Slashdot Mirror


6.6 Magnitude Earthquake Off the Coast of Japan

tekgoblin writes "Japan shook with yet another earthquake today. Its magnitude was 6.6 and its epicenter was about 60 miles off shore. Initially Japan had warned citizens of a possible tsunami, but they've since cancelled it. No damage or casualties have been reported."

69 comments

  1. UH-OH !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Here we go again !!

    Godzilla !!

    1. Re:UH-OH !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Gojeera. Go-zheer-uh. :>

    2. Re:UH-OH !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, 'zh' typically represents another sound, such as in pleasure. Second off, 'ji' would be more appropriate than 'jee,' which would be more like an 'jeh' sound, like jelly. Third off, calling Godzilla Gojira is like calling Japan Nihon. If you were serious, consider yourself schooled. If you were joking, consider me whooshed.

    3. Re:UH-OH !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider yourself whooshed

    4. Re:UH-OH !! by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      My head just exploded...

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    5. Re:UH-OH !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean that as an elaborate troll to end off with Nippon and fuck it up?

  2. Breaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan gets earthquakes. Nothing to see here.

    1. Re:Breaking by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      Agreed, how on earth is an average earthquake in a country that is used to minor earthquakes. Just because there was an earthquake to break all recorded records over there once, Next news story, thunderstorm hits new orleans, no deaths or damage.

    2. Re:Breaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I don't get it either. Japan has like 1500 earthquakes every year.

      Unless it's a major one, who cares. Nobody gives a fuck about a little 6.6 quake that happens several times a month, it's normal.

    3. Re:Breaking by adnonsense · · Score: 2

      I live in Japan and this kind of quake has been common since March, and is nothing to get excited about or make a special report on. When I saw the article headline (not long after waking up) I thought I might have missed something big, but no, it's just another offshore tremor.

    4. Re:Breaking by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Indeed. There were something like twenty 6+ quakes while I was there in April June and July.

      Only thing I can think is there were a few in one day and it got noticed. Kind of sad that the whole Japan recovery effort is pretty much absent from the US media.

    5. Re:Breaking by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      which earthquake broke all records? the march quake didn't even come close ,except in nominal dollar damage. The worst was the Great Tokyo quake with over 100k dead. And Japan's earthquakes are not generally known for incredible strength, those being in Chile, Alaska and Sumatra.

  3. Go back home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Earth is telling the Japanese people to go back to their native land of Korea.

  4. This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tsunami hits Japan, Japan completely unprepared

    1. Re:This just in by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Tsunami hits Japan, Japan completely unprepared

      They didn't even have a word for it!

  5. What a Hint ... by foobsr · · Score: 0

    This gave me the chance to realize that the 'subline' "news for nerds, stuff that matters" has been removed, presumably with the all new design. Right so!

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:What a Hint ... by erroneus · · Score: 2

      You realize it's still in the main page's title right?

    2. Re:What a Hint ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you realize its not right? just checked the main paid (un-logged in posting as AC) and its no longer there.

    3. Re:What a Hint ... by Dishevel · · Score: 0

      Can you show it to me.
      Because I am having a problem seeing it.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    4. Re:What a Hint ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize you're full of shit, right? Just checked the main page, and right there in the browser's title bar, "Slashdot: News for nerds, stuff that matters - Mozilla Firefox". Running no add-ons, plugins, or custom CSS.

    5. Re:What a Hint ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, I wrote this three step protocol to help you out.

      1) Open your web browser.
      2) navigate to http://www.slashdot.org
      3) Look at the title bar of your web browser.

      Hope this helps !

      Good day to you sir.

    6. Re:What a Hint ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see the future of this:
      "You realize that it is still there as a comment in the source code?"

    7. Re:What a Hint ... by wsxyz · · Score: 1

      I tried this. It says:

      Slashdot: News for nerds, stuf

    8. Re:What a Hint ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine says "Sla". I do have tyoo many tabs open.

  6. Not news by brian1078 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not news. I get notifications from the USGS for EQs 6.0+. They've been having 1 or 2 per month since the big one in March. This is the largest since a 7.0 on July 10.

    1. Re:Not news by Kylon99 · · Score: 2

      I have the feeling a 6.0 - 7.0 is big news in most places in the world, where the buildings can't take that. But in Japan, which seems to be able to ride out 7.0 - 9.0 with not much loss of life, (one lady fell off her balcony in Tokyo apparently... that was it) a 6.0 seems barely newsworthy.

      And of course like the parent poster said; they've been getting one or two every month. It's starting to become a way of life it seems...

    2. Re:Not news by adnonsense · · Score: 2

      Also, most of them are happening offshore, which limits the effects. Now, if a M6+ earthquake went off directly under Tokyo, things would be a little more dramatic.

      Now, this is what woke me up the other day (at 5pm local time - jetlag!), a mere 6.2 but much closer to Tokyo than the one in the article, and it was so unremarkable I'd forgotten all about it until now.

    3. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Why is this now "news". I stop counting the 6+ and > quakes in that region. I think I get at least one USGS alert per week from there.

    4. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a 5.5 caused most of Christchurch to disintegrate at that city (200 dead & 200k homeless) is over a plate boundary and a 5.5 in Australia killed 20 about 20 years ago, but earthquakes over make news there.

      http://www.disasters247.com/index.php/Earthquake-Map.html is showing:-
      5.2
      5.5
      5.5
      5.6
      6.2
      6.6

  7. Nuclear power is safe! by formfeed · · Score: 5, Funny

    This earth quake comes right after they announced to move to renewable energy. Not a coincidence. The so called green technology isn't so green after all. Each year more people die of shark attacks than get stabbed with a uranium rod. Think about that before you build a hydro dam. And wind energy isn't any safer. While depleted Uranium can be a fun and educational toy, hundreds of houses are destroyed by tornadoes each year. And to store all the solar energy one would have to pave the entire state of Arizona with batteries. Once they leak, everyone in New Mexico would die.

    1. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the I don't even

    2. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRT solar energy... well, everyone knows what happens eventually when you build a solar collector plant in SimCity. A massive focused blast of sunlight cooks part of your city!

    3. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know this was a Teahadist site!!

    4. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drugs really are not your friend.

    5. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This poster was using renewable energy and was cut down mid-post!

    6. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those jerks from the NCR had it coming!

    7. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by La_Boca · · Score: 1

      top 10 slashdot comments

    8. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure which is funnier, your comment or all of the AC's that seem to be taking it somewhat seriously. :D

    9. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuclear power will destroy Arizona and New Mexico. I fail to see the problem here.

    10. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      And to store all the solar energy one would have to pave the entire state of Arizona with batteries. Once they leak, everyone in New Mexico would die.

      Even worse: Getting all the solar power from Japan to Arizona and back would incur huge losses so you'd need more solar power and batteries (you might need to pave over Arizona and Utah), not to mention thousands of miles of cables.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    11. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuclear power is going to be replaced by a new type of recirculating steam engine powerplant. Steam is condensed then circulated around pre-heating the incoming water, sprayed through injectors inside the pre-heated cylinder. Doesn't take many btu's to exceed 212F when it's using that same electrical coil heat to stay up to temperature. Nuclear is finished. This steamer produces Zero Pollution.

    12. Re:Nuclear power is safe! by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      And it produces zero energy. Just where does the energy to condense the steam, and to flash the water to steam come from?

      Remember the first and second laws of thermodynamics. Or as Neil Peart wrote:
      "You can't get something for nothing" - Rush "Something For Nothing"

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
  8. Do they... by rossdee · · Score: 2

    Take the seismologists to court for failing to predict the quake, or does that only happen in Italy?

    1. Re:Do they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.
      ??
      Profit.

    2. Re:Do they... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      yes, not for failing to predict the quake, just failing to predict the magnitude of the unpredicted quake

    3. Re:Do they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, quake predict you.

    4. Re:Do they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan you postdict quakes!

  9. Still news for nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything involving Japan in intrinsically nerdy.

    1. Re:Still news for nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pika Pika!!

    2. Re:Still news for nerds. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      indeed, nerdy are the skills, wares and gear to properly acquire, assemble, and play anime.....or JAV

  10. Quick by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Arrest the geologists!

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  11. M6.2 was occured at Sep 15, no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ljJ1ANj6dw
    M6.2 was occured at Sep 15, no problem. Japanese people don't care such a small quake, less than M7.0.

  12. Things are still rumbling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The opportunities for Groundbreaking research are still rocking the geosciences world as another earthquake shakes Japan. Its likely connected to the 6.3 earthquake that shook 91 km west of Gold River BC on Vancouver Island on September 9, and the 4.0 quake that shook the same spot yesterday. Like California, there are a number of fault lines off of Canada's west coast where the North American plate rides over the Pacific plate (and where buckling occurs, you get geological formations like the Coast, Rocky, --and further south Sierra Nevada-- Mountains). There are mini quakes on Vancouver Island about every 18 months (almost like clockwork) and more major events also like clockwork over a wider span of time, and then even greater events (like the 1964 Alaska earthquake) over an even greater span of time.

  13. and here I thought by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    Earthquakes were fairly frequent in Japan ...

  14. 0.025% of the energy of an 9.0 earthquake by tp1024 · · Score: 1

    Little creaks happen all the time in that place. Why is it suddenly deemed worth reporting?

  15. This isn't interesting. What is interesting? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    This is just an aftershock from Japan's big one. It isn't interesting. What's interesting?

    The slight to moderate quakes across the entire US are interesting. The Virginia quake is the biggest; but if you look on the map now you can still see a triangular pattern that covers Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico. Those are smaller quakes--3 to 4 magnitude. There was one in Alabama too.

    Quakes in that range are not unheard of in the eastern and midwest US; but it seems like there have been a lot more of them lately. Unfortunately, I don't have rigorous stats to back that up, or to distinguish it from the expected outcome based on pure chance.

    Yesterday's 7.3 Fiji quake was interesting too because it was so deep.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  16. Link by drolli · · Score: 1

    ok guys, why not a link to the excellent japanese metrological agency earthquake information in english?

    http://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/00000000091.html

  17. Great East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Some how I don't think the current occupants of Korean peninsula would be receptive to the idea... indeed, I suspect many of them would find the very concept of being grouped with the Japanese as being of same origin deeply insulting, irrespective of what genetical evidence there might be.

    And please don't encourage the Japanese to try to reestablish the Great East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere again; the last time they tried it, most other occupants of the said sphere did not fare well...

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  18. Ho hum by Door-opening+Fascist · · Score: 1

    They've had 8 M6+ earthquakes this year. Why is this news? Skylar

    1. Re:Ho hum by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Once the tsunami warning was called off, it wasn't.

      More people need to mod down uninteresting articles in the Recent section.

  19. I, for one by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

    Will be glad to get 2012 out of the way.

  20. Re:This isn't interesting. What is interesting? by Pyrion · · Score: 1

    This is why we need to stop relying on the earthquake's peak energy output for determining newsworthy events - deep strong quakes can do diddly squat and yet the idiot journalists see the big number and automatically think it's newsworthy. Rate earthquakes based on how much damage they do, not based on how much energy is released. A 5.0 under St. Louis would be several orders of magnitude more newsworthy than a deep 8.0 out in the middle of fucking nowhere.

    --
    "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
  21. sounds like free energy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    c'mon japan.

  22. Not "The Big One" by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    However devastating, the earth quake earlier this year was not "The Big One" for Japan. The real "Big One" is supposed to hit the land mass that Tokyo is on with a magnitude well over 7. The epicenter will probably be about 100 miles south of Tokio and this type of quake is known in Japan as a "Tokai earth quake". They have had several before and the last one in 1854 caused most of Tokyo to burn to the ground and thousands died. Since Tokai quakes tend to happen every 100-150 years, the next one is due any moment now.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:Not "The Big One" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody mod this guy up. What's really tragic is that all this time they have been preparing for the next "Great Tokai Quake" and a 9.0 comes out of somewhere they didn't really expect higher than magnitude 7s. They're recovering for a terrible earthquake and the danger of the next Big One has never diminished.

  23. something is up ! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Ok...now i know something is fishy!!
    If you get that size magnitude earthquake, it must be something going on, and my thoughts are that maybe china or korea might be testing their nukes under the water....that would force the tsunamis and earthquakes for sure....

    My next thought is a scary one though, if you could forcibly sink Japan as a whole , then your whole shoreline becomes the mecca for import and trading
    where as now it seems Japan gets a lot of traffic. ...could this be china's way of forcing there be no competition for all their trading business.

    Now before you go and claim I am too into the conspiracy theory and argue that no country would ever do that knowing that they would feel retribution....
    if it is done in such a way as to look like it was a natural disaster...earthquakes, then it is possible it would not even enter any world leader's mind that this is being done on purpose....although I prefer just being a side effect of under water testing myself...i would hate to see what would happen if my thoughts were dead on....would this force the US or the world to retaliate on behalf of Japan?

  24. Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was asleep in Sapporo 6 floors up and it didn't even wake me up.