Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

More Photoshopped Evidence In Apple v. Samsung

Posted by timothy on from the artist's-conception dept.

jfruhlinger writes "It seems that Apple can't stop Photoshopping evidence in its EU lawsuit against Samsung. We already saw that the company used trickery in its side-by-side comparison of the iPad and Galaxy Tab; now it appears that it's fudging the comparison between the iPhone and Galaxy S as well."

8 of 345 comments (clear)

  1. Dear Apple by Kagetsuki · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is a flat screen with icons. No, you didn't think it up first. Now sit back down.

  2. That's also not the default home screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They also rearranged the Galaxy S's home screen so that it'd look more like the iPhone. Apple, I mean, not Samsung.

    Go ahead, take a look at the real thing. That looks nothing like an iPhone.

    For one thing, it supports widgets, which the iPhone doesn't. (Apparently the idea that people might want to get weather information on their phone still evades Apple.)

    Another good hint is the home button on the screen Apple's using, which probably doesn't appear on the home screen.

    1. Re:That's also not the default home screen by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I did the lighting for a number of the TV commercials for the Galaxy S. The apple screen shots are pretty close to the 'official' home screen layout approved by T-Mobile and Samsung.

      e.g. http://galaxy-s.t-mobile.com/

      I think the lawsuit is stupid but Apple didn't really game the homescreen in any way. That's an approved Samsung screenshot.

    2. Re:That's also not the default home screen by tokul · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's an approved Samsung screenshot.

      Apple should sue T-Mobile. It is not approved Samsung screenshot. It is approved screenshot of hardware sold by T-Mobile.

  3. The judges get to see *actual* devices... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    When the judge made his decision, he had a powered-up iPad and a powered-up Galaxy tab in front of him, so he could see for himself whether they were similar - at least according to the BBC. If he thinks Samsung is in the wrong after playing with a physical working device, what does it matter if one image shows the aspect ratio incorrectly ? (all of the other images in the brief clearly showed the different aspect ratios).

    Oh, it makes good link-bait ? You don't say!

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  4. Re:the two pictures were to show features, not siz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    +4 Misinformative?

    From TFA for those that can't be bothered to read:

    But the picture of purported Galaxy S has been resized about 6%, making the Galaxy S appear smaller and more similar to Apple's phone. The height of the purported Galaxy S that Apple displays matches the iPhone exactly. The aspect ratio has not been measurably altered.

  5. Re:if the Fiat were a smaller dupe of the Sequoia by mysidia · · Score: 5, Informative

    Then yes, Toyota would have a case. The relative size doesn't matter really. If it's similar, it's similar.

    When we are talking about design patents, yes, Scale does matter.

    In addition, if it can be shown that the design has certain utility, the patent of the design is invalid. Design patents can be invalidated if the design has practical utility (e.g. the shape of a gear).

  6. Re:the two pictures were to show features, not siz by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

    Especially when you also choose a non-default background image and icon arrangement