Slashdot Mirror


Celebrities Flock To Reserve .xxx Domains

hypnosec writes "Celebrities have moved swiftly to block their names from the .xxx domain, which is meant for websites that offer pornographic content. Thousands of celebrities have contacted ICM Registry to put their names on the permanently reserved list so that no one will be able to start offering porn under their name. The domain registration company, ICM Registry, failed to give out the list of domain names it had blocked nor it is willing to tell how long the list is. On a lighter note, OsamaBinLaden.xxx has been also blocked and we assume the Al Qaeda would have demanded to reserve the domain."

25 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. protection racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    protection racket

    1. Re:protection racket by jhoegl · · Score: 3, Informative

      I saw no cost to add to "reserve" list.

    2. Re:protection racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I saw no cost to add to "reserve" list.

      I did.

      There are no corporate trademarks on the reserved list. Companies that want to make sure their brands do not appear with a .xxx extension are expected to pay between $200 and $650 to to make sure they are removed from the pool of available names.

  2. people can be creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ParisHilton.xxx may be blocked, but what about Paris-Hilton.xxx, Paris_Hilton.xxx, ParisXHilton.xxx, xxxParisHilton.xxx and WeWillAlwaysHaveParis.xxx?

    1. Re:people can be creative by mtinsley · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't use underscores in domain names.

    2. Re:people can be creative by Cyko_01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      don't forget OneNightInParis.xxx

    3. Re:people can be creative by S.O.B. · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about ParisSucksCo.xxx?

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    4. Re:people can be creative by houghi · · Score: 2

      Enough with the anti-french postings already.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  3. This is stupid by Haedrian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't just mean the reservations, but also the whole domain.

    If I wanted to see porn of the Celebrity named Jane Doe, I wouldn't go

    JaneDoePorn(com/xxx)
    PornJaneDoe(com/xxx)
    JaneDoePron(com/xxx)
    JaneDoePics(com/xxx)

    et cetera

    I'd open Google and type in "Jane Doe Porn" and see which links look good.

    If you're going to flood the xxx domain with useless garbage, then the whole concept of it is useless.

    1. Re:This is stupid by SomePgmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Without enforcement, which won't exist and nobody wants anyways, the whole concept is useless anyway.

      There's no utility in this besides the cash grab.

    2. Re:This is stupid by SomePgmr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't even begin to imagine the colossal nightmare of trying to figure what should and shouldn't be on the .xxx domain, and policing it. Such a rule probably won't ever happen, but if it does, it'll be either a damned mess, totally fail in its intended purpose, or both.

    3. Re:This is stupid by Zedrick · · Score: 2

      Seconded. There was a time, perhaps around -94 or -95, when I would type in an url that described what I was looking for. Then webcrawler (the first decent searchengine) came along and made that whole "SLD having any relation to the content" thing useless.

    4. Re:This is stupid by Haedrian · · Score: 2

      Only for a server though right? Unless you're planning on hosting your own server you won't need those open.

    5. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Inbound, to protect averagely uninterested users from accidentally exposing their routers configuration interface to the world.

      (25 to prevent access to open relays on customers' computers, 135 and 139 to prevent access to unprotected SMB shares)

    6. Re:This is stupid by Stan92057 · · Score: 2

      Its simple, Graphic depictions of sex acts thats pornography. Soft porn/erotica obscured or suggestive sex acts.Why do people make something that is so simple so hard?

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    7. Re:This is stupid by S.O.B. · · Score: 2

      Didn't you ever see "Debbie Does A Donkey Up Against A Ficus And Takes It In The Bungalow"?

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  4. Most idiotic and futile task ever by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

    Misspellings, typographical differences (hyphens), and that is not even taking into account domain names can contain numbers.

    You can't buy them all. But the owners of the .xxx registry are making a tidy sum off the gullibility of celebrities, so it's all good.

  5. Idea by Haedrian · · Score: 2

    I wonder if I can register a .sucks TLD.

    I'm sure businesses will clamour to register the companyName.sucks domain to prevent competitors messing it up.

    Win.

  6. Re:Congratulations ICANN by petman · · Score: 4, Informative

    From what I understand from TFA, the celebrities don't have to pay to get on the list, so no one's making money out of this.

  7. Oh but they can by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I work in the industry and have followed this. The evil in the .xxx domain is staggering.

    First is the pure money grab, same as with .mobi and .travel and several others. Ever use them for legit sites? No? But lots of companies paid for their domain name nonetheless. Domain names are cheap? Not the .xxx ones. This ain't a service it is a commercial business and they want some real cash. Oh not enough to be a major worry to most companies but enough to add up.

    Then there is the provision that the registar has that they reserve the right to scan your site. That doesn't happen with any other domain but it does for the .xxx domain. Harmless you say? Most porn sites are members only. Is the registar going to need a full access account for every site to scan it? They refuse to answer. Who is going to responsible for leaked access? They don't even acknowledge that question. How is an American company going to deal with laws in different countries, as in why would a Japanese site have to follow US rules or vice versa?

    But the final evil is why lots of politicians are in favor of it.

    What is Playboy magazine? A porn mag OR a magazine with some pictures of nudity? The difference is important. The US has no clear anti-porn laws, instead it has laws that prohibit obscene material. What is obscene? That is a very good question and so far the courts have been unable to answer it.

    Porn is legal in the US as long as no court can define it as being obscene. In olden days this explains nudist magazines and movies. By shooting it as a documentary on nudist live a movie could be sold that was just a skin flick. It is educational!

    This has never gone totally away in the US although a lot of porn IS produced as purely porn the laws are still there and plenty of politicians would be willing to enforce them.

    But how can you proof something is porn? How do you proof playboy.com is just obscenity? Well, a bloody big clue would be playboy.xxx Godwin be damned but it is a yellow star. Why do you think the yellow star was used on jews but not say a black star on blacks in America? Because there was no need to, you can tell a black person just by looking a them and therefor there was no risk of a black person going into a whites only store. The only way to enfore "gein juden" was to force them to wear an identifier.

    If you force all porn on the .xxx domain you have also forced to label themselves as porn. To those who wish to purge porn from the web, step 1.

    Will this happen? Some believe so, the same kind of people that defended Larry Flint. Not because they liked Hustler so much but because of this "joke".

    An Arminain grandfather lies on his deathbed and calls his sons to him to depart some final wisdom, "Remember my sons, always defend the jews."

    Why the jews the oldest son asks.

    "Because once they are gone, we will be next".

    The web as it exist now is a mess, porn, business, copyright infringement, press all mixed up with no easy way to tell which is which. But it makes it very hard for a group to silence a part of it. See the US problems with trying to filter porn in public libraries. Oops, it may contain sex but it is also free speech. .xxx would have no such protection since by its label it is only obscenity and that doesn't fall under free speech.

    .XXX is a multi-layered beast. At first glance it seems just like a money grab until you realize that there is political support for it for over a decade from a certain quarter and they are NOT in it for they money. They got other motives and once they become evident it will be too late.

    Remember this, when it was asked during a conference that IF as the registar said market forces would decide if it was a success or not that ANOTHER option for the registar who invested a LOT of money in this MIGHT use their political mussle to buy ADDITIONAL laws to FORCE purchase of .xxx domains to save their business, the representative plain refused to answer.

    Google will do wonders for some more insights.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Oh but they can by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Some porn sites are known for their rather over-determined advertising - I've seen things like search engine manipulation, forum-spamming, etc. These sites typically aren't operated from the US though, or associated with any large porn company. They are just small porn distributors (Half the time distributing pirate porn at that) desperate to do anything to get customers in a saturated market.

    2. Re:Oh but they can by tverbeek · · Score: 2

      You do realize that the people stuffing your inbox with porn are not actually in charge of The Porn Industry, right? What you're saying is the equivalent of saying that [insert local minority here] deserves what they get because they steal things, bring down property values, etc.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  8. Re:This gave me a great idea by ObitMan · · Score: 2

    So you are going to tease us all like this and not put out?

    for shame.

    --
    Who run Barter Town?
  9. Bachmann? by cashman73 · · Score: 2

    I see that michelebachmann.xxx is reserved, but marcusbachmann.xxx is still available,. . . Likewise, rickperry.xxx is reserved, but Stephen Colbert could still reserve rickparry.xxx in the name of ColbertSUPERPAC,. . . ;-)

  10. Re:How famous? by lorg · · Score: 2

    anonymouscoward.xxx, what exactlly will your page be sporting? blurred out faces? people doing it with masks on?