Slashdot Mirror
New Mac OS X Trojan Hides Inside PDFs
Trailrunner7 contributes this snippet from ThreatPost: "Malware that targets Mac OS X isn't anywhere near catching up to Windows-based malware in terms of volume and variety, but it seems that OS X malware may be adopting some of the more successful tactics that Windows viruses have been using to trick users. Researchers have come across a sample of an OS X-based Trojan that disguises itself as a PDF file, a technique that's been in favor among Windows malware authors for several years now."
Article is shallow: users click executables disguised with a PDF icon.. Nothing to see here, move along folks!
It's just a trojan with a PDF icon.
And it will be nerfed as soon as it's added to the OS X XProtect filter, if it hasn't already.
Trojans are nothing new, giving them fake icons is nothing new, even Mac trojans are nothing new. News this ain't.
Title, summary and article all fail. It's an executable who's name ends with ".pdf" and has a pdf icon.
404: sig not found.
I saw reference to this trojan the other day, but my research turned up only vague descriptions such as the one linked in the summary. From all the reading I did it seems like this is an executable of some sort, with no extension that is being e-mailed to people. None of the descriptions I've read have described how it infects the machine, but I assume the user has to run it and then agree to allow the unsigned program to run for the first time. At this point it drops a PDF on the hard drive, opens it, and then installs a bare bones apache server, which doesn't actually work as far as anyone can tell. There was some indication that this was a cross platform trojan, but no one has been able to confirm this.
So if anyone is actually in a lab with a copy of this could you please enlighten us on the following points:
So as far as I can tell this is a failed attempt to create a trojan that was released into the wild, possibly as part of testing or as an experiment. It's not really much in the way of news, but for security geeks it is quite interesting; which is why the complete failure of the security companies to provide a decent description is so frustrating. Does anyone have real information about this trojan?
So it requires a gullible user. There's not exactly a shortage of those.
Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
This isn't a virus. It doesn't propagate; it's not even capable of communicating with its server once installed, so it's another one of these annual proof-of-concept social engineering attacks that anonymous Apple-haters latch onto and then promptly forget about a day later.
Here's the plan:
1) OS X makes it brain-dead easy to not run as an admin user. Create a separate admin account first, then remove the admin privilege from your everyday account. On those rare occasions you need admin privileges, you'll be automatically asked to provide the admin account info - you don't need to even think about it.
(Somehow that isn't sinking into a lot of peoples' heads, even those who should know better)
2) Back up your stuff regularly. Again, OS X makes this brain-dead easy with Time Machine. You can use something else like a custom rsync script, but - just DO IT.
If you're running as a non-admin user, the worst that can happen is your own stuff gets hosed - and then you can get it back from your backups. But since trojans are probably only going to go after the system files, it's unlikely even your stuff will get touched.
Okay, there's one caveat. If you click on an infected file, and it asks for admin permissions and you provide it, you're screwed. But one would hope you're smart enough to realize viewing a PDF should not require admin authentication. In the end, common sense does have to enter into the picture.
BTW if you claim running as an admin is okay because you're always prompted to authenticate anyway... you're just wrong.
#DeleteChrome
Every time one of these "sky is falling, OS X is being attacked by new malware/virus/trojan" articles floats around the 'net, it seems like the source document is from one or another AV builder or a computer security outfit with things to sell. The first clue is how vapid and vague the article is, and how little useful information it provides. Another clue is when one part of the article tells the story a bit different than elsewhere in the same article. For OS X users, there are a handful of good, indepdent, computer security sites (apple.com NOT being one of them), and if it aint there, I ignore it.
In fact I've seen a big rise in the amount of non-admin Windows malware. It just infects the user that is using the system. The reason is they realize that for the vast majority of systems, the user IS the system, there is no need to infect anything else. It also lets them get an infection in an enterprise setup where users don't get admin.
Now I suppose it does make the malware slightly easier to get rid of but then it really doesn't matter, I tend to scan the things from a boot disk anyhow.
This geek idea that only the system matters is silly. True for a server maybe, not for a desktop. On a desktop, the user's data is all that matters and you don't need admin to get at that.