Why Google Needs Firefox
MrSeb writes "Almost the entirety of Mozilla's income — 97% of $104 million — arrives in the form of royalties from the Firefox search box, and the lion's share (86%, $85 million) of those royalties are paid by the default search engine: Google. In November 2011, however, Mozilla's contract with Google will expire. Will Google renew it? A better question to ask, though, is whether Mozilla wants Google as its primary search engine."
Article overlooks the stupidly obvious
No, the article didn't overlook the stupidly obvious, you did, because you failed to read the next paragraph:
"While it's true that Mozilla strongly relies on Google's royalties, don't forget that Google is completely reliant on search traffic"
and later:
"In all likelihood, Firefox is probably the cheapest source of traffic that Google has."
and:
"If Google fails to renew its contract with Mozilla, do you think that Microsoft would blink an eye at spending $85 million for the majority share of Firefox's 450 million surfers?"
Of course, if you had a clue, you could have just read the title to get the gist of the article: "Why Google Needs Firefox"