Slashdot Mirror


Toshiba Adds Two-Way Wi-Fi To SD Card

judgecorp writes "Toshiba has announced an SD card with Wi-Fi. This is an advance on previous products such as the Eye-Fi Pro X2, as it allows two-way transfers over Wi-Fi. This will be a very convenient feature. It has been labelled a security worry — but most of us already have cameras with wireless connections ... called phones."

13 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. Summary misses the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We may all already have phones - but this would be invaluable for someone who takes a professional-quality image or video of say, law enforcement. Any data recorded stands a better chance of being immediately put out of reach from your average plod

    "You want me to erase all the evidence I just recorded of you officer? Of course."

    1. Re:Summary misses the point. by sosume · · Score: 3, Informative

      So what's new about this? This was available 10 years ago: http://www.mobiletechreview.com/tips/sandisk_SD_wifi.htm
      Or are they applying for a patent?

    2. Re:Summary misses the point. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what's new about this? This was available 10 years ago

      What's new is that Toshiba sent out a press release, so all media outlets must comply with the requisite awe and wonder.

      That's how this works.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Summary misses the point. by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      http://dpreview.com/news/1109/11090205toshibawificard.asp
      Its a first as in "fully comply with the SD standard" i.e. no drivers needed for a unique very small subset of units.
      For law enforcement and rent a spooks (or ex special forces) it means your very public photography/movie clip is safe from a software or "hard"ware deleting.
      From a Guardian story having its images removed ... http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/14/bilderberg-charlie-skelton-dispatch
      "One of the policewomen smiled. "Delete photos and you can go, no trouble.""
      The "London Street Photography Festival" shows some sides of image/movie making in public places http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJH9F7Hcluo or
      the parts of the world where police know to look around and 'remove' all cards/devices after a beating/death.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Summary misses the point. by errandum · · Score: 3, Informative

      This appears to be a real sd card, not just some gadget that uses the SD card slot.

      That it could be used for this, I guess it's not surprise to anyone, that you could incorporate it in a real size SD card, could be news.

    5. Re:Summary misses the point. by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 2

      that you could incorporate it in a real size SD card, could be news.

      Nope, still not a surprise, since over 200,000,000 photos have already been uploaded through Eye-Fi cards: http://www.eye.fi/

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    6. Re:Summary misses the point. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, no, this is not just normal WiFi, this is two-way WiFi. With old one-way WiFi, you had to send a packet, then eject the card, turn it around, and insert it the other way around to receive the reply. With this new two-way wireless magic your card can both send and receive! It's exciting and new!

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  2. Re:Implementation problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital#SDIO

  3. Re:Cell phone camera's by qwertyatwork · · Score: 2

    So your camera is an orange?

  4. Article misses the point, I think by PyroMosh · · Score: 2

    The new Toshiba FlashAir card can transmit photos and videos to the back-end system, but the really clever bit is that it can also receive data (photos, videos etc) as well.

    This means that two people, both equipped with FlashAir-equipped cameras, can transmit photos or other data between their respective devices, in a peer to peer manner.

    No, what it means is that you can have a scheme something like:

    1. Pair Card with external device
    2. Take picture
    3. Picture is saved to 8 GB of SD memory
    4. If pairing is still intact, upload image to paired device
    5. Wait for response from paired device that image is saved successfully
    6. Once response is received, delete image from 8 GB SD memory space.

    What this means is that a photographer can shoot until their battery runs out while a nearby notebook or WiFi enabled SAN device records the images. Instead of being limited to 32 GB, you can happily fill a terabyte drive or more.

    Or if you're concerned about the data's safety locally (journalist working in a dangerous area, someone taking pictures of authorities who might take the camera away) you can even set the device that's receiving the images to upload into a remote FTP or some kind of cloud based service.

    Or am I missing something?

  5. Re:Cell phone camera's by MarlonTucker · · Score: 2

    I think everyone's missing the point regarding the meaning of that quote.... I took it as the OP saying the following - "there has been potential security worries flagged up by people regarding having WiFi enabled SD (I suppose especially 2-way ones), however this technology has existed for years in phones, and whilst security can be a worry, it can be mitigated with proper management".

  6. Re:Like she said, size matters by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    the storage capability matters because you can't upload sdio drivers to your camera.. that's the only reason, really, miniaturising them wouldn't have been the problem, but doing the storage link needs sw and engineering, and something at the other end. still, how does one configure it?

    (and there's that direct upload wifi sd card that has been out for a while, so two way probably means you could stick this in your smartphone and upload stuff back too, and that's why this is different from the sdio wifi cards, technically though it's just putting 1+1 together and I have to really wonder about compatibility..)

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  7. Re:Implementation problems? by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 2

    This isn't a SDIO card but rather from the host device appears as a standard block storage card. Presumably finding a way of modifying the file-system without causing corruption is what qualifies this as news.
    The easy way way would have been to have placeholder files that were always visible to the host device. Which when read where blank, until new files where actually received.
    I expect they have gone an extra step and found a way of forcing the host to reload the FAT (so the files get relevant filenames), possibly simply by simulating an ejection/insertion, or perhaps just by emulating a cleverly structured read failure. This may catch a few devices out, but probably works well enough in the higher end devices they are targeting.