Slashdot Mirror


Human Brain Is Sensitive To Light In Ears

vuo writes "Finnish researchers have shown that the human brain contains photoreceptors that react to intracranial illumination. Light is provided through the ear canal with bright-light headsets by Valkee. These devices, much like earphones or should we say 'earlumes,' are registered medical devices. Retinal illumination or bright-light therapy has been previously assumed to be the only way light indirectly affects brains. Light therapy helps with mood swings, seasonal affective disorder, jetlag and other circadian rhythm disruptions."

25 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. saw light spot on opposite wall by CO_gun_toter · · Score: 2

    When they shined a light in my ear :-)

    1. Re:saw light spot on opposite wall by Sulphur · · Score: 2

      When they shined a light in my ear :-)

      When I turn the volume up, there is no noise coming out of my mouth.

  2. The slide of Slashdot contribution continues... by kamelkev · · Score: 5, Informative

    The source article is posted on "PR Newswire".

    This is a self published document by the company that creates and promotes the Valkee product.

    I am in no position to comment on the legitimacy of the product or the efficacy of it's claims, and neither is anyone else here given the complete uselessness of the article presented.

    At least link to the "scientific" article that they have on their website, which is more appropriate for this audience:
    http://www.valkee.com/uk/Valkee_Poster_Presentation-Human_Brain_Photosensitiveness_May2011.pdf

    I cannot tell if the above whitepaper is peer reviewed or what.

    1. Re:The slide of Slashdot contribution continues... by Nick+Ives · · Score: 2

      Of course it's not peer reviewed: it's not being published in a reputable journal.

      This is pure snake oil. We don't have photoreceptors in our ears.

      --
      Nick
    2. Re:The slide of Slashdot contribution continues... by godrik · · Score: 2

      It is actually not an article but a poster presentation that occured in this conference: http://www.ismrm.org/11/

      I am not sure about that particular conference but poster presentation are usually not peer reviewed. In general poster presentation are given as a teaser for a futur conference article (which are usually peer reviewed).

      Disclaimer: I am a computer scientist so it might be different in the medical field

    3. Re:The slide of Slashdot contribution continues... by Nick+Ives · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh god, reading that press release it just gets better.

      They reckon that because a photosensitive protein is found in the human brain, shining light in through the ears must help in seasonal affective disorder. To demonstrate this they cut up some cadavers and showed that this protein was found in their brain.

      I'm quite certain you can't see the brain by looking in through the ear canal.

      --
      Nick
    4. Re:The slide of Slashdot contribution continues... by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am in no position to comment on the legitimacy of the product or the efficacy of it's claims, and neither is anyone else here given the complete uselessness of the article presented.

      Ill take a shot at it, having used sun-lamps before. Lets take a look at Valkee's FAQ:

      Portable and always with you
      You can use Valkee wherever works best for you. Due to its small size, you can use it in the morning, during your commute or at work. It travels with you like a cell phone and mp3-player.

      BS alarm is going crazy, because if you were to start using a sunlamp at 7pm every night you could throw your sleep patterns into disarray. Light therapy usually happens in the morning, because it affects circadian rhythm and part of the point is to make your brain think the sun is rising even in dark winter months (if youre deaing with SAD). Additionally, all the sources ive seen (wikipedia, sun lamp vendors) caution that you should not overuse them because they are mood-altering and can have negative side effects.

      Saying that you can use the devices whenever you want for however long you want is a pretty clear indicator that they do nothing whatsoever (protip-- most devices that perform a medical function, other than Vitamin C, do not have a "when you want however much you want" dosing policy).

      What time of the day is it best to use Valkee?
      70% of users have stated that positive effects are best realized during the morning and 30% have stated that they achieve the best results in the evening. Start using Valkee in the morning preferably 30-60 minutes after waking up. If you do not realize positive results after 3-5 days, use Valkee 1-2 hours prior to going to bed in the evening.

      Same issue as above. Also, not having a clear stance on that (and relying on "users" rather than "clinical data") indicates that they really have no clue what this does or why it should work or anything else, other than that you should give them money for a gadget.

    5. Re:The slide of Slashdot contribution continues... by epine · · Score: 2

      ... indicates that they really have no clue what this does or why it should work or anything else, other than that you should give them money for a gadget.

      No, it indicates that they aren't doing a good job of making substantive arguments to an audience with no clue.

      The circadian phase response curve is increasingly well understood. I personally have a circadian rhythm disorder. I'm intimately familiar with my own PRC.

      Research I don't have at hand shows that among the elderly, treatment with blue light in the evening helps them make it through the night with more sheep and less roosters.

      Younger people and misfits such as myself often prefer to advance their circadian phase: for this you want intense blue light in the early morning (best in the hour before you feel like waking) or melatonin in the middle of your waking day.

      I'm more suspicious about this ear thing because of reduce, recycle, and reuse: mother nature just can't help herself from raiding the molecular junk drawer. She's already got the recipe. Why not?

      It's a long chain from the light bulb to the eardrum to molecules of the brain to the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

      I'd be very happy if a pair of Lite-Brite laser disco earmuffs could sort my circadian phase out while I slumber happily through my pre-waking dreams. Melatonin controls my problem, but it impacts my performance at about the intensity of two pints of beer consumed just as I'm entering the most productive part of my day. Unfortunately, I can't just grow a liver the size of a sofa cushion and have the impairment fade away.

  3. More ads? by FrankSchwab · · Score: 2

    Oh glorious, glorious slashvertisements.

    --
    And the worms ate into his brain.
  4. what about the colon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    is it sensitive to a reverse cranial insertion therapy?

  5. Re:Is this More Than an LED in you Ear? by jd · · Score: 2

    The idea that there may be neurons somewhere within the brain that are photosensitive is plausible enough. However, light shining in the ear won't ever reach them.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  6. Are any other other human orifices photoreceptive? by twocentplain · · Score: 2

    Think of the awkward clinical trials...

  7. Re:I'm not that certain by Nick+Ives · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, in between the ear canal and the brain there's the inner ear which is full of bones and fluid.

    Of course, that's leaving aside what those photosensitive proteins do in the brain. Maybe they're some leftover defence mechanism in case the brain gets exposed to light?

    Even assuming that this device does have an effect on the brain, photosensitive proteins in the brain are clearly a surrogate endpoint with respect to seasonal affective disorder.

    --
    Nick
  8. Blonde joke by thbb · · Score: 2

    Of course:

    Q: how do you make a light shine in a blonde's eyes?
    A: you point a flash light at her ear.

  9. Re:Is this More Than an LED in you Ear? by xquercus · · Score: 2

    OK, someone please tell me why I would need to spend nearly $300 USD to shine 2 white LEDs in my ear? Awaiting a schematic and a parts list of what is needed to build this. Oh 3 AA's wired to pair of in-ear headphones with the coil and diaphragm replaced by an LED on each side.

    Oh, you left out the super secret part that makes the whole thing work! The current limiting resistor!

  10. Re:That's nice. by Yaur · · Score: 4, Funny

    Common sense?

  11. Re:I'm not that certain by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    The brain is above, I'd suggest looking at some good 3D MRI imaging. what a load of BS this is.

  12. Re:I call shenanegans by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    Not just membrane, bone. have a look at some good 3D imaging. this is utter bullshit

  13. earlumes by aquabat · · Score: 2

    No, we should not say "earlumes". Please, no.

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  14. Re:the saddest part... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

    For the record, that's a rating of medical safety. So having something that does nothing is medically safe. IN the US, probably in the EU as well.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  15. Re:Is this More Than an LED in you Ear? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    OK, someone please tell me why I would need to spend nearly $300 USD to shine 2 white LEDs in my ear? Awaiting a schematic and a parts list of what is needed to build this. Oh 3 AA's wired to pair of in-ear headphones with the coil and diaphragm replaced by an LED on each side.

    Oh, you left out the super secret part that makes the whole thing work! The current limiting resistor!

    Yeah a SED (smoke emitting diode) is not what you want here.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  16. Re:I'm not that certain by Rei · · Score: 2

    Yes, this article is clearly bunk. But still, it's quite possible that light has more of an impact on the human body than has been traditionally accepted. Human skin might even be mildly photosynthetic -- not kidding. Fungi have been found at Chernobyl using ionizing radiation as an energy source -- and it appears that it's melanin that they've been using to capture the energy. Ionization of melanin can enhance NADH/NAD+ conversion, which is the last step before ATP production. UV was shown to be effective in causing this effect.

    --
    Hey, guys, I'm just pleased as punch to report that it's a fleet of a hundred Vogon Battle Destroyers!
  17. Hey! Me too! by denzacar · · Score: 2

    I just heard what you said there.

    And the optic-hearing apparently works long distance as well. What a glorious day for science this is.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  18. Like that time in the '70s by sumdumgai · · Score: 2

    when I could see music flowing out of the speakers.

    --
    âoeIn theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not." â Albert Einstein
  19. Tosh! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    You aren't going to get useful amounts of light to the brain through the ears! Worse, what light you do get will be all dim and orange/reddish, and throw your circadian rhythms for a loop because you think it is sunset all the time. Worthless.

    Here, just for my Slashdot friends, is the secret to really showing 'Seasonal Affective Disorder' who is boss:

    Simply passing electrons through the cerebrospinal and intracellular fluids of the brain at a speed greater than that of light within those media will bathe the brain in a lovely, broad-spectrum, delicate blue glow. This will stimulate photo-receptors that aural lighting cannot hope to reach.

    Unfortunately, due to high costs and a coverup by the alarm-clock/industrial complex, you may have to sneak into a nearby university or DOE laboratory in order to use a linear accelerator of sufficient power. While Cherenkov radiation can also restore vigor to the scalp and reverse balding, you need energy sufficient to pass through the skull in order to see circadian benefits.