Slashdot Mirror


$300M To Save 6 Milliseconds

whoever57 writes "A new transatlantic cable (the first in 10 years) is going to be laid at the cost of $300M. The reason? To shave 6ms off the time to transmit packets from London to New York. The Hibernian Express will reduce the current transmission time — roughly 65 milliseconds — by less than ten percent. However, investors believe the financial community will be lining up to pay premium rates to use the new cable. The article suggests that a one-millisecond advantage could be worth $100M per year to a large hedge fund."

7 of 524 comments (clear)

  1. Proof that the system is corrupt by dargaud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This kind of thing is the direct proof that the way the stock exchange is built is deeply flawed. Why don't they try to build it on sounder bases than "the fastest takes all" ?!?

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  2. Re:Blame the market by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fractional reserve banking actually creates money. It doesn't create an artificial scarcity.

    Yep, it creates money and debases it in the process. So you're correct, it doesn't create artificial scarcity, but it creates real poverty in the long term for those who have a little money.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  3. The giant leach on society by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The entire finance sector fills me with equal parts revulsion and sadness. This is yet another example of enormous resources consumed for no net gain to society. At least in this case something (however unnecessary), tangible is produced as a result. Think of the huge numbers of brilliant mathematical and programming minds that have been consumed by this nonsense! Think of the resources and financial liquidity that is reinvested into this zero sum game! Every hour of work, every employee, every structure erected in praise of this wholly disgusting idol of modern nihilism, makes the rest of our society just that little bit worse. To those who would praise the enabling power of our new financial systems I say Pah! We can create better financial systems within virtual worlds. The only intrinsic value in the financial institutions is the power it gives; and this has been abused for all it is worth! Give me back my engineers! Give me back my scientists! Give me back my hope for a better future!

  4. A short history of unfair trading practices... by thesandbender · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1817 : Major Brokerage leases building on Wall ST!
    1836 : Major Brokerage house installs first telegraph!!
    1890 : Major Brokerage house installs first telephone!!!
    1990 : Major Brokerage house has access to internet!!!!

    Sound investing is based on research but it is also based on the ability to react quickly to that information. If a company in the US announces that their CFO has been indicted, then investment firms in the UK are definitely going to pay to get that information and react to it as quickly as possible. Before you could submit bids to the fed electronically, investment firms used to place runners in pay phone booths next to the Fed so they could call them at the last minute and have them get in the best bid. Fundamentally, there is no difference between that and this.
    And yes, "black box" high-frequency traders are going to be the primary users of this line but that doesn't mean there aren't valid and legitimate (as far as the average consumer is concerned) uses for this line.

  5. Already Noted in Slashdot by InterGuru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    by yours truly, here .

    I just read an article in Popular Science that almost made me sick to the stomach. The headline says it all "Pricey Transatlantic Cable Could Save Milliseconds, Millions by Speeding Data to Stock Traders".

    Here is $400M being spent just to give flash traders a 5 ms advantage in trans-atlantic trading. It adds nothing to the economy, just lets the Wall Street Casino operators skim more money from the economy. I addition, it diverts talent from productive projects.

    Never has Matt Taibbi's description of Goldman Sachs, and by extension, all the big banks, as "a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money" seem even more apt.

  6. Re:Cheaper than a huge flying vacuum by Jawnn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Congratulations on completely missing GP's (admittedly off-topic) point. Making money off of the buying and selling of money is a drain on the economy. It produces nothing of intrinsic value and, by design, enriches only a lucky few. If you read your history, you will find that the rise of such an "economy" is frequently the harbinger of society's fall from dominance, if not it's outright collapse. And that is most certainly not "a good thing".

  7. Re:How? by Turken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because all high frequency trading does is inflate the cost for those of us who do invest in the "old-fashioned" buy-and-hold manner.

    I heard it best described in this way: There's a hot new gadget that's being released today, and you *really* want to go buy one. Unfortunately, as you're walking down the street, some hedge fund investors see you coming and quickly jump in front of the store milliseconds before you get there to form a line at the door. The store opens, the investor at the front of the line buys ALL of the gadget inventory. He then turns around and sells all those units to the guy behind him for a small profit, who sells to the guy behind him for a small profit, who sells to the guy behind him, etc.

    Eventually, they get back to you, but now if you're going to buy that gadget, it's going to cost you some significant percentage more to purchase for actual use. And you don't really have any option if you're going to buy one, because every store selling the gadget has a pool of financial sharks circling the entrance just waiting for another "traditional investment" sucker.

    In the end, the store doesn't benefit, since they still only sold the item at the normal price, and you don't benefit because you just got your price jacked up. The only beneficiaries are the HFT scum who have played the system in such a way to artificially inflate your costs to their own benefit while adding absolutely no actual value to the product as it passed through their hands. This DOES impact you, because the more of your investment that gets siphoned out by the hedge funds, the less you have left to actually invest in the original stock.