Slashdot Mirror


DHS Tries To Hide Mobile Scanner Details

OverTheGeicoE writes "The Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a Freedom of Information Act request last year (PDF) with the US Department of Homeland Security, whose Transportation Security Administration has been investigating the use of x-ray scanning technology for covert use in more public places, like train stations and even ordinary city streets. TSA has tested interesting devices like the Z Backscatter Vans both privately and on members of the general public. EPIC recently received new documents from DHS. Some of the documents are almost completely black from redactions."

9 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Doing a good job, too by chill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The YouTube video in the first link is already yanked.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Doing a good job, too by cultiv8 · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
  2. So what if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm walking down the street with a concealed handgun (perfectly legal in 30+ states) and the DHS van shows I'm packing heat. Next thing I know I'm on the ground with a knee in my back and automatic weapons pointed at me. Is this how it's going to work? Because if that's how it's going down, I see no reason not to overthrow this government now before it gets much worse. I'd rather live under anarchic self-rule than this nanny-state bullshit.

  3. Re:Take a look at the FOIA doc by bistromath007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You sank my battleship! :(

  4. Re:Take a look at the FOIA doc by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is where you file a FOIA complaint and they get to sit there in front of a judge and explain why they deliberately attempted to evade a properly filed FOIA request with such a ridiculous response.

    Unfortunately, as far as I know, FOIA has no teeth, i.e. there's no way to prosecute these clowns for even such flagrant abuse. However, if a judge forces the information to be released and it is legally actionable information, they could potentially be charged with obstruction.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  5. the reason by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    your safety comes second and the governments ability to detect terrorists comes first, is because the death of US citizens is well known to be uncontroversial and tolerable, even on large scales such as katrina.

    What is absolutely intolerable is terrorism, because terrorism undermines the governments control of the populous. its one thing if an earthquake kills three thousand people, but its entirely different when a single terrorist accomplishes it...the terrorist draws unwanted attention to the united states government, its foreign policy, its structure and its members position in the class system.

    this is also incidentally why governments are loathe to negotiate with terrorists, regardless of the validity of their positions; a single person or idea should never be allowed to upset the balance of power as it stands.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:the reason by evanism · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The days of "the united states" seem well and truly over. Economically, politically and socially it has turned to despotism, desperation and an absence of morals.

      time to turn our attentions elsewhere while the poor old US eats itself alive with hate and fear.

      Wonder how long it will be before the hate mongers generate a war with China?

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    2. Re:the reason by inviolet · · Score: 4, Informative

      your safety comes second and the governments ability to detect terrorists comes first, is because the death of US citizens is well known to be uncontroversial and tolerable, even on large scales such as katrina.

      What is absolutely intolerable is terrorism, because terrorism undermines the governments control of the populous. its one thing if an earthquake kills three thousand people, but its entirely different when a single terrorist accomplishes it...

      Not quite. The real death toll from Katrina, for example, is still classified. Were it published, it would significantly undermine public confidence in their government.

      The published death toll involved a great deal of 'creative' counting. Oh yeah, lots died from electrocution, and from falling objects, and from heart attacks, and from lawless violence... but those aren't Katrina deaths, you see.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
  6. Re:I don't condone this by psyclone · · Score: 4, Informative

    This looks like it scans cars, containers, and even buildings if they chose:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iABPKd0vFxQ