the environment.

    12. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      That is liberty as defined by the Republicans. Liberty is only for corporations, profiteers oops sorry Job Creators. You say, "I just want to use my gray water in my home" they laugh at you. They will sit in the medicare provided scotters, sniffing medicare provided oxygen tanks and rail against the government take over of healthcare.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    13. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Step #0: sell the public water utility off to a Republican robber baron.

      Step #1: Robber baron institutes a pricing scheme designed to punish people for using more water (if I use less than 1,000 gallons in a month I pay the lowest rate, each "tier" above that is doubled. If I go from 1,000 to 2,000 gallons I pay triple the price, 1,000 to 3,000 I pay 7x the price, and onwards).

      OK, so this "Republican robber baron" is trying to encourage people to conserve water. Isn't that an environmental issue? Wasn't it the environmentalists that forced me to replace my working toilet with a "low-flow" that leaves skid-marks all over the bowl and requires me to flush 10-20 times to get rid of them? Yeah, so conserving water is an environmentalist issue. So it appears that this "Republican robber baron" is doing something good for the environment.

      Right now, all it's proven to me is that Republicans don't give a crap about the environment.

      Wait. I though you just said.... never mind.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    14. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Afell001 · · Score: 2

      This is news HOW?

      Of course Republicrats don't give a damn about the environment...or, rather, they are only concerned about it if it means profits for their cronies (and themselves) in the end. For instance, if they can charge more for an incidental change that doesn't increase their costs, but it is beneficial for the environment, then all is good with the world. If they have to pay more, then they will only do it if they are forced into it by laws, and then, only if they can't get a variance in the law in their favor. I've seen this happen time and time again with zoning requirements, impermeable ground cover and runoff/retention requirements.

      As for the tiered scheme...this only applies to residential customers. Businesses get a huge break on rates per gallon as their usage increases. Residential customers usually end up subsidizing businesses. Consider that a catfish farm just outside of San Antonio uses as much water as the entire city of San Antonio...and I bet the owners don't pay nearly as much as all the residential customers of San Antonio combined.

    15. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by jschen · · Score: 1

      Oops... undoing bad moderation.

    16. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by nigelo · · Score: 1

      > The odds that the H20 you are drinking right now weren't peed out of some creature at some time are pretty low.

      I think you'll find that we are all made of stars, too, so drinking water is not the only recycled compound to (re-)enter our precious bodily fluids.

      --
      *Still* negative function...
    17. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I'm very good with reading comprehension, even if he isn't. I noticed that not once was it demonstrated in this discussion that the rates themselves were unreasonable.

      My guess is that the majority of users pay less because of the rate graduated system, that the heaviest users bare the brunt of the system... a concept right out of Democrat playbooks.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    18. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Moryath · · Score: 1

      The "1000" rate is 2,000 gallons behind the average monthly usage for the area. We wind up using more than that during times when we have to do things like water our foundation (but watering the foundation beats the hell out of cracked walls and $10k or more for foundation repair).

    19. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So why don't they just build better foundations? I'm sure large commercial buildings don't have this problem.

    20. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Step #2: Robber baron's corrupt stooges in city government block people from instituting meaningful technological solutions that would allow them to cut their water usage.

      Like what? Low-flow toilets and shower heads are required by Federal law these days. Laundry appliances use less water than ever before. What exactly are you alleging that these "robber barons" are doing to force people to use more water?

      Punishing people for using more water makes complete sense if you're trying to conserve it, which we should be (esp. in areas where water is scarce). What kind of dumbass bitches about Republicans, and then bitches about measures to enforce conservation? Or is it that the Democrats (assuming you identify with them) don't like conservation any more? After all, I sure haven't seen any significant environmental progress under Democrat leadership in the last 10 years, even during periods when they controlled the Federal government. It's the typical Democrat playbook: bitch about something bad the Republicans are doing, then when the Dems have power, do the exact same thing (maybe even worse) and then try to blame the Republicans for it.

    21. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by ender- · · Score: 1

      So why don't they just build better foundations? I'm sure large commercial buildings don't have this problem.

      They do try in some cases [rebar-reinforced foundations], and certainly on the more expensive homes they tend to have better, thicker foundations. Unfortunately the developers look at the cost and it just doesn't make sense for them to spend a fortune on a nice foundation for the cheap McMansions they've been building for the last decade .
      But still, even 'better foundations' can be susceptible to the huge soil movements that are possible here. It's also largely the reason that *nobody* has a basement here.

      I don't know about large commercial buildings. They tend to have landscaping and constant irrigation anyway, so that probably prevents a lot of issues right there.

    22. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by CubicleView · · Score: 2

      Every atom in out body was probably excreted by other creatures at some stage or another. I still wouldn't like to drink piss though.

    23. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Large commercial buildings have a better chance of recouping the investment. Modern post-tensioned slabs are able to stand up to the shift for most common sizes of homes, though.

    24. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Can you explain how a local government requiring use of the public sewer is a Republican problem?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    25. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      Umm, he lives in texas.

    26. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I doubt warehouses and other non-aesthetic places have much landscaping and irrigation. More likely, they have well-designed steel-reinforced foundations that make them mostly impervious to soil movement. Of course, these foundations cost a lot, but from what I've seen, commercial buildings are usually far better made than any residential structure.

    27. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      You aren't very good with reading comprehension, are you?

      Two contradictory policies. One, a confiscatory water rate that was justified as "encouraging conservation." The other, a policy that specifically prevents conservation.

      Are you really that dense that you can't understand it?

      It is unlikely that the guy selling your city the water is the same guy that is in charge of the sewage system. Also, your cities "drainage" system is likely different than the "sewage" system. For example, in my neighborhood, we have gutters that channel rain run-off into a local pond area. Others drain into a river system. The actual sewage that comes from your sink, toilet, washing machine, etc will go through different pipes that lead to your local sewage processing plant.

      Also, the pricing structure is compiled through your local utility company, which is heavily regulated, if not entirely government owned, just as Chef Boy-R-D doesn't tell your grocery store what to charge for ravioli.

      The point is that it's not the evil Republican raping you over your utilities, nor is it the evil Republican who is setting your sewage policies. It's your local utility company/ies that are raping you. Those are the people you elected. If you like, I'm sure you can go to your local record office and see the books from your utility company/ies and see if they are charging their customers more than they should. I'm willing to bet that if there is any "fraud" in the system, you'll find it's benefiting the businesses that water every day, rain or shine or the local water park that got a sweetheart deal or something along those lines. I'm certain that the guy providing water for your city has nothing to with your utility's billing policies.

      You can still hate on Republicans, but don't assume that every time you screwed over that a Republican is behind it. You start to sound like the people you mock who blame everything on "terrists" or "ferrners who tuke ur jobs!"

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    28. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Critical thinking fail.

      Robber baron used a two step plan to charge more. The conservation angle was lip service to justify a tiered pricing plan. Then he made the laws require you to use so much water that you're always going to be in the higher pricing tier, paying more money than you were before. The lower pricing tier is an optical illusion; it may be less than the original price, but you'll never actually get that price.

      So this robber baron sells water and controls the local, city run utility company? Who is this guy, Emperor Palpatine?

      Maybe you should look up that critical thinking thing yourself.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    29. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      That was his point - the article title is misleadingly dumb. They are treating all of the sewage water, not *just* the urine...

    30. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Moryath · · Score: 1

      It's your local utility company/ies that are raping you.

      Wow. Republicans are 0 for 3 on reading comprehension.

      The Republican-controlled state legislature sold our local water utility into the "private" hands of a prominent Republican a decade ago. When I say "prominent Republican", I mean "guy who donates the absolute max to every Republican he can, donates the absolute max to the local party, and runs a 501(c) slush fund on top of that."

      A year later, the new price-gouging structure (which bumped up everyone's bill by 50% at bare minimum unless you only bathe once every other day and never water anything) went into effect.

      So yes, I have ample reason to blame the Republicans, because everyone involved in the entire fucking corrupt deal is a Republican.

    31. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Ahem.

      Republican legislature sold off our water company to the private hands of a Republican a decade ago. Then they passed the law he asked for outlawing various conservation measures.

      We have "private water" bought and bribed for.

    32. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Wow. You just... don't have any reading comprehension skills at all do you?

      What exactly are you alleging that these "robber barons" are doing to force people to use more water?

      They outlawed installing Greywater systems, which would allow for significant (around 30-40%) reduction of water usage by recycling the water that goes from sink and shower and laundry drains to be used for watering yard and gardens.

    33. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      The worst part about these privatization deals is when they socialize the costs down the road. I am certain the private owner is not doing proper maintenance of the distribution system, and in 20 years when everything starts to fail he will declare bankruptcy and the city will have to foot the bill. He'll walk away with all the profits.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    34. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Read my original post two up from there, you fucking idiot. There's a reason it's called a THREAD. Start from the goddamn beginning instead of being a brain-dead bucktoothed trailer-trash republican.

    35. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Why should the "1000" rate have anything to do with the average monthly usage? You are just trying to detract from the meaningful issue here.

      If its gouging you so badly, then why would you be afraid to tell us what that rate actually is?

      The rate is a dollar amount per gallon for a specific usage. You have not given any dollar amounts yet, therefore you have just waved your hands about like a jealous and angry little boy.

      "wah wah! if I used 33% of what I use now, I would pay a lot less per gallon! wah wah!"

      My guess is that you are somewhere in the 2000-4000 gallon bracket and pay around $25/month, significantly less than a hell of a lot of people, for that same amount of water. I have to guess because you refuse to say anything fucking meaningful.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    36. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, monopolistic price gouging is Retardican behavior all the time.

      Price gouging has not been demonstrated. All that has been claimed is that people that use 2000 gallons/month pay 3 times as much as those than use 1000 gallons.month. For all we know, thats $3 and $1 respectively... the exact opposite of price gouging.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    37. Re:If your town gets its water from a river... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If they're turning to [drinking] urine.

      So, the article was about American beer.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  3. Asparagus by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

    This sounds logical but I would only drink this water if this process can really get the asparagus smell out of the urine. Have you noticed how nasty that is?

    1. Re:Asparagus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only about 70% of all people have the gene that makes the asparagus smell, and about 40% of them can't smell it anyway. That said, I agree

  4. Already used on space missions? by DJRumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I assume this is similar to recycling systems used for space missions? Don't they also recycle waste for H20?

    1. Re:Already used on space missions? by hal2814 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should bottle and market it. First we had astronaut ice cream. Now we have astronaut water!

    2. Re:Already used on space missions? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Replying to undo accidental moderation. I meant +1 funny. :-)

    3. Re:Already used on space missions? by vlm · · Score: 1

      They should bottle and market it. First we had astronaut ice cream. Now we have astronaut water!

      The funeral industry could follow the Dune / Arrakis model... anything to make the cost of death higher...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Already used on space missions? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Sell it unprocessed as Bear Gryllis water

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:Already used on space missions? by Nationless · · Score: 2

      I thought they already sold piss water under the name of American beer?

    6. Re:Already used on space missions? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Just slap a Mountain Dew sticker on it.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Already used on space missions? by Pope · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just look for the WYSIWYP* label!

      *What You See Is What You Pee!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    8. Re:Already used on space missions? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      In the movie Apollo 13 they ejected the urine directly into space. As it scattered, splattered off into the distance, one of the astronauts said, "The constellation Urain. Too bad they can't show this on television."

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:Already used on space missions? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      General Jack D. Ripper: Mandrake, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk... ice cream. Ice cream, Mandrake, children's ice cream.

      Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: [very nervous] Lord, Jack.

      General Jack D. Ripper: You know when fluoridation first began?

      Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: I... no, no. I don't, Jack.

      General Jack D. Ripper: Nineteen hundred and forty-six. 1946, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works.

      Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Uh, Jack, Jack, listen... tell me, tell me, Jack. When did you first... become... well, develop this theory?

      General Jack D. Ripper: [somewhat embarassed] Well, I, uh... I... I... first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love.

      Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.

      General Jack D. Ripper: Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue... a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I... I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence.

      Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.

      General Jack D. Ripper: I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, Mandrake.

      Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: No.

      General Jack D. Ripper: But I... I do deny them my essence.

    10. Re:Already used on space missions? by Jonner · · Score: 1

      I assume this is similar to recycling systems used for space missions? Don't they also recycle waste for H20?

      Yeah, but it's a lot harder to drill a well in orbit than in Texas. I'm surprised it might be more cost effective than piping or even trucking in water from somewhere else.

    11. Re:Already used on space missions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Urine the money.

    12. Re:Already used on space missions? by Tsingi · · Score: 2

      Or better still, sell it as "Bud Light" and you wouldn't even have to purify it.

    13. Re:Already used on space missions? by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Not sure where your impression of American beer comes from but we have some great ones! Nati and PBR and anything with "light" in the name don't count.

    14. Re:Already used on space missions? by Duradin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People would probably be rather suspicious of the sudden increase of its quality.

    15. Re:Already used on space missions? by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      OK, that's funny.

    16. Re:Already used on space missions? by operagost · · Score: 2

      Yes, because all American beer is the same, all French are cowards, and all Slashdotters live their mom's basement.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:Already used on space missions? by Nationless · · Score: 1

      And no harmless jokes are allowed to use a stereotype as a punchline. You need to lighten up a little, buddy.

    18. Re:Already used on space missions? by lostfayth · · Score: 1

      Funnier still that it's modded +5 insightful.

    19. Re:Already used on space missions? by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      That is a king mother of euphemisms there. Well done!

    20. Re:Already used on space missions? by jseale · · Score: 1

      ...and given that, I'm sure NASA would love to collaborate on this project, manned spaceflight overwith for the time being.

  5. About time. by cusco · · Score: 5, Informative

    About bloody time that some city in the US starts doing this. Did you know that the outflow from the Los Angeles sewage treatment plant is actually cleaner than the water that they pump (at ridiculous cost) over the mountains to the potable water intake?

    The capital of Botswana has been doing this since the 1960s. Nice to know that Texas is finally catching up to sub-Saharan Africa.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    1. Re:About time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you know that the outflow from the Los Angeles sewage treatment plant is actually cleaner than the water that they pump (at ridiculous cost) over the mountains to the potable water intake?

      I've just returned to Europe from the USA. The water quality in LA was awful. Quite easily the worst tasting "potable" water I've ever had, and that's my experience of numerous countries (1st to 3rd world) around the globe, across 5 continents. Congrats LA.

      Also, if you have such a water problem over there... how about replacing your heavily watered lawns with rock gardens or some other less water intensive feature? I couldn't get over the level of waste of good water. Then there's the energy usage, but let's not go there for now.

    2. Re:About time. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      About bloody time that some city in the US starts doing this. Did you know that the outflow from the Los Angeles sewage treatment plant is actually cleaner than the water that they pump (at ridiculous cost) over the mountains to the potable water intake?

      By what definition of cleaner? How are different contaminents weighted? are there any contaminents that neither the water processing system or the wastewater processing system can remove and so would build up cycle by cycle in a closed loop system? Can those contaminents be removed with special processing? if so how does that special processing impact the economy of the process? if not what limit does this place on the proportion of water that can be safely recycled to keep overall quality acceptable?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:About time. by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      If "catching up" requires environmental changes that cause massive amounts of resources to be devoted to simply providing clean fresh-water instead of having it in abundance for free like most of the U.S. I'd damn well prefer to stay behind and have that time and money be used towards other pursuits.

    4. Re:About time. by Tridus · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately here in reality, Texas doesn't have enough water to meet its needs that easily. This is a problem most of the planet suffers and that the US has been avoiding due to having abundant water for a while. But the party is coming to an end.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    5. Re:About time. by ATestR · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't know what he means in this particular case, but when engineers talks about contaminants in water, they are usually talking about bacterial counts as well as nitrates and other dissolved compounds. Sanitary waste water (in most of US) has to be cleaned to certain standards as far as bacterial counts as well as nitrate levels before it can be released to streams/rivers, or reused as "reclaimed" water, usually for irrigation.

      Any water used for water systems (drinking water) must be cleaned to an even higher standard before use. Unless you source is a mountain spring (not a creek!), you are almost certain to have to process it before use. The original poster's point was that often the incoming water is less sanitary than the discharge water of a sewage treatment plant.

      Come to think of it, I saw a documentary about the canal/pipe system that supplies LA a few weeks ago. I can readily believe that that water isn't too clean.

      --
      âoeAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
    6. Re:About time. by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      By every definition of cleaner. My wife has drank that water on a tour of the facility after her company completed construction of it.

      Most regions in the US have laws preventing reclaimed water from being used in potable water systems.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    7. Re:About time. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The original poster's point was that often the incoming water is less sanitary than the discharge water of a sewage treatment plant.

      And my point is that just because the outgoing water is "cleaner" (e.g. gets a lower contaminantion score on whatever unspecified weighted list of contaminents the study looked at) doesn't mean you won't have problems if you "close the loop".

      That doesn't mean you can't recycle water, it just means you have to be extra specially careful to make sure nasty chemicals don't build up over multiple cycles by adding extra special checks at the recycling plant and/or by ensuring that you have good mixing of recycled and virgin water.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:About time. by flink · · Score: 1

      What about pharmaceuticals that are excreted in urine or carcinogenic chemicals that are poured down the drain? I imagine that many of those compounds are small enough to pass through an osmotic filter.

    9. Re:About time. by GooberToo · · Score: 2

      The other problem with "cleaner" is that it doesn't mean what most people think its means. "Cleaner" means in relation to the things they are actually required to measure. There has been many stories about "clean" water actually being far worse for human consumption than some "dirty" water.

      Clean, and therefore "cleaner", is completely relative. As some environment scientists say, its clean only because we don't care to actually measure how dirty it actually is; as oppose to what the EPA actually requires. Basically, what's clean versus the "clean" the EPA requires are frequently worlds apart.

    10. Re:About time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "This intense process ensures that any pharmaceuticals and carcinogens are removed, and that the H2O stands up to drinking water regulations."

      That is a contradiction, most municipals systems do not have regulations about pharmaceuticals in their drinking water. This will actually be a better place to get water than most.

    11. Re:About time. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      What about pharmaceuticals that are excreted in urine or carcinogenic chemicals that are poured down the drain? I imagine that many of those compounds are small enough to pass through an osmotic filter.

      Yep.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:About time. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Unless you source is a mountain spring (not a creek!), you are almost certain to have to process it before use.

      A great deal of Florida can still drink their groundwater (both shallow well and deeper aquifer) without treatment. Mind you, I'm talking about a great deal of land area, not the population. Most of the population lives on the coasts and has sucked so hard on those aquifers and diverted natural (swamp) water holding areas into drainage that they are now living over salt-water intruded aquifers. 50 years ago, you could pump fresh water from the ground right by the bays - if things keep going as they are in Florida, in 50 years, they'll have to desalinate all water pumped from the ground south of Orlando.

    13. Re:About time. by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      What about pharmaceuticals that are excreted in urine or carcinogenic chemicals that are poured down the drain? I imagine that many of those compounds are small enough to pass through an osmotic filter.

      Is Homeland Security keeping an eye one the urea being stockpiled?

      --

      If I owned Texas and Hell, I would live in Hell and rent out Texas. Mark Twain

    14. Re:About time. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      My town has groundwater that merely gets the iron and some carbohydration removed before being sent to homes. It's drinkable without that but tends to stain things red and tastes like blood when unfiltered.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    15. Re:About time. by zildgulf · · Score: 1

      We in Atlanta, when we will need to do this recycling, will be prohibited from doing it because Alabama and Florida depend on our outflows.

    16. Re:About time. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Every time there is a story that says "Person X has has done something good" there is a reply that disparages them because someone else has already done that, or they should have started sooner, or they haven't gone far enough.

      That's because it's a valid criticism. When the country that bills itself as "the most advanced country in the world", "#1", etc. and is in fact the richest country by most measures, isn't doing something simple as well as some random country in the world's poorest continent, that means there's something seriously wrong.

      One of the biggest reasons for this is NIH, which is a giant problem in the USA.

    17. Re:About time. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      From my reading, pharmaceuticals do indeed get past the reverse-osmosis filters, but not activated charcoal filters. Many commercial RO systems include several stages of filtration, including RO, activated charcoal, UV, etc., so a complete system like that should be effective at removing these things. Of course, this system has to be serviced regularly since those filters need to be changed every so often.

    18. Re:About time. by CannonballHead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just as a note, please don't judge the rest of the US based on LA. Or SF. Or NY.

      It'd be like us basing our view of Europe based on ... London.

      In fact, a lot of CA has pretty normal people. LA and SF are just weird, overpopulated... LA especially, there's tons of urban sprawl in the middle of basically a desert. I don't get it.

    19. Re:About time. by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      If so many people are pissing out birth control pills, why is the birthrate so freaking high. Personally, I'd like to see the birthrate go lower. We should have less than unity gain.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    20. Re:About time. by operagost · · Score: 1

      Los Angeles is in California, not Texas. See, the topic up there? ^

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:About time. by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good, but we're not discussing "most of the U.S." but instead a place where water is scarce, and failing to make some changes will lead to some unpleasant consequences in a not very distant future.

      The obvious solution is STOP MOVING TO TEXAS. There are entirely enough people in Texas already, perhaps too many, and the available resources won't support more with current usage patterns.

      However, getting people to do such obvious things is difficult.

      Waste water recycling seems like a good idea, if it can be done in a way that doesn't use up too many other resources. I have no idea what the numbers on that look like.

      --
      WALSTIB!
    22. Re:About time. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      You do realize that your post is just as judgmental, right? So, maybe you drove down a street in LA or SF or watched one too many reality TV shows, and now you think it's ok to judge 15 million people based on your poorly formed preconceptions?

      How about not judging *any* people or huge metropolitan regions based on useless, inaccurate stereotypes?

    23. Re:About time. by dadioflex · · Score: 1

      Is your town in Romania?

    24. Re:About time. by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, in 100 years most of southern Florida will be under sea level.

    25. Re:About time. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Even a home system typically has a carbon prefilter, AND a gross matter filter before that... and maybe ANOTHER gross filter between the carbon and RO filters. The old RO filters were destroyed by chlorine; these are still on the market but less prevalent now

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:About time. by treeves · · Score: 1

      In the U.S.? You are not aware that the population of the U.S. is increasing not due to birth, but due to immigration? Yes, many people still want to come here despite how terrible it is.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    27. Re:About time. by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Just as a note, please don't judge the rest of the US based on LA. Or SF. Or NY.

      Something like 6% of the US population lives in LA, and it's our biggest city. Bit absurd to say "Don't judge us by a significant chunk of our population." The fact that our biggest city is pumping water all that way is the crown jewel example, but there are plenty of other ones. Few other cities are recycling waste water, which is why this is newsworthy. Think about how many of our citizens are convinced that individually bottled water is preferable to improving their tap water. Fracking up NY's water supply is another good example of how we're shitting where we drink.

  6. Fish have been shitting in my water for years by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Like your drinking water isn't already the toilet for fish, birds, and god-knows what other wildlife. Get over yourself, Sally.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Fish have been shitting in my water for years by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      and yet people still swim in public pools full of piss.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:Fish have been shitting in my water for years by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I don't drink water. Fish "function" in it. - W.C. Fields.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  7. That's how bad the situation is... by uzd4ce · · Score: 2

    That it's being considered really shows how bad the drought situation in Texas is. I'm sure the quality of the water will be fine, but for people to mentally get over the stigma requires some serious problem that needs to be addressed. Pretty much the whole state is "hell" and relief does not seem anywhere in the distant future: http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/expert_assessment/seasonal_drought.html

    1. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by Aranykai · · Score: 1

      The problem is only being exacerbated by this extremely warm summer this year as well. There aren't many lawns left in my neighborhood anymore. I haven't had to cut my grass in almost a month.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    2. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      What exactly do people think happens to waste water? If your water comes out of a river or lake, unless you happen to be at the headwaters....

    3. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by residieu · · Score: 1

      I haven't had to cut my grass in almost a month.

      Sounds like a benefit, then. When I get a house, i'm installing astro-turf for my lawn. I hate mowing.

    4. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by vlm · · Score: 2

      Sounds like a benefit, then. When I get a house, i'm installing astro-turf for my lawn. I hate mowing.

      You're on the same path as I was many years ago. What I discovered along the way about astroturf:

      Astroturf lawns literally stink from bird / animal waste, and try to turn themselves back into soil/turf unless you use almost as much water to clean them as you would to water a regular lawn, unless you live in AZ or TX or something where you'd practically need a waterfall to keep the lawn damp. So astroturf is only a net water win if you live in a desert and the HOA bans xeriscapes because its too cheap (legally enforced conspicuous consumption, etc)

      Also astroturf is remarkably expensive. More expensive than most other outdoor groundcover at the time I researched.

      If you're trying to avoid mowing, put in paver bricks if you like pulling weeds out of the decorative cracks between the bricks, or put in poured concrete patio if you like looking at random shrinkage / settling cracks. Also structures like decks kill most of the plants underneath them by shading.

      The local govt building permit requirements and exception processes warp the market so much, its almost not worth discussing across political boundaries.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by camperdave · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think what I'll do is develop a grass that only grows an inch and a quarter tall, and then retire on the hush-money from lawn mower companies.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      I think what I'll do is develop a grass that only grows an inch and a quarter tall,

      Clover. Doesn't need mowing (or any care at all), stays green later in the season, and displaces weeds. Feels great on bare feet, too.

    7. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      it already exists.. it's just really bloody expensive.. local place has it for ~1-2$ a square foot. they sell it for specialty things (like scaped gardens that have grass in areas not accessible with mowers)

      http://www.plantdelights.com/Ophiopogon-japonicus-Gyoku-Ryu-Perennial-Dwarf-Mondo-Grass/productinfo/551/

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    8. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by ananamouse · · Score: 1

      "Texas" is an old native-american word meaning, 'Once you cross over into this territory the Law will stop chasing you because if they caught you nothing they could do would be worse than to leave you here.' People can handle drinking a little piss.

    9. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So astroturf is only a net water win if you live in a desert and the HOA bans xeriscapes because its too cheap (legally enforced conspicuous consumption, etc)

      If your HOA bans xeriscapes, then you should stick with regular grass, and stop complaining about the issues involved. After all, that's the choice you made by buying into that development; there's no way you couldn't have known that xeriscapes weren't allowed before signing the contract.

      If you want to do xeriscaping, make sure to buy a house in a development that allows it. In fact, if you're contemplating buying a house in an HOA, make sure to look over all the crazy rules and regulations to make sure you're OK with them all. If not, then don't buy it!! If you somehow missed it, then suck it up and pay the water fees for your stupidity.

      This isn't to say that all HOAs are bad or Nazis; I've lived in one that was actually pretty good, they kept up the pool and the common areas, and stayed out of everyone's business otherwise, and had low fees (enough to cover the pool, which of course can be a little pricey). I lived in another one that wasn't great (their fees were even higher than the first one, but there was no pool at all, so I think someone was pocketing some money because there's no way the maintenance for the one puny common area could have cost that much), but they didn't say much about what anyone did with their lawn either. These were both in Phoenix AZ, where xeriscaping is a pretty big trend due to the climate.

    10. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's a good one for dry climates. Try dichondra instead. It's a little hard to get started, but once it's in place, it doesn't grow very tall, stays green year-round, and is pretty effective at keeping weeds out.

    11. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Looks crappy, though, especially when it flowers.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      The flowers are the best part! They keep the local bee population healthy and these important creatures closer to your garden.

    13. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Around here clover grows about a foot high, more or less... not suitable for lawns.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    14. Re:That's how bad the situation is... by vlm · · Score: 1

      In fact, if you're contemplating buying a house in an HOA, make sure to look over all the crazy rules and regulations to make sure you're OK with them all

      Its worse than that... a HOA makes you infinitely personally liable as a member for their dumb mistakes. So if they lose a multi-million dollar lawsuit, you as a fraction of the HOA get a share of that liability. And HOAs as a group seem to have a reputation for dumb decisions.

      So you need to make sure anyone who could sue you is OK with how the HOA is run, not just you personally.

      Homes outside a HOA always sell for more than equivalent homes inside a HOA. Always. Its just that in some areas, there are no homes outside HOAs. Whoops.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  8. Rick Peery Ad by sgt+scrub · · Score: 3, Funny

    See! Were having to drink our own piss. Do you really want Rick Peery for president?!?

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Rick Peery Ad by JazzHarper · · Score: 1

      See! Were having to drink our own piss. Do you really want Rick Perry for president?!?

      Cheapskate Republicans would rather let children and the elderly drink their own piss than spend a paltry billion or two on orgone cloudbusters.

    2. Re:Rick Peery Ad by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Rick Perry is too busy using emanate domain, stealing land from people and giving it to his friends and cronies, to bother running for President. If he actually runs, I guess that means he ran out of land to steal.

    3. Re:Rick Peery Ad by antdude · · Score: 1

      Who were having to drink our own piss? [grin]

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:Rick Peery Ad by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      As someone that worked for a law firm that handled removing people from land in Waxahachie when I was in college, your frightenly close to the truth. Not that I could prove intent but, he helped doom the supercollider project knowing most removals would end up going to be sold off at a fraction of what the government was paying. When W was moved out and he moved up he knowingly, IMHO, set it up for the juniors (w.bush & perot) to pick up the land for $1/acre. Perot Jr. has morals and things with W were too hot so Hunt ended up with it. Though I'd bet my left nut W ended up with plenty from it in a "lateral". Anyway. Everybody in Texas knows he has been making side money off of pushing people off of their land for years. It would be nice for some hard evidence to come forward while he is running for president. Hopefully that much spot light will shake the tree hard enough.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    5. Re:Rick Peery Ad by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      Texas proper is We're or We are for you Americans. If your also trailer trash or "a parky" like me you don't have to add the '. It is understood since our schools have few books and those only discussed god, so expecting invisible things is perfectly acceptable.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  9. Lack of strategic planning by scarboni888 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's amazing to me that this type of thing only gets implemented due to a crisis when it should be obvious from the get go that developing and improving the methods of recycling and reclamation should always be part of the way we do anything.

    1. Re:Lack of strategic planning by vlm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's amazing to me that this type of thing only gets implemented due to a crisis when it should be obvious from the get go that developing and improving the methods of recycling and reclamation should always be part of the way we do anything.

      Not everywhere...

      I'm currently sitting less than a mile upwind of one of the great lakes... The energy requirement for this sewage filtration process has a far larger environmental impact than just regular sewage treatment combined with pumping a bit more water out of the lake. We could probably reduce out draw out of the lake 50% with this technology, at the mere cost of kilotons of extra fly ash and mercury dumped into the lake from our coalburners ... the same lake we're getting our drinking water out of...

      California / desert SW solutions are not appropriate everywhere. If anything, on average, east of the mississippi river, we have way too much fresh water and need to focus tech on dealing with floods caused by rain. Much like fixing failing school systems or sick care systems, just dumping more money on the problem doesn't seem to help.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Lack of strategic planning by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Much like fixing failing school systems or sick care systems, just dumping more money on the problem doesn't seem to help.

      Nonsense! Much like school systems and healthcare, the answer lies with a standardized federal process! The only solution is The One solution, and it is best for all!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Lack of strategic planning by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The invisible hand is only the solution to banking crises.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  10. Taking the piss ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    If they aren't, I will!

  11. more stupidity by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Drinking wastewater makes as much sense as watering your lawn with potable water.

    1. Re:more stupidity by Piata · · Score: 1

      Good sir, are you suggesting I piss on my lawn?

    2. Re:more stupidity by Arlet · · Score: 1

      Well, it does have plenty of Nitrogen, which is something plants like. You may want to dilute it a bit, though.

    3. Re:more stupidity by vlm · · Score: 1

      Well, it does have plenty of Nitrogen, which is something plants like. You may want to dilute it a bit, though.

      Dilution... finally a purpose exists for American "lite" beer...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:more stupidity by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Most people drink treated waste water. By the time the Mississippi gets to New Orleans, that water has been past many major cities, all drawing from it and dumping into it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:more stupidity by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Dilution... finally a purpose exists for American "lite" beer...

      Do you mean to say we should water our lawns with a mixture of Bud and piss? Why would anyone be so cruel with their own grass?

    6. Re:more stupidity by pyrr · · Score: 1

      I thought plants craved electrolytes.

    7. Re:more stupidity by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      I heard once (I've no way to know if it's really true) that by the time Thames water reached London it had been through 7 people. It was claimed to be one of the reasons London drinking water was so soft and good tasting (it routinely won blind taste tests against bottled waters) .
      Shame about the bi-sexual fish though.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    8. Re:more stupidity by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Its got what plants crave!

    9. Re:more stupidity by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Shame about the bi-sexual fish though.

      Screw the fish. It's the bisexual Londoners that I worry about. I always knew it wasn't just the cooking.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:more stupidity by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Beer is actually good for your yard - especially if you have thatch. It also kills slugs.

    11. Re:more stupidity by vlm · · Score: 1

      Beer is actually good for your yard - especially if you have thatch. It also kills slugs.

      Well, its sorta like composted barley, which is a grain, just like (lawn) grass.

      I was implying a human processing stage before application, but just pouring it out on the ground could work.

      The yeast at the bottom of the fermenter from my brewing days was spread under the bushes to get rid of it... The plants did not have any observable negative effect. (laziness results in more dumped on the closer plants, which were not any more or less healthier than the further away plants)

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    12. Re:more stupidity by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Drinking wastewater makes as much sense as watering your lawn with potable water.

      No, drinking purified wastewater makes more sense than putting purified water on your lawn.

    13. Re:more stupidity by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Good sir, are you suggesting I piss on my lawn?

      I'd guess that urine is too salty and acidic to be used directly on a lawn. However, you don't need to kill all the microbes to water your lawn with it.

    14. Re:more stupidity by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that piss has what plants crave?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:more stupidity by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Well, it does have plenty of Nitrogen, which is something plants like. You may want to dilute it a bit, though.

      You mean, drink a lot of beer?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    16. Re:more stupidity by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      That picked my attention, the flow of any medium river is gigantic when compared with human drinking. So:

      According to wikipedia, average flow at London is 65.8 m^3/s. This means 5.685.120 m^3/day, or 5.685.120.000 liter/day.

      Give that everyone upriver uses not the 2 litre/day the physician recommend but that they sweat heavily so they use up to 4 l/day.

      So, 5685120000 / 4 means that, just to be able to drink all of it once, you need 1.421.280.000 people upriver. More than the population of China. If you assume the human use is the usual 2 l/day, you need half the world population upriver. If it has to pass through 7 people... well, you get the idea.

      That wasn't to difficult to check, I often wonder why people just repeat these legends without doing the most simple fact checking.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    17. Re:more stupidity by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Nicely debunked sir...

      --
      Nullius in verba
  12. Any sign of un-magical thinking is welcome... by John+Guilt · · Score: 1

    ...and, yes, I'd wear John Wayne Gacy's sweater, if it were clean, I needed a sweater, and it at-least-sorta fit.

    1. Re:Any sign of un-magical thinking is welcome... by pyrr · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't believe in homeopathy. I mean, when water molecules can have "memory" of some compound through insane amounts of dilution, how could it not have a really, really strong memory of the filthy urine and feces that were in it just minutes before? (Tim Minchin has a brilliant video that includes this flaw of homeopathic theory entitled "Storm")

    2. Re:Any sign of un-magical thinking is welcome... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      ...and, yes, I'd wear John Wayne Gacy's sweater, if it were clean, I needed a sweater, and it at-least-sorta fit.

      Why do most serial killers have the same middle name?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    3. Re:Any sign of un-magical thinking is welcome... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      ...and, yes, I'd wear John Wayne Gacy's sweater, if it were clean, I needed a sweater, and it at-least-sorta fit.

      Why do most serial killers have the same middle name?

      John Wayne Berkowitz,
      Theodore Wayne Kaczynski.
      Timothy Wayne McVeigh.
      Charles Wayne Whitman.
      Charles Wayne Manson.
      Richard Wayne Ramirez.
      George Wayne Bush (couldn't help that one, the dubya has to stand for something)?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Any sign of un-magical thinking is welcome... by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Actually, McVeigh was a mass-murderer and Whitman was a spree-killer.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    5. Re:Any sign of un-magical thinking is welcome... by leamanc · · Score: 1

      That's because that's how the media refer to these criminals. They give their full names so they won't be confused with another John Berkowitz or another Rick Ramirez, both of whom are perfectly normal, non-serial killer citizens. It's not like these folks went by their full names before they became well-known in the media.

      And G.W. Bush's middle name is Walker.

      --
      :q!
  13. Why put this story in the Idle directory? by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

    This is definitely "stuff that matters" especially for the people in the affected regions.

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  14. Bear Grylls by Das+Auge · · Score: 2

    If it's good enough for Bear, it's good enough for anyone.

    So...when do we start eating raw snakes?

  15. Re:shouldn't this be the norm by residieu · · Score: 1

    Depends on how much energy it takes. In many places, it's probably still cheaper to take it from wells and lakes/reservoirs. This is an inevitable necessity, though, at some point few places will have enough fresh water to provide for their populations.

  16. Troll headline? by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 3, Informative

    Urine? Well, yes, but also the feces and the nasty water from industry. As someone has pointed out already, if your WTP collects from the river, you are already drinking treated sewage water.

    At our plant, we have a water reclamation facility at the end of our process, the same type of facility used at the water treatment plant upstream. A WRF is common, iirc, in CA, but is, afaik, the first of its kind here in MN. It is far more common to discharge without the additional filtering and contaminant removal provided by a WRF.

    The water we discharge is tested biweekly for ammonia and phosphorus and daily for total coliforms and biological oxygen demand. Ammonia and coliforms are non-detectable ~99% of the time. We are doing a very good job turning sewage into drinking water for the next town on the river.

    /lab intern at a WWTP

    1. Re:Troll headline? by fritsd · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but I think larger problems are nearly undetectable levels of PCBs and dioxins (from industry) and estrogens (from the anticonception pill) that build up in your fatty tissues. Because they're already low concentration, they are more expensive to filter out.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  17. Milk is cow piss by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid, I used to think Milk was cow piss and I loved drinking milk. So, for me, I just don't see what the fuss is all about.

    1. Re:Milk is cow piss by cffrost · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, I used to think Milk was cow piss

      Nice way to change the topic to "The dismal state of education in this country"...

      Thanks, you just made me snarf my cow piss.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  18. Draining a Reservoir by CWCheese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And in Portland, they drain an entire reservoir after one guy takes a leak
    http://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2011/06/16/Reservoir-drained-due-to-urine/UPI-10781308249177/

    --
    Have a Day!
    1. Re:Draining a Reservoir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And in Portland, they drain an entire reservoir after one guy takes a leak

      The guy did take a leak, but there were other reasons to drain the reservoir:

      "officials said they are also concerned about unidentified objects Seater and four other people were taped dropping into the open reservoir."

  19. This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They've been recycling piss in the US for years, usually under the name Budweiser...

  20. what do you normally do with your wastewater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Huh? You Americans don't clean/recycle/process your waste water?
    You just dump your untreated wastewater into the local river, or what?

  21. Re:Drinking wanter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is TEXAS! We don't have a drought, we just have a God-induced anti-flood. He loves us SO much he wants to show us that, unlike in the age of Noah when a flood was the only thing that would wash the world clean of the heathens that overran it, we are SO loved by our Lord that he has taken away all of the water in a demonstration of how safe we are here on our planet!

    Climate change? That's for those Pussies in Seattle.

  22. like sausage-making by swan5566 · · Score: 1

    People want the end product, but no one wants to know how it's made. True in many contexts.

    --
    In debates about Christianity, there are two groups: those looking for answers, and those looking to just ask questions.
  23. Frankly... by Syberz · · Score: 1

    ... this should be done everywhere, not just drought stricken Texas. Water is a precious commodity that needs to be preserved, if we can recycle waste water and reduce the amount taken directly in nature with no adverse effects to us, go for it.

    --
    ~Syberz
    1. Re:Frankly... by forrie · · Score: 1

      Texas is close to the ocean, if they're going to spend money, why not also include desalinization equipment -- plenty of water there.

      I also read a couple years ago about a device invented for the military (mostly) that would literally create water out of the air. All of this equipment would be terribly expensive to acquire. However if these weather patterns are to become the "norm", seems like it might be prudent to do so and to continue to think of solutions "outside of the box" of what we typically expect for solutions.

      They could augment power constraints with massive solar and wind arrays.

      But who's gonna pay for it :-)

    2. Re:Frankly... by japhering · · Score: 1

      Texas is close to the ocean, if they're going to spend money, why not also include desalinization equipment -- plenty of water there.

      rtfa.. it says West Texas .. depending on the town it could be 1000 miles from the nearest ocean.

  24. They should ask South Africa for help by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    South Africa, being a dry country, has been doing this for years. All sewage gets sent to treatment farms, where it is cleaned, and the water from it are then placed back in the river systems from where it is used for irrigation, drinking water and everything else - just like rain water.

    South Africa also boasts that the water from the treatment plants are cleaner than rain water. My father is an electrical engineer and helped design one of the plants (the electrical systems obviously). The process is quite spectacular - and moreso than what is described here. For starters the first phase includes the sewage being cleaned by specially cultured bacteria to break it down, before chemical cleaning, filtering etc. step by step turns it back into pure H20.
    The two main waste products from the process is methane and solid waste. The solid waste is used to create fertilizers. The methane is burned off (being a clean-burning gas) but quite a few people here have converted their cars to run on methane (any gasoline car can be converted) and fill up there - for the moment at least (since the demand is pretty low and they have massive amounts they need to get rid off) the sewage treatment farms don't even charge them. Fill up the car, no cost.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    1. Re:They should ask South Africa for help by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Fill up the car, no cost.

      There's the obvious problem, the Texas economy would (got to be a tank or toilet joke in here somewhere...) if people could fill up their pick up trucks and SUVs for free.

    2. Re:They should ask South Africa for help by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >What about the heavy metals sewage often contains? Which farmer would use that? I realize this is Africa we're talking here about but still.

      This is the solid waste that's left *after* massive cleaning operations. And what goes into the fertilizer should be purely organic. Heavy metals and such get filtered out earlier in the process, like I said it's long and with many different steps (including activated carbon filtering as well).

      That said - South Africa really shouldn't be compared to the worst of Africa (and neither should most of the rest). The country has by far the best infrastructure on the continent and it also has some of the best Universities in the world with (among other things) some of the best engineering departments there are.
      There's a reason South African trained engineers get scooped up by Canadian, European and US companies - they are good. BMW has most of their research funding going to the engineering department of a South African university - and obviously they use the results of said research to develop new products for their cars.

      Now it's true that no South African university is MIT but they are not very far behind and certainly can keep up with at least the non-Ivy-league US schools (and in some cases even the Ivy Leagues).
      Remember that this country is the most likely candidate for the Square Kilometer Array - the largest radio-telescope network ever planned. South Africa did the world's first heart-transplant.

      While the country has many problems - we do have a lot of know-how (for now anyway, if we can stifle the brain-drain effect of our brightest minds emigrating), and this is the sort of thing we're good at.

      Ever wonder how the evil appartheid government kept the economy going during the sanction years when (among other things) we couldn't buy oil ?
      We have no oil, but we do have very rich coal resources, and we developed the first oil-from-coal process - and it kept all our cars and trucks and engines running. We have had access to oil for two decades now, and we still make most of our fuel that way - which means we buy only about 40% of the oil we require even now. Our electricity networks are safer than yours, all houses have earth-leakage protection (which automatically shuts off all power-systems in the event of a leak-to-ground, that has saved countless lives as almost any human-electric-shock event is a leak-to-ground as well).

      Short answer: water has always been in short supply, we know how to do stuff in this country and cleaning water for re-use is among the things we do BEST.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  25. Will it be ready by a useful time? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    If they just broke ground on it recently, I'm curious to know if it is supposed to be ready before, say, winter.

    Of course, being Texas they don't really have winter. Temperatures probably go from "Jesus Christ on roller-skates it's unbearably hot!" to "hey, my face is no longer melting off, but it is still miserably hot!".

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Will it be ready by a useful time? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Texas is big enough to have some pretty cruelly cold winter areas - even in Houston it gets nasty cold once in awhile, up in Amarillo, you're just a little puff of wind away from Saskatchewan.

  26. West Texas changing tourism slogan to... by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

    "West Texas....URINE for a surprise!"

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. This is nothing new by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    Arizona has been doing this for a long time. For the most part, the water treatment is less intense and it is distributed through a separate, non-potable system to be used for irrigation. Makes sense since it is cheaper (requires less filtration). However some of it is filtered further, and mixed in with water from wells and the CAP to go in to the drinking water.

    1. Re:This is nothing new by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      How do they handle inorganic pharmaceuticals like Lithium?

  29. BRAWNDO HAS WHAT PLANTS CRAVE by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    you mean water, like in the toilet?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  30. Late to the party by dthx1138 · · Score: 1

    Yawn.. here in Orange County, we've been doing this for over 3 years, because we're getting tired of people from up north bitching about us stealing their water. The plant they constructed near my house pumps out 80 mllion gallons of reclaimed water per day. Anybody who claims they can tell it used to be wastewater is insane.

    http://www.slashfood.com/2008/08/13/orange-county-produces-the-worlds-most-recycled-water/

    --
    I just found the box to change my sig. Um.... [timeless witticism].
  31. Homesteading Hell by SuperCharlie · · Score: 1

    We moved from the gulf coast of Texas (thats enuf hurricanes) to the Hill Country (central) trying to do homesteading and..dont laugh..rainwater collection... 2 years ago. We had grand ideas about farming and becoming self sufficient. In two years here we have had maybe 5-6 inches of rain total and been under burn bans for all but a few months because of the drought. Local cities are under stage 4 restrictions and it is so bad that wild deer are dying on the hoof from nothing to eat and all the vegetation being dead.

    We still have the grand ideas, but at the beginning of next month we are moving the plan to Missouri..where it actually rains.

  32. Far from first... by __aazsst3756 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chanute, KS was the first in the US, from October 14th 1956 to March 14th, 1957. The water met microbial standards of the time, but was discontinued as soon as possible due to public acceptance.

    Windhoek, the capital of the Republic of Namibia (Sahara desert) recycles about 30% of their water to supply a population of 300,000 residents. They started in 1968.

    Not common, but far from a new idea.

    1. Re:Far from first... by phik · · Score: 1

      Actually... Namibia is a couple thousand miles from the Sahara... you must have meant Kalihari

  33. Is it necessary by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    for me to drink my own urine? NO! But I like the taste.

  34. Re:shouldn't this be the norm by __aazsst3756 · · Score: 1

    Cheaper to pump it into a stream and let mother nature clean it up before being pulled into the plant by the next town. Although I did not answer your question.

  35. Re:Drinking wanter? by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does it the water burn when it gets out the tap?

    Only if your faucet has Gonorrhea. ;-)

  36. This topic is ripe with jokes by Tilgore+Krout · · Score: 1

    This is old news, Texas has been recycling piss for years and bottling it as Lone Star and Pearl beer.

    --
    main(){char*c="main(){char*c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c, 34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
  37. The road to Urinetown by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Recycle human waste into drinkable water.
    Step 2: Privatize the water recycling business.
    Step 3: Because human waste is now a commodity, pass laws forbidding anyone to pee anywhere but in a restroom with an approved capture facility.
    Step 4: Charge people for entry into the restrooms.
    Step 5: Profit!

    Congratulations, you've started down the road to Urinetown!

    "Those who made dough from debasing / Need erasing, need the knife / Let their blood flow like Campari, / We're not sorry - Hey that's life!
    They're not sorry! I'm not sorry! No one's sorry, no one's sorry, 'til they get to Urinetown!"

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  38. This is Texas we're talking about by Benfea · · Score: 1

    As far as they're concerned, the world of science is part of a vast international communist conspiracy to make everyone think the world is round. The crisis is the only thing they'll accept as proof that they needed to do this.

  39. Pharmaceuticals by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    That will be the biggest obstacle; very (and varying) complicated chemistry and as far as I can tell it doesn't have any End of Life requirements placed upon it, even though the environmental impacts are already being seen. Perhaps it is time for Big Pharma to kick in a few sheckels to help out with the clean ups, especially for potable water intake - without us asking our doctors to be sure.

  40. Re:Drinking wanter? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    The conspiracy theories I've heard are that estrogen-related compounds get into the water, are difficult to get out, and may be having an effect on men. A google search came up with a daily mail report and something from the pope, so I have no idea how seriously to take that notion, but it would be entertaining if Texas became more liberal.

    I think it's positive they're proposing this, rather than a desalination plant on the coast and pumping the water long distances. Although drinking purified water from the ocean doesn't have the ick factor of drinking pee, it requires a lot of energy and causes much more environmental damage compared to water recycling.

  41. Um no. by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    As anyone in a waste water plant could probably tell you, only a small amount of water that goes through sewage actually comes from your toilet. The vast majority likely comes from your shower, tub, sink, dishes, watering you lawn, washing your car, rain water, etc... You don't think they maintain a special pipe for urine right?

  42. Dave Berry > Rick Perry by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    For example, if you read about some religious sect in India that believes God wants people to drink their own urine, you don't say to yourself, "Isn't it amazing, the diversity of belief systems man has developed in his never-ending quest to understand and cope with the intricate moral dilemmas posed by a complex and uncertain world?" No, what you say to yourself is, "These people have the brains of a trout."

    Meanwhile, over in India, the sect members are getting a major chuckle over the fact that some American basketball players cross themselves before they take foul shots. "As if God cares about foul shots!" the sect members howl, tears streaming down their faces. "Say, is this my urine or yours?"

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  43. Trees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is this great invention called "trees". Apparently when you plant them they can retain moisture in the soil. That makes the vegetation around need less water, it prevents from flooding and they actually pull moisture out of thin air! If you use trees instead of concrete you will be able to use the trees to reduce the temperature in the hot summer days. They even take some of the road-dust out of the air. You can even talk about firewood from the trees. Not much, but it's free.

    Imagine a town that banned lawns and insisted all should have trees!

    1. Re:Trees by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Many neighborhoods in Southern California are required to have at least one tree at every house.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Trees by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      Ummm....

      It really depends on the type of tree planted. Many trees will require as much if not more water than the lawn. Cottonwoods are a good example - they require huge amounts of water - they grow in the Mojave desert along riverbeds and quite literally suck the river beds dry.

      What you should be planting is native plants. They are not a huge burden on the water supply. In arid areas mesquite, ironwood and joshua trees are a good choices, but the do grow slowly. Many cacti are quite nice looking. They also can provide for better home security - just plant cholla along your fence line. It's also great around and below the windows of your house. Nobody in their right mind goes near the stuff!

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
  44. Re:Drinking wanter? by camperslo · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should study some people in Chula Vista California. For about two years they drank some not so completely treated wastewater (meant for grass at golf courses etc).

    http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070823/news_lz1ed23top.html

  45. The future of food by Rizimar · · Score: 1

    If this takes off, then a tall glass of urine-derived water could wash down the Shitburger. The relative quality of food will be so high that it'll put McDonald's out of business.

  46. I'm waiting by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    Where's the "frosty piss" guy when you need him?

  47. London != yummy by fritsd · · Score: 1

    I heard once (I've no way to know if it's really true) that by the time Thames water reached London it had been through 7 people.

    I heard that too as an anecdote, and from a Londoner, but if anybody considers it "good tasting" then they've never in their life drunk normal tap water.

    London tap water is chlorinated a lot (not as bad as Florence though) and you'll breathe out the chlorine vapour after you've brushed your teeth with it. Yuk.

    I understand they can't be choosy, but still... aren't there always a lot of floods in Britain because it rains so much? May be a better idea to make an overflow lake somewhere in flood zone land (Norwich?) and pipe it to London to dilute/improve the taste of their chlorinated "I can't believe it's not water". Can any Brit tell us why they haven't already done this.

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    1. Re:London != yummy by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I don't know how it works for drinking water, but for sewage outfalls they have to put enough chlorine in to last for the entire length of the outflow pipe. Otherwise, green nasties grow in the outflow pipe. I imagine that with the age and condition of London's water pipes, they have a similar situation.

      In other words, it's probably not the source that determines the amount of chlorine that has to be in the water when it hits your tap. Living further from the treatment site probably also improves things... and maybe something as simple as putting the water in a pitcher in the fridge would improve matters.

      NYC has fairly heavy chlorine taste as well, and their water is pristine when it enters the city from the Catskills.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  48. Re:Drinking wanter? by McGuirk · · Score: 2

    Climate change? This shit's fairly normal. We get a drought like this every 20 years or so. Our summers always have long bursts of 110+ days. Likewise, most of the younger generation has little to no contact with Christianity, though many of them still maintain a facade around their families.

  49. Re:Drinking wanter? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    This just in, Texas town cuts water:

    http://edition.cnn.com/2011/US/08/08/heat.wave/

    Actual quote:

    "Right now our water towers have no water in them at all," said the town's mayor, Donald Kile. "According to the weather forecast we got no relief coming. We're believing and we're praying for rain."

    How about instead of praying you make some calls and see if you can get some water trucked in, smart guy?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  50. I'm not sure by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I don't work in wastewater treatment, I am just aware of the existence and general development/deployment since they send all water customers a newsletter about it and I actually read that newsletter.

  51. Re:Jumping intermediate steps by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    (I might also invite you Texas readers to come to Pennsylvania, where water is plentiful.)

    Not a good idea. It's better for you that they stay where they are. Let's keep the Rick Perry-worshiping morons in one place.

  52. Not New by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    The city of St. Louis has been doing this for several decades now, putting it in cans, and shipping it out to the rest of the world under the brand name, "Budweiser",. . .

  53. Re:Drinking wanter? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    Easier to truck the people out than to truck people in. I doubt his town is so important that it couldn't be located elseware for a few months.

  54. I cannot believe that no one has posted this yet by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    "Is it necessary for me to drink my own urine? No! But I do it anyway, cause it's sterile and I like the taste."

    Patches O'Houlihan

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  55. So? by pimpsoftcom · · Score: 1

    Astronauts do it, why cant cowboys?

    --
    - d
  56. crap (pun) by pbjones · · Score: 1

    most of the waste water is not urine. it's also laundry water, gallons of clean water used to flush your several ounces of urine away, and the water you have showered it. As it has been said, if your town draws water from a river, you get this anyway. Split your water system into clean and grey water and you get less of a problem. You don't need drinking grade water for many industrial processes or watering parks and gardens. Plan ahead and wake up to the fact that people are using more water than some areas of the world can provide.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  57. cue the theme from Urinetown.... by hguorbray · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urinetown

    It's the oldest story -
    Masses are oppressed
    Faces, clothes and bladders
    All distressed
    Rich folks get the good life
    Poor folks get the woe
    In the end
    It's nothing you don't know

    You're at Urinetown!
    Your ticket should say Urinetown!
    No refunds, this is Urinetown!
    We'll keep that dough!
    _____________________________________________________
    It's a privilege to pee

    I run the only toilet
    In this part of town, you see
    So, if you've got to go
    You've got to go through me

    It's a privilege to pee
    Water's worth its weight
    In gold these days

    No more bathrooms
    Like in olden days
    You come here and pay a fee
    For the privilege to pee

    HIghly recommended if any high school or community group is doing this in your area

    -I'm just sayin'

  58. Happens more often lately... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there another story about this just last week?
    In another area, that is..

    Shouldn't that start making this _not_ news?

  59. No good idea by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Yes most things can be eliminated with this process, but if you are only treating urine in water, but people throw out all sorts of sh*t in those sewers, paint, thinner, oil, medicine, etc...etc....

    I would not touch this with a 10 foot pole, how about just moving to another town with more water?

  60. But they're horrible poisonous chemicals!! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    slimy sewage is cleansed with peroxide and ultraviolet light

    Peroxide and UV light are both extremely toxic and teratogenic artificial chemicals, and I insist on my little bunnykins (Jocasta and Aquapodes) not being exposed to anything but natural organic materials. Like Vibrio Cholerae and Salmonella typhi. As pure as nature intended.

    Now that you've upset me, I'm going to have to take the little darlings to the beach to recover from the shock with some nice healthy sea breeezes and some sunbathing.

    You dirty scientists trying to destroy the safety of the natural world with your dangerous chemicals.
    Dr Bob was right - always listen to your chiroproctologist on matters of bacteriology. And nuclear physics. Dr Bob knows his shit.

    This post may contain sarcasm. Read with care.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  61. Re:Drinking wanter? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    Funny, but no, I meant the environmental damage from the likely coal-generated electricity needed to pump the water all that way, and the waste brine from the plant.