Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Could We Deal With the End of Time Zones?

First time accepted submitter hairyfish writes "Do we still need time zones? Time zones are a relic of the past, when different parts of the world were isolated, and 12 p.m. was whenever the sun was directly above your specific location. Now, in the Internet age, time is just an arbitrary number, and time zones are just unnecessary complexity. Why can't we scrap time zones altogether, and all just use UTC across the board? So here on the eastern seaboard of Australia, lunchtime will now be at 2 a.m., In New York it will be 4 p.m., and in Moscow it will be 8 a.m. There'll be some pain with the initial changeover, but from then on it's all good. Got a meeting with colleagues on the other side of the world? 4 a.m. means 4 a.m. for everyone. Got a flight landing at 3 p.m.? 3 p.m. now means 3 p.m. for everyone. For DST, you simply change your schedule rather than the clock (i.e. work and school starts an hour earlier during DST months). No confusion ever again. For someone whose work involves travel or communication across time zones, this is the best idea I've ever heard. So why aren't we doing it?"

26 of 990 comments (clear)

  1. Is this even a real question? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this the type of crap we can come to expect now that CmdrTaco is gone?

    1. Re:Is this even a real question? by myurr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem with the unification of time systems is that 4am may be 4am everywhere, but now you'd need to know if that was the middle of the day in New York or the middle of the night. You still need to know all the time differences to have any meaningful interaction with other people, so the problem is no simpler. If you go on holiday you still need to learn to get up at 4pm instead of 6am, and it won't be as simple as just changing your watch and trying to adjust to the normal localised times you'd do those things.

      So it's a whole load of pain changing the system for no gain, or even a step backwards. Woo.

    2. Re:Is this even a real question? by Zombie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it just means you're old.
      Linux is twenty years old.
      The IBM-compatible PC is a relic.
      Modem handshake noise is no longer widely recognised.
      Most people using computers have never seen a text screen.
      And your UID has four digits, as does mine.
      Now let's kick those darn youngsters off our Slashdot!

    3. Re:Is this even a real question? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 4, Funny

      Modem handshake noise is no longer widely recognised.

      *wipes tears from keyboard...*

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  2. Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first!! by sam0737 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DST is a beast. Worse, the rules change over time!

  3. Dates get confusing by crow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do we really want the date to change in the middle of the day? No, that is not practical. Most of the world still runs based on sleeping when the sun is down, so the time zone system still works.

  4. AM & PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Scrap AM & PM - most people can figure out a 24 hour clock. Time zones, on the other hand, make perfect sense.

    1. Re:AM & PM by doctormetal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      AM and PM is stupid and can be confusing. People often mention the time and assume you know whether they mean AM or PM. Most countries use a 24 hour clock so ditch the 2*12 one. And also ditch the imperial system.

  5. So why aren't we doing it? by Ark42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So why aren't we doing it? Because it's a stupid idea. We still want noon to be when the sun is overhead, and midnight to be the middle of the night. Internet be damned, it's arbitrarily more convenient for most people, because most people don't travel all that often, and spend most of their time in their local time zone.

  6. We already use UTC! by FranTaylor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our computer clocks are all using UTC already

    The displayed time is adjusted to local time for the benefit of us humans

    We can say "the best time to feed the animals is at 4 PM" and that applies to everyone on the planet. With your scheme we would have to give a much longer-winded explanation.

  7. Re:Why not by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The rest of the world had no problem...

  8. Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by impaledsunset · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With time zones you can simply look up the time at a given location to know which part of the day it is, time corresponding to a part of the day is extremely useful, especially when you're moving through different countries or working with foreign people. It's much easier to change the time zone of your clock than to adjust to a day that starts at 16 o'clock. The different time zones give you more information, and given that most electronic devices can convert between them easily and display multiple at the same time, it's not really harmful.

    DST is the beast that needs to die, because it makes it hard to represent the exact time me with the local time plus a simple offset. After DST dies, we should try to deal with unusual time zones that do not match the local solar mean time that you have in countries like Russia or offsets that have half an hour in them like you have in Iran.

    If time zones make it difficult for you, work on the better integration of the tools dealing with them.

  9. Re:Why fix it? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah. Why bother trying to improve anything? If it isn't completely broken, don't try to fix it.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  10. It's Internet Time all over again... by kaiidth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First thing that came to mind on reading this article was "1998 called, they want their suggestion back".

    Back in 1998 when the Web was new and cool, Swatch were attempting to market a metric alternative to the 24 hour clock, which they excitingly referred to as 'Internet Time'. It divided the day into 1,000 'beats', and was based around the Central European timezone (GMT + 1) on the basis that Swatch's headquarters are in Biel. Unsurprisingly, the concept went down like a lead balloon.

    FWIW, you'd have to think about different timezones anyway. No amount of universally-shared timezones are going to change the physical reality, so they may as well reflect it.

  11. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the U.S. it is because the Federal Government oversteps its bounds on everything, including telling us what the clock shall say.

    Think about this: People this stupid have the right to vote.

    The US is doomed.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  12. If you want to get up an hour early in the summer by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want to get up an hour early in the summer, get your ass out of bed!

    Why should the rest of us screw up our sleep rhythms because you don't want to reset your alarm clock?

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  13. Time zones were created to fix local noon by DragonHawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Submitter gets it wrong anyway. From TFS: "Time zones are a relic of the past, when different parts of the world were isolated, and 12 p.m. was whenever the sun was directly above your specific location."

    Um, no. Time zones were *created* to deal with the problem of local noon being whenever the sun was directly above your specific location. That's what the world used for thousands of years, until rapid transit and communications made that impractical. With the coming of railroads, for the first time, people were frequently outrunning the sun. Time zones became a necessity. You can't have a rail time table if everybody's clock is different.

    Also, I think the proposal is just moving the problem around. Currently we have to think, "Okay, they're 3 hours ahead of me, so 9 AM here is 12 PM there." With this proposal, we'd have to think, "Okay, they're 3 hours ahead of me, so when I'm starting work they're going to lunch".

    And nobody's stopping anyone from doing everything on UTC. I know at least one person who sets his schedule that way.

    DST -- as others have said -- that we can do without.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  14. i dont see how its any easier by rrossman2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Either way, you have to know where you are to determine when stuff happens.

    For example, I'm on the east coast. I travel to California, set my clock back 3 hours (or for a cell phone it adjusts its self possibly.. some phones do some don't). I still know stores open at 8 or 10 am.. lunch is at 12, done working at 5.. stores close at 9.. etc.

    Now with the op's idea.. I have to constantly remember the stores open at 5am or 7am, lunch is at 9am, done working at 2pm, stores close at 6pm.. how is that *any easier*? Instead of changing one factor and the rest fall in place, you're now keep that one the "the same" and having to remember to adjust *all* of the rest that are typically a given constant.
    And if you can't figure out UTC +/- then you have other issues.

  15. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but if you want to buy a single drink, it's easier to say "a pint" or even "a 12-ounce cup" rather than "400 milliliters."

    What's wrong with saying 4 deciliters?

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  16. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by kbolino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, the Federal government has every right to regulate its own agencies, which is all the time-keeping regulations do. They have no authority to tell you how to set your own clocks, nor do they even have any such laws. You have CHOSEN to use the same time convention, for reasons of convenience. Go ahead, set your clocks to whatever time you want, hell you can even invent your own clocks. I guarantee you they will not levy any fines, charge you with any crimes, nor make any other attempt to coerce you into adopting their system of keeping time.

    Don't be an idiot.

  17. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whelp, an anonymous anarchist has given me an unsubstantiated account of what seems like the most tedious and trivial event in law enforcement history. Guess that proves it... the government is evil!

  18. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're not doing it because it's retarded. Somehow the submitter thinks this will help people who travel for business. Excuse me?

    When you land, you've got to say to yourself: "Ok...at home, I started work at 3AM, which was after the sun came up, so here, I have to get to work at....wait....what time does the sun rise here? 5PM? WTF?"

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  19. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by NoMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, what you're saying is that the U.S. government controls your clocks by beaming invisible rays into them?

    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  20. Re:Slow news day? by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I'm curious about is how precisely this is any simpler than our current system. You do get the advantage of specifying a time that's globally valid, but for things that matter you still have to worry about what times are appropriate to expect a response from somebody in Georgia and depending upon which one the answer is likely to be different.

    The real problem is that when you're traveling you'd then have to learn what times everything is done or convert those times to ones your familiar with, rather than the current system where most of those times are the same, just happen earlier or later with respect to your home.

    The current system we have works in the instances where one needs that sort of coordination we've got GMT and UTC available.

  21. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Thangodin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bingo. When you go to a different place, you don't want to be somewhere where the sun rises at 11 PM and sets at 12 AM. You want a normal day, and the timezone tells you what the range of that day is. Timezones don't interfere with travel, they facilitate travel.

    Look, can we just start ignoring libertarians? I mean, when someone is wrong once, you shrug. When they're wrong ten times, you raise an eyebrow. But when they're wrong hundreds of times, they need to be added to the twit filter. These people are the new bolsheviks, who also promised that the state would vanish under their leadership. Never trusted the communists, don't trust the libertarians. Same shit, different bucket.

  22. Re:Slow news day? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly. Suppose you're sitting in your New York office, and you want to call a colleague in an office in California, and you have to determine if now is a good time to call or not.

    The way it is now, you look at your clock, see it's 10AM, and then mentally calculate the timezone difference: EDT is 3 hours offset from PDT. So it's 7AM in California, and now is probably too early to call your colleague, as he's probably still at home or on the way to work (or maybe still sleeping, depending on when he gets in).

    Under a timezone-less scheme, you'd have a harder time, because there's no time zones to help you quickly calculate offsets. Instead, you'll think to yourself, "well, back when we had time zones, California was 3 hours apart from us, so it's like it's 7AM over there, so this is too early." But what happens in 20+ years when a younger generation comes along that doesn't remember the old time zone system? How exactly are they supposed to know that California is (roughly) three hours behind the east coast, and that it's now customary in California to start work at 5AM and leave at 2PM (unless they frequently communicate with people from there and remember this fact)? Do they have to start up some web application to tell them this? I suppose this would be one solution, but it seems pretty ridiculous when we already have a system now that doesn't require a constant internet connection or a nearby computer to tell us such a simple bit of information.

    With time zones, all I have to remember is the GMT offsets of every place I'm interested in, and it's trivial for me to calculate local times for those places, which means I know what time most places start business and close business. Without time zones, I'll have to do a lookup for everything. Maybe if we get to the point where we all have constant internet connections wired into our brains, then they'll truly be obsolete, but not before then.