Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Training May Have Helped Tunisian Regime To Spy On Citizens

An anonymous reader writes "A document released in the recent Cablegate leak reveals that Microsoft provided training to the Tunisian Ministries of Justice and the Interior in exchange for exemption from the country's open software policy. These Ministries would soon put the training to use by phishing for the social networking credentials of bloggers, reporters, political activists and protesters. Microsoft's assistance resulted in the sale of 12,000 software licenses to the Tunisian government." The cable itself details the effort Microsoft put into negotiating a deal. Their clear intent was simply expanding into a new market, but the author of the cable was skeptical of the Tunisian government's adherence to its stated goals. Quoting: "In theory, increasing GOT law enforcement capability through IT training is positive, but given heavy-handed GOT interference in the internet, Post questions whether this will expand GOT capacity to monitor its own citizens."

129 comments

  1. Wow by Mensa+Babe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Microsoft was helping to oppress innocent people by a totalitarian regime to get a chance to sabotage the Free Software movement? Wow. Just wow. This is low. Even for Microsoft. Is there anything that the richest man in the world won't do to get even richer? With all of that money he should be dating supermodels in Paris for the rest of his life but no, he prefers to help putting heroic individuals in jail for having guts to say what they think so that he could sell more of his precious licenses! How do such bastards sleep at night is completely beyond me. I won't repeat what I have already said about corporations that help to maintain dictatorships all over the world. I will only add that sabotaging the Free Software movement adds insult to the injury. We should all be outraged and never buy anything from Microsoft ever again. I call for a boycott of Microsoft until they explain themselves and repair the harm.

    --
    Karma: Positive (probably because of superiour intellect)
    1. Re:Wow by St.Creed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gates is rich enough. But I'm guessing the local sales rep isn't a billionaire yet.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    2. Re:Wow by ge7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well even the summary notes that Microsoft was basically offering them generic computer training. Now slashdot (note that we don't even have article here!) needs a good MS-bashing title - hey, lets go with "Microsoft helped Tunisia to spy on citizen". No, we need to tone it down a little.. what about "Microsoft may have helped Tunisia to spy on citizens"? Good.

      Seriously, all Microsoft knew was giving them computer training. What about we start writing news on how school chemistry classes allow people to make bombs? Or god forbid, cooking tv shows teach you how to use a knife!

    3. Re:Wow by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Duh. Welcome to capitalism. If there's a buck to be made, a human life becomes secondary.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Wow by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Do you really think that, during a 5 year negotiation process, which included a variety of topics including training, licensing, IP policy, and training and support for state IT capabilities, poor lil' Microsoft just had no earthly idea what likely use would be made?

    5. Re:Wow by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gates is rich enough. But I'm guessing the local sales rep isn't a billionaire yet.

      No, but that only makes it even worse: That sales rep sold out an entire country's people in exchange for a few grand worth of commissions.

      More to the point, somebody hired a sales rep willing to do that. And that willingness stems from a flaw in Microsoft's business model. The quality and price of their products has never matched their market share; they subsist on inertia and lock-in. The problem with that model is that all it would take to break it is for a single medium-sized country to decide that they would rather spend a billion dollars once to implement all of the APIs, file format converters, migration tools, etc. to make switching from Microsoft to FOSS easy and popular in order to avoid having that same country's government and people continue to pay an even greater amount of money every year to a foreign corporation. The last thing in the world they need is for some oil-rich dictators to conclude that they could implement a feature-complete open-source equivalent of Exchange Server for less than the amount of money their country pays to license it.

      So when Tunisia or China or whoever else comes to Microsoft and makes demands, Microsoft bends. Because Microsoft can't afford for those countries to make the path away from Microsoft's ecosystem simple, well-documented and conspicuous. So yes, you can blame the sales rep who did the deed, but that doesn't change the fact that Microsoft has left itself in the position that it has to yield to crackpot dictators who violate human rights in order to maintain its market dominance.

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actualy, no. Microsoft provide intensive training to police forces, specificaly on MS security features, as mentionned in chapter 1.1 and 1.3 of the leaked agreement. Curious how the first 3 part of the contract are about security features (1.2 is about the local certificate autority and its inclusion in future MS update). You can access this agreement here (french and arabic) http://www.fhimt.com/leaks/contrat-entre-microsoft-et-le-gouvernement-tunisien/

    7. Re:Wow by symbolset · · Score: 1, Troll

      As in all threads relating to Microsoft, prepare to be utterly disgusted. The company's defenders are going to be here promoting the most abhorrent and misanthropic arguments, or attempting to deflect the dialog. It is evil, but it works.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:Wow by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      Microsoft was helping to oppress innocent people by a totalitarian regime to get a chance to sabotage the Free Software movement? Wow. Just wow. This is low. Even for Microsoft.

      You're right, this is pretty low for a company who needs successful P.R. to keep printing money. So, Mensa Babe, I have a question for you: When you said "This is low even for Microsoft", how come you landed with all four paws on the assumption was that Bill Gates personally ordered it instead of asking whether or not this story wasn't spun to sell ads?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:Wow by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The linked source even says that Microsoft agreed to help train handicapped workers to telecommute so they could get employment. MS: being evil by helping all those damned cripples. The whole summary is a massive sensationalist attempt to create a "scandal" where none really exists, or rather where no proof of one really exists (maybe MS helped Tunisia, maybe they didn't.) Otherwise, this is just a pretty standard trade deal for IT software. Not illegal, probably not even immoral at all. Maybe there is more to it, but I don't think so. Computer training is not hard to find, these days, what MS was really selling was the licenses (which don't help Tunisia with it's crackdown at all) and what MS got was Tunisia using less pirated software. Oh, and note the part where all this happened before the trouble, and it was a five-year in the making deal.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy overreaction batman. Next, you'll start blaming the terrorist regime at Institute for Advanced Studies for their involvement in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and question their ability to sleep peacefully at night.

      Wow. Just wow. This is low. Even for Slashdot.

    11. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft employment is not known for being ethical by any stretch. They're a high pressure big business corporation that's so stressful that people die/commit suicide/etc all the time. If ethics are of your concern, working at microsoft should not even be a consideration.

    12. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and note the part where all this happened before the trouble, and it was a five-year in the making deal.

      If the citizens of Tunisia revolting against an oppressive government is considered 'trouble' then I guess that's true.

    13. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, American training of Afgan soldiers leads to deaths of Afgan citizens.

    14. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the creepiest troll on Slashdot. You post obsessively in every story, you constantly link to your past posts, and you call yourself a "proud member of Mensa." The "I call for a boycott of Microsoft" line at the end of your post gave away the ruse, unfortunately.

    15. Re:Wow by bonch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I mentioned this earlier. Most reasonable posters left Slashdot for Reddit, Hacker News, and even Digg, leaving behind the really hardcore posters who visit Slashdot solely to find reasons to hate Microsoft, the RIAA, Apple, etc. That is the majority of the readership now. Slashdot today caters to a lowest common denominator demographic, similar to what TechCrunch tries to do, where sensationalism and page views are what's most important.

      Look at this submission from a week ago, Only Idiots Don't Give Back To Free Software. Not only was the summary worded to make it look like Jim Zemlin was referring to end-users and not downstream organizations, but the submission itself is from the author of the article being linked--Julie Bort at Network World. So the person who knew exactly what their own article was actually about intentionally phrased the summary in a way that would lead to a different conclusion in order to inflame Slashdot readers and drive page views.

      Now, we have a story with a "may" headline. These are as bad as question headlines ("Could So-And-So Be Dangerous To Your Health?"), where something is implied, but because an outright claim isn't being made in the headline, the author believes they're technically not lying.

      Seriously, all Microsoft knew was giving them computer training. What about we start writing news on how school chemistry classes allow people to make bombs? Or god forbid, cooking tv shows teach you how to use a knife!

      Hell, the Chinese government uses its own Linux distribution. That must mean open source is helping China oppress its citizens!

    16. Re:Wow by WNight · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      this is just a pretty standard trade deal for IT software. Not illegal, probably not even immoral at all.

      Almost certainly immoral, possibly illegal.

      How standard it is just speaks to the level of corruption and dishonesty in business, not the inherent rightness.

      MS was really selling was the licenses (which don't help Tunisia with it's crackdown at all) and what MS got was Tunisia using less pirated software.

      Oh gosh, I didn't know they had business goals. Well shucks then, all's fair if you're trying to make a buck.

      Oh, and note the part where all this happened before the trouble, and it was a five-year in the making deal.

      Oh, note how the cable (circa 2006) questions the goals of the Tunisian government. Even then their dictatorial activities were well known.

      Further, Microsoft was negotiating a government-enforced monopoly. You'd have to be stupid to think that would help the people. They're clearly buying favors from the government that go against the good of the people. They're slime even if there isn't a law against it in this case.

      The linked source even says that Microsoft agreed to help train handicapped workers to telecommute so they could get employment. MS: being evil by helping all those damned cripples

      The linked source even calls the charity "backroom dealing required to finalize a deal" so we can safely assume (based on other Tunisian leaks) that MS simply kicked back much of the government's purchase price to the ruling family. It's part of how dictators drain their economies into their personal accounts.

    17. Re:Wow by WNight · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because lower-level employees routinely approach foreign governments and bargain for laws to be changed without the higher-ups noticing.

      But whatever. Even if he setup a business where such things were done without his oversight, it doesn't lessen his moral responsibility to watch what his influence is being used to do.

    18. Re:Wow by wsxyz · · Score: 1

      Is there anything that the richest man in the world won't do to get even richer?

      No, Carlos Slim will do anything for one more peso.
      What does that have to do with this story anyway?

    19. Re:Wow by jbengt · · Score: 1
      I agree that this may be overblown, at least from what I can glean from the links.

      The whole summary is a massive sensationalist attempt to create a "scandal"

      The sensationalist part of the TFS is a quote of the linked ZDnet article, and the headline of TFS is less sensationalist than the headline of TFA.

      Not illegal, probably not even immoral at all.

      Iit was a negotiation to override current policy that was at least amoral, probably somewhat unethical, and possibly extra-legal. (we don't have all the facts)
      From the leaked cable:

      Since 2001, the GOT adopted an open software policy, using only free software programs. . .
      future GOT tenders for IT equipment will specify that the equipment must be Microsoft compatible, which is currently prohibited by the Tunisian open software policy. . .
      Microsoft's reticence to fully disclose the details of the agreement further highlights the GOT emphasis on secrecy over transparency. In theory, increasing GOT law enforcement capability through IT training is positive, but given heavy-handed GOT interference in the internet, Post questions whether this will expand GOT capacity to monitor its own citizens.

    20. Re:Wow by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      Do you honestly expect a foreign government to be so stupid as to reveal their plans of misuse to an American corporation? Any government that incompetant is no threat to anyone but themselves.

    21. Re:Wow by MarkTina · · Score: 0

      Do you live in a happy little world with talking fluffy bunnies by any chance ?

      The world of business is there to make money and that's it, if you can negotiate a deal where your products and services get priority over someone elses then you take it and run to the bank!

      I used to sell systems to a US sponsored outfit that recorded telephone calls in the old East Germany from West Germany .. what's the issue ? Honestly and truely is there anyone who actually cares if someone you don't know, have never met, never will meet, who'se in a country that you can't find on a map and will never go to, has been "spied" upon ?

      Find something worthwhile to fight for rather than trying to promote how much better free software is over paid software .. personally I detest most "free" software as a large percentage is unfinished crap and I'd rather buy from a company I can hold accountable if I have problems

      Karma: Positive (probably because of superiour intellect)

      I do hope hope your spelling mistake was intentional and just a parody of your "superiour" intellect...

    22. Re:Wow by bonch · · Score: 0

      Your're batshit insane. You're so conditioned from anti-Microsoft stories on Slashdot that you actually use religious terminology like "evil" and believe that offering general computer training--that was Microsoft's only intent, as stated right in the summary--somehow means Microsoft helped spy on Tunisian citizens.

      Think of the ridiculous leap being made here. If Microsoft offers computer training that is subsequently used to do something bad, that means Microsoft is responsible? Was Flight Simulator also responsible for 9/11? Does the fact that the Chinese government uses Linux mean open source is contributing to the oppression of Chinese political dissidents? Is torrent software responsible for the piracy of its users?

    23. Re:Wow by sjames · · Score: 1

      He sure didn't mind when the money flowed uphill to him, so he gets to take the responsibility too.

      If MS had a pattern of behavior that suggested this was an uncharacteristic move, it would be easier to believe it was a rogue manager exceeding his authority and acting against policy.

    24. Re:Wow by vadim_t · · Score: 2

      Do you live in a happy little world with talking fluffy bunnies by any chance ?

      No, but it should have some.

      The world of business is there to make money and that's it, if you can negotiate a deal where your products and services get priority over someone elses then you take it and run to the bank!

      Yeah, you're only saying that because nobody properly screwed you over yet.

      I used to sell systems to a US sponsored outfit that recorded telephone calls in the old East Germany from West Germany .. what's the issue ?

      It's absolutely disgusting and you should be ashamed of yourself?

      Honestly and truely is there anyone who actually cares if someone you don't know, have never met, never will meet, who'se in a country that you can't find on a map and will never go to, has been "spied" upon ?

      On a personal level, probably not, on a general level, hell yes. There's got to be something else to life than blind pursuit of money. Otherwise we'll all find any quality of life fly out of the window soon enough.

      Find something worthwhile to fight for rather than trying to promote how much better free software is over paid software .. personally I detest most "free" software as a large percentage is unfinished crap and I'd rather buy from a company I can hold accountable if I have problems

      Ah, but how does that mesh with your philosophy? Why would I have any reason to care about what some guy I have never met, will never met, in a country I don't know, thinks I should be doing?

      BTW, I don't think you've ever tried to hold any such company accountable for anything. Hint: you're way too much of a small fry for them to bother with anything for your sake. Now sign a contract for a couple million, then they'll pay attention.

    25. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, I'm not disgusted. Anti-ms trolls like you are entertaining.

    26. Re:Wow by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Read the damned comments. Are they not as I described? What is your issue? Is an ability to anticipate a regular occurrence insane in your eyes? Call me crazy: tomorrow night it will be dark outside.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    27. Re:Wow by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your're batshit insane.

      And you're intentionally blind to reality.

      offering general computer training--that was Microsoft's only intent,

      1. 1. The cable specifically mentions Microsoft knew the Tunisian government would misuse the training.
      2. 2. Microsoft knowingly provided CA certs so the Tunisian government could use spoofed https sites to spy on, and persecute their own citizens.

      Microsoft did these things because they are a deeply unethical company that is so obsessed with eliminating competitors they are prepared to trample civil rights if it forwards their goals.

      It's interesting that you share the same ability to ignore ethics and evidence in your determination to evangelise for Microsoft.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    28. Re:Wow by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

      http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2007/snapshots/50.html
      http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2008/snapshots/86.html
      http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2009/snapshots/38.html
      http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2010/snapshots/51.html
      http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2011/snapshots/72.html

      Fortune wouldn't even rank Microsoft anywhere near their list of "Best Companies to Work For" (let alone in it for at least the last 5 years) if they had the problems you're describing, but then again, you're just another generic slashdot troll.

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    29. Re:Wow by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      1. The cable specifically mentions Microsoft knew the Tunisian government would misuse the training.

      No, it doesn't. It says: "Post questions whether this will expand GOT capacity to monitor its own citizens."

      "Post" is not Microsoft, it is a self-reference to the diplomatic post or station which is writing the cable. Furthermore, it doesn't even say they KNOW what Tunisia will do, it says they question. For example, I might question whether you are incapable of reading comprehension, but I don't know it.

    30. Re:Wow by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      Now I know you lack for reading comprehension. For starters, Russia is not Tunisia. And secondly those stories are about Russian Security forces cracking down on political groups under the auspices of "piracy". There's not a whole lot Microsoft can do if gun wielding Russian Security Forces want to break down your door and throw out a lame piracy excuse to do it despite the fact that you have genuine windows and the documentation to prove it. It's fucking Russia, they don't care. I stopped reading your examples when you got to the point where your pointing out Microsoft raising money for Tsunami victims via retweets. Yea, that's def proof positive of Microsoft knowingly and specifically helping the Government of Tunisia to spy on their citizens. Give me a break.

  2. and apples nazi app store censorship is just as ba by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    and apples nazi app store censorship + tracking is just as bad.

  3. Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by rtfa-troll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can anyone knowledgable comment? There are quite a few articles around saying that the key thing that MS did was to put in a certificate for the Tunisian Government in Windows / Internet explorer which let them intercept any domain they wanted to; See this posting in Scribd. If that's true it's a much more serious betrayal of their users by Microsoft.

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    1. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe state CAs are swapped in according to localization; or I suck at finding them; but I didn't manage to locate any such cert in an EN-US win7 machine. I don't, of course, have any access to whatever localization Tunisian systems would be using.

    2. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by rim_namor · · Score: 1

      6. (C) In a call on DCM a few days before the South Africa Forum, Smaoui worried that she was going to the Forum without a signed agreement in hand and could not confirm that the GOT's representative would even show up. She fretted that she might have to confess to Bill Gates that she had no reason to be at the Forum. In the event, Khedija Ghariani, Secretary of State for Computers, Internet, and Free SIPDIS Software, attended and signed the agreement on behalf of the GOT. Despite the drawn-out negotiations, Smaoui stated that reaching an agreement was "vital" for Microsoft. ...... Even as the goal of expanding employment opportunities for handicapped Tunisians is worthy, the program's affiliation with Leila Ben Ali's charity is indicative of the backroom maneuvering sometimes required to finalize a deal.

      first of all, this likely is a violation of FCPA, this is the stuff that Murdoch is facing BTW, so he is trying to repeal this law.

      Microsoft's reticence to fully disclose the details of the agreement further highlights the GOT emphasis on secrecy over transparency. In theory, increasing GOT law enforcement capability through IT training is positive, but given heavy-handed GOT interference in the internet, Post questions whether this will expand GOT capacity to monitor its own citizens. Ultimately, for Microsoft the benefits outweigh the costs.

      - secondly, here we have a company (MS) conspiring with a foreign government in order to limit freedoms of entire nation. If there is nothing illegal about this, then everything on this planet is f.d up.

    3. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Scribd article claims that Firefox won't resolve the first link but IE will, and claims that as evidence that MS is up to something horrible; problem is that Firefox 6.0.1 certainly does resolve it with no errors at all. This calls the veracity of the entire article into question.

    4. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by FrangoAssado · · Score: 1

      The Windows XP machine I'm using has the Tunisian government certificate authority installed (it's named "Agence Nationale de Certification Electronique").

      An easy way to check if you have it is to simply go to the Tunisian Certification Agency site (with https). If your browser shows a warning saying that the certificate authority can't be confirmed (or something like that), you don't have the Tunisian Govt CA. If it doesn't show any warnings, it probably means you do have the CA -- to check it, ask your browser about the certification information of the site (by clicking in the "lock" icon). Somewhere in the interface (I'm not sure how much it changed in Windows 7) you should see the "certification path" -- the root should be a certificate named "Agence Nationale de Certification Electronique", and in its details you can see the issuer country is TN (Tunisia).

      <rant>
      The situation of https authentication is increasingly a joke. Look at the number of CAs you have installed in Windows. Any of these organizations could sign any site, which means that simply seeing a lock icon in your browser's URL bar means almost nothing; for it to mean anything, you should check who signed the site's certificate.
      </rant>

    5. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      How curious. I still cannot find any mention of the certificate, or the CA in the system certificates management interface; but IE sure does seem happy with the certificate and the root...

      I revise my earlier comment to the effect that "either I suck at finding them, or Microsoft sucks at showing them".

    6. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Well Google isn't Microsoft and they don't seem to mind telling me the Agence Nationale de Certification Electronique is just fine as well within Chrome. I don't have firefox, but I doubt it's any different.

      Bad government or not, I'm betting most browsers aren't going to have fits over it.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    7. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      On Windows clients, at any rate, Chrome uses the system certificate store, same as IE, so behavior should be identical(barring any ad-hoc bodging in response to particular issues). I don't know what Chrome on other platforms does.

      FF does its own thing, independent of the OS/DE provided certificate store, and throws an untrusted certificate warning.

    8. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It was probably Firefox 4 or 5 for which that applies, between the crazy release cycle of major Firefox versions and slashdot's habit of posting things late, it's unlikely that Firefox 6.0.1 was used by the person writing the story.

    9. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by Ltap · · Score: 1
      Testing that site on Firefox 6.0.1, I get an error page which says the following:

      www.certification.tn uses an invalid security certificate.

      The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.

      So Firefox definitely does find something fishy about it, though this might be completely unrelated.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    10. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      In my case both Chromium and Firefox reject the certificate. So it's clearly a Microsoft thing to accept it.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    11. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 2

      There is nothing "fishy" about it, Firefox just doesn't include the issuing CA in its certificate store.

      Unlike Chrome (and obviously IE), Mozilla software doesn't use the certs supplied with Windows.

      --
      We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
    12. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Huh, site worked fine in stock IE8 (OS installed from a Dell image), in a heavily modded Firefox 6 it was untrusted. Half the Perspectives notaries showed consistent results, the other half returned nothing.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    13. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Also I can confirm the CA is trusted, you can see it in IE8's cert manager.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    14. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Your 6.0.1 doesn't throw an untrusted cert error? Mine does.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:Maybe it's more than that; it's their CA by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      for it to mean anything, you should check who signed the site's certificate.

      Afaict even that is of limited utility because thanks to the webs page by page model there is no enforcement that the cert used to send you the login page is the same cert that will be used when you submit the login form.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  4. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GE power turbine used to energize torture cables

    Caterpillar tractor harvested crops to feed dictator

    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      GE makes missiles and other weapons of mass destruction.

      Caterpillar sells bulldozers to Israel that are used to run over and kill people, as well as illegal home demolitions.

      In other news, blissfully ignorant American is ignorant.

    2. Re:In other news by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's hardly interesting, in both of those cases the equipment would have to be used in a legitimate way before that could happen. Unless GE generators are being hooked up directly to the cables used for torture, it's highly unlikely that GE would know that it's being used for nefarious purposes rather than for humanitarian ones.

      As for Caterpillar, under that scenario it's unlikely that they'd have done anything wrong, so long as they didn't need to break an embargo to ship the equipment over there.

    3. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, the French government offered to put security forces in Tunisia to "help control the uprising"...but Microsoft, man, those evil American bastards provided IT training.

    4. Re:In other news by Quila · · Score: 1

      Missiles aren't considered weapons of mass destruction, and GE got out of the nuclear weapons making business a while ago.

      Caterpillar sells special armored bulldozers to Israel because the Palestinians try to kill the drivers who are demolishing terrorist hideouts. People get run over because they run where the driver can't see them (the armor restricts visibility), or the Palestinians are shooting at or otherwise interfering with the the Israeli soldiers whose job is to clear the path of any people.

      In other news, AC has no idea WFT he's talking about.

    5. Re:In other news by swinferno · · Score: 1

      and you do? So he may have chosen a side in this conflict but (clearly) so have you. Both parties are committing immoral acts in this everlasting conflict, but that doesn't make them OK...

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
    6. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS training is previous to any specific tunisian MS traning, MS products use is certainly previous to any tunisian use of those products, so your argument applies as well to MS.

  5. In other news, Knuth was tarred and feathered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for writing books that allowed totalitarian regimes to write software to oppress their native peoples.

  6. No surprises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a very common, age-old practice. Exchange of info, tools and technologies among all sorts of governments, call them democracies or dictatorships as you wish, happens every day.

    Deals such as Microsoft's with the Tunisian government or the recently exposed Diginotar's with the Iranian government (likely at the command of the Dutch government) are just two small examples.

    ANY communications technology in general, and our current internet structure in particular, is by definition and by design unsecure and totally controllable by anyone who has the means, the resources, and the motivation to do so. Tie that with political and financial interests of all sorts of corporate and government entities and you see why these seemingly unfathomable cooperations take place.

    1. Re:No surprises by Caesar+Tjalbo · · Score: 1

      (likely at the command of the Dutch government)

      Unlikely, their own certificates were compromised too. The way Diginotar went about in their business and the way they handled the fall-out is reminiscent of IT gaffes by the Dutch government (unfair, you rarely hear about the things that do go right but that's assuming there are things that go right). The average Dutch government wouldn't hesitate about letting the USA spy services in though but not the Iranians.

      --
      "I'm not much interested in interoperability. I want substitutability. I want to be able to throw your software out."
    2. Re:No surprises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caesar,

      Appreciate your point. You would have been right in your point except that you seem to be unaware of the depth and extent of cooperation between "western" and specifically in this case Iranian "security" agencies. The fact that the Dutch governments own certificates were messed with too does not negate the possibility of their hand being in this whole debacle. Many European governments have deep coopeartion with the Iranian regime against this regime's oppents and on other issues of "mutual interest".

      It is well known that Nokia, Ericsson, Siemens, and others have sold telecom spying equipment and software to the Iranian government. In principle, these sales are impossible without (of course secret) backing of the relevent European governments.

      As another example, google the news about the visit by the Iranian intelligence minister to Germany a few years ago and the warm welcome extended to him by German interior minister. He was given a tour of the German security facilities and contracts were signed for "security" equipment and training and cooperation.

      This is not the first time this kind of cooperation has gotton out of hand and fired back at the enabling country (Holland in this case).

  7. Re:Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Courtesy of mister_playboy

  8. Re:In other news, Knuth was tarred and feathered.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knuth didn't put a false certificate authority for totalitarian regimes in the code examples.

  9. It's Ballmers Plan C. by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

    Plan A: Build better products which compete on merit alone. Failed - look at the market share of anything outside Windows & Office - e.g 1% for their new phone OS or IE's decline.
    Plan B: Use litigation to extort or smother the competition, e.g. 5$ for every Android handset from HTC. Failed - Motorolas patents will nullify them now, and Ballmer is in serious shit for letting Motorola go to Google.
    Plan C: Get corrupt government officials to buy their products by helping them do evil. Good luck with that, now it's no longer a secret.

  10. Oh c'mon, why the outcry? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because it gets known now? You don't think MS is the only company that doesn't give half a shit about who they sell to, do you? If there's not an outright embargo (that has to be circumvented somehow), anyone can buy anything if the price is right. Hell, IBM sold computers to the Nazis, knowing quite well just what they will be used for.

    You think any corporation would have acted different in any way? Corporations are the pinnacle of capitalist evolution: Intelligence without conscience.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Oh c'mon, why the outcry? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Most do it as a shell game, using cut outs and having all paper work moved around as needed.
      If anyone finds a person or tech, its emptied out, sold, lost in a take over ...
      http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-22/torture-in-bahrain-becomes-routine-with-help-from-nokia-siemens-networking.html
      e.g. "says he can’t comment because all documentation from the intelligence solutions unit had been transferred"
      The big brand then only likes "ethical businesses"

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Oh c'mon, why the outcry? by dmgxmichael · · Score: 1

      IBM sold computers to the Nazis...

      Cite - cause I'd really like to know which ones. The first true computer ever built wasn't completed until 1943 (ENIAC). Other computers wouldn't show up until after the war.

    3. Re:Oh c'mon, why the outcry? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Depends how you count:
      Konrad Zuse - Z1 program-controlled computer ~ 1936. His Z3 was the world's first fully functional programmable computer ~ 1941.
      http://ei.cs.vt.edu/~history/Zuse.html
      and by "computer" people point to the IBM's Hollerith punch card technology.
      http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Oh c'mon, why the outcry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's the traditional "why bother, everybody already knew it" which come after the "yeah, may be they do that evil stuff, but there's no solid evidences".

      So, this is it, you should never care that people hiding behind virtual (company) names do consciously evil things. You have no evidence, or it's too late.

    5. Re:Oh c'mon, why the outcry? by jean-guy69 · · Score: 2

      Fortunately not every corporation corrupts the iso process, not every corporation joins a standardization body while parallely setting a patent ambush.. So yes corporations can act differently;

      I guess the morality of the executive leadership can affect the morality of the corporation's acts.
      Sometimes the main shareholders are real humain beings with a conscience, which may affect their choices for the corporation.
      Even if we accept the idea that every corporations are without conscience, they may a least be concerned and be affected by their customers perception of their acts.

      If we excuse someone just because others did/do the same or worse, everything is excusable.

    6. Re:Oh c'mon, why the outcry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporations are the pinnacle of capitalist evolution: Intelligence without conscience.

      Intelligence without conscience ... in other words, a psychopath / sociopath.

    7. Re:Oh c'mon, why the outcry? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. A corporation can be socially responsible if it sees an advantage in it.

      Mostly, corporations can be guided by laws and fines. Fines need to be high enough to overcome the potential increase in cost, though, or the fine will become a cost factor.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Oh c'mon, why the outcry? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nope. Corporations, from bottom to top, are guided by a sense of duty, a sense of responsibility and a shift of blame.

      Every person has a conscience that would prohibit certain actions. Even the most "evil" patent lawyers might be conscious people. But they have a duty, a responsibility and someone else is to blame for their actions.

      Take the chance of getting laid off. A group manager gets told that he has to fire one of his people. He knows them. All of them. He knows that Bill has just bought a new house and has a mortgage breaking his back, Jeff has a new baby, Tom needs the job to pay off his student loans and Frank has to pay alimony for two ex wifes. No matter who he fires, it's wrong. But he has to fire one of those guys. His reasoning will be that if he doesn't, his whole branch might get shut down and all of them will be fired, him included.

      His boss didn't make that decision because he's a bad guy. But because he has new orders from above, he has to cut costs somewhere, and that somewhere is personnel. He gets told that he has to cut back 5% of the people. So he decides. He doesn't know any of Bill, Jeff, Tom or Frank, or anyone else that he fires "indirectly", but his reasoning is that it's his responsibility to make ends meet and keep the budget, or the whole company will suffer, let alone that he will get into trouble.

      You can trace this up to the C-level execs. Who are in turn maybe not even bad people. But they know that their competitors managed to cut costs, so they have to, too. They know that firing people will put these people in dire straits, but they have a responsibility towards their shareholders, and to the other workers in the company. Shareholders might sell their shares and the company might lose value that way, eventually maybe even leading to the company going bankrupt and instead of having to fire 5% of the people, all of them will lose their jobs. So it's better to just cut 5% and keep at least 95% of the others working.

      Shareholders are not bad people either. Often, they don't even know what they invest in. They hand their money to investment banks with the order to "make it more". They don't even know that their request causes that layoff.

      Investment bankers are not necessarily evil people either. They can justify their locust behaviour with the responsibility for their investors money, they have the duty to invest the money with the best interest of their investors, and that best interest is by default making sure that they get the best revenue for their invested money.

      So it's quite possible that YOU cost yourself your very own job. If you invested your money in stock via investment banks or fonds. Did you want to do that? Hell no. Are you a bad person? Certainly not. In the end, though, your interest in making your money work for you costs you your job.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Ahh .. The Arab Revolt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems these troubles occur again and again.

    This time, 'sted the British and their Telegraph, Its Microsoft and the Internet, which they being Microsoft never did figure out I'm affraid to their detrement.

    +++++

  12. Probably ALL companies involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's face it. If there was a country such as Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, or maybe even Iran, is there a computer security company who would have the guts to say "no" when a pile of cash was plonked on the table? Oh, you want to spy on your own citizens that might be breaking local laws (which happen to prevent free speech and any expressions of disagreement with the government)? No problem. For a fee we'll train your personnel to configure the software however you want. This is what happened at the intelligence service in Libya, it's unsurprising in Tunisia.

    Are there laws in the countries where they are incorporated that would prevent them from doing this? With the exception of Iran and Syria, which are under a regime of sanctions that may or may not bar this kind of commerce ("state sponsors of terrorism"), I doubt it. This is all just business-as-usual. The real question is whether it should be.

  13. What if it had been open source software? by devleopard · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that mean open source software was being used to oppress? Or would somehow the spirit of freedom inside of the software refuse to run, knowing what it was being used for?

    I know Microsoft is evil and all, but really, it sounds like they had plausible deniability: "..Tunisian government's adherence to its stated goals."

    --
    The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
    1. Re:What if it had been open source software? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Nice strawman. The problem is not the software, it's the company. Nobody is blaming Windows, we're blaming actual people who made a deal. And if instead of MS it was a company which produced open source it would be just has bad.

      And there's nothing plausible about their deniability.

  14. USA by santax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, the USA torture practices come to light, the USA illegal wars, the USA illegal everything... and those same guys see MS doing something that might be stupid from a human perspective, but no where near the level of the USA as a country in itself... is pointing the finger???? Man, you guys here still don't get the cables. It's the fucking USA that is the enemy! YES! Even if you are a USA Citizen. I might as well say, especially if you are a US citizen. Those people, that lead your country, not the guy in the White House... are fucking war criminals at best! Do something about it! We (the rest of the world) can't! Prove for once America is about freedom. But think about real freedom for once. Not just freedom on your own continent. The world doesn't turn around you. Let alone the universe. We have one earth and we have to make it together. And right now we are fucking it up. And that fucking up is being orchestrated by a handful very powerful people. Having said that... Peace. We need to stick together. Because our children will hopefully be smarter.

    1. Re:USA by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 0

      Good god, shut the fuck up you insufferable douche. Omg the sky is falling, the sky is falling! You sound like an AGW denier pretending that "climategate" means AGW is a "lie". No, it doesn't.

      You're a hyperbolic twit. The USA is evil, but... Iran - they're OK? Turky? Saudi Arabia? Italy?

      Nobody with any sense puts any stock in your fucking paranoid hippie delusions. The USA certainly isn't perfect, but it's also not the dystopian hellhole your overly active imagination has apparently made it out to be.

    2. Re:USA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Isn't this the story of every powerful nation? We could go back in time and the people of the world would be complaining about the English, or the Dutch, or the French spreading their imperialism across the globe, and complaining that they can't do anything about it. Well, the cost for us to do something is the same as the cost for you. And meanwhile, the powers that control the USA are not the only problem. Germany, Canada, Australia, Britain, China... they're all the same. The USA just happens to be projecting the most power right now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:USA by jtseng · · Score: 1

      WE'RE TRYING!!!!! It doesn't help that the sane people who vote in those who they thought were also sane were ( bought off by monied interests | turned his/their back on their base constituents ). And it takes time to change minds to at least change (if not dismantle) the military-industrial-intelligence complex.

      --

      Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

    4. Re:USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People in Europe hate people from the same country if they are not from the same region.

      to be fair, the guys not from my region are assholes.

      Seriously though, when quoting Thomas Jefferson to a bunch of Europeans have in mind that the "founding fathers" mean nothing to us. I.E. their word will not be taken as literal, immutable truth. If on the other hand you quote their logical arguments instead of some witty comment they made, you have a better chance of getting your message across.

  15. Only Money matters: Bing in China, renren, GOT,... by tvlinux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MS is a business, It does not care about people, It would sell Windows licenses and database to the Devil if it could make a profit.

  16. Microsoft compatibility prohibited? by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Additionally, future GOT tenders for IT equipment will specify that the equipment must be Microsoft compatible, which is currently prohibited by the Tunisian open software policy.

    This seems to be a point of contention. Can anyone explain why/how Microsoft compatibility is prohibited? Just because it can run MS software doesn't mean it will, the same hardware could very well run exclusively "open" software. The open software itself could also be compatible with MS hardware and software, providing drivers that work with hardware under the Microsoft label (mice, keyboards, webcams, etc), and be capable of reading and exporting to MS file formats (.doc, .xls, etc).

    1. Re:Microsoft compatibility prohibited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone explain why/how Microsoft compatibility is prohibited?

      It isn't. What is prohibited is specifying that equipment must be Microsoft compatible.
      The equipment may be compatible but it must not be a requirement for the purchase.
      The reference in that sentence is a bit awkward.

    2. Re:Microsoft compatibility prohibited? by currently_awake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It means that government contracts won't be awarded to cheaper hardware based on arm processors because that's not windows compatible. The change in policy means all government contracts must use windows compatible hardware instead of cheaper stuff that only runs open source. And as long as the hardware supports it microsoft has the option to bribe/leverage their software onto the hardware.

  17. News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty funny, these cables read more like informative news stories than most actual news stories.

  18. Re:and apples nazi app store censorship is just as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad can beat up your dad.

  19. This is so silly by patscii · · Score: 1

    So you mean if I sell someone an axe, knowing that they will kill someone with it, I am somehow responsible?

    1. Re:This is so silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by anti-ms logic, yes.

    2. Re:This is so silly by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      If you live in the US, yes.

      It's called accessory to murder. Also, you could be charged with conspiracy.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)#United_States

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:This is so silly by formfeed · · Score: 1

      So you mean if I sell someone an axe, knowing that they will kill someone with it, I am somehow responsible?

      Legally?
      It would be hard to prove, that you knew that they will kill someone with it. But if that could be established, in most countries you would be held responsible.

      Morally?
      Yes, asshole

    4. Re:This is so silly by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you know that they will kill someone with it, you are guilty at least of aiding and abetting, assuming the killing is a crime in the first place.

    5. Re:This is so silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only by anti-ms logic but also by the law in most countries.

      If you sell an object that you know will be used for a crime you are an accessory to the crime and depending on your location you can be punished to the same extent as the one commiting the actual crime.
      If you sell someone an axe, knowing that they will kill someone with it, you are commiting a criminal act.

      When it comes to axes it is pretty easy to dodge since you can just claim that you thought that the person was going to chop wood.
      In this case MS can not use the "I didn't" know defence, more likely it will not be an issue since the Tunisian population can't put them to trial in the US and it is very unlikely that any US citizen will be willing to go to court agains MS for this.

    6. Re:This is so silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally, no. But if the purchaser is the equivalent of a well-known axe-murderer who asks you "Can you train me to more efficiently decapitate people with this tool?", yes.

  20. Lawful evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just because it's legal, doesn't make it right.

  21. so what by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    that is the way the world works, you sell a product or service or die

  22. Re:Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really enjoyed that very much. Thank you.

  23. how about a scanned contract? by decora · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.fhimt.com/leaks/contrat-entre-microsoft-et-le-gouvernement-tunisien/

    Support de l'autorité de certification électronique reconnue au niveau de Microsoft IE

    Microsoft inclura dans son cycle de mise à jour des autorités de certificats au niveau d'Internet Explorer, le support de l'autorité de certification nationale. De son coté, le Gouvernement Tunisien procédera à une demande écrite dans ce sense auprès de Microsoft pour la mise en place de cette procédure

    google translation:

    Support for electronic certification authority recognized at Microsoft IE

    Microsoft will include in its cycle of updating the certificate authorities in Internet Explorer, support for the national certification authority. For its part, the Tunisian Government will make a written request in this sense to
    Microsoft's implementation of this procedure.

    English translation:

    Tunisia's certificate authority allows it to release it's own SSL certificates. Microsoft agrees to include Tunisia's CA certificates in Internet Explorer updates.

    Thats fine. But it also allows the dictator to spoof https sites and thus snoop on people even if they are using SSL. There is evidence that exactly this has happened in Tunisia with sites like gmail. See

    http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2010/07/05/mass-gmail-phishing-in-tunisia/

    I know there is a lot of bullshit assumptions in some of the articles on this issue, but there is definitely some fire at the heart of the smoke.

    1. Re:how about a scanned contract? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Since they do this for a lot of countries, Tunesia could have claimed discrimination if they'd have refused to do it for Tunesia. Unless there was an official embargo, which there wasn't. You *may* suspect the usage of these certificates will be bad (and I agree) but there are a lot of standard uses for certificates.

      We need (a) more awareness that certificates are not just "computer things' but have real impact on security and (b) more control over what happens with the certificates in our browsers. Fortunately, Tunesia's dictatorship is no longer in any position to abuse the certificates and also, the Diginotar hack is highlighting why exactly these things matter.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  24. might be illegall.. who will enforce the law? by decora · · Score: 2

    obama's DOJ is too busy going after journalists and 'leakers'

    (Stephen Kim, Jeffrey Sterling, Shamai Leibowitz, Thomas Drake, Bradley Manning)

    In fact, Bradley Manning is quite probably being charged specifically with giving out this cable, as it is probably one of the 100,000+ he is charged with under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Theft of Government Property laws.

    in essence... the government we have now would allow Microsoft to break this law, but they would put the guy in jail who let you know that it happened.

    and I'm not just talking about manning, im talking about the Cambridge associates who are under Grand Juries right now.

  25. actually you could. you own our debt. by decora · · Score: 1

    China and Russia could sell all their fannie and freddie bonds, and all their tresaury bonds, and the US would collapse overnight.
    move off the dollar as a world reserve currency, and it would undergo mass inflation like argentina a few years back.

    1. Re:actually you could. you own our debt. by santax · · Score: 2

      Yeps but the usa has a zillion nuclear weapons and a zillion nuclear idiots... The top guys - the snakes in suits - would probably rather kill the whole world :( Having said that, here in Europe we only have a million nuclear weapons but still a zillion nuclear idiots that would do the same. People are retarded. They really are. Me myself and i. That's all that matters. And even these cables that should have lead to a complete new system... well... we - the people - just don't give a fuck. At least, that is what I have learned from this all :( And it hurts.

    2. Re:actually you could. you own our debt. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      China can crash the US economy, and then their biggest exports market ($365 billion just last year) crashes too, leaving them in shit. The EU (the other big importer) is already having enough problems affording China's stuff, they have nothing to gain adding instability.

    3. Re:actually you could. you own our debt. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      It does hurt. Your level of barely coherent populist ranting hurts my brain you fucking parasite.

  26. Which is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so Microsoft sells a couple of more copies of Windows and Office by throwing in some free training. That is the equivalent of a car dealer throwing in car mats. Yet, somehow this is some sort of evil conspiracy from an evil company that somehow knows nothing about security, yet will train the Tunisian regime on security? Meh.

    1. Re:Which is it? by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the training was more along these lines than "Ctrl-X cuts, ctrl-V pastes..."

  27. cheer up by decora · · Score: 1

    go through the cables at http://www.cablegatesearch.net/

    type in something interesting like 'microsoft' or 'cisco'

    find some interesting ones

    submit a slashdot story on it ....?

    profit!

  28. Re:and apples nazi app store censorship is just as by wmbetts · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah? My god can beat up your god.

    --
    "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
  29. Re:Only Money matters: Bing in China, renren, GOT, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To the devil? Somehow I don't think they need to buy their own software.

  30. how about this cable? by decora · · Score: 2

    http://www.cablegatesearch.net/cable.php?id=07TUNIS1286&q=linux

    "
    US companies selling quality products cannot compete on a
    price basis. Microsoft gave the example of PC procurement,
    in which the GOT procurement commission does not specify an
    operating system in their RFPs. This results in the PCs
    being shipped with the Linux,s open source operating system,
    which does not support Microsoft software. The Microsoft
    representative argued that this has encouraged piracy and
    resulted in GOT PCs using pirated Microsoft software. She
    continued that the fact that the EU Commission and the
    African Development Bank accept these GOT procurement laws
    only encourages the GOT to maintain government procurement on
    a lowest cost basis.
    "

    in other words, not shipping Windows with a PC = piracy

    then there is the whole Tunisian Certificate Authority being put into Internet Explorer updates thing (which should have been the real story IMHO)

    1. Re:how about this cable? by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Or you could see it as arguing that mandating that only open source software be purchased doesn't mean that closed source software isn't being used. It's all fine and dandy to order a PC with Linux on it, but if you order a PC with Linux on it when what you really want is Microsoft Office, do you reckon the government employees are doing without or using pirated copies. Prohibiting the purchase of any kind of software doesn't stop that software being used, just purchased.

  31. because his name is on the contract by decora · · Score: 1

    http://www.fhimt.com/leaks/contrat-entre-microsoft-et-le-gouvernement-tunisien/

    Afrique du Sud - Cape Town - GLF Africa, le 11 Julliet 2006,

    EN LA PRESENCE ET EN QUALITE DE TEMOIN:

    M. Bill GATES
    Chairman & Chief Software Architect, Microsoft Corporation

    POUR LES PARTIES CONTRACTANTES

    M Kate SHALLOE
    Microsoft Ireland Operations Limited

    POUR MICROSOFT

    Director General Microsoft Tunisie

    POUR LE GOUVERNEMENT DE LA REPUBLIQUE TUNISIENNE

    Secretaire d'Etat aupres du Ministre des Techonlogies de la Communication chargee de l'Informatique, de l'Internet et des Logiciels libres

    ----

    unless you believe that the fhimt.com people fabricated an 18 page contract in French and Arabic... i'd say that Mr Gates has his name right there, same contract that talks about sending Tunisian government Cert Authority with IE updates.

  32. MS To Reboot Charlton Heston? by retroworks · · Score: 2

    "Software doesn't spy on people. People use software to spy on people."

    --
    Gently reply
  33. The US Gov. does this too by E.I.A · · Score: 1

    See EFF's https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/07/politics-surveillance-erosion-privacy-latin-america - The Politics of Surveillance: The Erosion of Privacy in Latin America. Reminds me of Microsoft Coffee (http://cryptome.org/0001/ms-cofee.htm), and makes me wonder what effects the Pentagon's sockpuppet programs are having as well: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks *New Microsoft eugenics program leaked: Controversial "Just Click [HERE] to Send Drones" has many concerned* - maybe

    --
    Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made. - Otto von Bismarck
  34. Microsoft "Training" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    `According to a cable sent by the US embassy in Tunis on 22 September, 2006, Microsoft was so keen to get the Tunisian government to drop its policy favouring open-source software that it agreed to set up a "program on cyber criminality" to cover training. The deal also entailed the company giving the Tunisian regime, headed by President Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali, the original source code for Microsoft software.' link

    "Tunisia has its own certificateauthority and since 2007 the root certificate has been included in Microsoft Internet Explorer.This certificate is not included in common other browsers like Safari or Firefox. If you visit from one of those browsers you will see a certificate error" link

  35. Re:and apples nazi app store censorship is just as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The standard reply is, "My dad is your dad." ;P

  36. Re:Only Money matters: Bing in China, renren, GOT, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it this way. MS is a human persons association, which work together to make money.

    Of course "MS" is shameless, because it's a virtual entity. But microsoft employes should feel ashamed and find a way to work otherwise

  37. Business is Business. by luk3Z · · Score: 0

    Business is Business.

    --
    Recipes for USA bankrupt - http://tinypaste.com/0d66f dd = dollar deluge (printed in the infinity)
  38. thats not what they are saying by decora · · Score: 1

    what they are saying is that the government shouldn't be able to order computers without windows pre-installed, because this enables piracy, therefore you shouldn't be able to order computers without windows pre-installed.

    that argument wouldn't pass any jury on the planet.

  39. If... by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

    businesses are allowed to do business in Tunisia, isn't this just a piece of anti-microsoft fud? We (the USA) trained Afghani's to fight the Soviets, it worked pretty good until the tactics were used on US (USA). It's not the training that is the issue, its the application; just say what you want to say and be done with it;

    You think Microsoft training is evil.

    FUD.

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  40. Re:Only Money matters: Bing in China, renren, GOT, by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Are you suggesting that the Dark Lord pirates his database software?

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  41. The question is Caterpillar's culpability by Quila · · Score: 1

    The purpose of these bulldozers is not to run over people. In fact, that is why the IDF has troops go with them when possible to make sure they don't run over anybody (but as I said, their job is made difficult due to attacks by the very people they're trying to save from getting run over). The IDF has even installed cameras to try to eliminate the blind spots so drivers can avoid running over people who throw themselves in front of the bulldozers.

    But the AC made it out as running over people was in the plan. It clearly isn't.

  42. Next you'll be accusing them of.... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
    ....creating front companies in Africa to shell for their investments in Monsanto, and pushing their GMOs throughout the planet.

    http://techrights.org/2009/09/20/privatization-africa/

    http://techrights.org/2009/11/02/gates-africa-un-education/

    http://techrights.org/2009/10/22/seeds-of-doubt-in-bill-gates-investments/

  43. Re:Only Money matters: Bing in China, renren, GOT, by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    They run Windows ME and MSSQL in hell, I don't think anyone around here is going to question that. Now if the devil wants to spread more evil is he going to pump money into a big evil monopolistic corporation and make Steve Ballmer richer, or is he going to pirate it, removing the trouble of managing licenses from the backs of hell's sysadmins?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel