Slashdot Mirror


Twitter To Meet With UK Government About Riots

"Twitter has confirmed that it will meet with the UK Home Secretary on Thursday, after being called in for discussions over the role it played in the recent UK riots. Twitter will send a representative to the meeting scheduled for August 25. Both Facebook and RIM will also send representatives to the meeting in regards to their effects on the riots."

186 comments

  1. Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will there be representatives from the telephone company, and the postal services, to answer for the roles they played in the riots? What about mainstream print, radio, and television media who made others aware of the riots, and carried the idea of unrest to others, who then joined in?

    The communication medium is but the messenger.

    1. Re:Other representatives by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I heard most of those rioters wore shoes. Maybe shoe companies should be taken to task for all the malfeasance they enable.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story needed only one comment, and that was it. Fuck me, this actually seems worse than Blair. I figured to top him the next leader would have to run around a primary school with an erection, yet somehow Cameron manages something equally repulsive while keeping his little soldier safe from draughts.

    3. Re:Other representatives by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! I was just about to say the same thing, but you said it better.

      And when did it become OK to shift responsibility and blame to anywhere and everywhere except the people who actually committed the crimes?

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    4. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, with the cooperation of the shoe companies, shoe stores, and facial recognition technology, maybe Scotland Yard can make casts of the myriad shoe impressions at some of the scenes, and it would be possible to link certain particular shoe impressions to surveillance footage of the people purchasing the shoes at local retail chains.

      Why, the convergence of digital DNA and cutting edge technology like this could spark a revolution in shoe-based criminal justice!

    5. Re:Other representatives by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Speaking with a cab driver here in London this morning, he claimed there have been 1,900 arrests in London over the riots. 1,900 would seem a remarkably high number, and I challenged him on it. He said it was information he gathered from some sort of official who was a fare the previous day.

      If they did arrest this number of people, it's remarkable and I would strongly suspect collusion from social media outlets as part of the roundup effort. GPS on your phone, anyone?

    6. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why go that far? 1900 arrests seems reasonable if the police resort to the simple expedient of going to a riot and arresting rioters.

      Not everything calls for CSI-level sleuthing.

    7. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love how the gov'ts love to go blah blah blah blah instead of helping to fix the causes that caused people to want to riot in the first place. Plenty of $$$$$$ to flap gums but not actualy fix things

    8. Re:Other representatives by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Dear Sirs, Downing Street Hacks, and assorted Parliamentarians: We simply convey the tweets. Your nasty little island produced the twits tweeting them.

      Yours sincerely,
      A useless, but harmless, web startup from somewhere that hasn't had any rioting issues lately.

    9. Re:Other representatives by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      When opinions and emotions are involved, probably.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    10. Re:Other representatives by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      GB has to be the most reactionary country in the world. Twitter's part in the riots?

      Looks like the country is going to go into lockdown mode for the next civil disorder. Hit the Killswitch on the internet, mates!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shoe company can't add software that automatically scans for riotousness talk and tag those users for investigation.

    12. Re:Other representatives by dark_requiem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Remember remember the fifth of November...

    13. Re:Other representatives by chaos.squirrel · · Score: 1

      when politics and the blame game are involved, more likely...

    14. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but both the freedom fighters and the looters were wearing shoes and using phones. Obviously we need to prevent the bad guys from getting phones and shoes while letting freedom fighters get phones and shoes, and I'm sure that politicians will promise us that they have a reliable way to it, and commercial businesses will tell the politicians it is technically possible, if only we would give them sufficient power to do so.

      [Hint: think about what the people in power want, and it all starts to make sense]

    15. Re:Other representatives by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And when did it become OK to shift responsibility and blame to anywhere and everywhere except the people who actually committed the crimes?

      When a small group of banksters committed fraud to crash the world economy, ruining lives and pushing hundreds of millions of people into poverty or economic uncertainty.

      Don't fool yourself. The biggest crimes are the ones where it's " OK to shift responsibility and blame to anywhere and everywhere except the people who actually committed the crimes". And the same people who paid for those crimes are going to pay for the crimes that occur when social contracts break down and civil violence occurs: everyone but the ones responsible.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that dirty cop who murdered Mark Duggan and started it all in custody yet? Not enough people seem demand to address the root cause, only the effects.

    17. Re:Other representatives by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      I heard most of those rioters wore shoes.

      I heard most of those rioters had feet. Maybe we should look into those parents who have been plotting for years to enable the riots, by raising those ambulatory children... teaching them to stand erect, to walk, even to run and evade capture.

    18. Re:Other representatives by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      He was claiming 1,900 people were arrested since the riots, not at them. Not sure how that gets done efficiently without some technological assistance.

    19. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation? And hopefully not the National Enquirer. Who are these masked bankmen?

    20. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not, but that's only because we don't talk with our feet (unless of course one is deaf and armless, and practices sign language...).

      But perhaps if shoe companies learn from this missed opportunity, the footware industry will be willing to join with law enforcement in a collaborative effort to surrepititiously insert a tiny chip, no larger than a grain of rice, in shoes likely to be purchased by military-aged-males, which integrates a 3G wireless transmitter, RFID, and an accelerometer, so the the authorities can analyze the data for riotous gaits, and follow up on THOSE leads with additional investigation.

      Of course this would also demand a sister team of analysts keeping tabs on popular footware trends, in case styles shift toward feminine footware, indicating a growing awareness or full-blown discovery of this secret surveillance program...

    21. Re:Other representatives by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      There were already over 1000 arrested 2 weeks ago.
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/10/london-riots-spark-copycat-birmingham

      There are cameras everywhere, they just have to follow the masked guys from camera to camera on their way to and from the crime until they remove or have not yet put on their masks.
      Takes some time but you get there.

    22. Re:Other representatives by bigbird · · Score: 1

      The communication medium may be the messenger. But would the rioting and looting have taken off to the same extent without Blackberries and Twitter?

      They aren't culpable, but it seems reasonable to explore ways to help prevent this happening in future.

    23. Re:Other representatives by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Its clothing in general that's the problem.

      Simply wearing it enabled the hoodlums to leave their homes without feeling naked. As well, it clearly was used to hide peoples identities and even as protection from personal injury breaking through glass windows while looting.

      All those clothing shops deserved to get looted!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    24. Re:Other representatives by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

          It's long been suspected that "ECHLON" already monitors phone calls, faxes, and emails. But hey, maybe all their gear is just a huge expensive decoration, to distract tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy freaks. The truth is somewhere in the middle. :)

            RIM's SMS most likely don't leave their network. Why would they? If I recall correctly, they are encrypted at the phone, so they wouldn't be easy to intercept at the tower.

          The same would also apply to cell providers, unless SMS was already easily interceptable when it hit the tower.

          Although it would appear safe, are messages sent via https://twitter.com/ really safe? Probably not.

          But why would governments have to go through the hassle of intercepting messages at the tower, and decrypting them, when the providers can hand them over, unencrypted, on an E-silver-platter(tm).

          Most likely such a meeting isn't to determine if they should or shouldn't do it, but what the pricing will be. I guarantee, if the gov't wants it, the provider will let them pay at greater than cost. It's a lot easier to negotiate for a live feed, than to come back later with a warrant. For god and country only goes so far, but the right price tag will get you anything.

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    25. Re:Other representatives by leenks · · Score: 1

      Well, at least the Government (that nobody voted for) will be there to discuss their role in the riots too!

    26. Re:Other representatives by Stevecrox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It sounds close to the official number as quick glance at BBC news's website shows. Nothing to do with collusion, people keep talking about all of the CCTV camera's in the UK police have been identifying people through that. Most of the papers have also been printing pictures of rioters in an effort to identify them, there are about half a dozen stories of mothers turning in their kids when they saw the child's photo in a national paper.

      This meeting is the higher ups way of looking like they are doing something to daily mail readers, I'm hoping nothing comes of it especially when you realise Twitter & Facebook were used by people to organise clean-ups and identify the rioters.

      There has also been a lot of talk about the harshness of the punishments handed down to rioters. The UK doesn't require mobile phones to have Government available GPS tracking like the USA. You can only check-in with Facebook/Google latitude and not twitter.

    27. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This claims 1733: http://www.metro.co.uk/news/872635-london-riots-significant-milestone-as-more-than-1-000-riot-suspects-charged

    28. Re:Other representatives by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There are two reasons most bankers got away with wrecking the economy.

      Firstly we encouraged them to do it. In the 1980s Thatcher wanted the UK to become the world's first post-industrial economy. Everyone should own a house and a car, funded by loans. Everyone should be able to own shares in private companies, and the state should do as little as possible itself so that private enterprise can move in and take over those services for profit. We kept voting for those policies* that were building up banks and the City, and when it all crashed we suddenly realised what a mistake it was.

      Secondly what most of them did was not a crime. Unlike smashing a shop window and looting it financial risk taking is not easily defined. The regulators couldn't keep up with all the new and complex financial products bankers were dreaming up, and so became ineffective. The same is true of most while collar crime, it is hard to legislate effectively against it and cases take years to build up, and the defence will argue over every word of the law on the grounds that what happened was not actually illegal. When you compare it with the relative ease of proving simple theft you can see why one group is far easier to control and punish than the other.

      * Okay, I didn't, I was too young to vote, and some people voted Labour.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government are a bunch of chancers taking advantage of the situation, and that the riots are a consequence of government policies and the actions (or inactions) of the comfortably off. But .... ... Twitter is not like the telephone company; on tweet reaches lots of people. Its not like the postal service; tweets are delivered near instantaneously. Its not like mainstream print; tweets are delivered near instantaneously and the content is first-hand. It's not like radio and television; the content of tweets is first-hand. So the government will claim - with some justification - that the instantaneous first-hand nature of twitter is new and different. The communication medium may be but the messenger, but it still affects the message.

      Actually, its not so different from the stock and currency markets being played by computers programmed to compete with one-another at millisecond intervals. Now, is there any chance of goverments looking at that? I don't hold out much hope.

    30. Re:Other representatives by Inda · · Score: 1

      This could be a whooooosh moment but fuck it...

      They already have a DB of shoe impressions. They use them for investigating burgularies.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    31. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's long been suspected that "ECHLON" already monitors phone calls, faxes, and emails.

      No it hasn't. We've known for a long time it's just an email scanning system.

      The system used for monitoring phone calls/faxes is called CALEA, and if you had any understanding of phone switching technology you'd throw your tinfoil hat in the trash.

    32. Re:Other representatives by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Well, at least the Government (that nobody voted for) will be there to discuss their role in the riots too!

      Didn't we? 16 million people voted for either Conservatives or Liberal Democrats, and a little less than that voted for someone else. Seems like we got what we asked for.

    33. Re:Other representatives by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      True, but nobody voted for both - which is what we actually got.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:Other representatives by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. This is just politicians doing what they do best: Attacking the consequences instead of the causes. Solves nothing, but makes them look tough, and allows for some more anti-freedom legislation. A few more riots and the UK will have the privacy laws of Saudi Arabia or Iran, which is what the Government wants in the first place.

    35. Re:Other representatives by xaxa · · Score: 1

      True, but nobody voted for both - which is what we actually got.

      Getting both is much fairer than somehow choosing one or the other.

    36. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you very much. It blows my mind that I did not know this.

    37. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about word of mouth? Who is going to represent that?

    38. Re:Other representatives by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      It was up to ~1000 last time I checked at the end of last week. 1900 isn't outside the realms of possibility, but yes, it does seem a little high.

    39. Re:Other representatives by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      And if you shut Twitter down, or started tracking its users, how many minutes would it take for people to find an alternative? Haven't they attempted to unopen Pandora's Box before with music, Kazza, etc? How did that work for them? More money being wasted by clueless suits in government.

    40. Re:Other representatives by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      The answer is "Yes, rioting and looting could have taken off to the same extent without Blackberries and Twitter."

      The 1992 riots in LA lasted 6 days. 53 people died and damange was pegged at $1 billion. The recent London riots were nowhere near as bad (3-4 days, 5 dead, £200-M damage).

      1992 was long before Twitter, SMS, BBM or even real cellphone use.

      Anything imposed on Twitter, Blackberry and other social networking tools to prevent future riots, would be equivalent to landline phone companies in 1992 cutting all service to all of Los Angeles, and authorities taking TV and radio off the air to keep people ignorant about what's happening. Or worse, censoring of point-to-point voice and data conversations in realtime (we know they already monitor).

    41. Re:Other representatives by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      More importantly, how about representatives from the Chinese, Iranian, and Syrian governments--who are also interested in establishing a way to shut down Twitter in times of social unrest.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    42. Re:Other representatives by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      I have petitioned the Home Office to also call in representatives from the Highways Agency and the councils of the towns where the riots took place. They are as responsible as anyone, having provided the rioters a town in which to riot and the paved and maintained roads upon which they rioted.

    43. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That happens all the time.

      Murder? It's the gun's fault, not my innocent baby; he wouldn't harm a fly!
      Violence? The video game/song/TV show/movie/book/internet made me do it!
      Bad grades/underachieving students? Clearly the teachers aren't good enough at FORCING the students to care!

      As a species, we have a hard time accepting our own faults as individuals and as a society. It's much easier to blame inanimate objects and "them" than it is to take a long look at ourselves and accept what history and the Stanford Prison Experiment has shown. We're capable of being saints, but even "normal" members of society can very easily revert into behavior better fitting less evolved species than what we think of as "man."

      We're not comfortable with the idea that we/loved ones can do terrible things without being forced and we also tend to get our backs up if someone tries to put the blame there. Even if politicians are too far removed to be subject to that effect, they know their constituents aren't and why would they make them angry?

    44. Re:Other representatives by tendrousbeastie · · Score: 1

      In what way was fraud the cause of the current recession?

    45. Re:Other representatives by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      By that logic a Conservative-Labour coalition would have been fairer still, since they were the two most popular parties.

      Of course, the paradox is really that the people who voted for one partner didn't like the other one much - or they'd have voted for them instead.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    46. Re:Other representatives by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      * Okay, I didn't, I was too young to vote, and some people voted Labour.

      Actually, by the end Labour were the same as the Tories at sucking up to big business. Possibly worse, in fact, as at least some Tories have some experience in business and would have known when they were being fed bullshit.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    47. Re:Other representatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking back, the creation of most of the financial instruments that caused all the problems looks less like incompetence and more like active malice. Even at the time, they looked to truly objective observers like methods someone came up with so they could grab the money and run. The problem is, truly objective observers either don't stay objective for long because they see how they can cash in and decide to do it, or they ignore it, or they get labelled as conspiracy nuts when they try to tell everyone about it. In any case, the current horrible economic situation goes back years and years. It certainly includes Bernie Madoff and Enron and Worldcom in its timeline. Now, in those cases, some people really did go to jail, but plenty more extremely scummy people weren't prosecuted at all, or managed to strike deals as witnesses to protect themselves from prosecution.

    48. Re:Other representatives by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      In what way was fraud the cause of the current recession?

      Just a small (!) example:

      Goldman Sachs selling CDOs and other derivatives knowing that they were toxic and taking market positions against the products they were selling to their customers.

      That's just a tiny bit of it, yet it caused at least a trillion dollars damage to the US economy, almost as much to the EU.

      Another is the investment banks creating such demand for mortage-backed securities that they bribed lenders to drop all standards for giving loans, knowing that when the whole thing blew up that they'd get bailed out by taxpayers.

      That's fraud, friend.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    49. Re:Other representatives by xaxa · · Score: 1

      By that logic a Conservative-Labour coalition would have been fairer still, since they were the two most popular parties.

      It would, sort of. The idea is they argue it out in Parliament, on behalf of their voters, and find a compromise.

  2. ANARCHY IN THE UK !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go queeen, Go !!

  3. Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When it happens in Egypt and Libya, its an amazing tool for freedom of speech and the spread of democracy.

    When it happens in your own back yard, its a problem.

    1. Re:Double Standard by MakinBacon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a fine line between staging a revolution and looting an electronics store, my friend.

    2. Re:Double Standard by no-body · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any social problems in that area - like high unemployment, low standard of living, educational/career dead-end. other types of violence/repression, possibly from government agencies?

      And - if so, what are the solutions of the local governments?

      One person protesting there was interviewed and stated that news media would not care unless fuss would be created.
       
      A fine line.... right.

    3. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a fine line. Also, I do believe plenty of looting occurred in these other countries as well.

    4. Re:Double Standard by Riceballsan · · Score: 2

      aye, while I agree there is little defense for what the rioters do, there is something important about them having the technology to have either option. You can't ban talking to each-other, or even saying specific things (even if it is down with big brother). The right to say things the government dosn't want you to say should be fought for, regardless of the consequences, and banning twitter etc... just gives the rioters/looters something to justify their actions with.

    5. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, thats not a fine line. thats a wide tipped permanent marker pen line.

    6. Re:Double Standard by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Problem is, you can't enable governments to stop one without enabling them to stop the other.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UK riots were ONLY looting. Do you think more than about 10 people cared about the police shooting some armed dealer? really?

    8. Re:Double Standard by AngryDeuce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With the speed with the government can clamp down on the citizenry with it's resources, it's only fair that the population have access to the same level of coordination. I think we would all agree that all societies have the right of self-determination, and if self-determination takes the form of open rebellion and revolution, that's the price we pay for democracy.

      These days, freedom to communicate via the internet and text messaging is almost as important as the right to assemble, and definitely as vital. The powers that be are using their authority in order to force it's agenda on the citizenry. Whether they agree or not, if the citizenry decides to rise up against them and defy their authority, is immaterial. Government exists at the will of the people, not the other way around.

    9. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, the key difference is whether NATO supports it by shooting at the police and dropping weaponry on the looters or not.

    10. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a fine line between staging a revolution and looting an electronics store, my friend.

      Hm, let's see... both fit the category of "doing things that can hurt some entity bigger than me", so as far as Teh Intarnetz0rz are concerned, both actions are identical. Plus the added bonus of a herd mentality that provides an illusion of invulnerability and freedom from responsibility, the kids love that these days. Doesn't matter that one is against a tyrannical despot and his cronies and the other is against small shops trying to stay in business, rioting and looting are perfectly justified and Right(tm).

    11. Re:Double Standard by digitig · · Score: 2

      Any social problems in that area - like high unemployment, low standard of living, educational/career dead-end. other types of violence/repression, possibly from government agencies?

      In some of the areas where there were riots and looting. Not in others. And the rioters seem to come from across the social spectrum (the teenage daughter of a millionaire has been arrested, although she has pleaded not guilty). The rioters, and their reasons for rioting, were so diverse that every pundit can find cases to support their political or social agenda, and the opponents of every pundit can find cases that disprove it. If anybody (eg, David Cameron) says that the causes were simple then they are cherry-picking cases to fit their agenda.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    12. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The people are from the UK (my original home). 'social' problems you describe appear to be economic problems.

      These folks were stealing Hi-Def TV's and IPads, not food or medical supplies.

      I've lived in areas of south east Asia where a week's worth of income support from the UK is, in real terms, more than two months of wages for someone lucky enough to have a job (90%+ unemployment). I'm sure that there are other, far worse off places than that!

      The punishment should be to send them to work on community projects in the developing world. Supplying fresh drinking water, building schools. Not only would they realize the insignificance of their hardships, they'd have character building experiences, working in teams making amazing differences to peoples lives with all the personal benefits that go with it.

      Still, back on topic, they should have the right to organize peaceful protest, via any means they like. However, inciting riot and looting is a different matter.

    13. Re:Double Standard by digitig · · Score: 2

      The UK riots were ONLY looting. Do you think more than about 10 people cared about the police shooting some armed dealer? really?

      No they weren't. In some places if was just trashing stuff, with no looting. In others, one gang would come along and smash all of the windows, and a while later others would come along and loot. In some places and in some groups there was clear protest going on, in others the riots seem to have been just for the hell of it. Even those who were not bothered by the police killing of a suspected criminal were bothered that they misled the public about what had happened (forensics showed that the shot the police said he fired at them actually came from a police gun), and a lot more are bothered by increasingly heavy-handed policing. But yes, plenty were bothered by the fact that others were getting free stuff and they weren't, and set out to change that.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    14. Re:Double Standard by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      actually i would say that it is a Rail Marker line between protesting against the government and being a foul thieving GIT

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    15. Re:Double Standard by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Not the same thing and you know that very well.

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/08/11/riots-men-killed-reverend.html

      Egypt and Libya are examples of oppressed peoples rising up to demand inalienable rights.

      The UK is an example of chav scum smashing shit (and killing innocent fellow citizens, lest you forget!) for shits and giggles.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    16. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think looting did not go on during those revolutions? Do you honestly think the majority of those riots where due to people just wanting free shit? Way to buy into someone's straw man argument.

      We had this in the states, too. When Katrina hit New Orleans, it wasn't that all those poor black people where starving and dehydrating to death, no. They just wanted to steal TVs and sneakers. You see, once you find a few people that are superficially similar that are, or are doing something you don't like, you can justify using them as scapegoats to demonize the entire group and avoid having to actually come to terms with your conscience. Because, you know, actually considering that some of those people might have something of a point and might actually be somewhat justified is too mentally disruptive to consider.

      The government and people that feel like they have to support it do not like admitting when there is a bloody fuck-up that costs lives, much less actually do something constructive about it. And, it is so much easier to let people suffer and die when you don't consider them to be people. Oh, noes, they want to live and be free! Those arseholes! How dare they! Why can't they just take it like the rest of us!?! Do those pampered sons-of-bitches think they are too good for it or something!?! The nerve!

      (...)

      The overwhelming majority of the population, yes, including the ones you don't like, is not willing to risk their lives for a TV you wanker.

    17. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looting makes those people happy, which keeps a possible revolution in check. At least for a little while.

    18. Re:Double Standard by khallow · · Score: 0

      Even those who were not bothered by the police killing of a suspected criminal were bothered that they misled the public about what had happened (forensics showed that the shot the police said he fired at them actually came from a police gun)

      So where's the evidence that the police misled anyone? Instead we see that the police came through and admitted a fact which runs counter to their interests. The thing that is missed here is that witnesses, even trained ones like police, can make big mistakes of perception, especially in a sudden violent encounter like this one.

      I wonder instead why the presumption is that the police lied even though in this case they came through with the truth even when it cast them in a poor light.

    19. Re:Double Standard by Kvasio · · Score: 2

      you call it looting, some call it "electronics liberation"

    20. Re:Double Standard by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      One person protesting there was interviewed and stated that news media would not care unless fuss would be created.

      Right, because they tried peacefully protesting first, and that didn't work.</sarcasm>

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    21. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a fine line between staging a revolution and looting an electronics store, my friend.

      Should I stay thirsty?

    22. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure there is, as long as NATO is doing the looting, err, obliterating by bombing. I am referring to the hooray, yay victory for Libiyans by a lots of Brits in the Guardian comments.

      You are saying it is OK to bomb a country (I am not a fan of Qaddafi) and the collateral damages are not equivalent, if not more than, looting a few stores. Very wise, you are.

    23. Re:Double Standard by bronney · · Score: 1

      Would you keep it down bro? If "they" block slashdot I wouldn't know what to do in my basement :(

    24. Re:Double Standard by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Would you keep it down bro? If "they" block slashdot I wouldn't know what to do in my basement :(

      Judging by the state of your palms, you find plenty to do in the basement.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    25. Re:Double Standard by mywhitewolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm disappointing you aren't willing to put your name against that comment Mr AC. Because IMO you're at least partially right. The kids can try and play the society game that we have laid out to them, or they can make their own rules and fight to have them apply instead. we like our rules so we apply them with force and fight back, but that doesn't make our society rules "right" any more then they are "wrong". there are winners and losers in any social contract, when the losers are sick of losing they stop playing by the rules, and the winners get angry because "but, we said that wasn't ok to do!". but pretending there is some "rules" to life that "everyone should follow" and those that don't are "evil scum" is ignorant to the complexity of even a basic animal let alone one as complicated as the exceptionally resourceful, extremely opportunistic naked ape.

      if you've never had to rely on government handouts to eat, you're not in a position to condemn the actions of the less fortunate, its completely disheartening to have your survival reliant on a faceless entity who is willing and able to throw you to the dogs at a moments notice.

      the riots may have occurred because people are selfish, but you can't stop people from being selfish, IMO social policy is what is wrong and what caused this issue. people are just people doing what they do to give them selves an advantage at life.

      you're expected to pay into this society to help make things "better for everyone", and yet when you need help, then what? Imo this won't be the last high profile riot in western cultural hubs until the government gets a lot more social in their spending to offset the hardships that the financial crisis induces on the population.

    26. Re:Double Standard by utkonos · · Score: 1

      Have you spent any time in London?

    27. Re:Double Standard by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Shut up. I disagree with the looting and protests in the UK. Therefore, no one participating wanted to change anything. And "no one" means "not many people" (which, of course, makes complete sense).

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    28. Re:Double Standard by Sheik+Yerbouti · · Score: 1

      One person said they were "gettin their taxes back" as they ran off with a flat screen TV. The reporter asked what does that even mean? They had no response. Let's not forget these lovelies http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14458424

      Puhlease, who are you trying to bullshit?

    29. Re:Double Standard by no-body · · Score: 1

      "gettin their taxes back"

      Let's not forget these lovelies http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14458424

      contains:

      London rioters: 'Showing the rich we do what we want'

      This seems to be a better attempt to try to explain what was happening:

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/09/london-riots-who-took-part

      Definitely a mix of motives

    30. Re:Double Standard by timeOday · · Score: 2

      There's a fine line between staging a revolution and looting an electronics store, my friend.

      But not that much. Most political political discontent (beyond a few radicals like Noam Chomsky) is really just about pain in the pocketbook. (Perhaps you've hard of the Boston Tea Party, or have even noticed that "it's the economy, stupid" in US presidential politics lately.) When people's quality of life goes down, they get angry. When enough people can no longer afford food, it's game over. That's what happened in the Middle East. In the US the system failed more gracefully, and morphed into modern Big Government (the New Deal).

      Don't get me wrong, the poor in Britain are relatively well off. But not as well as they used to be, and, more importantly, their prospects of a life beyond being kept like a house pet are shrinking fast. None of which justifies what they did. Let's just not confuse righteous disapproval with actual solutions.

    31. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit.

      the last riots and protests over 20 years ago where spinned the same way by the conservative media and politicians.

      dont believe the hype.

    32. Re:Double Standard by X.25 · · Score: 0

      There's a fine line between staging a revolution and looting an electronics store, my friend.

      Haha. Of course, there was no looting in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, etc - those were 'revolutions'.

      But all there was in the UK was looting of the stores.

      Right?

      I wish I had your brain for a week, to get some serious rest.

    33. Re:Double Standard by karuna · · Score: 2

      The truth didn't come from the police. It came from IPCC which is the Independent Police Complaints Commission. The police initially said that Mark Duggan exchanged gun-fire. Actually they found Mark Duggan's gun hidden in his sock.

      It is hard to say if it was the police miscommunication or an attempt to cover their mistakes but the incident was badly managed.

    34. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rioting is always a socioeconomic problem. People don't just all the sudden feel like stealing shit and burning down their own neighborhoods. They see no future and so they cash out now and the rest of it is people getting caught in the hysteria. None of this ever should have happened. If you think people are justifying or excusing it you're wrong. Crime in impoverished areas is a perfect example, the socioeconomic stressors cause and exacerbate the crime. Doesn't mean the criminals shouldn't be punished under the full extent of the law, but the mayor who is running the racket should be locked up with him.

    35. Re:Double Standard by karuna · · Score: 2

      It is all about relative prosperity. You will be miserable if you make $10,000/y in the US while your neighbors make $100,000/y. Whereas if you lived in poor village in India you would be quite happy even with $5000/y.

      The social issues in the UK are as much real as in India or elsewhere. Don't be mislead by absolute comparison between countries. The high unemployment and slums are very real and if nothing is done about this, it will turn very ugly.

    36. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you have them do? Attack parliament?

    37. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The punishment should be to send them to work on community projects in the developing world. Supplying fresh drinking water, building schools. Not only would they realize the insignificance of their hardships, they'd have character building experiences, working in teams making amazing differences to peoples lives with all the personal benefits that go with it.

      Still, back on topic, they should have the right to organize peaceful protest, via any means they like. However, inciting riot and looting is a different matter.

      I'm sure that whilst your intentions are honorable, this particular subset of people would not be the ideal type to send on missions to aid the developing world. Why would you inflict this group of parasites on those nations? They'd probably reinstate colonial policies, judging from their belief in taking from others in order to support their consumer habits.

    38. Re:Double Standard by leenks · · Score: 1

      Relying on handouts has become a lifestyle choice for many because the handouts available are worth more than a wage.

    39. Re:Double Standard by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1
      You forgot to open your sarcasm tag, so there's a syntax error and a logic error. The logic being you are making a ton of assumptions:
      1. The rioter being interviewed was talking about himself, not the youth in general
      2. The rioter had not been involved in protests prior to the riot
      3. The rioter's not having protested invalidates his observation

      Frankly, the observation that the media tend to only care about spectacle, and focus in on the spectacle even when it isn't the center of an issue, seems pretty self evident. Not that you need to rely on self evidence when plenty of the usual kind is available. (EG: http://www.alternet.org/environment/134613/media_focus_on_minor_violence%3B_ignore_peaceful_protests_at_global_summit/.)

    40. Re:Double Standard by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 1

      The only thing "radical" about Noam Chomsky is that he speaks the truth to power, backed up with plenty of verifiable real world references (which make the often repeated 'He is no more than a conspiracy theorist' little more than a sound bite for the seriously-uninformed to repeat). When presidential candidates dare do the same, they are disappeared off the media circus.

    41. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was an interesting article in private eye this week. There was a riot in Tottenham last march. 200 police officers turned up but weren't enough to put it under control. Eventually it resulted in many arrests and a pub being stripped of its license. Why didn't we hear about it and why didn't it spread to other parts of the country? Well there was a tsunami in Japan which was dominating the news. It didn't get any airtime.

      So anyone saying the riots were about some guy being shot by the police is talking bollocks. They were going to riot anyway. What do we do? Shut down the news channels? Apparently, that works.

    42. Re:Double Standard by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Relative prosperity - is that the new name for envy?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    43. Re:Double Standard by Xest · · Score: 1

      The problem is that whilst poverty and unemployment might well have been a cause, they were not an excuse.

      The North of England has long seen much higher levels of poverty and unemployment yet these riots didn't get much further north than Birmingham bar Manchester. Yorkshire was fair quiet, as were the likes of Newcastle and Scotland- places generally known for having rather prominent chavish underclass yet for some reason- even when all their police had been sent down to London meaning it would be even easier in the North, they didn't engage in it.

      Of course, you can theorise that it was the spoilt southerners, being used to getting the moon on a stick, because there's so much money down there, and not being able to cope when things go tits up and some of their lovely council estate support and benefits are cut. But really, whether it's something like that or not, the GP's point that the riots were not an acceptable form of political protest, especially if you haven't attempted peaceful protest like a rally to parliament square first.

      Of course, there's also another problem with the theory that the riots were a form of political protest- some of those apprehended do not even face issues such as unemployment, low standards of living, educational dead end and so forth- in fact, the first person at all that went to trial of all the possible people that could have was a teacher and teachers enjoy pay well above the national average, they enjoy very long holidays, they're decent educated, and have strong job security. It wasn't just teachers of course- we had many people caught from decent backgrounds.

      No, the riots weren't political, they were an orgy of gang led violence that was widespread enough that others thought they could get away with destroying, and stealing shit who might not otherwise have been able to.

    44. Re:Double Standard by dredwerker · · Score: 1

      In some of the areas where there were riots and looting. Not in others. And the rioters seem to come from across the social spectrum (the teenage daughter of a millionaire has been arrested, although she has pleaded not guilty)..

      Is that champagne looting rather than socialism then, wrt millionaire daughters

      --
      On a long enough timeline. The survival rate for everyone drops to zero. Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club, 1996
    45. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's EXACTLY what he said they did. The person being interviewed stated something to the effect of "Last year, we demonstrated in thousands outside parliment, and you didn't give a shit. Now that we're causing a mess, here you are talking to me."

    46. Re:Double Standard by Zwets · · Score: 1

      Judging by the state of your palms, you find plenty to do in the basement.

      I don't get it. What has his subterranean arboretum got to do with anything?

      --
      One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say. - Will Duran
    47. Re:Double Standard by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Frankly, the observation that the media tend to only care about spectacle, and focus in on the spectacle even when it isn't the center of an issue, seems pretty self evident.

      The media seems to do a pretty good job covering large protests, even when peaceful. I don't mean follow the letter of the law and get permits and meet in designated areas. I mean a peaceful version of the riots. Gandhi and Martin Luther King and the Arab Spring have shown what peaceful protest can bring. Burning and looting your own neighborhood will get you nowhere. If you are going to go the violent route, you'd better be prepared to see it out and win (Libya) or you'll be worse off as the loser.

      Your link is interesting, but those anti-globalism protests have really become non-news. It's the same weird collection of unrelated causes every time they meet for G7, G20 or World Bank summits. The protests got a lot of press the first dozen times, but failed to grab much popular support. If the ghettos of London rose up in peaceful protest, that would certainly get the attention of the media. They could march on some square somewhere symbolic. Maybe on a big roundabout that would make everyone's commute harder - that would be hard for the media to ignore.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    48. Re:Double Standard by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Was the scale of the protest as large as that of the riots?

      Honest question, I'm not from the UK. I've not seen the interview you are referring to and I don't know about any protests except those at the G20.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    49. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      found Mark Duggan's gun hidden in his sock.

      Oh, that's alright then. Never mind the fact that guns are basically illegal in the UK, and the only people who have/carry guns are low-life criminals anyway. Nooo.. This is still the police's fault, and poor old Mark Duggan is simply an innocent victim in all of this. Innocent, I tell ya. Because butter wouldn't melt, would it?

      Fuck him. He's a criminal. A convicted criminal. He wanted to live by the sword, and now he got to die by it.

    50. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used Twitter to find out where my local clean up initiatives were meeting. After all, I am a miscreant that must be stopped!

      Thankfully, the council had already sent lots of street cleaners around, so there was very little to do and we all went home. Since a lot of us turned up with brooms and the like, you could argue we were "going equipped" and since there were a lot of us, it was actually a riot. For this, Twitter should answer the government's questions - after all, we the people demand answers as to why any of this was ever necessary.

    51. Re:Double Standard by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't call him a conspiracy theorist, did I? I don't follow him all that closely, and I would be surprised if he hasn't said some indefensible things occasionally over the years, but it's evident he's not motivated by narrow self-interest. I was kind of disgusted watching how little voters cared about what we did to Iraq, vs how we exploded when our finances took a dump.

    52. Re:Double Standard by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      But aren't you using a few individuals (individuals that a newspaper editor chose to portray on TV/paper/site) to paint a picture of the whole group? A pretty small sample size. And likely a biased one at that, no? Are we going to kid ourselves into believing that newspapers operate independently of the interests of those in power?

      Besides, I'd like to see the well crafted harangue you could come up with when someone sticks a mic in your face out of nowhere. You don't know that that person didn't have some sort of a rationalization and viewpoint.

    53. Re:Double Standard by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      One man's freedom fighter is another man's criminal.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    54. Re:Double Standard by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Relative prosperity - is that the new name for envy?

      Yes and no. "Relative prosperity" is another way of saying "standard of living". There was an article a few years back talking about millionaires who were working themselves to death, because their neighborhood was full of whatever you call 10x- and 100x-millionaires. By the neighborhood standard, these millionaires were "poor". (IIRC, many moved away to areas where they didn't feel the need to try and keep up with the Hiltons).

      It's the same logic that sends Americans to poorer countries for vacations - when your dollar quadruples in spending power, you suddenly feel a whole lot richer, don't you?

      Also worth noting that you can be making "a living" and be legitimately pissed that the government that just cut services to you because "the country can't afford it" happily gives the cash to bankers and corporate barons who are making 100 times your wage.

    55. Re:Double Standard by anyGould · · Score: 1

      One person protesting there was interviewed and stated that news media would not care unless fuss would be created.

      Right, because they tried peacefully protesting first, and that didn't work.</sarcasm>

      Actually, they did - the full interview had the youth pointing out that 20,000 people protested peacefully outside Scotland Yard a few months ago. Media and government completely ignored them. The youth said words to the effect of "you're paying attention to us now, aren't you?".

    56. Re:Double Standard by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Never mind the fact that guns are basically illegal in the UK, and the only people who have/carry guns are low-life criminals anyway.

      And police officers. Or were you combining the two groups?

    57. Re:Double Standard by rkd2110 · · Score: 1

      It could've been an insightful comment if you would have left your 'Big Government/Tea Party' agenda out of it.

      The New Deal (what you call a failure of Big Gubermnt) was a reaction to the catastrophic failing of decades of 'Small Government'. Lax regulations, complete lack of worker protections and extremely libertarian approach to markets led to the great depression. The New Deal literally saved people from starvation.

      What led to the current depression is the almost complete reversal of policies that created the 'American Golden Age' of the 50s through 70s.
      Surprisingly when you drastically reduce taxes you incur a massive deficit. Even more surprisingly, when you remove all stop gaps that were put in place to remove market volatility, the markets, fueled by unsustainable greed, fail catastrophically.

      All your Tea Party rhetoric neglects to take into consideration what amounts to be a century of contrary empiric evidence and will eventually lead to a full circle. You'll eliminate all government intervention and let the 'Free Market' take care of you, see millions of people in astounding poverty and millions starving on the streets and whoops, suddenly there will be popular cry for socially conscious policy.

    58. Re:Double Standard by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      20,000? I'm sorry, but you need more than a soccer match to get media attention.

      I'm not saying that their concerns aren't legitimate. It's just that violent uprising only works to improve your situation if you win.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    59. Re:Double Standard by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Well, they might try ... but chavs aren't very good at fighting unless they have at least a 20:1 numerical advantage.

      They'd probably end up dangling from trees or staked out on top of anthills. And nothing of value would be lost.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    60. Re:Double Standard by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's the same weird collection of unrelated causes every time they meet for G7, G20 or World Bank summits. The protests got a lot of press the first dozen times, but failed to grab much popular support. If the ghettos of London rose up in peaceful protest, that would certainly get the attention of the media.

      Where is globlisaisation man I don know like nobody come from dere like is it in affric or somefink no way I's goink on no march walk thing man if I ain't got no wheels and I mean some smart wheels then I ain't got no respeck off me homies nawhamean

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    61. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there. Nice.

      The police, especially those "trained" and "authorised" to carry guns are not perfect by any means, the whole Jean Charles de Menezes incident bears testament to that.

      Nonetheless, my original point still stands. The only people (apart from the police) who have/carry guns are low-life criminals. Dangerous low-life criminals who are just as likely, if not more likely, to put one of their bullets in an innocent bystander who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time when a gang feud turns sour.

      In this specific case of Mark Duggan, although on the occasion he was shot and killed he may not have been the one to fire first, he was a known convicted criminal, drug dealer and gang leader. I think the police have done society a favour, quite frankly. He chose his path in life and if it wasn't the police that killed him, it would have been a rival gang member soon enough. I will not feel sorry for his loss.

    62. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, yes. One quote was something along the lines of "two weeks ago 5,000 of us marched through London, and the government and media ignored us. Now? We have their attention."

    63. Re:Double Standard by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Dangerous low-life criminals who are just as likely, if not more likely, to put one of their bullets in an innocent bystander who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time when a gang feud turns sour.

      As opposed to the police, who managed to shoot one of their own?

      Cops are supposed to be the good guys, and they're supposed to be better trained than this.

      In this specific case of Mark Duggan, although on the occasion he was shot and killed he may not have been the one to fire first

      According to the new version of events, he hadn't drawn a weapon (it was tucked in his sock). So, while we can debate whether being a "scumbag" is a capital offense, we can't ignore some basic facts - the police shot and killed an unarmed man, and managed to shoot one of their own in the process.

      Don't get me wrong - police good, crooks bad. But if our police force is reduced to Arnold-level "I only kill the bad guys" competency, we haven't done much more than hire one group of thugs over another.

    64. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poor are not as well off as they used to be because they're finally being forced to live within their means instead of being able to pretend like they're middle class.

      The amount of credit (e.g. letting the banks give out mortgages and loans to people who couldn't possibly afford to repay them; thanks Gormless Frown/Phony Hair/Darth Mandelson...) and benefits required to let them live like that contributed to the economy going down the shitter.

    65. Re:Double Standard by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      5000? They probably thought it was regular rush hour.

      Seriously, not impressed. I think you get that in some of the larger flash mobs.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    66. Re:Double Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the point?

    67. Re:Double Standard by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you mean. But if you can organize only 5,000 to protest but many more to riot, then either your organization sucks, your cause sucks, or you just incited criminals to riot.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    68. Re:Double Standard by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      One person protesting there was interviewed and stated that news media would not care unless fuss would be created.

      Right, because they tried peacefully protesting first, and that didn't work.</sarcasm>

      Pretty much.

      LONDON -- As political and social protests grip the Middle East, are growing in Europe and a riot exploded in north London this weekend, here's a sad truth, expressed by a Londoner when asked by a television reporter: Is rioting the correct way to express your discontent?

      "Yes," said the young man. "You wouldn't be talking to me now if we didn't riot, would you?"

      The TV reporter from Britain's ITV had no response. So the young man pressed his advantage. "Two months ago we marched to Scotland Yard, more than 2,000 of us, all blacks, and it was peaceful and calm and you know what? Not a word in the press. Last night a bit of rioting and looting and look around you."

      Source: http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/08/07/7292281-the-sad-truth-behind-london-riot

    69. Re:Double Standard by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      2000 people? That's not a protest, that's a sale at Wal-Mart.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    70. Re:Double Standard by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've seen a Wal-Mart in the UK. Apologies that their protest wasn't the true scotsman you were looking for.

    71. Re:Double Standard by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I won't google the name of a UK department store just to sound educated :)

      I'm not saying that their protest wasn't up to "my" standards. I'm saying it wasn't up to the general standard of "newsworthy". If they sat their 2000 asses on a freeway and made the cops arrest them individually it sure as hell would have made the news. Civil disobedience doesn't require you to burn down your own neighborhood.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  4. Allowing Freedom of Speech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, a terrible role to play.

  5. It'd be nice... by AngryDeuce · · Score: 0

    It'd be nice if they just told the government to go fuck itself if they try to interrupt service, but that probably won't happen. Then again, if they do, the government will just use it as an excuse to just kill the internet for "security reasons" next time so we're pretty much fucked either way, it seems.

    1. Re:It'd be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, if they do, the government will just use it as an excuse to just kill the internet for "security reasons" next time so we're pretty much fucked either way, it seems.

      not necessarily, in a proper functioning democracy, the electorate would kick the gov's ass if they tried blocking twitter cos' they allowed the riots, etc.

    2. Re:It'd be nice... by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      not necessarily, in a proper functioning democracy, the electorate would kick the gov's ass if they tried blocking twitter cos' they allowed the riots, etc.

      Thus why they are working on making it impossible for the citizenry to communicate quickly enough to outmaneuver the government who will most definitely still have their radios while the electorate is stuck with useless cell phones and internet connections with no idea which direction the troops are rolling in from.

    3. Re:It'd be nice... by digitig · · Score: 1

      not necessarily, in a proper functioning democracy, the electorate would kick the gov's ass if they tried blocking twitter cos' they allowed the riots, etc.

      No, in a properly functioning democracy the electorate would decide whether they prefer bread and circuses to an uninterrupted Twitter feed and might well choose the former.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  6. dunno about uk.. by gale+the+simple · · Score: 1

    but in the us all the gvmt institution has to do is to issue subpoena and pretty much all the information is up for grabs.. be it financial institutions, your m$ sexbox profile.. not to mention facebook which is basically founded on selling information of its users. I have to assume that UK wants somewhat quicker access to twitter, fb and RIM... less paperwork, more trees saved. because ya know.. they do care about the environment.

    In essence, gvmt backdoor coming to all communication services. How long till that is broken and abused by evil hackers which will require even more draconian surveillance?

    --
    This post is provided without warranty as to reliability, accuracy or otherwise or fitness for any particular purpose.
  7. Hand over the logs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a freedom of speech issue.
    Planning crimes on facebook, twitter and RIM (public + persistent + 3rd party corporate), is infinity stupid, and the chav hordes have made it extremely easy to catch.

    Oh and next time, use IRC over SSL.

  8. I agree, entirely.. by intellitech · · Score: 1

    When I first read the summary, I was surprised they even dignified the UK government with a response, much less an actual representative.

    But then, I thought to myself, if they didn't, the government would have likely used that alone as an excuse. It really does seem the UK is fucked, either way.

    Personally, though, I blame my government for the UK's attitude here. The United States government has pretty much shown the world that a powerful governmental body can get away with anything to a certain degree, unless the people do something about it. Hell, I doubt anything but a freaking revolution, either civil or congressional, could change government views of the effect of internet communication platforms on keeping the peace.

    --
    vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
    1. Re:I agree, entirely.. by siddesu · · Score: 1

      a freaking [congressional] revolution ... could change government views

      I am not sure why you think the government would be opposing itself. What would be the motivation of Congress to revolt? Most of the views of the government on the effects of internet communication platforms are formed within the Congress (and the legislative branch elsewhere). Sometimes the executive government nudges the legislative, sometimes it is the other way around, but overall the two branches are pretty much sharing the same views.

    2. Re:I agree, entirely.. by jd2112 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I am not sure why you think the government would be opposing itself. What would be the motivation of Congress to revolt?

      Congress is already revolting.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    3. Re:I agree, entirely.. by siddesu · · Score: 1

      I agree, they are totally disgusting.

    4. Re:I agree, entirely.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out the Senate, bro!

    5. Re:I agree, entirely.. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I am not sure why you think the government would be opposing itself. What would be the motivation of Congress to revolt?

      Congress is already revolting.

      You said it. They stink on ice.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  9. They say... by 787style · · Score: 1

    Twitter does't kill people, tweets kill people.

    1. Re:They say... by siddesu · · Score: 1

      The keyboard is mightier than the flick knife, eh?

    2. Re:They say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no such thing as a "flick knife". That word is bullshit on par with "WMD" & "lone wolf terrorist".

      Thank you for reminding me how grateful I am that I don't live in the UK though.

  10. Facebook, twitter, RIM, etc did nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had nothing to do with it. Nor the "flash mob" 7-11 robbery. This is pure hype and scapegoating at its best.

    The government now locks down social media, for your safety.

  11. They should meet with a car manufacturer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...every time somebody runs in to the front of a shopping mall. Why blame the user when you can blame the tool?

  12. Sounds interesting by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    I wish there were some way that they could tell the world what happens at the meeting.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  13. BT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is British Telecom invited?

  14. Sigh by Timmmm · · Score: 1

    I think this is probably the most stupid thing the Tories have done so far.

    1. Re:Sigh by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      Key phrase being "so far".

      Don't worry, there's more than enough time for them to REALLY cock things up.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    2. Re:Sigh by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      I think this is probably the most stupid thing the Tories have done so far.

      It doesn't even come close to being visibile on the list of stupid things the current government have done so far.

    3. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it's nowhere close to the stupid things that the last government did. At least not yet.

  15. Yeah, I'm sure UK is not the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the governments of China, Egypt, Syria, and (har) Libya will also be meeting them, if they haven't already long ago.

    Apparently the UK government hasn't been keeping up on the news.

  16. yes momma government. by StandardAI · · Score: 1

    Is this really how all countries end up? Take away the ability for people to defend their freedoms, play on their fears, take away their voice. Then rape them through taxation, banking and consumption.

    1. Re:yes momma government. by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      typically, yes. Most govs seem to last about 250 years or so at best. Of course, past experience is not necessarily indicative of future performance, blah blah.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    2. Re:yes momma government. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:yes momma government. by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      yes, and they start like that too.

  17. It wasn't twitter, morons, it was Blackberry msgr by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    How dumb can they get.

    Twitter only was used by peeps like me in other countries to rebroadcast the pics and vids they tried to pretend weren't happening.

    It was Blackberry messenger that was being used to coordinate things.

    Total insanity.

    Btw, I used to do counter-terrorism ops, and right now high-end automobiles are being burnt in record numbers in Germany.

    You can't put the genie back in the bottle - either create jobs for youth and stop subsidizing the rich, or watch your country burn.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  18. First they came for the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whose idea was it to make buildings out of bricks? Didn't they stop to think that their buildings could be dismantled and converted into missiles? And what is the idea of putting flammable liquids in automobiles? Did no one consider that someone might try to set a car on fire?

  19. Proper Response by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    They should all give a response in the words of Sir Alex Ferguson: "Fuck off."

    --
    [End Of Line]
  20. Wonder what UK govt wants from them? by c0lo · · Score: 1
    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    1. Re:Wonder what UK govt wants from them? by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Is it: Cameron later asked the question: “Are we going to give police the power to track activity on BlackBerry and Twitter?”

      If your police detectives can't keep track of trending topics on Twitter, you need better detectives.

  21. Twitter enables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people to coordinate. The ability to coordinate helps both revolutions and store-robbing riots. Same as weapons can be used in revolutions, self-defence, and armed robberies. That is why the US Bill of Rights Second Amendment is right near the First Amendment: they enshrine very similar natural rights that can both be very severely misused, and yet should not be infringed as a matter of principle.

    Now, the UK chose to erode both of these rights for its citizens, in the name of public good, peace or whatever. Enjoy the fine line, then.

     

  22. Re:It wasn't twitter, morons, it was Blackberry ms by lgw · · Score: 1

    I used to do counter-terrorism ops, and right now high-end automobiles are being burnt in record numbers in Germany.

    That's a bizarre non-sequitur in the middle of a sentence!

    either create jobs for youth and stop subsidizing the rich, or watch your country burn.

    England has socialism up to its eyebrows. They've created a nearly-unemployable class of young people by removing any need to work (for the basics). The jobs are there, yet most low-skilled jobs are filled by immigrants (I was in London recently, and it seemed everyone in a service role had a French accent; it was very strange). Jobs programs have been tried, and people would simply not show up, or be so lacking in basic literacy, numeracy, or work ethic that there was no useful way to employ them.

    I believe firmly that whoever can find a way to usefully employ all the chavs, neds, and yobs of the world will have invented the post-capitalist economy. MMOs and Farmville have shown that people will do menial, repetitive work for long hours and little compensation - and train themselves on the job to do it! There must be a way to build an economic system around that.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Re:It wasn't twitter, morons, it was Blackberry ms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "England has socialism up to its eyebrows. They've created a nearly-unemployable class of young people by removing any need to work (for the basics)."

    You, sir, are an idiot.

  25. Re:It wasn't twitter, morons, it was Blackberry ms by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I play FrontierVille, not Farmville. Farmville is for neocons.

    Besides, I'm working on the next gen Kthulhu Kitchen (tm), the eldritch cooking game, and that runs on an iPad in standalone with networked "gifting".

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  26. Re:It wasn't twitter, morons, it was Blackberry ms by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "You, sir, are an idiot."

    You, sir, presented nothing to counter his argument.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  27. If only. by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 2

    The UK government were friends with their citizens and followed them on twitter, they'd have a clue what all the commotion was about...

    1. Re:If only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe twitter should make a default friend UK government for every uk account :)

    2. Re:If only. by tendrousbeastie · · Score: 1

      And that would be?

  28. Don't forget religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously they will be questioning their respective gods as to why the human race was created to allow this to happen.

  29. Re:It wasn't twitter, morons, it was Blackberry ms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asian gold farming services: do menial task for lazy Westerns in exchange for real gold. Let the very uneven cost-of-living profits keep them fed for weeks without the need for real jobs.
    Anyway, here's 56c/hour rates and other info: http://www.1up.com/features/wage-slaves-mmo-goldfarming
    Even Korean presidents are using it: http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2011/08/08/kim-jong-ils-latest-cash-source-is-mmo-gold-farming/

  30. pumaccat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.puma-ferrari-cat.com est une bonne site en google.fr

  31. Just a spoon full of sugar... by JustinFreid · · Score: 1

    I'm imagining the meeting of Twitter and the UK Government will look a lot like the animated scenes from Mary Poppins.

    --
    Hey, how's it going?
  32. May not be so bad by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

    I know it's terribly unpopular to be the voice of reason in a "GOVERNMENT IS BAD" discussion, but this meeting may not be a bad thing. Perhaps the government just wants insight into how they can get advance notice of violent trends. Perhaps Twitter can provide easy access to its data, to find people bragging about the loot they took. Perhaps whatever socioeconomic factors (if any) that led to the riots could be derived from other posts by the rioters, and the government could better understand the problems it faces.

    But hey... never mind me. Let's all continue jumping to conclusions anyway. Up next, Linux Torvalds looks at Windows 8. Could this mean Microsoft secretly controls Linux development?

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  33. UKGov - FB, Twit.. 'Just flick the sw...' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody else perceive this as a kill-switch ploy between that of corporate and government?

    1. Re:UKGov - FB, Twit.. 'Just flick the sw...' by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Does anybody else perceive this as a kill-switch ploy between that of corporate and government?

      More likely it is the government asking for a way to monitor tweets in real time surreptitiously based on various geo filters. e.g. all tweets from particular IPs / cells coming from a particular region. I wouldn't be surprised if they also wanted the ability for tweets to be modified, delayed, lost etc. and to send out tweets to people based on geographic location too.

  34. It's a well understood colloquial expression by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Lots of people in the UK know what you're talking about when you say a flick knife. It's a colloquial expression. Maybe its not used correctly (if you're in Ye Olde Guilde of Knifey Makers or something like that) but people here would understand it to be a sharp easily concealed knife that folds into the handle and springs and locks into place, or perhaps is flicked into the locked position by a flick of the wrists.
      We've got quite a lot of pedants here already in the UK so probably we should be grateful you don't live here ;-)

  35. Re:It wasn't twitter, morons, it was Blackberry ms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny you should mention it. I am writing a book called "MMORPG Management" where I describe how the key to effective management is omniscience in pos/neg reinforcement(peer pressure through profit sharing) combined with the ability of employees to instantly monitor regularly updated progress towards an objective.

    Other features:
    Glorification/embellishment of job duty importance, as well as the ability to decorate/express themselves and "accessorize" their presentation.

    The most important feature is having friends as co-workers. This reduces turn over because the job & social life are linked IE badass employees only social clubs.

    Human resources needs to get out of the stone ages and start hiring small teams/working groups based on competency vs. Individual degrees/resumes and then management should give these teams work framed as competitive tasks/contests to exploit the gambling mentality(ie:challenge.gov). Ex:"identify a means to cut janitorial expenses by 10%"-> and team "morning shift" won so they get to split 50% of the savings as part of their wages.

    -floydmcooper@gmail.com

  36. What's sauce for the Chinese goose by dugeen · · Score: 1

    Twitter in China = FREEDOM Twitter in the UK = NASTINESS Cameron you utter hypocrite.

    1. Re:What's sauce for the Chinese goose by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Your premise rests on a false assumption of equality, namely that the UK government is as repressive as the Chinese one.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  37. Just 'meet' not 'meet with'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or will something else be present?

  38. Were riots earlier, but no media so no spread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Page 1 of current issue of Private Eye, met police had to deal with similar riots earlier this year but the media were too busy looking at Japan and hoping for a nuclear apocalypse to report on so paid no attention, so it didn't spread.

  39. Other companies called in: by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    Shoe, clothing, jewelry, gun, car, match, and lighter companies were all called in for their roles.
    How dare they make products that can be used by destructive people!

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  40. This being twitter by stubob · · Score: 1

    Will they answer all questions 140 characters at a time?

    --
    Planning to be moderated ± 1: Bad Pun.
  41. Re:It wasn't twitter, morons, it was Blackberry ms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The jobs are there, yet most low-skilled jobs are filled by immigrants (I was in London recently, and it seemed everyone in a service role had a French accent; it was very strange).

    I'm sure there aren't many French over here doing that type of job. You sure it wasn't a Polish accent? Lot's of Polish people have come over in recent years since they joined the EU.