Slashdot Mirror


Former Wikileaks Spokesman Destroyed Documents

bs0d3 writes "Former Wikileaks spokesman Daniel Domscheit-Berg claims to have destroyed more than 3,500 unpublished files that had been sent from unknown informants and are now apparently lost irrevocably. Among the files destroyed are the US gov's 'no-fly list' and inside information from 20 right wing organizations. Daniel Domscheit-Berg is now known as one of the founders of openleaks."

5 of 469 comments (clear)

  1. /rage by drobety · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If what DDB claims are true, he also destroyed five gigabytes of internal documents from the Bank of America. Seriously, how can anyone trust OpenLeaks when one of his founder completely disregarded the wishes of the whistle-blowers to expose what they perceived as wrong, immoral, and/or of public interest? His excuse that he wanted to "protect the sources" is over-the-top ridiculous given that the track record of Wikileaks is impeccable regarding source protection (alleged cablegate leaker outed himself as per alleged chat transcript.)

    I was really looking forward to have Bank of America being exposed, especially after reading this piece.

    In the end, DDB exposes himself as ultimate retarded prick.

  2. Domscheit-Berg has just killed OpenLeaks by Crouty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are two things an architect of a whistleblowing platform must never do: revealing the identity of informants and accepting submissions without publishing them. I despise Domscheit-Berg for keeping WikiLeaks from publishing that data. Who knows what risks were taken to get this information on that hard disk.

    --
    On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
  3. Re:Tragic... by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is "right" and there is "lawful." They are not always the same things.

  4. Re:Tragic... by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Certainly though, if a cop is lawfully arresting you, and has his gun drawn, you shouldn't pull yours out and open fire. That's not self-defense.

    Not necessarily true.

    What if the current law says that you need to be hauled away to a concentration camp and murdered, and the cop is "just doing his job" in arresting you and sticking you on the train bound for the concentration camp?

    In this case, you're entirely justified in shooting the cop, whether he's arresting you, or anyone else. In fact, you're not just justified, but you're doing the right and moral thing by executing him. He deserves to die for upholding such an evil law.

    Personally, I think punishments for police and other government officials should be much, much, much harsher than for regular people. If you can't even trust your own government, then your society is failing, so strong protections should be put into place to protect the people from government abuses.

  5. Re:Tragic... by djlowe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh sure. The federalists thought it was a slur. But once the unformed masses realized that the federalists were a bunch of elitist prigs, the Democratic Republicans took over.

    And now, both the Democrats *and* the Republicans are "Extreme Federalists", and they are ALL elitist prigs now.

    Regards,

    dj