Slashdot Mirror


Marking 10 Years Since 9/11/2001

10 years ago today, coordinated terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C. killed nearly 3,000 people. It wasn't the first terrorist attack directed against the U.S., or even on U.S. soil, but it was the deadliest, and came at a time of relative peace. Probably most people reading this remember where and how they heard the news. We've often discussed the consequences of the attack: security cordons, ID checks and metal detectors where none existed before, a reexamination of how U.S. policy affects international perception and attitudes, and the encroachment of surveillance policies and technology, to name a few. Today, we don’t want to inundate you with links to tributes and retrospectives, so we’ll offer the only thing we can: a look back at how the day unfolded here. Our thoughts are with everyone who lost friends and family members.

15 of 804 comments (clear)

  1. That's not the first memorable 09-11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In 1714, the Spanish army crushed the Catalan resistance and imposed their barbarian culture upon them. A whole nation obliterated.
    In 1973, the US-backed Pinochet overthrew the democratic government of Chile. At least 3,197 died.

    1. Re:That's not the first memorable 09-11 by mike1210 · · Score: 0, Informative

      In 1973, the US-backed Pinochet overthrew the democratic government of Chile. At least 3,197 died.

      Salvador Allende was "democratically elected", but then, so was Hitler. Before Pinochet forcibly removed him from power, Allende had destroyed democracy in Chile by imposing socialism in violation of Chilean law.

      No, the CIA was not involved in the coup.

  2. Re:My thoughts are with everyone who lost anyone by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Religion may have been played a small part in convincing the attackers to commit suicide, but the motivation for the attacks themselves was political."

    That "small part" is lethal.

  3. The sad thing is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    that the terrorists have won.

  4. Re:and the saddest thing by anagama · · Score: 1, Informative

    retard.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  5. Re:10 years later by anagama · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe he'll come back with some humanitarian understanding, as Mike Prysner. This is, or should be, an iconic speech:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akm3nYN8aG8

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  6. Bin Laden said what? by copponex · · Score: 4, Informative

    Summarized excerpt from "Al Qeada's Strategy to the Year 2020":

    1. Provoke the United States into invading a Muslim country.

    2. Incite local resistance to occupying forces.

    3. Expand the conflict to neighboring countries, and engage the U.S. in a long war of attrition.

    4. Convert al-Qaeda into an ideology and set of operating principles that can be loosely franchised in other countries without requiring direct command and control, and via these franchises incite attacks against countries allied with the U.S. until they withdraw from the conflict, as happened with the 2004 Madrid train bombings, but which did not have the same effect with the July 7, 2005 London bombings.

    5. The U.S. economy will finally collapse under the strain of multiple engagements in numerous places, making the worldwide economic system which is dependant on the U.S. also collapse leading to global political instability, which in turn leads to a global jihad led by Al-Qaeda and a Wahhabi Caliphate will then be installed across the world.

    bin Laden's stated goal, before and after the terror attacks in Kenya and on the Cole, was to draw the West into an intractable war with the Middle East. He was an evil fuck, but like some evil fucks in the past, he wasn't crazy or stupid. He got the idea from us in the late 80s when the same policy bankrupted the Soviet Union.

    "I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life." --October, 2001

    "All we have to do is send two mujaheddin... to raise a small piece of cloth on which is written "al-Qaeda" in order to make the generals race there, to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses." --2004

  7. Re:He just made one mistake by sydneyfong · · Score: 3, Informative

    On these subjects, if you read "news", or even *real* news , you're probably already unknowingly subject to various propaganda campaigns, unless you read a *really* wide range of news from various agencies and countries, in different languages.

    The picture painted (for example) in the news in the Muslim world is not as rosy for the US as the whatever news you read.

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
  8. Re:My thoughts are with everyone who lost anyone by Opyros · · Score: 4, Informative

    Shinto, not Buddhism. They literally worshiped the Emperor, and you can't draw a clear distinction between religion and patriotism in their case.

  9. Re:Nice summary, but... by SlovakWakko · · Score: 4, Informative

    True. Of course, I also remember Palestinians cheering in the streets after the attack. Almost everyone in the world could be better behaved and more humane.

    I remember that one too. I also remember that it was a fake, footage taken from some different event.

  10. Re:and the saddest thing by ultranova · · Score: 4, Informative

    Islamic terrorists do want to destroy the world.

    The problem is, the Religious Right also wants to destroy the world. Go see Rapture Ready forums: every time something bad happens somewhere, the news is met with jubilence; because, after all, it hastens the day when Lord Jesus returns and drowns the world in fire while the righteous - meaning people who'll enjoy watching everyone else burn - watch. And if Lord Jesus might seem to be taking his time in returning... Well, one could always help God's plan along by causing some bad news, right?

    Basically, we have two bunches of omnicidal maniacs, one with nuclear weapons, and both are trying to goad each other to get on with it.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  11. Re:Nice summary, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    True. Of course, I also remember Palestinians cheering in the streets after the attack.

    Was just reading about that episode from John Simpson's book:

    "The great majority of Palestinians I knew were stunned by the news of the attack, and realised immediately that it would do their cause nothing but harm"

    "But the pictures of eight or so Palestinians rejoicing went around the world. I must have seen them repeated a dozen times over the next few days. The human mind has a remarkable tendancy to generalise from particular cases."

      - News From No Man's Land, p171

  12. Re:The terrorists won, beyond their wildest dreams by unitron · · Score: 2, Informative

    When the Supreme Court handed Bush the 2000 election, The Onion ran a story entitled "Our Long National Nightmare of Peace and Prosperity Is Finally Over".

    Look it up and read it. It's chillingly prescient.

    P.S. Congrats on a very good 9/12/01 column

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  13. Re:But by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uh, does anyone realize that there is an actual reason for our way of writing the date?

    It follows the way we say it in speech. The numbers are just an abbreviation, after all. We don't say 1st September, 1990; we say September 1st, 1990. So it follows that when you use the abbreviation, you use the same order.

    You can argue that it's not the best system, but to say it is not logical is just blind.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  14. Re:But by fnj · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not just "good," it's standardized. It's the only correct way. Anyone who doesn't format dates per ISO 8601 is stupid. "American style" and "European style" are both stupid. I haven't used either one in ages.