Slashdot Mirror


Australia's National Broadband Network Officially Open For Business

sydneyhype writes "The Australian National Broadband Network is open for business. The 14,000 residents on the first roll-out will be able to order an NBN service (current ISP contract permitting). Internode, Exetel, and iiNet have released their commercial pricing. iiNet has undercut Internode with prices starting at $49.95 per month for 12Mbps down and 1Mbps up with 20gb on-peak and 20gb off-peak."

161 comments

  1. Asia in general costs a lot by tech4 · · Score: 1

    It's only like Japan where you can get fast connections cheaply. In rest of the Asia connections cost just as much, if even you even can get faster than 8/1 at all. Only Europe has it good, and it's just some countries too. I know, I live in both Europe and Asia.

    1. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > It's only like Japan where you can get fast connections cheaply.

      They have it pretty good in South Korea too. The OECD had them pegged as spending about 1/3 less on the average broadband bill than the United States.

    2. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by tanveer1979 · · Score: 2

      Hmm Australia moved to Asia... Interesting!

      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    3. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The low end prices don't tell much of the story with the NBN. 12/1 is a speed designed to match local low-end ADSL connections, and isn't any real difference to what my mother's been paying for ADSL2+ with 40GB (which comes out to about 10/1 due to her distance from the exchange)

      $70ish for 100mbit down/40mbit up though, yeah, that's getting a bit more like it.

      Australia's internet prices have been on a constant huge downswing for ten years now, and I wouldn't be surprised to see perfectly usable 100/40 plans for $30ish within a couple of years.

    4. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by mjwx · · Score: 0

      Hmm Australia moved to Asia... Interesting!

      Haven't looked at a map recently have you.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what do they charge for going over the cap? 40gb total per month is not that much, especially when you consider that it's split between peak and non-peak.

    6. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      The low end prices don't tell much of the story with the NBN.

      If that's the low-end, it is telling. I can get those kinds of prices here from our greedy dualopolies, without caps (USD ~= AUD these days), and that's the undercutting provider.

      I hear all the prices in Australia have gone through the roof in the last decade - perhaps it's relative?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Err, Australia is about as much in Asia as the Eastern US is in Europe.

    8. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australiasia?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australiasia

    9. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by mjwx · · Score: 0

      Err, Australia is about as much in Asia as the Eastern US is in Europe.

      Err. you really haven't had a look at a map recently. The continent of Australia is geographically located where?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    10. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      They don't charge you extra, they just throttle your speed down. This is what they do now on xDSL and cable connections, and so it will be on the NBN as well.

      Having said that, if you are hitting your cap regularly, just pay a few bucks extra and upgrade to the next highest plan. All the big ISPs are offering plans up to 1000 GB (1 TB) per month, which is enough for almost any conceivable domestic (non-business) need. At the moment I'm only on a 30 GB plan because that's all I use. The next plan up only costs another 10 bucks a month and gives me 200 GB - a large jump for not much money, and I won't hesitate to upgrade if I need to.

      The other thing you have to factor in is that Australian ISPs also typically have a lot of value-adds, including large file mirrors and access to various other Internet services that are 'unmetered' (i.e. data from which is not counted against your cap). For instance one ISP might offer unmetered streaming TV services, unmetered iTunes etc. Another might give you unmetered access to file mirrors such as Major Geeks, Tucows, Linux repositories, gaming servers etc. These are incredibly useful: about 25-30% of my typical usage per month ends up in the "unmetered" bucket and for some people it's higher.

    11. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by BobTheWise · · Score: 0

      Well that's just nitpicking, as it's basically one country. It pretty much belongs to Asia geographically. It would be much easier for everyone if we just divided the world to the three big ones - US, Europe and Asia.

    12. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Dual US/Aussie citizen here who splits their time between both countries. Australia IS more expensive than the US for almost everything (except, interestingly, cellphones and cellphone plans - Australia kicks the US' ass on this front in terms of selection and price). But clothes, cars, food, rent and housing, entertainment ... everything else is considerably more expensive in Australia (1.5x for food and electronics, about 2x for everything else)

      Including the Internet. It's one of the curses of being a 'terminating destination' (i.e. cables don't really go ~through~ Australia to get to anywhere else, so they have to be purpose-built and laid under 10,000 miles of ocean to serve a total population smaller than some single American cities). Not to mention that 90% of our traffic has to be pulled all the way from the US/Europe because we are an English-speaking country located distantly from the main sources of English language content. (This is a problem that doesn't affect other 'language isolate' countries such as Japan and Korea - most of their traffic is domestic and hence much cheaper).

      It doesn't matter though. Prices here are higher but wages are higher. I find it balances out about the same in the end ... I don't feel like I have less disposable income in Australia than I do in the US. Plus you make savings in other areas (healthcare is free or very cheap etc.)

      (* PS: Also keep in mind that the NBN plans quoted generally include a home telephone service with free or cheap national calls.)

    13. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Well that's just nitpicking, as it's basically one country

      Indeed, Australia is closer to Papua New Guinea, East Timor and Indonesia then it's closest Australasian nation, New Zealand if we want to get nit-picky.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    14. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by tech4 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter though. Prices here are higher but wages are higher. I find it balances out about the same in the end ... I don't feel like I have less disposable income in Australia than I do in the US. Plus you make savings in other areas (healthcare is free or very cheap etc.)

      This is the thing people forget when they just compare prices to cheaper countries. It's the same in Europe too. Products prices are higher, as are all costs and wages. This means it costs more to companies too, so they have to charge more in the prices too. Also, In Europe we have stuff like warranties in products that also take the price higher.

      The good thing is that both Australians and Europeans win on this when they go travel to US or the cheaper Asian countries. Hell, in some Asian countries you can live like a king with just the normal western salary, but living isn't suddenly cheaper to the locals.

    15. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by omni123 · · Score: 1

      Err. you really haven't had a look at a map recently. The continent of Australia is geographically located where?

      Australia is technically not in Asia... Wikipedia although not the best source agrees. Australasia is the region you're looking at that includes PNG, NZ and Australia.

      You can obviously see the confusion, though. I don't know how long the separation between Asia and Australasia has existed but it has been for at least as long as I can remember (but I'm young).

    16. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Muahah.

      Australia was it's own continent last time I looked? ..... Yep, still not Asia.

      Sometimes people decide to put us in there for grouping countries, but that's just for convenience. Even then, Oceania is a more accurate grouping.

    17. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's just nitpicking, as it's basically one country. It pretty much belongs to Asia geographically. It would be much easier for everyone if we just divided the world to the three big ones - US, Europe and Asia.

      What about Africa?

    18. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you been to South Korea and Hong Kong? or do tyo

    19. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I'm not sure if that's just American arrogance at it's finest, or if you really don't know your geography very well. At the very least, you missed South America and Africa.

    20. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have looked at a map. Australia is in Oceania.

      Germany, France, China, Russia, India, Australia, and many more countries are all in Eurasia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasia

      My son was born in Australia, learned to walk in the Middle East, mother from China, and father a from Scandinavia. We are all Eurasians.

    21. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Flemington is in Africa.

    22. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Why bother with the "eur" bit of "eurasia"? europe's just the arse end of asia anyway.

    23. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by eransom · · Score: 2

      I am an American living in South Korea. My cable internet (60 Mbits down / 5 up), cable TV (75 channels), and broadband phone are included in a single package that costs 21,000 Won a month. This is roughly $19. I am not even in Seoul. Your statement is wrong.

    24. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, Australia is about as much in Asia as the Eastern US is in Europe.

      Err. you really haven't had a look at a map recently. The continent of Australia is geographically located where?

      South of Asia (East-Asia, if you want to be more precise).

      Your point being?

    25. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I's the other way around... Asia is where all the crap comes out... :)

    26. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Nursie · · Score: 1

      The continent of Australia is geographically located where?

      You said it yourself, the continent of Australia, which is about as far from Asia as the Eastern US is from Europe.

    27. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Nursie · · Score: 1

      And everyone always forgets Antarctica!

    28. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remember we're not talking $US, rather $AUS - and despite the exchange rate between the two, the difference matters where you earn it. Earnings in .au are a whole load higher than the US - US average wage is about the same as our minimum wage.

    29. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so. You'd have to have a minimum wage upwards of $18US an hour for that to be true.

      There's not an economy on earth that could sustain that.

    30. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      Still trying to disenfranchise a billion+ blacks I see. You yanks, tsk tsk...;-p

    31. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      I know it's my favourite continent. The indigenous lifeforms there are by far the nicest & most worth saving on this 3rd rock from the arse end of nowhere :).

    32. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by quenda · · Score: 1

      You can obviously see the confusion, though. I don't know how long the separation between Asia and Australasia has existed

      It helps if you understand that "Australasia" means "South of Asia". (Australia means Southern Land. (And Austria means Eastern land, just to confuse things.))

    33. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by mossr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      --
      The PowerPC includes for this purpose two instructions called SYNC and EIEIO.
    34. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Rob+from+RPI · · Score: 1

      I'll let you chew on your own foot for a while, before you pull it out of your mouth..

    35. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by tepples · · Score: 1

      Indonesia acts as a bridge of sorts between southeast Asia and Australia. What continent is Indonesia considered to be on?

    36. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Why bother with the "eur" in "eurasia"? Europe's just the arse end of Asia anyway.

    37. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Skal+Tura · · Score: 2

      Still sucks. The price is high, the caps are low, the speed is low.
      I'm paying 39.90€ a month for 24/1 unlimited. Practically get about 1.8M/s down and 90k/s up.
      and that is considered slightly on the expensive side.

      40Gb cap i would blow through really fast, then again i'm a business owner.

    38. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Cimexus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Internet costs more in Australia due to distance from the rest of the English-speaking world (i.e. where 95% of internet hosts we want to access are located), huge area and small population. We will never be able to compete with Europe on price. Also you're picking the entry-level 12/1 40 GB plan for home users (which includes a home phone service with untimed national calls BTW, not just internet) to compare with ... and it only costs only a few euro more than what you pay (59 AUD = ~42 EUR). That ain't bad, considering what prices and speeds are like now. Besides, if it ain't fast enough, up to 100/40 Mbit is available to everyone, and gigabit for business plans.

      The relevant comparison is between what Australians can get now (generally ADSL2+ on which for most people get 10 Mbit unless they live close to the exchange), and what we can get on the NBN (same cost - much faster). Not between what you can get in Australia vs. what you can get in densely populated Europe. It's a pointless comparison - EVERYTHING costs more here (but wages are very high too - it all balances out in the end).

      It's also likely unlimited plans will be offered by some ISPs on this network too. You have to remember - all you are seeing now is the first batch of pricing released from the first batch of ISPs. Once more get on board and the rollout gathers pace, prices will decline, just as they have been for the ADSL2+ offerings over the last decade. ISPs like TPG already offer unlimited ADSL2+ for $29/month, so I foresee them offering a similar thing on NBN eventually too. It's still early days.

    39. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Lol - Australia is pretty close to that, actually. Mid-$15/hour range is minimum wage (and that doesn't include 9% compulsory retirement savings that gets paid into a fund on your behalf by the employer - if you include that it's $17/hour!)

    40. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      According to wikipedia the median household income in Australia is 44,000 dollars It is 49,000 in the US. Where are you getting your numbers from?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    41. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      I have looked at a map. Australia is in Oceania.

      Australia has always been in Oceania.

    42. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By all "logical" definitions of continent, Africa is in Asia. It's only when speaking culturally did the need arise to separate those Africans and Asians. Untis the Suez, you could (theoretically, it'd be hard) walk from Beijing to Johannesburg without getting your feet wet. Isn't that the core od the definition of a continent? "The Americas" should be one continent again, as well as Eurasia (including Australia and Africa), with australasia being a "subcontinent" of Asia, much like Central America is a subcontinent of North America (where the people in the US who make definitions defined it as "white North America and other').

    43. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's PPP, or Purchasing Power Parity... which is basically what the poster you replied to was describing. Things might be more expensive numerically in Australia, but wages are also higher, which goes a long way to mitigating the difference.

      Look at the table you pulled the numbers from. In local units, the USA median household income is $US49k in 2010, in Australia it's $AUD66k in 2007. More recent Australian figures have it at just a hair under $70k local (the economy here is doing pretty well)

      Taking the same PPP rate of ~1.51* into account for broadband prices means when you see a $49.95 price for broadband here, read it as if t were $US33.30 to a US resident. That's still not as cheap as much of the world, but a more meaningful comparison than considering the same numbers just because the exchange rate is almost 1:1

      * I can't vouch for the current correctness of the 1.51 figure, but it's in the right order.

    44. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      I learned something today. Thank you.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    45. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      We've always been at war with Oceania.

      ;p

      All the more amusing because I'm in a WoW guild called Oceania.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    46. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point out that ADSL2+ isn't available on all exchanges for all ISPs.

      We currently have ADSL(1) with 8/1 and a 30Gb peak/40Gb off peak plan that we really like, but our ISP doesn't have ADSL2+ available at our exchange. I keep checking periodically, and unless I wanted to change to Telstra (no thanks) it's not an option.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    47. Re:Asia in general costs a lot by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Ah yes very true.

      Though don't feel too bad. I technically have ADSL2+ but because my line is rather long, I get under 6 Mbit (i.e. well short of even the top ADSL1 speed) anyway.

      The way I see it, NBN is at worst, the same price for more speed (for someone already on a good ADSL2+ line). And at best (people stuck in Telstra monopoly areas/on long lines/on ADSL1 only), it's cheaper AND more speed. It's a win for almost everyone.

  2. First post!!! by therufus · · Score: 1

    Well, it would have been. I don't have this new NBN thingy yet...

    --
    You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
  3. We finally got the internet! by Sigvatr · · Score: 1

    I say, mates, this is bloody impressive.

    1. Re:We finally got the internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      England finally got the internet? An Aussie would have said "G'dee meate! We feenally got the eenterneet!"

    2. Re:We finally got the internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      England finally got the internet? An Aussie would have said "G'dee meate! We feenally got the eenterneet!"

      England finally got the internet? An Aussie would have said "G'dee meate! We feenally got the eenterneet!"

      Ahhh, no we wouldn't.

    3. Re:We finally got the internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they would have said anything at all. Just glued eyes to monitor. Joined the "Your Virtual Reality World" club.

    4. Re:We finally got the internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      England finally got the internet? An Aussie would have said "G'dee meate! We feenally got the eenterneet!"

      FFS, please stop basing your crap on Meryl Streep's portrayal of an Australian accent. Whoever was her linguistics trainer in Evil Angels/A Cry in The Dark was probably a dumb-ass yankee and deserves to be taken out and strung up on the back fence next to all of the rotting kangaroo carcases. Worst imitation Australian accent ever!

    5. Re:We finally got the internet! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      I'd say. IMO, the stereotypical Aussie accent is actually closer to a South African accent. And that's the stereotypical one, not the one you actually get if you go there.

      (Disclaimer: I'm from Australia's fifth state - or at least it will be at the rate our government is going).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    6. Re:We finally got the internet! by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Even with the internet, I bet they still can't bowl or catch.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    7. Re:We finally got the internet! by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I count 6 plus assorted territories now. Don't they teach you math or geography in New Zealand[1]?

      [1] Point of trivia, New Zealand was supposed to come on board as a state when Australia federated, but backed out at the last minute. Looks like they've been second guessing that decision ever since.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    8. Re:We finally got the internet! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Six? There's Queensland, New South Wales, Tasmania, Western Australia, South Australia, um... I forgot the state Canberra hangs out in didn't I?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    9. Re:We finally got the internet! by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      You missed Victoria, but ACT sits in NSW. There's also NT and an assortment of island territories.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  4. Down-under? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's this on-peak, off-peak stuff? I speak American, please translate.

    1. Re:Down-under? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      during the day when everyone wants to use the internet is on peak and in the middle of the night when it's all free is off peak.

  5. iinet and internode by mjwx · · Score: 2

    iiNet has undercut Internode with prices starting at $49.95 per month for 12Mbps down and 1Mbps up with 20gb on-peak and 20gb off-peak."

    When comparing iinet to Internode, one has to remember that Internode doesn't do this on peak/off peak thingy. On peak is the download limit you have between 8 AM and 12 Midnight, off peak is the download limit between 12 Midnight and 8 AM. With Internode you get 40 GB whatever time of the day it is.

    However, having been a happy customer of both iinet's and Internode's ADSL offerings, both are great ISP's you wont be unhappy with. I'm waiting for Telstra and Optus to release their NBN pricing, that should be hillarious.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    1. Re:iinet and internode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      iiNet has undercut Internode with prices starting at $49.95 per month for 12Mbps down and 1Mbps up with 20gb on-peak and 20gb off-peak."

      When comparing iinet to Internode,

      Of interest is that this story linked is out of date. Pricing for both has changed since the 19th.

    2. Re:iinet and internode by tepples · · Score: 1

      With Internode you get 40 GB whatever time of the day it is.

      That's potentially not even one full-sized PlayStation 3 game. PS3 games come on Blu-ray Disc, and dual-layer discs can be up to 50 GB.

    3. Re:iinet and internode by mjwx · · Score: 1

      With Internode you get 40 GB whatever time of the day it is.

      That's potentially not even one full-sized PlayStation 3 game. PS3 games come on Blu-ray Disc, and dual-layer discs can be up to 50 GB.

      Because everyone is using the internet for piracy.

      You also seem to have failed to understand the concept of an "example" and have taken everything a little too literally. There are differing download cap volumes, around 40 GB is starting territory for iinet and Internode.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:iinet and internode by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Even when not pirating things, the bandwidth can be eaten up quite quickly. My ISP limits me to 1500MB per day between 4pm and 9pm. This sounded like a lot, until I tried watching a film on iPlayer in the early evening. The HD streams are 3.6Mb/s, so I use up the total allowance in 55 minutes and then get throttled back to 2.5Mb/s and the stream dies. I bought a game on GoG.com this afternoon, which was a 1.1GB download - and that was a relatively old game. The biggest game I've bought from them was about 5GB, but some of the ones they sell are over 10GB. 40GB/month is not very much if you're streaming video or downloading games...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Good value! by tconnors · · Score: 1

    Good value! With Internode, on copper ADSL2+ (24 down, 1.5 up), 150GB monthly quota, all for... $50!

    I'll let the early adopters adopt this one. (on the other hand, those poor sods that hadn't heard that you didn't need to use Telstra would probably consider this a good deal).

    1. Re:Good value! by Zouden · · Score: 1

      The basic plan isn't very compelling, but for $65/month you get 200GB (100/100) and 25mbit/5mbit. That's definitely better than ADSL, for only $15 more.

      --
      "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    2. Re:Good value! by fryjs · · Score: 1

      I was initially thinking the the plans were not going to be very good value, but I would happily pay $99 a month for 100 down, 40 up and 1TB of bandwidth, which is the iinet top tier plan. I'll be signing up when it is available in Sydney.

    3. Re:Good value! by daBass · · Score: 1

      Plus $30 line rental? For the $80 you'd get the 25/5, double the quota and node phone. Not to mention a more reliable connection with lower latency.

      That is good value if you ask me!

      Not to mention you are in the .1% of the population that actually gets those speeds on ADSL...

    4. Re:Good value! by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Hell yes. You pay $59.95 with Internode now for only 30 GB plus home phone service, all on a rusty old copper phone line that (for me) syncs at 6 Mbps on a good day. For the same price on the NBN I could have 4 times the speed, much better reliability and a higher download quota.

      Sure if you are one of the 0.1% of the population who live close enough to the exchange to get 24 Mbit out of ADSL2+, it's not so compelling. But the majority of people are on long and unreliable lines. Or even worse, RIMs or pair gain systems. NBN is a huge boon to the quality of Australian connectivity, both in the large cities and the small towns.

      Will be signing up in a flash when it's available (which will be a few years yet in this part of the world, unfortunately, although the area just 5 km north of me is one of the second release sites getting it next year - lucky sods!)

    5. Re:Good value! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, now even Australia is ahead of us Americans in terms of cheap bandwidth...

    6. Re:Good value! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... only that 24down lasts only for the first 500 meters, your name is Tony Abbot by chance????

    7. Re:Good value! by citizenr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The basic plan isn't very compelling, but for $65/month you get 200GB (100/100) and 25mbit/5mbit. That's definitely better than ADSL, for only $15 more.

      Meanwhile in Europe im getting 25mbit/5mbit for $15, no caps.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    8. Re:Good value! by Zouden · · Score: 1

      Where in Europe? Even in the Netherlands you can't get a connection for that price.

      --
      "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    9. Re:Good value! by timbo234 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Germany we're getting 100Mbit down 6mbit up and truly unlimited bandwidth on fibre for 20 Euro a month. That's a normal residential connection with Kabel Deutschland.

      The NBN is an improvement but Australia is still a rip-off for internet connections.

      --
      Pre-canned Evolution Links for all those Slashdot holy wars.
    10. Re:Good value! by citizenr · · Score: 2

      Where in Europe? Even in the Netherlands you can't get a connection for that price.

      Poland. http://www.aster.pl/internet
      I pay 100zl for TV + internet. TV is 50zl, internet another 50zl
      $1 = 3.3 zl
      internet = $15
      Granted its "only" 20/2 and not 25/5 like in the post above me, but still :)

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    11. Re:Good value! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The basic plan isn't very compelling, but for $65/month you get 200GB (100/100) and 25mbit/5mbit. That's definitely better than ADSL, for only $15 more.

      Really? TPG does a $49/month and you get 500GB (250/250) and 25mbit/5mbit. Or better still you dump Telstra for your landline and bundle the phone with them and you get $59/month unlimited 25mbit/5mbit and no extra cost monthly line rental to a third party.

      I don't see anything even remotely compelling about the pricing which has been announced by any party so far.

    12. Re:Good value! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile in Australia we're getting much better value than the parent said too. I just don't think he's been shopping around. Not $15 though.

    13. Re:Good value! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Latvia, the national operator offers 100/100 for $30 per month. No metering.

    14. Re:Good value! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really need to consider population density, area, and how that relates to the cost of infrastructure.

    15. Re:Good value! by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile in Europe im getting 25mbit/5mbit for $15, no caps.

      That's not nearly enough incentive to move to Europe. I'd hazard a guess and say your heating bill is higher than mine.

    16. Re:Good value! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NBN is an improvement but Australia is still a rip-off for internet connections.

      When you look at the sheer size of Australia along with the small population, you can understand completely why the costs are high.

    17. Re:Good value! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile in Europe im getting 25mbit/5mbit for $15, no caps.

      That's not nearly enough incentive to move to Europe. I'd hazard a guess and say your heating bill is higher than mine.

      and your air conditioning bill is probably higher than ours :-)

    18. Re:Good value! by Warwick+Allison · · Score: 1

      Considering Germany's population density for the entire country is almost 25% of an Australian capital city, it's hardly a rip-off.

      Australia has more kilometres of roads than Germany, yet 1/4 the population. Would it shock you that German autobahns are superior to Australian freeways? Is it a government rip-off?

      Providing network infrastructure, just as providing roads, is all about population density. Would it shock you that 5 people in my house get 1000Mbit for free, or would it just seem parochial?

    19. Re:Good value! by timbo234 · · Score: 1

      1000mb or not you might need to grow a thicker skin if you want to post on discussion boards. I am an Aussie, I was just pointing out that even with the NBN we still pay a lot for what we get.

      --
      Pre-canned Evolution Links for all those Slashdot holy wars.
    20. Re:Good value! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      You Aussies complain too much. The prices for fibre on New Zealand's FTTH network are ... actually not too bad. Holy shit. ($37.50/mo wholesale for 30Mb/s downstream, 10Mb/s upstream - but that includes zero data, which we'll probably get raped on).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  7. Well strike me dead cobbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $49.95 for only 12Mbits with a 40Gb total cap?

    Now that is enough to send me down to the pub for a tinny or two while I watch the rugger.

    That is a ******y rip off.

     

    1. Re:Well strike me dead cobbers by dbIII · · Score: 1

      No, the $1000+ per month I have to pay to get 6M/6M is the rip off.
      Bring on the NBN.

    2. Re:Well strike me dead cobbers by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Looking at the iiNet site you can get 100GB+100GB at 12mbps on the NBN for $60 per month. If you compare that to naked ADSL, you would have to pay $70 for the cheapest plan and you only get half as much quota plus "ADSL2+ speeds" instead of 12mbps (and unlike ADSL2+, the NBN speeds dont drop off as you get further from the exchange)

      If you are in a location without an iiNet DSLAM and need to use Telstra DSLAMS (including all those people stuck on "pair gain") the value of NBN vs ADSL is even better.

    3. Re:Well strike me dead cobbers by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Now that is enough to send me down to the pub for a tinny or two while I watch the rugger.

      You don't drink a "tinny" (which is a can) at the pub, which serves beer in glasses. "Rugger" is a Brit term, not Aussie.

    4. Re:Well strike me dead cobbers by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It's properly called footy over in Aussie is it not?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    5. Re:Well strike me dead cobbers by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I thought it was referred to as League or Union. Aussie Rules is referred to as footy. At least down here 'south of the border'.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    6. Re:Well strike me dead cobbers by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      No idea really. Here in NZ we just call it "sports" with everything else being "fake sports". Or at least that's the impression you'd get.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  8. come on down, the price is right! by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

    but the cap is 40gigs [20gb on-peak and 20gb off-peak]? at those speeds you could use up your whole allotment in like 2 days, and I hate to see what the overages costs.

    1. Re:come on down, the price is right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Overage costs are rare in Australia. Typically your connection speed will be shaped to anywhere from 64k-512k depending on your ISP and plan.

    2. Re:come on down, the price is right! by mjwx · · Score: 2

      but the cap is 40gigs [20gb on-peak and 20gb off-peak]? at those speeds you could use up your whole allotment in like 2 days, and I hate to see what the overages costs.

      That's the starting cap, iinet and internode have plans that go up to 1 TB limits.

      Also, no overage charges, they shape your speed down to 128 or 256 Kb/s if you go over.

      BTW, 2 days is a bit rich, there's a big difference between theoretical speeds and real world speeds. Besides this, there are larger caps available so you if you dont download 400 GB a month, you dont have to pay for that much.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:come on down, the price is right! by citizenr · · Score: 1

      but the cap is 40gigs [20gb on-peak and 20gb off-peak]? at those speeds you could use up your whole allotment in like 2 days, and I hate to see what the overages costs.

      That's the starting cap, iinet and internode have plans that go up to 1 TB limits.

      Also, no overage charges, they shape your speed down to 128 or 256 Kb/s if you go over./quote>

      1 why cap at all?
      2 shaping to 256kbit? you realize we got FREE HSPA+/LTE 256kbit internet in Europe (Poland)?

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  9. So? by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

    This is newsworthy how? Does an ISP rollout in California, which has ******************DOUBLE******************* the population, get a /. post?

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close. This is not an ISP, this is a whole new infrastructure.
      Getting rid of copper, moving to fiber.
      Getting rid of analogue telephone infrastructure, going to digital VoIP services.
      This is not just a single city, this is a redeployment in the whole country.

    2. Re:So? by macraig · · Score: 1

      What is the realistic probability that a new ISP will roll out any type of broadband in California now, that isn't simply reselling the medium of one of the incumbents? That's right: zero.

      Guess what? Even if we got the full Free Press et al version of so-called network neutrality, it STILL wouldn't change that state of affairs, because a few giant corps own all the wires. IIRC one of the differences with this new Aussie broadband plan is that it includes public buyback of the physical medium... so in Australia they will have TRUE network neutrality.

    3. Re:So? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      This is newsworthy how? Does an ISP rollout in California, which has ******************DOUBLE******************* the population, get a /. post?

      First off, NBNco is not an ISP, it's a wholesale provider.

      Secondly when the state of California rolls out a fibre network that creates a competitive environment for multiple ISP's to provide high speed internet state wide

      Thirdly, when the state of California becomes as geographically large as the continental US and only then, do you get a /. post.

      But seeing as the state of California is in worse debt then the rest of the US and US telco's would rather fight like feudal lords over local monopolies and dont want a competitive fibre environment that wont be happening any time soon.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's the start of the $36 billion national network of fibre to the home with speeds of 100Mb/s on rollout and gigabit coming shortly.
      The summary may have neglected that.

    5. Re:So? by Cimexus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a $40 billion+ project to rip out the 100-year old existing copper POTS network and replace it with a new, independently operated layer 2 FTTH network (upon which dozens of competing ISPs will be able to offer layer 3 services to the end user). Nationwide - from the large cities to small towns in the middle of nowhere (every town with >1000 people will get fibre, smaller hamlets will get some form of 4G or WiMax fixed wireless). There will then be dozens of ISPs operating layer 3 services on this network to the end user.

      That is much more significant than a new ISP.

    6. Re:So? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's also been pending since 1996 when Telstra were thinking about doing it before they turned into a half-government/half-private monster that decided to do as little as possible with their monopoly and just watch the money roll in.
      We've been waiting for fifteen years and now it's starting. That makes it news.

    7. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, so this. This is absolutely huge news for Australia.
      They are getting to the point where the UK was with ISPs not too long ago there when BT was forced to open up.
      Now we have an ungodly amount of ISPs all fighting for popularity, it worked so well. BT actually care a little bit more about customer satisfaction now.
      In fact, right now I am jealous since their plans seem even better than the plans we have in the UK for coverage. All our plans are is: 1) OLYMPICS LOL, 2) iunno, give that farm some aluminium or something

      A country that has suffered pretty lax internet service for so long is finally getting a national grid built up and running for business.
      Think of it as the brand new highway for cars. It will change the business landscape so much when completed.

      I'd love to see the US do this as well, they suffer so much because of the "multopoly" mess going on there.
      And Canada too I hear.

  10. I know where I will be for awhile... by toxickitty · · Score: 0

    In rural Australia there is no NBN for you. Enjoy your congestion, I wouldn't be surprised if 50% of the exchanges in Australia have backhaul problems it's pretty appalling. NBN change it? I hope so but I am not exactly expecting a positive result.

    1. Re:I know where I will be for awhile... by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 3, Informative

      The list of small towns which are being FTTH'd is pretty impressive though. There are places on there with populations as low as 800.

      That said, the NBN outback and deep rural strategy isn't focused on exchanges and ADSL technology - it's focussed on wireless for rural and satellite for really remote places. They've a pretty good track record so far with sensible deployment decisions, and a point-to-point wireless technology in uncrowded spectrum would probably work out.

    2. Re:I know where I will be for awhile... by baileydau · · Score: 2

      Sorry, what are you talking about??

      The N in NBN is for NATIONAL. The plan is for 93% fibre, 4% wireless 3% satellite with at least 12/1 speeds available on all mediums. The fibre is to go down to towns of 1,000 premises, sometimes smaller if the fibre is going through town anyway. Those on wireless will basically be those currently on the outer edges of ADSL or beyond. Those on satellite will be truly rural.

      The NBN are planning plenty of backhaul to their POIs. Congestion isn't going to be an issue within the NBN. Your ISP (now known as RSP), well that *could* be a different story, especially if you go with one of the cheep and cheerful providers.

      --
      Ever stop to think ... and forget to start again?
  11. I want it NOW! by ignavus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I so want the NBN service now. At the next election, there is likely to be a change of government and the current opposition claim that they will cut back the scope of the NBN project (like only provide wifi and/or fibre to the neighbourhood instead of providing fibre to the home).

    I want the NBN to do my town before the next election (we are on the list, but it could take years for them to get to us).

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
    1. Re:I want it NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the comment by, iirc, Peter Costello (leader of the opposition) that fibre was not future proof but his plans for WiMax rollout was...

    2. Re:I want it NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a customer of an ISP in Australia I want the NBN service for 100MB download speeds @ $70/mth as soon as possible.

      As a taxpayer and citizen of Australia I want the $40 billion dollar waste of money (and way to appease country based members of parliament) shutdown and the money handed back to taxpayers.

    3. Re:I want it NOW! by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Yes, clearly that will lead to a better country for all of us and not the immediate migration of that money to China as iWhatever purchases.

    4. Re:I want it NOW! by Cimexus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firstly, it's 'only' around $29-30 billion now (the 40+ billion figure was the budget BEFORE the Telstra conduit-sharing deal was struck).

      Secondly, $40 billion over the 12 or 13 years the rollout will take really isn't much. Compare it to what we spend over that time period on other infrastructure like roads, schools, hospitals etc. You make it sound like it's a $40B bill that's all due in one hit up front or something. Plus it'll form the 'guts' of the telecommunications network in this country for the next century. I really don't think the cost is outrageous when you consider that ... what do you think the original copper POTS network cost to roll out?

    5. Re:I want it NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The change in government can't come fast enough as far as i'm concerned.

  12. Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am near the NBN rollout - but I get 100Gb (no peak) a month for $69 - and I sync at 22mbps down, 1.1mbps up on ADSL2. So why would I?

  13. 20 gigs? by zyzko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    20 gigs? For that price? You gotta be kidding me - I get 20 gigs easily in a week just from work (yeah, when you can mount a .iso from your computer to install in vmware and the speed is about equal to actually first upload the image to storage server you get lazy...) and those speeds - it is now 2011, not 2000 when 12/1 Mbps was hot.

    Here 100/10, 19,90 euros / month. No caps. Gasoline however costs a crapton and half a year it is freezing and dark but at least connectivity is good and cheap.

    1. Re:20 gigs? by philmarcracken · · Score: 1

      Got a spare room cause i just packed a bag. Cold weather sounds lovely to me.

    2. Re:20 gigs? by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 1

      It's ~AU$80 for the 100/10 plan. They just listed the slowest and most limited plan in the article for some reason. And paying about 3 times more for things is unfortunately common in Australia.

      $20 a kilo for bannanas anyone?

    3. Re:20 gigs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol.. try Latvia - one of the poorest countries in the EU. Here we can get 100/100 for $30 per month, no data limit.
      They really need to start talking about third-rate countries as well as third-world ones.

    4. Re:20 gigs? by Skythe · · Score: 1

      Australia is one of the least densely populated countries in the world, so the rollout of a network like this is nothing trivial. Europe is a different story..

    5. Re:20 gigs? by zyzko · · Score: 2

      In fact where I live - Finland - our density of population is quite similar to Australia - huge country with people concentrated on a few citites "en masse" and running the network to the non-dense areas is easy and not *that* expensive - if the local land owners don't object to fiber being laid down beside the road, but then you can see who to blame, been there, done that - NIMBY works there too, if everybody agrees fiber is quite easy and even cheap to install. Yeah, cities produce the best revenue per km2 for operators but with current technology getting reasonably priced high bandwidth to even rural areas is not *that* expensive. And paying for an example 2-3 thousand dollars to get the the fiber to your home should be no problem when compared to that that it propably cost a lot less than similar sized apartment in the city - people tend to forget this and bitch and moan how they should get everything with city-prices when the biggest cost - the house itself is haevily cheaper dependeng on location.

    6. Re:20 gigs? by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      In fact where I live - Finland - our density of population is quite similar to Australia - huge country with people concentrated on a few citites "en masse" and running the network to the non-dense areas is easy and not *that* expensive - if the local land owners don't object to fiber being laid down beside the road, but then you can see who to blame, been there, done that - NIMBY works there too, if everybody agrees fiber is quite easy and even cheap to install.

      According to wikipedia Finland has a population density of 16 per square km, Australia 2.8. That's a pretty broad definition of "quite similar". Australia is also about 22 times larger area than Finland.

      You calling Finland huge would be considered pretty funny here.

    7. Re:20 gigs? by zyzko · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia the urbanization rate in Australia is 89%.(Finland 85%) So basic land-mass comparison is not giving the right numbers...

      And yes - compared to Australia Finland is not huge, but it has ver similar rural areas ans same kinds of problems with high bandwith providing.

    8. Re:20 gigs? by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      How does an 89% urbanization rate make broadband networks to rural areas easier or cheaper to build? It means we have a lower proportion of our population spreading over vastly larger distances. Since we already have a much lower population density, the urbanization rate doesn't mitigate the difference, it exacerbates the difference. That makes it more expensive per household.

    9. Re:20 gigs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll. That was after the banana crop got ruined by a cyclone.

    10. Re:20 gigs? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      But you get free drop bears!

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    11. Re:20 gigs? by Ninth+Marion · · Score: 1

      I'm floored by how incredibly bad that is! This is the wonder of the NBN?? I almost get those speeds for that price for unlimited data, right fucking now, on my adsl2+ connection in Brisbane. Even if this plan is only for the most isolated of outback towns, that's dreadful. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that we'll get utterly shafted yet again, but I had hoped with it being a public project... ugh.

  14. Scarcity Myth = Slow Speeds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately NBNCo have successfully propagated a scarcity myth in both speed and data, so 50% will be connecting at 12/1Mbps (page 118 of NBNCo Corporate Plan). The government have been promoting 1000/400Mbps (which the installed hardware is capable of), but those plans aren't expected to appear until 2026, and eHealth, but HD Video conferencing won't work on a 1Mbps upload.

    Telstra have just launched an LTE network and the other mobile carriers will also launch LTE networks shortly for the low-end user these networks will be $10-$20/month cheaper than the NBN. So much so that NBNCo have been trying to restrain the mobile operators from competing. If the wireless operators can take more than the 13% that NBNCo are predicting (page 116) then NBNCo will be in serious trouble and prices will rise.

    In summary, Australia is building a world class fibre to the premises network, but it is going to be hamstrung by speed tiers which deliver little extra money to NBNCo (~$4/month) and reduce NBNCo's income from data.

  15. Re:20 gigs?First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    19$ for 100/100 mbps uncapped where i live, not even cold. All hail FTTB. (with cat5 last mile)

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. Re:Issue of Redundancy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering Fibre is more reliable and the copper network isn't redundant. Whats your point?

  18. The right general direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A step in the right direction in terms of services but the bandwidth cap is a bit much for a hefty price.

    No doubt a little competition can alleviate these minor issues.

    One day Australia will be like other countries where you can get 20mb (Usually not) unlimited broadband for £10 or less...

    Now, for the real Australian broadband test; how much would it cost to hire a mail pigeon to deliver a 32mb stick and how quickly will that transfer.

    Suppose you can deliver 1tb 2.5" drives with a pigeon, but can it fly over the Southern Ocean?! No? oh gee well that's $50 for 20gb mate.

  19. TP in AU? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    So my "move to Canada" fund needs to be adjusted to "move to Australia". Do they have trailer parks in Australia?

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:TP in AU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to do that? Move to Eastern Europe - it's more fun and much cheaper.

    2. Re:TP in AU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Watch Home&Away, the whole cast lives in a trailor park.

    3. Re:TP in AU? by Esquilax · · Score: 1

      You can live in a trailer park but you have to own a Holden Commodore.

    4. Re:TP in AU? by Quick+Reply · · Score: 1

      So my "move to Canada" fund needs to be adjusted to "move to Australia". Do they have trailer parks in Australia?

      Yes, but Trailer Parks or "Caravan Parks" as they are more well known as do not have the negative connotations that the US counterparts do. They are usually more temporary in nature - more like a holiday resort where you bring your own cabin, although I'm sure there are plenty of long term tenants too. Getting hooked into the NBN might be a bit of a problem, NBN is a fixed-line service, so they will probably not hook it up right to your Caravan, but hook it up to the park's buildings instead.

      It would then be shared (probably with a cheap router that wont make the distance right to your Caravan) with all of the residents who will have all their torrent clients competing for bandwidth (not to mention that the park owner would probably opt to be 'shaped' after the download quota is sucked dry in less that 10 seconds at the start of each month thanks to the speed of that fibre optic goodness).

      Not to mention that there are only 5 sites in the entire country live at the moment (although I'm sure by the time you save up enough money to live in Australia it will be fully operational, due to the high living cost compared to the US, it will take a long time to save). It is not as easy as crossing the border into Canada with your own trailer - It costs a lot to ship a large item literally have way around the globe.

      By all means come to Australia, it is fantastic. But if you want to tour around, NBN is not your best bet (LTE/wifi Hotspots might be however), and if you want cheap accommodation with fast Internet, Caravan parks are not your best bet either.

    5. Re:TP in AU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      See the movie "You and your stupid mate" for details.

    6. Re:TP in AU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTTH is highly unlikely to be available in trailer parks, your best bet is to buy a piece of land in NSW for $150,000, then build a house ontop of it, then pay thousands per year for land rates, close-to 50% effective taxes, other expenses, then you just might get the NBN available at your home.

      With a back yard the size of your garage.

      Seriously, move to Canada, this place sucks.

    7. Re:TP in AU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're called caravan parks here.

    8. Re:TP in AU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't call them trailer parks. We call 'em caravan parks.

      And that's not a knife, either.

    9. Re:TP in AU? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      I'll just have to find a home for my transmaro.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  20. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm already on 24 Mbit/s down, no on- of offpeak limits for 60 bucks a month. And I'm not in a state capital.

    Does the B stand for Bullshit or is this just an initial rolling out which will aim at getting all the suckers?

  21. Australia beats my connection / price on.. by Fireking300 · · Score: 1

    Australia beats my connection / price on everything except Data caps. I currently have Timewarner Wideband Internet in Dallas, Texas. I currently have 50 Mbps Down and 5 Mbps Up as my selected tier package. Which costs $99.99(USD) a month. I see that it would cost a Australian with iiNet only $99.95($99.95 Australian Dollars = 97.0015 US dollars) for Twice the speed with a 1 TB Cap. They have me beat on pricepoint. But Timewarner has no Data caps in my area.

    1. Re:Australia beats my connection / price on.. by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      A 1 TB cap is pretty huge though. In practice, would you even come close to hitting it?

      Also this is just the first 'batch' of ISPs that have announced pricing on the network - and they are all currently considered "premium" ISPs for existing DSL connections. Wait until the cheap and nasty ISPs get on board and I'm sure you'll see unlimited plans happening (might take a few years ... but if they can offer unlimited cap 24 Mbit ADSL2+ now, which they do, they can do it on the NBN).

  22. Censorship? by xmorg · · Score: 1

    IS there a hidden price tag?

    1. Re:Censorship? by Quick+Reply · · Score: 1

      Not censorship, that legislation won't float. Besides, the goverment is too cunning for that....... the hidden price tag is 38 thousand million taxpayer dollars + your first born's future. Mwhahahahahahahaha

    2. Re:Censorship? by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Clearly this is an expenditure the first world country with the lowest sovereign debt of all developed nations cannot possibly afford, in a world where major growth industries are being increasingly dominated by IT companies.

  23. Re:Issue of Redundancy... by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

    Also cheaper to maintain. It's marginal but it changes the maintenance cost structure from continuous upkeep (power, line degradation etc.) to largely being the expense of replacing direct physical damage (trees, back hoes).

  24. Re:Issue of Redundancy... by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

    When was a copper-only POTS network ever redundant?

    --
    this is my sig
  25. PlayStation Store by tepples · · Score: 1

    That's potentially not even one full-sized PlayStation 3 game. PS3 games come on Blu-ray Disc, and dual-layer discs can be up to 50 GB.

    Because everyone is using the internet for piracy.

    How exactly is it piracy to buy a video game on PlayStation Store?

    But I agree that 40 GB should probably be enough for entry-level users who don't rent movies online (does Australia even have a counterpart to Netflix?) and don't subscribe to the "discs are going away in the next console generation" philosophy.

    1. Re:PlayStation Store by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Australia has movies you can rent or buy via iTunes - can't recall if they have TV shows too.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  26. prices will rise by pbjones · · Score: 1

    the pattern is usually a low starting price to lock you in and then the price floats up at the end of the contract period, either 6 months or a year later. NBN promises a roughly equal service to most people in Oz, some of us won't see much speed difference, others will. The downside is that rural customers will only get the service they have now, that is, poor ADSL, or 3G wireless, sat doesn't really count as it's usually subsidised and services so few few people. NBN isn't planning on going into towns smaller than 1000 people.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
    1. Re:prices will rise by baileydau · · Score: 2

      the pattern is usually a low starting price to lock you in and then the price floats up at the end of the contract period, either 6 months or a year later. NBN promises a roughly equal service to most people in Oz, some of us won't see much speed difference, others will. The downside is that rural customers will only get the service they have now, that is, poor ADSL, or 3G wireless, sat doesn't really count as it's usually subsidised and services so few few people. NBN isn't planning on going into towns smaller than 1000 people.

      You are the second person in this thread to try and claim that rural people won't see any benefit. The NBN is to provide AT LEAST 12/1 speeds to 100% of the country (at the same (wholesale) price for all). Those in towns of less than 1,000 may not get fibre, but they will get high speed fixed wireless or satellite. Those who are on the dodgy ADSL / 3G will definitely see a benefit, possibly by an order of magnitude.

      As the average Australian download speed is ~8.5Mb/sec down and 1.28Mb/sec up (according to Netindex), even the SLOWEST NBN speed of 12/1 will be a 25% improvement for most people. Don't forget that there are speeds up to 100/40 for now and those speeds will be increased over time.

      There will be very few people in Australia who won't get an improvement in download speed and virtually everyone will be able to get massively higher UPLOAD speeds.

      I'm not sure what you mean by the "price float". In Australia, virtually all of the price movements in ADSL (or even 3G) over the past 5 or more years have been downwards. There have been new plans with larger quotas from time to time that do cost more, but noone is forcing you to move to them. (I've always been able to stay on my current plan if the new ones didn't suit for whatever reason)

      --
      Ever stop to think ... and forget to start again?
  27. Eurotrash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Queue hordes of Eurotrash boasting about their enormous speeds / tiny costs.

    Here's a clue, Klaus Kraftwerkkrauthumper - your entire country is less than half the size of New South Wales, yet has four times the subscriber base of all of Australia. A little bit harder building a single national broadband network in a country a third as big again as the whole of Europe with a tiny population of 21m to pay for it.

    By the way, you lost. Twice.

  28. The sockpupets are out today by baileydau · · Score: 1

    The NBN is a highly political topic in Australia. The opposition leader blames it for loosing him the last election (probably right too). He hates it with a passion. He appointed Malcolm Turnbull to "destroy the NBN". A job he has been working on ever since. There have been many lies and much FUD spread by them and their sock puppets (particularly their propaganda wing, "The Australian")

    This is a fairly typical example:

    As a taxpayer and citizen of Australia I want the $40 billion dollar waste of money (and way to appease country based members of parliament) shutdown and the money handed back to taxpayers.

    If this person actually had a clue, they would know that the NBN is "off budget". It isn't being paid for out of taxpayer dollars. It is being funded by Government bonds. So there is NO MONEY TO GIVE BACK TO TAXPAYERS. But this is a favourite lie they like to peddle. As well as it not actually costing tax payers anything in the long run it will actually make a modest profit (~7% IRR)

    The "appeasing country based MPs" is also pure BS. The NBN was planned and under way well before the country based MPs held the balance of power. It's just that they have all realised how beneficial it will be to the country and it was one of the reasons they chose to back the Government, rather than the Opposition (hence their hatred of it).

    Another part of the FUD is that the actual budget is $36B, but they love to round it up to $40B or $50B or even $60B.

    To put the price tag into perspective, even if it were to come out of the budget, it would be less than 1%!!! For such a significant national infrastructure item that will last for decades to come, that's pretty small bickies.

    --
    Ever stop to think ... and forget to start again?
  29. So vote with your... vote. by Warwick+Allison · · Score: 1

    Nothing is "likely" about Abbott and his Luddites winning the next election, a lot can change in the next 2 years. By then, the NBN and the Carbon Price will either be huge positives or huge negatives, in real terms, rather than the current fear of the unknown that we Aussies tend to wallow in in the political sphere. That's why the Climate Change deniers and Luddites have tried to delay them.

  30. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get better speeds than that for cheaper on my portable wimax with great service all across japan & korea!

  31. Yes, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is already a billion dollars over budget and only deployed in a handfull of places around the country.