Slashdot Mirror


PC Designer Says PC "Going the Way of the Vacuum Tube"

jbrodkin writes "One of the original engineers of IBM's first PC says PCs are 'going the way of the vacuum tube, typewriter, vinyl records, CRT and incandescent light bulbs.' With the 30th anniversary of the IBM 5150 (running MS-DOS) coming this week, IBM CTO Mark Dean argues that the post-PC world is very much upon us, perhaps not surprising given that IBM sold its PC business in 2005. Microsoft, of course, weighed in as well, saying the PC era is nowhere near over. But perhaps in the future we will consider a personal computer anything a person does computing on — whether that be laptop, tablet, smartphone, or something that hasn't even been invented yet."

54 of 685 comments (clear)

  1. supposedly obsolete tech by YouWantFriesWithThat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Me: "I'll take supposedly obsolete technology for $200"

    Trebek: "the vacuum tube, typewriter, vinyl records, CRT and incandescent light bulbs"

    Me: "What are things I have in my house"

    *DING DING*

    1. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Vacuum cleaners are different than vacuum tubes.

    2. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Guitar amps and bass amplifiers, and preamps for vocals, for their nice distortion.

    3. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by qinjuehang · · Score: 2

      Russian fighters

    4. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by QuasiSteve · · Score: 2

      what could you possibly still be using that has vacuum tubes in it?

      Amplifier?

      Though most people who 'use' those, just 'use' it as a conversation piece.
      e.g. http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_6_4/images/manley-stingray-amplifier.jpg

    5. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your microwave. Ok it is a magnatron, but still its a vacuum device (electrons in a vacuum). But vacuum tubes are far from obsolete.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    6. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      I'm going to respond to your comment and say "amplifier", without reading the seven responses your comment already has, which I'm sure mine won't be duplicating. This is how to post well, right?

    7. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      CRT's are vacuum tubes. also you can still get some high end tube based amps

    8. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by ledow · · Score: 2

      But it's not at all far-fetched to imagine (or even FIND) millions of people without any of those things in their house, even in the first-world countries. I can probably name half a dozen close friends for whom it's true, and I'm only in my thirties.

      I have only CRT (because I'm too cheap to buy an LCD when I have something that works, and like my 4:3 ratio on my TV, and use my laptop for more than my TV), and incandescent lightbulbs (slowly being replaced as they blow with energy-savers because a) I'm not going to replace them UNTIL they blow, b) energy-savers are cheap and c) they light enough for my purposes so I don't notice any functional difference).

      I have NEVER owned a vinyl record in my life. Not once. I barely used cassette tapes outside of computer games. I was brought up on CD's. Even the only tapes I have in my possession are for the ZX Spectrum - I've not used them in the last 20 years at least.

      I have typed on a typewriter and find it painful and inconvenient and can't name a single other person who actually USES one (my father-in-law is a professional children's author and he's used Word for the past decade at least). A couple of people I know have one in the attic but that's about it.

      I only know vacuum tubes from one that a worker at Bletchley Park gave my brother (that was part of their reconstruction of the famous machines there). I've never used one, don't own one (except hidden in other more modern devices where the definition is REALLY stretched to include them), never made a circuit with one, and only know of one electronics supplier that can actually sell them to you in anything less than 1000's.

      And PC's are in the same sort of categories - few people have a desktop PC nowadays. Everyone has laptops or smartphones or netbooks. The desktops that are about are either specialist (gamers, overclockers, research), business (where space and portability aren't an issue), or just plain old.

      The article is right - the only thing it misses is that a laptop IS a PC - just what the PC would have been if we could have afforded it from the start ("Hmm, shall I design a small personal computer that everyone has one of, or a huge thing that can't be moved that are shared one to a family because of their expense/size").

    9. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by AngryDeuce · · Score: 2

      Hipsters flaming hipsters. I knew this day would eventually come...

    10. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      Me: "I'll take supposedly obsolete technology for $200" Trebek: "the vacuum tube, typewriter, vinyl records, CRT and incandescent light bulbs" Me: "What are things I have in my house" *DING DING*

      While in understand your point - I still have those as well, I think your comment misses the articles point:

      The PC, as we used to know it - a big box that runs an OS and is not very portable and ties you to specific data storage locations and programs, is on teh way out. It is being replaced by smaller, portable devices that perform the same functions (which still are important) but using different technologies and in some ways a completely different a paradigm of ow we accomplish a task.

      We still do the same things but what we use to do them changes - using your example, I still:

      have a TV (but instead of a vacuum tube monster it uses solid state circuity); write letters (but with a Word processor and not a typewriter); listen to music (except it's digital not analog 90% of the time); look at a monitor (but solid state not cathode ray technology); and illuminate my room (more and more with low power bulbs rather than incandescent).

      I think the real point is as technology changes previously ubiquitous things that are used to perform functions get replaced by newer things that do the same functions.

      That doesn't mean the old tech is useless, it may even be better than what replaced it, but it becomes relegated to niche markets as mainstream users move to the new technology.

      Vacuum tubes produce a unique sound that digital doesn't replicate - but for 99% of the market the reliability and low cost of solid state audio was good enough and so replaced tubes as the dominate product. Still, McIntosh, while a tiny part of the market, survives for those that want a different experience. All though they have gone solid state as well; but I would suppose with tighter specs than the mass market stuff.

      Sometimes, even when the new stiff is better the old sticks around because it performs a task that the new tech doesn't - which is while dot matrix printers are still her as well as typewriters and fax machines.

      Of course, in some cases the new tech still can't do everything old tech can - look at the pencil, for example.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    11. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by Phreakiture · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your microwave oven will have a cavity magnetron in it, which is a vacuum tube.

      Also, if you have an older TV, CRTs are vacuum tubes.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    12. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      And they go to 11...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by rgviza · · Score: 2

      There is very little distortion with tubes unless you overdrive them. They do clip more musically than silicon, yes, but that's not the only reason people use them.

      A tube mic preamp can be much cleaner and musical with less THD than any amplifier on a chip.

      Some of the cleanest, most distortion free preamps in the world are tube driven. I'm not talking about $200 t00b amps from guitar center, but amps like the universal audio 610 or 6176 or some of the Manley stuff. If you are getting a distorted signal from these you are doing it wrong, unless you are using the distortion as an effect.

      There is equally great FET technology though (think Neve and Great River) which also clip musically and use transistors.

      Most analog audio technology has soft clip properties... however this is probably in the middle of the list of reasons why analog audio gear rocks. Cheap analog gear sucks unless used as a "cheap analog gear" effect. It's noisy, typically the circuit boards are filthy and your work sounds like shit due to the accumulation of noise across all of your tracks. It adds up fast ;-)

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    14. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by obarthelemy · · Score: 2

      especially with those gold-plated, polarity-optimized ethernet cables !

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    15. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 2

      "And PC's are in the same sort of categories - few people have a desktop PC nowadays"

      Nonsense.

      As I sit here at work I see hundreds of desktop pcs. At home I have a gaming pc as do my three kids. my wife does have a netbook but she only reads blogs and watches the news. I do also have an iPad and an iPhone bit it's still gonna be a long long time before I give up my desktop pc. Most of my friends are the same.

      "vacuum tubes...I've never used one, don't own one " Yes you have, and yes you do.., "I have only CRT " google for what a CRT is.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    16. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by hjf · · Score: 2

      It doesn't. Tube amps *have* distortion, that's why they're good for distorting guitars. Transistor amps don't distort (under their acceptable input range), take less power, generate less heat, have unlimited service life, etc. The difference is that transistor amps distort sharply and tube amps distort "gracefully".

      It's a lot like film vs. digital photography. Film gives you grain, colors are distorted (depending on what film you're using. Velvia doesn't look the same as Portra). Nowadays, digital looks just perfect. No grain under appropriate light conditions, and the colors of a pro digital camera can be calibrated to look exactly like a test chart. You CAN (I do) use film for artistic purposes. And there are parallels with transistor vs tube distortion: Digital photography overexposes sharply and film overexposes "gracefuly". Curious.

      In short: using a tube amp at the output stage of your CD player is stupid. You're distorting what the mixing engineer recorded on that CD. And if you are all about playing it as the artist intended, then why the hell are you distorting it then?

    17. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by dnahelicase · · Score: 2

      My father still listens to a 40's era (huge) radio. It's a conversation piece for sure, but it does also sound quite nice. Lots of vacuum tubes in the back.

      Plus, vacuum tubes are fairly expensive to buy now. I know they aren't really making them too much any more, but old technology that isn't useful doesn't get expensive, so someone must be using them. I doubt there are too many collectors that just like to have vacuum tubes without an application for them.

    18. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by AJH16 · · Score: 2

      Technically there is some distortion inherent in tubes, just not the kind you are thinking of when you think distortion. That is the reason they are preferred by many. They give the sound a characteristic "warm" sound which is precisely from the lack of digital precision involved in a digital conversion. This is why people have worked on tube modeling DPS effects to attempt to replicate the subtle way in which tubes distort the sound.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    19. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by mpeskett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seems to me that the trend isn't "the death of the PC" so much as "the rise of shiny toys for simpletons who don't know how to computer"

      Use of traditional PCs might decline among those who want to use a computer the same way they use a microwave –to do a handful of simple pre-defined tasks, without any control or knowledge of the details– and maybe that's a big market segment these days, but I can't see myself replacing my big box any time soon.

      I prefer the form factor, the desk setup, the ability to open the thing up and tinker with it, the extra power and storage... everything.

    20. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by eexaa · · Score: 2

      FYI, the "warmth" you describe is actually caused by vibration of internal components (mostly the grid in triode) which usually reflects the actual harmonic tones being played. When amplified, it gives the signal almost unhearable chorus-like effect.

    21. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Or the believe the tube 'sounds' better.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by geekoid · · Score: 2

      No, because you believe they sound better.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      I don' t know about *your* microwave oven, but *mine* has a vacuum tube.

      My TV also has one, it is eight years old flat CRT and its auto-adjusted picture is still beautiful so I'm not replacing it.

    24. Re:supposedly obsolete tech by MrMatto · · Score: 2

      Tube amps add a touch of harmonic distortion, which can make the music sound richer, deeper and fuller. It adds subtle harmony to the sound. They are still used in mixing and mastering for many different styles of music.

  2. Nahhh... Never Happen by rtkluttz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nahhh.. Never happen. Smaller more portable devices are coming and filling in the gaps and taking market share, but there will always be power users who need as much power as can be fit in a form factor about the size of a PC and that power will keep increasing just as it always has.
    Pundits just WANT the PC to go away because they realize they screwed up in that early product cycle by giving all the power to the users. Users have the ability to change anything or do anything they want and can un-cripple anything they do to that class of devices. They want to introduce something shiny and new that is locked down and sealed box like smart phones where they can cripple them and sell the features back to you piecemill.

    --
    Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
    1. Re:Nahhh... Never Happen by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 2

      When is a tablet a PC and when is a PC a tablet? To me its all marketing speak to hide the fact that PC just got a lot more portable.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    2. Re:Nahhh... Never Happen by realityimpaired · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At home, perhaps. But for business? There's no way a tablet or a phone could suit the needs of a business user, putting together things like presentations, spreadsheets, etc. Let alone working with tools that keep everything going.

      And as long as people still have that kind of stuff on their desk at work, they're going to ask why they have to make do with a tiny screen to do that stuff at home. Perhaps the PC as we know it is going the way of the dodo, but a screen with an operating system and some kind of input device (keyboard/mouse/etc.) is not going anywhere. For one, it's really not possible to type at a decent speed using a touch screen like on an ipad... no tacticle response. Bluetooth keyboards are well and good, but there's an input lag that will screw with anybody who types faster than 80wpm or so.

      So yes, perhaps the PC as we know it is going the way of the dodo. But I doubt very much that things like laptops, particularly portable light-weight laptops, are going anywhere any time soon. Perhaps when we see more devices like the Asus eee transformer in larger more usable screen sizes, we'll start to see a traditional PC disappearing, but I doubt we'll ever see a transformer like that with a 15" or 16" screen, because it kind of defeats the point of having a tablet.

    3. Re:Nahhh... Never Happen by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      > So who would want the fuss and bother of a PC-sized
      > box when they can have a virtual slice of a huge server,
      > and connect to the horsepower using their smartphones?

      All it will take is just one network outtage and people will get over that idea real quick.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  3. Accounting and marketing departments by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    not many businesses nowadays depend solely on PCs for their income

    But they do depend on PCs to count their income and to make promotional material to sell their products to make income.

  4. Macs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    But perhaps in the future we will consider a personal computer anything a person does computing on — whether that be laptop, tablet, smartphone, or something that hasn't even been invented yet.

    Like macs? Please for the love of gods, can we please refer to them as PCs? They are fracking personal computers!

    1. Re:Macs by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

      Someone: What's that?
      Mac Owner: It's my Mac.
      Someone: Nice PC.
      Mac Owner: It's not a PC, it's a Mac.
      Someone: What's the difference?
      Mac Owner: The difference is that it's a Mac and not a PC.
      Someone: Is it yours?
      Mac Owner: Yes.
      Someone: It's your computer?
      Mac Owner: Yes.
      Someone: Yours personally? You own it?
      Mac Owner: Yes.
      Someone: So it's your personal computer but not a personal computer?
      Mac Owner: Exactly. Now you get it.

  5. Dumbest Prediction Ever? by shellster_dude · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "post PC" age is not upon us. Small computers and cellphones largely do what PC's used to, but they don't even come close to being capable of handling high-end gaming, graphic editing, movie editing, sound editing, and heavy mathematical computation. Small computers also aren't particularly convenient for software development in general. Unless the landscape radically shifts those items aren't going away anytime soon.

    Someone is just trying to get a little press buzz and desparately hoping the world takes notice of them.

    1. Re:Dumbest Prediction Ever? by tepples · · Score: 2

      Small computers and cellphones largely do what PC's used to, but they don't even come close to being capable of handling high-end gaming

      Which home users tend to do on dedicated devices such as Xbox 360, PLAYSTATION 3, and the forthcoming Wii U.

      graphic editing

      Doable on an iPad according to Google.

      movie editing, sound editing, and heavy mathematical computation [and] software development

      Which, as I understand it, most home users tend not to want to do in the first place. I fear that PCs will become something that only a business buys.

    2. Re:Dumbest Prediction Ever? by rebelwarlock · · Score: 2

      Someone is just trying to get a little press buzz and desparately hoping the world takes notice of them.

      "Remember that guy who said PCs where going away?"

      "No, but he sounds like a dumbass."

      Yeah, that should work out great for him.

  6. Personal computers by DragonHawk · · Score: 2

    From TFS: "But perhaps in the future we will consider a personal computer anything a person does computing on..."

    That's what the term "personal computer" means in the first place. Person. Computer. It's not that big a leap to get from where we are to... where we are.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  7. The decline of civilization by superdude72 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The PC will not be obsolete as long as there are still a few people around who actually *do some work*, rather than just consume entertainment.

    1. Re:The decline of civilization by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2

      It's simply a matter of terminology. The PC is going away, but workstations are here to stay

  8. Re:Affordable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Okay, seriously? You mean to tell me you can't fathom people spending gobs of cash on some bad-ass box when they're spending 4-500 on things the size of our hands!? Please...

    PCs aren't going anywhere and the idiot who made the original comment about this is some moron who has his head in the cloud a bit too much.

  9. Eh? by ledow · · Score: 2

    Why is a laptop not a PC?

    It's a personal computer (you can't get more personal than sitting on someone's lap). It has full compatibility with "PC" software and quite a lot of hardware, has the same external ports, has the same keyboard and video standards, and has the same kind of display. It's just that someone shrunk it and stuck a hinge in the middle.

    The standalone desktop - sure, that might be on the way out, but what do you think all those SOHO servers are sitting in? A laptop? A 19" rack? Nope. But a laptop IS a PC - it's the PC we would have had 50 years ago if the technology allowed it. If you'd asked someone in the 60's to design a "personal computer", it would have been portable, and come with all the added extras (screen, keyboard, disks) built in - and it would connect wirelessly and run for hours off a battery without needing to be plugged in. That's sitting on most people's desks and in most student's bags nowadays.

    Though they'd probably add "all the computers work the same", "they all use the same standards" and "the contents of world libraries and textbooks would be free". You can't have everything though, in a corporate world.

    I hate smartphones. They are underpowered computers slapped into a device that has a single primary purpose. I like my general purpose computers for 99.9% of things I want to do and if I want to phone, I Skype or use the cheapest, most basic mobile phone available. The point of the PC (and a laptop) is that is a general purpose machine. The other gadgets AREN'T. I can't word-process on a touch-screen. I can't play 3D FPS on a smartphone. I can't play a DVD on a 2" screen. I can't compile my code on something that doesn't let me run any program I like. I can't even view most damn web-pages/streams properly without having a "full" PC. But on a laptop, you can do all those things and have touchscreen/3G/Skype/a headset etc. if you want.

    Sure, it's not practical in every application but the point of a PC (especially a laptop) is that it's general purpose. I can literally do everything a computer can do, without having to juggle compromises.

    The PC isn't dead - it's just that one old definition of it has ceased to be relevant, while another newer definition has taken over because it does everything the same, but better.

  10. Probably ... in a distant future by Zen-Mind · · Score: 2

    I'm also sure the PC as we know it will disappear or at least change radically, but probably not in the next 10 years. Their mainstream adoption, in the meantime, will probably fall back to the same proportion as people who had PC in the 90's; people who wanted PC because they wanted a PC, not because it became a common household item and a commodity.

    Ultimately, I think the trend will go toward wearable computers and perhaps personal household servers when people realize the "cloud" is probably just that: vapor. You will probably end-up with some kind of G modem on your belt, a display/keyboard on your wrist and an earpiece, all connected to your home-server and/or cloud.

  11. Not over yet, who's fault? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    I don't feel the PC-like (including Mac and Linux) era is over on my side.
    My concerns are
    - Internet is not available from anywhere
    - More importantly, cloud offers do not guarantee that all my data is stored on their side in an encoded way that makes the data understandable (humanly or computerly) only when it's locally on my computer

    These are my two requirements.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  12. Seems unlikley. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems rather unlikely.

    Vacuum tubes were replaced by transistors which are smaller, cheaper, much more reliable, much more capable of integration and for most applications have superior performance characteristics. Valves don't give you anything extra.

    Typewriters have obviously been replaced by something which has all the features plus many, many, many more which are very useful. Again, there is nothing you can do on a typewriter that you can't do more easily otherwise.

    Vinyl records. Well, some people still hold on to them. But, CDs are generally sound better, are smaller, more robust, don't wear out as they are played, cheaper due to the small size, hold more audio, don't need to be double sided etc. There are apparently a few cases where vinyl is alleged to be better, and that's probably why they still exist.

    Incandescent bulbs haven't gone yet. I, personally avoid them where possible, but they are still cheaper and have a much higher power density than the competitors. They're still around because there is no complete replacement. It is likely that replacements will slowly replace incandescents as their capabilities improve.

    So, onto PCs. What is going to replace them?

    If you want to write a lot or code, nothing beats a proper keyboard and a large screen (or two). Nothing beats the PC for 3D graphics performance. Nothing beats the data storage and bandwidth (want to do video editing in the cloud, eh?). Nothing beats a PC for the range of peripherals which ban be plugged in. Nothing beats a PC in terms of flexibility. Etc, etc, etc.

    Of course mobile devices will start to catch up in some areas, but unlike the previous examples, the PC is a moving target. It will always be 5 steps ahead because the technology is the same but the formfactor allows it.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  13. Bring back the digital divide! by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

    A few decades ago, only the most nerdy of people had PC's.
    In a few decades, only the most nerdy of people will have PC's.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  14. The home PC or the work PC? by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a desktop at work. I have one at home but it's a remnant of a bygone era. If I stop being able to incrementally upgrade it I'll get a high-end laptop. Most of what I do I can use my netbook for.

    For work, it's the focus of everything you can do. A laptop is adequate but the keyboard isn't as good, nor is the monitor, nor is the trackpad. You can use an external version of each of these but if you're doing that why go for the expense of a laptop?

    For the home, a PC needs a place to live. It needs a desk and chair. These take up space. A laptop can be used on any table and packed away and put on a shelf when finished with.

  15. Re:Affordable by Destoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    PCs aren't going anywhere and the idiot who made the original comment about this is some moron who has his head in the cloud a bit too much.

    *squint* .. I see what you did there..

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  16. Modifiable! by nicodoggie · · Score: 2

    The day I stop buying PCs is the day we can easily build laptops and tablet from easily available consumer-grade parts. Probably not even then.

  17. Re:Tablets are eroding the economy of scale of PCs by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How do you figure that? By and large they have the same components.

    And a retail video game console "by and large" has "the same components" as a debug console that mainstream video game developers use. One just has different binary signing keys, is much harder to buy, and is much more expensive.

    After decades of race to the bottom competition to make low-margin PCs, the race to the bottom will end up shifting to tablets running Android Ice Cream Sandwich, allowing price pressure on PCs to relax. Then PCs will become a luxury item that not everyone feels a need to own. The new feature of iOS 5 to make it independent from iTunes is one step toward end users not absolutely needing a PC. I guess the real test of my hypothesis will come in the next version of Mac OS X after Lion: whether not Apple will choose to continue to make XCode upgrades available for $5, or whether the Mac SDK will become a $99/year subscription like the iPhone SDK.

  18. IBM: world market for 5 computers... by captainpanic · · Score: 2

    Thomas J. Watson, president of IBM, famously said "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers".
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_J._Watson#Famous_misquote

    Apparently the company still pursues the same goal.

  19. Re:Affordable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But with tablets allegedly eroding the economies of scale of the home PC market, how long will individual hobbyists still be able to afford new PCs?

    Tablets are a fad. It should be no surprise that some of the best selling accessories for the iPad et al are stands and keyboards. Some of those keyboards even include a touchpad mouse. It should also be no surprise that the best selling apps (that are not games) for the iPad et al are productivity applications like PDF readers, word processors, spreadsheets, and presentation managers. The customer basically wants a laptop with a long battery life and a shiny factor amped to 11. Maybe a detachable screen. Tablets don't make sense because by the time you've gotten all the features back in you can get, it is the cost of a pretty high end laptop or extremely high end desktop.

    I also strongly suspect we may yet see a resurgence in the home desktop. I've been a laptop only guy for 6 years. I just recently set up a "family computer" desktop. I'm amazed at how much my productivity increased sitting at a desk. I'm also amazed at how much faster the previous generation desktop is compared to the current generation laptop. (I do tend to be a bit cheap when it comes to laptops though.)

    Finally, business will keep the desktop alive and well. Every business I've been in the majority of the computing devices at the company are desktops.

    It will be as the OP suggested, there will be an expectation of "well why can't I?" This question has killed many technological has-beens in the past, regardless of their success at the time, they didn't last long. Remember the internet appliances of the late 90's? The H/PC? The Pocket PC? Even the EEE PC running gimped Linux? Of course the PC has to be functional in its form factor, which is why we don't see things like the UMPC anymore. I don't think we'll see any long term break in the laptop/desktop form factor except where I noted we may see a laptop with a detachable screen.

  20. Re:Affordable by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2
    I already have a tablet with HDMI output that I can plug into a big screen. It has a USB host mode, so I can connect it to 1TB+ worth of hard drive space, as well as full sized keyboards, mice (though I could equally do those with Bluetooth) etc.

    The one I have now has a 1GHz dual core cpu and an OS that makes it feel instantly responsive. Later this year, quad core versions of the same CPU will be available.

    What can your full-size box offer me that I don't already have?

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  21. Any consumer device sufficiently advanced is... by jurgen · · Score: 2

    ...indistinguishable from a PC.

    They keep saying that PC's are going to be replaced by: set-top boxes, game consoles, smart-phones, etc. But the moment any of these devices are advanced enough to replace the personal computer they ARE the personal computer.

    That's why in the end the only thing that will truly replace the PC is another PC. Doh.

  22. Re:Affordable by Necroloth · · Score: 2

    so.... you have a seperate hard drive and keyboard and an intergrated display & processor... I guess it's easier than carrying a pc and a monitor... but isn't a laptop more convenient? Can your tablet run full versions of software - not stripped out shadows? Can it run software like Matlab.. do you have space to install large programs?

  23. On the bus by tepples · · Score: 2

    You say a full-size desktop PC offers use of programs anywhere? Not on a bus. Anytime? Not during your commute. A laptop does. A tablet also does for those living in a market with affordable mobile broadband.