Slashdot Mirror


Cop Seeks Wiretapping Charges For Woman Who Videotaped Beating

An anonymous reader writes "A police officer who was disciplined for his role in the beating of a Massachusetts man (many broken bones in his face and permanent partial blindness) is looking to bring criminal wiretapping charges against the woman who caught much of the incident on video. The officer received a 45-day suspension for the beating. He does not appear to deny anything that happened in the video, but he apparently thinks it shouldn't have been filmed."

2 of 662 comments (clear)

  1. This guy is just blowing smoke. by intellitech · · Score: 5, Informative

    The full video being available in the second link, but it looks it's being taken on a public street, where police officers should have no expectation of privacy.

    On another note, the individual referred to in the summary (identified in the stub-of-an-article as Michael Sedergren), was not the guy who beat Jones senseless, but in my personal opinion, he's just as dirty, and should have been fired, too.

    FTFA:

    “They’re really just trying to intimidate and silence her, but whether she’s charged or not (the tape) can still be used in court,” said attorney Shawn P. Allyn, who represents Jones in a civil rights lawsuit against the police in U.S. District Court.

    Case and point. Guy is a complete dirtbag.

    --
    vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
  2. Massachusetts laws are fucked up by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    He'll win, easily.

    It's illegal to record audio of people without their express permission in Massachusetts. Period. Doesn't matter where.

    About the only exception is if it's blatantly obvious that you're being recorded, which has been taken to mean "news team" - in other words, an absolutely gigantic, impossible-to-miss camera, or a large microphone, like TV reporters carry with the station logo on it.

    Otherwise, it's "wire tapping."

    Ridiculous? You bet. Going to change? Hah!

    Incidentally, as far as I know, you're allowed to take video of people in public places. Just not the audio.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.