Slashdot Mirror


Drunkeness and Sexual Harassment Alleged At Microsoft UK

rtfa-troll writes "A picture of vodka fountains, indefinite amounts of Jaegermeister, and sexual harassment is emerging from Microsoft. The former second in command at Microsoft UK was accused of sexual misconduct involving at least five separate women. A Microsoft internal investigation was unable to prove the allegations but decided to fire Simon Negus for having 'behaved dishonestly, and thereby acted in a manner calculated or likely to destroy trust and confidence between him and Microsoft' and sue him £75k. Now Negus, who already has a new job as COO at Upstream Systems has struck back with a £10 million false dismissal suit alleging a culture of drunken parties and claiming that other (Male) management at Microsoft were so drunk they followed a female Microsoft UK manager into the ladies' lavatories. I guess we can now guess why senior managers go away to Microsoft vowing never to buy anything and come back with signed contracts; presumably it was just lying there next to them in the morning and they were too afraid to ask what happened."

159 comments

  1. Meh by d.the.duck · · Score: 2

    This happens at every company.....until someone reports it.

    --
    Where does the signature go?
    1. Re:Meh by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      This is true. I worked for a company that did a lot of partying. It was fun times when we went out, a lot of dating, etc.

      This wasnt the craziest part, the sexism was prevalent, including pay differences.
      So I left.

    2. Re:Meh by azalin · · Score: 1

      At least ERGO had the courtesy to supply hookers in addition to the booze.

    3. Re:Meh by capnkr · · Score: 1

      Well, MS UK could hire Douglas Reynholm to replace Negus...

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
    4. Re:Meh by 1s44c · · Score: 0

      This happens at every company.....until someone reports it.

      I'm a pretty big Microsoft hater but I have to say I totally agree with you.

      People with any kind of power will abuse it and men often abuse their position to get female attention. The women who flirt with the boss get good reviews, the women that sleep with the boss get big pay raises, the ones that have their kids get jobs for life on pay they could not otherwise justify. It happens everywhere just like fiddling expenses and booking extra flights to collect air miles. It's not seen as wrong until someone starts complaining.

    5. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Speaking of "reporting", anyone find it odd that a search for Simon Negus on MSNBC returns no results? The Bing page shows mostly non-scandal related links (only two "negative" articles on the first two pages). Filtering results maybe?

      Mij

    6. Re:Meh by cayenne8 · · Score: 0
      I remember when some companies I worked at...had food and parties for us on campus...with free drinks. Man, that was fun...

      Unfortunately, everywhere is so "PC" these days, and afraid of any kind of problems from sue happy people.

      Kinda sux that some people looking to make a buck out of suing ruin it for us all.

      Hell, the open bar Xmas party now is becoming a thing of the past....in some ways, the old days WERE better...at least more fun.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:Meh by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why doesn't this ever happen at companies I work at? The places I've worked suck the sex drive out, along with motivation, sense of self-preservation and sometimes even the desire to breathe.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The minister's cat is a WORRISOME cat!"
      "The minister's cat is... oh bother..."

    9. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not the place you work, so much as it's just you. You don't have the drive and social skills necessary to get to a position where you get to party like this. This is why every place you work at "suck the sex drive out, along with motivation, sense of self-preservation and sometimes even the desire to breathe."

      Fag.

    10. Re:Meh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Supplying hookers doesn't always go well:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E4yrqGGLPo

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Meh by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't this ever happen at companies I work at?

      To hazard a guess, everyone where you work is probably not that attractive.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    12. Re:Meh by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The bing results are very similiar to the google results. The only difference is the bloomberg article which is link 1 on google is link 12 on bing.

      I think we're just seeing a difference in the ranking algorithms... google is pushing "news" harder than the facebook, linked in, etc stuff.

      As for not finding it on msnbc... its not on CNN either, or Fox News, or CBS News... so I don't read much into that at all either.

    13. Re:Meh by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't this ever happen at companies I work at?

      Everyone was too busy making stuff?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    14. Re:Meh by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      You can still have social functions, they just have to be stupid, like everyone riding go-karts or playing laser tag in the hopes that this will make our product better.

    15. Re:Meh by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      No bro... we had open bar christmas parties. In fact every event was open bar. We stocked alcohol at work!

    16. Re:Meh by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Go-karts & laser tag aren't fun?

      We even did bocce ball, which I thought was going to be boring, but was fun.

    17. Re:Meh by hiroko · · Score: 1

      That's what the booze is for...

      --
      Just because you can't, doesn't mean you shouldn't.
    18. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well believe it or not, I'm owner and CEO of a small company, and we do organize parties from times to times. Alcohol is planned, with the specific purpose of getting drunk together and tighten relationships. It's completely routine in the country I work for. Except for young generations, who curiously don't drink, even light beer.

    19. Re:Meh by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Just saying in my experience in the US, alcohol parties are getting in general, fewer and rarer..sadly

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:Meh by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      Because no one wants to get hit with a lawsuit by women in a legal system where a woman can destroy a man's life with just a simple accusation.

  2. sounds annoying by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unless it's a small startup formed with people you're friends with, there's not much worse than a corporate culture of socially coerced "fun". Let's party with the boss!

    1. Re:sounds annoying by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its either "party with the boss" or you're the one who has to stay sober and get the work done.

      So the boss' idiot son-in-law can take credit for it.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:sounds annoying by Xest · · Score: 1

      It's not just internal. When I went on a trip to Reading in a previous job where they were showing off new server technologies they had hired good time girls there too to basically act as eye candy for all the people they were trying to tie in to a future with Microsoft tech.

      But let's also be honest, Microsoft is far from unique here, it's not fair to single them out over it, really, it's a problem with corporate sales and marketing culture across many industries.

    3. Re:sounds annoying by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      I was that guy once. Worked many 30+ hour overnights to correct problems created by the adopted idiot son and the son's best friend, lead coder and project manager with no experience, respectively.

      I was fired 9 months in for not getting enough done.

    4. Re:sounds annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... When I went on a trip to Reading in a previous job...

      I am so sorry for you. I am glad that you survived the trip

    5. Re:sounds annoying by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Microsoft and Intel have thrown some legendary parties at Supercomputing. In 2006, they rented an entire Mall in Tampa. Free food and drink (Pretty much anything you wanted, They wouldn't hand out 20 year old scotch I'm sure, but I specifically remember having a Bombay Sapphire martini), live music, probably more than a thousand people. It was an amazing time, but I'm told that it paled in comparison to some previous years. There's no doubt Redmond knows how to throw a party.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    6. Re:sounds annoying by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i wouldn't have waited to get fired - i would have found another job and quit

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    7. Re:sounds annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you shouldn't be calling them idiots when clearly you're the idiot..

    8. Re:sounds annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's your father-in-law doing these days? Things going well back at the old company? Did you manage to hold on to your job when they outsourced everything to India?

  3. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by jhoegl · · Score: 1

    Are.... are you Dr. Bob's "alt"?

  4. This is exactly the problem with the higher ups. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 3

    Now Negus, who already as a new job as COO at Upstream Systems

    If you get high enough up in a company, you can do whatever you want, get in whatever trouble you want, and some smaller company will always hire you.
    Another recent(ish?) example I can think of is Mark Hurd from HP, Oracle immediately gave him a job.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  5. well damn by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    now I want to work at MS.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:well damn by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Beats the hell out of the ping pong tables at google. At least MS knows to use them for beer pong.

    2. Re:well damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, but it's in the UK.

      OK, maybe there isn't a down-side here. Perhaps the dental plan?

    3. Re:well damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micro-who? Watch the mighty giant fall.

      You're next Apple.

    4. Re:well damn by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      It's exactly this response that worried me when I posted. But then I thought that they might get some decent people out of this, but the average will be a bunch of drunks and will pull the company down more than enough.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    5. Re:well damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beats the hell out of the ping pong tables at google. At least MS knows to use them for beer pong.

      Linux has beer, not free though - and I've never seen any rent-a-good-time-girl at the conferences (sigh). I'd join Microsoft in a flash - except all their senior staff are butt-ugly.

    6. Re:well damn by Xacid · · Score: 1

      I'd join Microsoft in a flash - except all their senior staff are butt-ugly.

      Then just think of them all as professional wingmen!

  6. Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pictures or it didn't happen.

    1. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go!

      Oh, wait, you wanted pictures of Negus.

  7. Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      yea ME that wasn't a decade ago and is still funny! I wanna know where the xkcd is for MSDOS 4 that would be a fucking barrel roll

  8. Re:This is exactly the problem with the higher ups by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

    That's even true for politicians.

  9. Didn't he get the memo? by nani+popoki · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has deprecated sex. We're supposed to use the master bait now instead.

    1. Re:Didn't he get the memo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has deprecated sex. We're supposed to use the master bait now instead.

      i lol'd

    2. Re:Didn't he get the memo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be just like Microsoft though...

    3. Re:Didn't he get the memo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can use the new SexEx function, or query for the ISex2 interface.

  10. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

    Pretty weak troll. You should have stopped after paragraph one. About a 3 on a scale of 1-10. For the record, Dr. Bob sits at a solid 10.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  11. That's Just Like Women, Alright! by eldavojohn · · Score: 2

    Take a flat tire on a moonless night for instance. While a man is out changing nuts and bolts and doing all manner of screwing on the side of the road, will a woman so much as think to grab a flashlight and help? No.

    Let me guess, everything you learned about women you learned on TV? And you're still single you say? Marvelous, simply marvelous.

    Bruce Molholland, is that you?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:That's Just Like Women, Alright! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      But if there's a zombie attack, people seem to skip the chainsaws, shotguns, cricket bats and flamethrowers and go straight for the flash light. Weird!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:That's Just Like Women, Alright! by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Many years ago I was playing in a Macho women with Guns game at a RP convention and I had a character who in the initial part of the adventure was determine to be too stupid to be trusted with a gun, so she was given a flashlight.

      Over the course of the module she found that anything she shone the toch on died (because the other characters shot it), so when we were gearing up for the ultimate encounter and she was finally told she could have any weapon she wanted, she asked for a portable floodlight.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    3. Re:That's Just Like Women, Alright! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      *golf clap*

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  12. Now we also know.. by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    ...why MSFT is always in the top three of the "top employers" rankings. And it looks like they only ask men in these surveys.

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    1. Re:Now we also know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think there aren't women who enjoy sexual harassment?

    2. Re:Now we also know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's not sexual harassment if all parties involved welcome it. And we all know that when women make sexual advances, it is almost always welcomed by the involved parties. Geez, didn't you even listed to the training video?

  13. What about the robot hand? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    No mention of him having his hand removed and replaced with a robotic one?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:What about the robot hand? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Was it an evil robot hand?

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  14. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do women hate sex? They do, but do you know why? Is it because of some kind of woman-guilt from an outdated puritan societal dogma? Or perhaps a stigma of guilt or a fear of abandonment? No. None of these things are it. Women hate sex simply because they are lousy at it.

    I seriously get the impression it's you that is doing something wrong there mate. From what I can tell, women don't hate sex, certainly not the women I've been with, they just think there's much more to life than just that. And they'd be right.

    By the way, it is entirely possible to take flirting too far. There's absolutely nothing wrong with flirting, but no means no and alcohol is not an excuse.

  15. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IT's a work function, you don't flirt. It' puts pressure on people because they are afraid to loose their job. And why are you overlooking the part where he kept touching them inappropriately?

    "course weared sexy short skirts and shirts that highlights their boobs.
    ah. You are blaming victims so yu can not feel guilt about seeing women as sex objects.

    Why would you company a women leg to a penis...I mean my penis* could be confused with a leg, but not most others.

    "Do women hate sex?"
    Just with you.

    "They do, but do you know why? "
    no, they don't.

    " Women hate sex simply because they are lousy at it."
    ah, the blaming of women for your own sexual inadequacy.

    You are a sociopath. A dangerous one.

    *ob. lrg penis joke.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was sounding great, but I could have used a little more subluxation.

  17. Re:This is exactly the problem with the higher ups by 1s44c · · Score: 2

    If you get high enough up in a company, you can do whatever you want, get in whatever trouble you want, and some smaller company will always hire you.
    Another recent(ish?) example I can think of is Mark Hurd from HP, Oracle immediately gave him a job.

    The old boys club. It's killing industry worldwide.

  18. If the boss is paying.... by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    I'm not aware of many IT employees that turn down free alcohol. I can count one part-time guy in my entire career of the top of my head, and he was the one who was planning to go into the seminary when he finished his undergraduate degree.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:If the boss is paying.... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of many IT employees that turn down free alcohol

      In short, it's not many people. There's a few practical declines (designated driver, pregnancy), a few muslims who don't drink out of religious convictions and a few others, but the vast majority of people in all walks of like will have a few free beers or glasses of wine. Not everyone is looking to get drunk on the company's bill though, but there's usually someone who does. They don't all try to flirt, and most do it in a way that's not sexual harassment. But does it happen? Yes, probably.

      The problem is that everything the company touches, that's the company's problem. If they'd all gone to a local club and she was sexually harassed there, it wouldn't normally be the club's problem. But if it's a company party, even if it's not more than providing a place for people to socialize then it almost certainly will be the company's problem. Next thing you know lawsuits are flying and everybody must stay at arm's length from members of the opposite sex (and these days, probably the same sex).

      Okay, so maybe some companies have a really horrible attitude to this but I've not run into one. Most of the time the problem is with that one employee that doesn't know boundaries and probably doesn't know boundaries in other places either. But in those places you can't sue the company for millions.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:If the boss is paying.... by billstewart · · Score: 1

      At a previous job, we had a guy in our group who didn't drink, and was always convenient as a designated driver. There are enough techies around who aren't neurotypical or otherwise don't drink because they don't like having their heads messed with, or who don't drink because they had alcoholics in their family and don't want to go there. There are also people who don't drink because they used to be alcoholics, though I ran into that more often with sales people and cops than with techies. Also, when I got older than about 30, I found that I couldn't have a beer at lunch and still get anything done in the afternoon, and I'll seldom have a second drink these days.

      On the other hand, a few years ago the department I was in had a guy who made wine, and we'd occasionally have wine-tasting after work. His belief was that if you don't have at least two different wines, it's not wine-tasting, it's just drinking :-) And I was commuting by train back then, so it worked out just fine.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    3. Re:If the boss is paying.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they'd all gone to a local club and she was sexually harassed there, it wouldn't normally be the club's problem.

      If there's a sexual harassment claim then it's the company problem, regardless of it happening inside or outside it's premises.

    4. Re:If the boss is paying.... by sjames · · Score: 1

      There's a good reason the employer is responsible and the club is not. First, some random drunk guy in a club can't threaten employment consequences against women who turn him down. Second (and closely related), the club didn't hire the guy to represent them and then grant him the authority to affect the future employment of the people he harassed.

  19. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

    Where's Dr Bob when you need him?

    --
    You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  20. No case by ktappe · · Score: 2

    Negus...has struck back with a £10 million false dismissal suit alleging a culture of drunken parties and claiming that other (Male) management at Microsoft were so drunk they followed a female Microsoft UK manager into the ladies' lavatories.

    So because someone else acted improperly, he thinks it was OK for him to do so too? I hope he gets laughed out of court.

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    1. Re:No case by LateArthurDent · · Score: 5, Informative

      Negus...has struck back with a £10 million false dismissal suit alleging a culture of drunken parties and claiming that other (Male) management at Microsoft were so drunk they followed a female Microsoft UK manager into the ladies' lavatories.

      So because someone else acted improperly, he thinks it was OK for him to do so too? I hope he gets laughed out of court.

      Did you miss the part of the article where he denied the accusations against him? Or the one where the investigation turned out no proof of the allegations?

      He's not saying, "everybody else was acting improperly, so it was ok for me to do it." He's saying, "I was acting properly amidst massive impropriety. If anything, they fired me because I wasn't playing along."

      Whether you believe him or not is moot. The question is, can he prove his allegations while Microsoft can't prove theirs? If that's the case, not only should this not be dismissed, but he should win.

    2. Re:No case by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      In short: the jocks and cheerleaders picked on him for being a nerd. Wow, Microsoft. Wow.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:No case by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      If he's high up enough, then what his subordinates do *is* his problem. More likely though he's just a sociopath (like many higher ups in major companies) so he's just lying through his teeth to save credibility for future victims.

      This will continue until he becomes convinced of his own invincibility and cocks it up royally enough to get the attention of the police and thrown in jail.

    4. Re:No case by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      I like how you assumed he's guilty based on mere allegations. Nice. We shall achieve our feminist utopia one day sister, and all men will either grovel at our feel (but not close enough that they may look up our skirts) or hang by their neck from a tree (by not high enough that they can see down our shirts)!

  21. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1, Insightful

    women don't hate sex ... they just think there's much more to life than just that

    It depends. There are plenty of women who enjoy sex. But they are easily painted off as whores.

    Or there are women who confuse sex with love and get hurt all the time after someone just "played them", so they choose not to get burned anymore.

    Then there are the women who fuse sex with love and don't give their body unless they're in a loving relationship and feel a connection.

    For men sex is a whole different kind of thing. And flirting and such serves another purpose or goal for each sex.

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  22. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    I thought it was hilarious and it made me feel better about myself for not being a bitter woman-hater.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  23. The Office by Akira+Norimaki · · Score: 1

    Where's Davide Brent? LOL.

  24. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by DeathToBill · · Score: 1

    Why can't a woman be more like a man?

    Men are so honest, so thoroughly square;

    Eternally noble, historic'ly fair;

    Who, when you win, will always give your back a pat.

    Well, why can't a woman be like that?

    Why does ev'ryone do what the others do?

    Can't a woman learn to use her head?

    Why do they do ev'rything their mothers do?

    Why don't they grow up- well, like their father instead?

    Why can't a woman take after a man?

    Men are so pleasant, so easy to please;

    Whenever you are with them, you're always at ease.
     

    And so on.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  25. Not the best example by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2
    Hurd's misdemeanours seem to have been very minor. Outsiders might speculate that he trod on toes and was forced out. His successor has managed to wipe billions off the share price and royally piss off the distributors way ahead of any spin off, which might be seen as very much worse.

    Now Oracle has acquired a man who knows HP and probably would like nothing better than to move into the president's office after the cheap Oracle takeover and start firing some people. It is a terrible way to run business, but it makes a lot of sense.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  26. They're actually working by jcronen · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're just trying to achieve the Ballmer peak! http://xkcd.com/323/

    1. Re:They're actually working by Chayak · · Score: 0

      I hope none of those guys are working on Windows 8. The story sounds like they have a years supply of whiskey on hand.

  27. Re:This is exactly the problem with the higher ups by wondafucka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you get high enough up in a company, you can do whatever you want, get in whatever trouble you want, and some smaller company will always hire you. Another recent(ish?) example I can think of is Mark Hurd from HP, Oracle immediately gave him a job.

    The old boys club. It's killing industry worldwide.

    Nope, it's the reward for building a ladder of other people's bodies to climb your way to the top.

  28. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

    Or a fucking moron.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  29. level 69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFA:

    "Mr Negus, who claims he left a more senior position at Dell because of assurances he would eventually succeed Mr Frazer at Microsoft, was ranked as the top performing “level 69” partner at the company worldwide, posing a potential threat to his superior."

  30. Unlikely by ego+centrik · · Score: 1

    Unlikely_ look at the products of MICROsoft. No sex in it at all.

    1. Re:Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their name does not evoke an image of virility, no.

  31. First World Problems of the corporate elite by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

    Even though knowing this isn't an uncommon practice at the corporate level it still makes me a little sick to read about the shameless expense fund. The harassment allegations almost seem like a secondary grievance.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  32. Now I understand why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they kept telling me that Microsoft Office is such a fuc*ing piece of crap

  33. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    Poor baby. Sucks to be you, huh? Not once in your life, has a (actually, more than ten in my lifetime) woman grabbed you in a bar, and told you, "You're going home with me tonight!" Nor, have you ever experienced a (different) woman dragging you to the bedroom, saying "Gotta make hay while the sun shines", totally ignoring your protests that you need a shower. You can't find a woman who DEMANDS to have your baby? Damn. Sometimes I think life sucks but it would REALLY suck to be you! Everyone has their highs and lows - except you. All you know, is lows!!

    I could recommend that you go see a shrink - but the shrink won't get you laid or anything. All he can do is make you feel better about not getting laid.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  34. Charlotte Campus in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft's Campus in Charlotte has had many issues in the past.
    Sexual harassment claims like crazy such as this one.

    They've caught people having sex in the stairwell.
    Female employees harasses on numerous occasions only for the reports to be suppressed because of superiors.

    One engineer was trying to lure underage girls using the teleconference room.

    I won't even talk about the pill popping SQL Team :-O

    The cluster team likes uppers... (meth heads)

    The list goes on and on... and on some more.

  35. Sexual Harassment...Panda! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    When one programmer panda touches another programmer panda in a private place without permission, that makes me a saaaad panda :-(

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Sexual Harassment...Panda! by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      Just remember when you are programming C++: only your friends can touch your privates.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
  36. Bad summary by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, actually the first article says that it was an annual sales conference, and generally you'd notice everyone even mentioned is a manager or HR consultant or such. E.g., the woman he asked to flutter her eyelashes is apparently a HR consultant, at a quick googling.

    What? Did you think they had parties with unlimited vodka and JÃgermeister for the peons?

    So unless you were some sales manager or such, yeah, probably you wouldn't see that happening at any company you worked for, or even at MS. They're not going to do that for the likes of YOU, of course.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Bad summary by houghi · · Score: 1

      I have been to company parties where there was almost unlimited amounts of alcohol available. Paid by the company and.or by partners.

      I am talking renting a disco and asking all to come (about 500 people). 3 day holiday for all with partner. Yes, this included all the peons.

      Many 'short term relations' were happening during those times.

      At all companies I have been there were always smaller or larger events where there was almost unlimited amounts of alcohol available for free. The managers almost always went home early, specifically so they would NOT see what was going on and nobody was to be held accountable, because the boss saw stuff.

      Several companies have monthly drinks for all. One company even told that if you came, you could leave half an hour earlier to encourage ALL to come. All company paid for several hours.

      Nothing more fun as a peon to have too much to drink with a CEO.

      But then I live in Belgium.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Bad summary by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      What? Did you think they had parties with unlimited vodka and JÃfgermeister for the peons?

      I'm a developer but a bit more outgoing than your average bunch of devs. And it's my experience that there is a large part of this group that doesn't even want to go to a party with girls, even if you tell them it's all paid for.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    3. Re:Bad summary by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      At all companies I have been there were always smaller or larger events where there was almost unlimited amounts of alcohol available for free. The managers almost always went home early, specifically so they would NOT see what was going on and nobody was to be held accountable, because the boss saw stuff.

      In Australia, and I suspect many other places, that wouldn't save them. If the company supplied the booze and the venue, they are legally responsible for whatever went on, whether sexual harassment, accidents due to alcohol, etc.

    4. Re:Bad summary by houghi · · Score: 1

      Never seen that happening in Europe. To me you are responsible for what you do. It is not as if people are forced to drink. Blaming the company and/or the alcohol is like blaming the girl for wearing a short dress.

      Sorry for the rape, but it was because ...

      No! It was because the rapist is a complete idiot who should be put away for a long time and then some.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Bad summary by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      The logic goes something along the lines of the Employer is legally responisble for providing a safe work environment, free from threat of phyisical injury, bullying or harrasment. As the function is arranged and funded by the employer, it is considered an extension of the workplace, and all workplace protection responsibilities apply.

      That's not to say that if someone criminally assulted someone else they wouldn't be held personally responsible in the eyes of the law. But an employer could potentially be see as contributing to the action if they don't ensure a safe environment.

      Pretty much all serious large employers (and possibly small to medium, I haven't worked in that sector in over a decade), have codes of conduct that employees sign when they start, and annual refresher courses, stating they understand the harrasment policy and that it extends to work supported social events.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    6. Re:Bad summary by st0nes · · Score: 1

      I worked for a company that did this. The tea lady got so rat-arsed she fell off the boat in the middle of the booze cruise.

      --
      Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis
  37. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    Take a flat tire on a moonless night for instance. While a man is out changing nuts and bolts and doing all manner of screwing on the side of the road, will a woman so much as think to grab a flashlight and help? No.

    If he's already doing all manner of screwing on the side of a road, having a women grab a flashlight and do whatever with it would not be necessary or helpful; in fact it could be very painful.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  38. party with taxpayers money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kind of behaviour is typical in non competitive organizations which live on taxpayers money.

    1. Re:party with taxpayers money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF?

    2. Re:party with taxpayers money by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Microsoft tax.

  39. Explains a lot by badzilla · · Score: 1
    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
  40. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Gilmoure · · Score: 0

    Wait, shirts that highlights their boobs.; you think boobs are sexually attractive? You do know that they're just modified sweat glands that are used for feeding baby primates, right? And you want to color on them with fluorescent markers?

    Your weird!

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  41. How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the Negus is going to get drunk and harass females.

    The more important question is, what are hyoo-mahn females doing with clothes on in the first place?

    Someone ought to be thrown off the Tower of Commerce for this.

    1. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for not disappointing me on my search through the thread for an oblig. Ferengi reference.

  42. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by greghodg · · Score: 1

    I thought that was hilarious, but as I was reading it, it seemed rather unlikely that someone could come up with that entire thing in time to be the first post. And of course, he didn't. Everything after the first paragraph is copied from someone named Dick Masterson, "the most chauvinistic man alive". http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/why-women-hate-sex/

  43. Sounds to me like a disgruntled ex-employee... by idbeholda · · Score: 1

    I'm willing to bet the real reason he's filing the suit is because he was rejected by Debra. Like a baus.

  44. MS and the Catholic church. by Noughmad · · Score: 1

    They are becoming more and more alike. It seems the GNU guys were right all along. Microsoft Church

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  45. Microsoft UK the new Renholm Industries? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    http://www.reynholm.co.uk/

    Maybe some of you are not familiar with this iconic corporation, but it is well known to have such problems in its offices.

    1. Re:Microsoft UK the new Renholm Industries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol,

      Didn't know they had a site. I just booked some leave on their intranet :)

  46. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah... but having dated a girl who had a "problem car", the part about the flashlight made me laugh out loud.

  47. Longing for the old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If women would stay at home making babies, cleaning house, and cooking dinner the way God intended, this problem of "sexual harassment" in the workplace wouldn't be a problem. Women don't belong in the workplace. It's a scourge.

    1. Re:Longing for the old days by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      so you liked it better when you could only be sexually harassed by men in the workplace.

      good to know

  48. "Simon Negus" by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Isn't that the name of the Evil Necromancer from some supernatural pot-boiler?

    Either that, or the Jewish Aleister Crowley.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  49. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Thanks for your insight. It's always nice to get a view of how others might see things from the outside of a situation.

    In this case, I believe the class of "others" in question is that of the closeted homosexual.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  50. Political Correctness at Startups by billstewart · · Score: 1

    One thing that consistently seems to happen at startups is that once they have more than a dozen or so people, there's a Friday afternoon beer party, and when the company gets up to 100-200 people they hire a professional HR department, whose first move is to kill the beer party.

    But also, this is the UK Microsoft, and apparently it's more socially acceptable to get ripping drunk in the UK than it is in the US.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Political Correctness at Startups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not more socially acceptable in the UK - it's basically mandatory.

      At my last work night out our party got chucked out of the second bar after the Wintel work-experience guy vomited down someone's back, and the Infrastructure manager was arrested after falling asleep in a hedge.

      Nobody gave a toss. All anyone was bothered about was why those who didn't turn up, didn't turn up.

    2. Re:Political Correctness at Startups by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a large multi-national (Australian division) where we used to have quite a few senior managers from the UK.

      While Australians have a reputation for hard drinking, the UK guys would typically start earlier, go longer and get totally wrecked. Then be up the next morning roaring to go. I remember at one work event we were informed that the company would no longer be welcome to book accomodation at that venue because someone decided around midnight to start playing carpet bowls in the lounge around midnight, and shortly after someone else decided it was a neat idea to bowl overarm. They left holes in the walls.

      It was also the culture at this compant that we had beer fridges in all the managers' offices, if you worked past 5pm it was acceptable to have a beer or wine sitting on your desk while you were working, and we had regular Friday night drinks in the office starting about 4pm.

      I went from that job to working for a public utility where every site was classed as 'dry', if you had anything to drink you were not to come back onto the premises. You were warned to take your bag with you if you went to the Christmas lunch and planned to drink as you were no to come back to the office.

      I'm now working for the pulic service, it's a bit of a split between the two. Not dry (they have Friday drinks), but not the hard drinking culture of the first company mentioned.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    3. Re:Political Correctness at Startups by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Pardon the US question, but what are carpet bowls?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Political Correctness at Startups by aduxorth · · Score: 1

      Its like Lawn Bowls except its played indoors on carpet.

  51. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Tsingi · · Score: 1

    Wait, shirts that highlights their boobs.;

    you think boobs are sexually attractive? You do know that they're just modified sweat glands that are used for feeding baby primates, right? And you want to color on them with fluorescent markers?

    Your weird!

    That would be "you're wierd", not "your wierd". Learn to spell.

    Boobs are sex organs. To fulfil their part time function as mammary glands they have no need to be as large or as sensitive.

  52. Reminds me of a quote by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    âoeThe measure of a man is what he does with power.â -- Plato

    (And to keep with times, I'd say it goes for women too.)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  53. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by LC+Trucido · · Score: 1

    That would be "you're wierd", not "your wierd". Learn to spell.

    Oh, the ironey...

  54. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Your.Master · · Score: 1

    Wearing a short skirt is so much less inappropriate than repeatedly touching somebody who doesn't want to be touched, that it doesn't really deserve to be discussed at the same time.

    And even if it was on the same level, person A doing something wrong doesn't excuse person B doing something wrong.

    ...do you seriously get uncomfortable around women wearing short skirts? What the fuck is up with that?

  55. Zzzzz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Powerful, self motivated executives think they're better than the common employee!!! News at 11:00.

  56. That's how the Romans behaved at the end, too by phonewebcam · · Score: 1
  57. Wish it was that clear by Moraelin · · Score: 2

    I wish it was that clear.

    For a start, Hurd wiped out almost all R&D. Which is pretty much guaranteed to boost stock in the short run by reducing costs. It also usually signals the spiral into death or becoming an irrelevant a me-too OEM for a tech company.

    He also managed to drag the morale into the fucking ground, pretty much. And managed come across as a huge hypocrite by posing as cutting even his own salary in his quest to slash everyone else's... but have his compensation raised by the exact same amount. So, you know, way to say, "fuck you, it only applies to you peons after all." Padding his travel expenses on top of that, just made it all the more petty.

    Anyone coming after that would face a stock drop sooner or later even if they did nothing but continue Hurd's line, because that's what's coming after such a policy. Trying to get back into being a tech company, well, that raises the costs right back in the short run and the payoff will be later, so it was pretty much predictable that it will drop the stock price even more.

    I would hardly consider such (occasionally destructive) Wall Street metrics to be relevant for an apples-to-apples comparison of two CEOs.

    As for Oracle, meh, Larry is a bit of Captain Asshole on a personal crusade to make the world safer for rich assholes everywhere to abuse their power. You can almost picture him swooping away, with his cape flowing in the wind, after saving some prick from those peons who thought to hold him responsible for some sexual harrassment or sexism or such, while starry-eyed crowds go, "Thank you, Captain Asshole! Whatever would we have done without you!" But I doubt even he would blow that many billions just so Hurd can have his petty revenge. Now maybe if it was Larry's personal revenge, or rescuing yet another asshole CEO, he might do it, but I doubt he'll bet the company just to make Mark Hurd's day.

    You have to give the man credit though, at least he puts his money where is convictions are. Many will offer lip service to why it should be like in the good old days when it was ok for a CEO to harass subordinates or for an academic to hold public speeches about how women are dumber. (Bonus points if they actually just prove how a little sexism adds up.) But it takes someone like Larry to actually go on public record as trying to financially bully a college into tolerating such a sexist prick, or to actually blow some money to make a point that Hurd should be allowed to be a flaming asshole, dammit. Hats off, not many people would do that.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Wish it was that clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This academic you speak of... is it who I think it is?

      What about for an academic to suggest that biophysical differences might be in part responsible for statistical disparities? That is the same as calling women dumber? Because, you know, those biophysical differences are well established. Until testosterone and estrogen levels lose their dependency on gender, men and women will continue to have functionally significant differences in the corpus callosum.

      But obviously, in this era of batshit crazy political correctness, who would be so crazy as to suggest that men and women are, you know, different?

    2. Re:Wish it was that clear by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      This academic you speak of... is it who I think it is?

      Depends on who you think about, I should think. I'm talking about Lawrence Summers.

      What about for an academic to suggest that biophysical differences might be in part responsible for statistical disparities?

      If he can actually quote scientific disparities, then he should go ahead. If he's just postulating unsupported bullshit then it's just the usual sexism.

      I didn't see him quoting any scientific data, just inventing some numbers and massaging them into justifying disparities by nothing more than "what if". Well, that's nice, but he's not proving there more than that he can extract a root, if that's his only support for his conclusion, not that he's actually having an explanation. Just being able to pick an arbitrary Flanagan's finagling factor ("That quantity which, when multiplied by, divided by, added to, or subtracted from the answer you get, gives you the answer you should have got.") for no more reason or explanation than giving him the final number he wants, does not a scientific biological explanation make.

      Doubly damning is that his maths don't work that way for actual differences. If there is a difference in where the gauss curves are centered, and an objective selection is done, then it doesn't matter through how many layers of selection you got there. What DOES work like in his maths, however, is it at each level there is a level of bias against promoting women or offering equal incentives.

      That is the same as calling women dumber?

      If it's based on unuspported postulates about their lack of intellectual aptitude, yes.

      Because, you know, those biophysical differences are well established. Until testosterone and estrogen levels lose their dependency on gender, men and women will continue to have functionally significant differences in the corpus callosum.

      If they're actually well known, can you quote any studies that actually show a difference in IQ or aptitude in physics?

      Because, you know, cretin apologists pretending they can just throw around "well known" to mask their bullshit preconceptions, is hardly impressing me.

      But obviously, in this era of batshit crazy political correctness, who would be so crazy as to suggest that men and women are, you know, different?

      But obviously, in this era of batshit-crazy idiots trying to get their privileges back by dressing their prejudice in a thin veil of pseudo-science, it would be too much to expect that such claims of relevant biological differences be actually supported. You know, instead of seeing one more such idiot rails against reality or acting like a decent human being is "batshit crazy political correctness".

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  58. The Register by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The source given is The Register. Considering every story I've read there has been dishonestly distorted, I'll pass on reading the fake article.

    1. Re:The Register by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      The source given was the Telegraph. The register was just a side issue that happened to turn up on Google when looking looking to see what other accusations he made against MS.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  59. Top Performing "Level 69" Partner? by Kirrilian · · Score: 1

    From TFA:
    "Mr Negus, who claims he left a more senior position at Dell because of assurances he would eventually succeed Mr Frazer at Microsoft, was ranked as the top performing “level 69” partner at the company worldwide, posing a potential threat to his superior."

    I LOL'ed out loud when I read that...

  60. "indefinite amounts of Jaegermeister" by metrometro · · Score: 1

    So the problem is that we don't know how much Jeagermeister there is? Is there a Jaegermeister Uncertainly Principal?

  61. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

    Wearing a short skirt is not appropriate, it makes men uncomfortable too. The door swings in both directions.

    Appropriate is a matter of cultural choice. There have been many cultures where wondering around naked was fine. If you want your women to be invisible head to toe then you are making a sick and really sad cultural choice. It's people like you who make the office environment more boring and uniform. Worse, it's fundamentally a snobbish discrimination which picks a certain middle class dress and defines it as "appropriate" and then makes the others have to try (and inevitably, in small details fail) to copy that standard instead of just accepting that different people have different tastes and we should judge people by their ability. I can even understand that within a given company because the company its self is also judged. That doesn't make it right. Men who feel uncomfortable can get counselling or just come to terms with and accept their latent homosexuality and get a boyfriend instead.

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  62. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Smauler · · Score: 1

    For men sex is a whole different kind of thing. And flirting and such serves another purpose or goal for each sex.

    As a man, for me, sex is always emotional... perhaps I'm odd, but having sex with someone, even one night stands, generally means something. And I have done the seemingly "meaningless" one night stands quite a few times, and I've got a lot out of them - not just the sex. I can't think of one time I've had sex when I didn't like the person I was having sex with. YMMV.

    Just because you know you're probably not going to see the other person again, doesn't mean they're a lump of meat.

    As I said, perhaps I'm odd... I've never had sex when it's been _just_ sex - I've never disliked anyone who I've had sex with.

    Also, bear in mind, that on average heterosexual men and women will have exactly the same numbers of partners - men will over-report, women will under-report. That's a problem with our culture. You can't get around the fact that men and women by definition have on average exactly the same number of partners, but men always claim more, and women always claim less. Everyone is lying about their sex life, men are ashamed by having too few partners, and women are ashamed by having too many, generally. It's fucking stupid, and it's getting worse.

  63. Women are always crying and alleging foul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the only way they can be seen and heard and the only way they can do something that gets noticed outside of the kitchen. Tell lies, tell lies, tell lies and exaggerate.

  64. Jaeger by AdamWill · · Score: 1

    "indefinite amounts of Jaegermeister"

    Isn't Jaeger one of those drinks whose quantity is indefinite more or less by definition? Like absinthe. Or Special Brew...

  65. At Microsoft in Brazil... by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1

    A woman I knew who worked at Microsoft in Brazil was told that her husband couldn't be covered on her health insurance, even though male employees' wives were all covered by their husbands' Microsoft-provided policies. When she started to say that was unfair, she was told to back off. I guess sexism at Microsoft is a worldwide thing.

    --
    "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
  66. A personal observation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been out after work with groups of people from both Microsoft and Dell in the UK a few times. In some parts of this country (for IT folks anyway), serious drinking after work happens a lot. In my experience the Microsoft folks were very restrained when it came to drinking. The folks from Dell seemed a little more serious about it ...perhaps the guy came from Dell and didn't quite get the new culture?

  67. Microsoft can thow a good party. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Computer Science student at one of the UK's better universities I can safely say, Microsoft can throw a good party. I'm not a huge fan of their software of general behaviour but they certainly know how to attract new graduates. They've had 3 talks over my current university career and each one has ended in an open bar for everyone who attended. All things equal I would rather work at a company which is slightly inappropriate than one which isn't.

  68. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be "you're wierd", not "your wierd". Learn to spell.

    Oh, the ironey...

    Amen, brother!

    Hint: It's spelled "irony".

  69. That's what's missing by confused+one · · Score: 1

    I've just realized what's missing where I work (besided job satisfaction). Vodka fountains and a stock of whiskey.

  70. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    thank you Professor Higgins

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  71. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you think boobs are sexually attractive? You do know that they're just modified sweat glands that are used for feeding baby primates, right?

    You do realize we evolved to find them attractive, because other animals only grow them when in heat (and the other animals find them attractive as a secondary sexual characteristic too).

    But human females evolved to have them permanently to show the fact that they are essentially always fertile (I mean compared to animals that go into heat once a year). Thus the women that had boobs had more babies, thus passing the trait onto further generations.

  72. Well, this explains a lot of things. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

    For ages we've wondered why anyone would purchase windows or sign any kind of deal with microsoft. This Explains why: They were drunk.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  73. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

    Then what about anuses? Are they sex organs because they can be sensitive?

    Liking huge tits that are bigger than her shoulder width is weird. Stop projecting your latent feelings for your mother onto women, sick fuck! As for me, see my sig.

  74. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Tsingi · · Score: 1

    Liking huge tits that are bigger than her shoulder width is weird. Stop projecting your latent feelings for your mother onto women, sick fuck! As for me, see my sig.

    It's something I picked up in an anthropology course. It makes sense to me, breasts are 80% non functional. Now why would that be if it wasn't to attract the other sex?

    That, plus it seems to me that most men, present company excepted, fixate on boobs.

    Your milage obviously differs, maybe I'm a sick fuck, but I'm sick the same way everyone else is.

    It's OK to be gay though, anuses are sensitive too. Boobs aren't for everyone.

  75. Birtain oh Birtain, Britain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical british from working there for 3 years that's what most people were doing, getting drunk and spending their money in booze.

  76. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by Vidar+Leathershod · · Score: 1

    Why isn't this modded up as funny? This is a fantastic, stream-of-consciousness pile of awesome. For my money, it doesn't get any better than when Michael Bolton sings, "That's because women hate holding flashlights, because they are complete rubbish at it."

    Bravo!

    --
    The brains of a chicken, coupled with the claws of two eagles, may well hatch the eggs of our destruction.
  77. Hi! I'm Gropy! by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

    It looks like you want to sexually molest your co-worker. Would you like some help with that?

  78. I worked at MS for 10 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but was sacked recently for coming to work sober!

  79. Must have been using ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    involving at least five separate women. A Microsoft internal investigation was unable to prove the allegations

    Must have been using a Pentium processor to keep track of the allegations.

    The question has to be asked : were sequential, or simultaneous harassments?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  80. Re:What's so bad about little partying? by flargleblarg · · Score: 0

    Also, bear in mind, that on average heterosexual men and women will have exactly the same numbers of partners - men will over-report, women will under-report.

    Men will over-report to other men, but will under-report to women.

    Women will under-report to men, and god knows what they report to other women.