Slashdot Mirror
Facebook's Faces Trademark Suit Over Timeline
sydneyhype writes "Facebook's recently announced Timeline feature is up against legal action from an online social-scrapbooking company that has been in business since 2008. The company, Timelines.com, filed a trademark-infringement suit yesterday against Facebook, claiming it is to prevent being 'rolled over and quite possibly eliminated by the unlawful action by the world's largest and most powerful social-media company, Facebook.'"
With faces being a noun since facebook posses it, tradmark is the most likely verb.
So some faces at Facebook are trademarking a suit over at timeline. Well good for them.
National Geographic, the band Ayreon, the band Rennaissance, MIT and, despite being dead, Michael Crichton have joined the suit.
You have left us at the mercy of trolls and idiots. Headlines don't even make sense anymore.
The term "time line" is such a common generic term. I doubt their suit has any legal standing.
If it did have legal standing, then we would see sites like Dictionary.com suing every site that had a dictionary, or Sex.com that sued every news site that had a sex carried column. It would freeze the Internet as we know it and all sites would be required to use pig latin to communicate (until most common pig latin terms are monopolized, and then we'd only be left with gibberish if we're lucky).
And in other news, someone else sued Facebook, the sky is blue, water is wet and ice is cold.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
'Unfortunately', this is how the free market works, and I'm sure many businesses have been bitten by such deaths.
The 'good news' if they do go under is they don't have to put more hard work into updating their site, as the good souls at Facebook would be taking over that role. Google, MS or Apple after that will probably chomp even Facebook then, bringing us all one step closer to an automated society, which is in no way a bad thing.
Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
Timeline.com is just making chronological lists of historical events, which anyone can do with a piece of paper and pen. That idea is probably older than Jesus. How is this a trade-mark infringement? It's like trying to sue someone for making a Venn diagram.
Facebook isn't marketing this as Timelines.com by Facebook or even Timelines by Facebook, it's simply a timeline of your facebook information. A google search of Timelines had multiple items (not related to the news of the suit or to the FB feature) before timelines.com, including at least one other site that does the exact same thing Timelines seems to do. A search of the word Timeline failed to find the site in three pages of links.
If FB were marketing the new Timelines website by FB then the site might have a case, but FB is using a generic term in accordance with it's definition.
Somebody should make a Timeline about the history of such trolls.
I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
This isn't about what Timelines.com does, nor is it about the common use of the word - you're all missing the point or don't understand trademarks.
Timelines.com applied for and received the trademark on timelines (trademark number 85432026, look it up on http://tess2.uspto.gov/ ) therefore, in the US at least, they have the sole right to use that word in connection with the caveats on the mark (which includes pretty much anything to do with computers). If someone else, facebook or anyone comes along and uses that word, they have the right to tell them to stop. Otherwise - what's the point of trademarks? FFS I'm Australian and I know more about your trademark system than you guys do.
If you want to argue about "common use" of the word, then it's the USPTO that you need to be directing your complaints too, not timelines.com
Trademarks should be used not to try to destroy large businesses who come up with names that may be vaguely similar to the name of an unrelated product, but to protect consumers against fraud. No one in their right mind thinks that Timelines.com and Facebook are in any way related. Trademarks are designed for the purpose so that I know what I'm buying, for example, if I order an Xbox 360 game console, I should receive an Xbox 360 game console and no other makers of game consoles other than Microsoft (or who are affiliated with Microsoft) can make a console called the Xbox 360.
Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
I think, if anybody should sue them, it should be Twitter. The current Facebook setup seems like a complete ripoff of twitter's style, with its "[X] new stories" bar at the top that you click on to see recent posts. If it's worthwhile to sue over a black rounded rectangle, this seems worth suing over too.
Dumbest trademark suit since Monster sued Disney over "Monsters, Inc".
I mean, attach the word "infringement" to any story, and the marketing people will go nuts! Facebook's lawyers will quickly figure out whether there is any merit to the case, and either change their word or kill Timelines' TM registration. My guess is that Timelines.com knows they're dead meat already, and they're just trying to get a little more VC money before the axe falls.
Then again, MicroSquishy got away with "Windows"
As I remember it, it appeared at one time that the company that produced LindowsOS had a good case for "windows" being generic, and Microsoft agreed to settle the lawsuit and buy the Lindows trademark.
Check out our IT social networking blog www.thinknett.com ...
Wow. Sorry, I'm just a little astonished that actually worked.
Have you heard of LinkedIn? Diaspora? Are you re-inventing the wheel?
... share your ideas on technology between your personal/professional network.
I think BestBuy seriously ripped me off selling me this HP Pavilion AMD Turion X2 laptop (dv4), and am currently attempting to make sense of C-50 Dual Core vs. Athlon 64 TF-20 vs. V105, V120, V140, V160 vs. E-240 X1/E-350 X2 vs. Athlon II Neo K125.
Any help? Other than "Never purchase from BestBuy", I mean.
"Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit
The unintentionally funny thing is Taco did a few things for the window manager "enlightenment" before slashdot. :)
Thus he'd not only reached enlightenment but also ePlus
On one hand, we have some unknown company with egos generous enough to consider a common English word their property; on the other, we have a company that has outright stated their users aren't their customers, but their product.
I'm rooting for the lawyers on this one. Bleed 'em both dry.
I think BestBuy seriously ripped me off selling me this HP Pavilion AMD Turion X2 laptop (dv4), and am currently attempting to make sense of C-50 Dual Core vs. Athlon 64 TF-20 vs. V105, V120, V140, V160 vs. E-240 X1/E-350 X2 vs. Athlon II Neo K125.
Any help? Other than "Never purchase from BestBuy", I mean.
Never buy HP. What are you, new?
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
At the top of their page they have a "Find us on Facebook" link....
So they're using Facebook for their own commercial gain, and now trying to sue them...... what Facebook doesn't have a clause in their TOU about giving FB a license to use their mark?
Maybe Facebook should exercise their right to "turn off" timelines's FB page as a retaliatory measure :)
If I enter my last name.com, meaning "strong.com", it redirects to http://www.wellsfargoadvantagefunds.com/.
Should I sue because it tarnishes my name, even though it is completely unrelated based on use and classification?
Give me a break. They want money. :)
Isn't it too descriptive to be a trademark to begin with?