Slashdot Mirror


iPhone 4 Prototype Finder Gets Probation

think_nix writes "Brian Hogan, who found an iPhone 4 prototype last year which was sold to Gizmodo for $5,000, has been sentenced to one year of probation, 40 hours of community service, and a $250 fine. The District Attorney's office was asking for jailtime."

19 of 334 comments (clear)

  1. Justice is served by infernalC · · Score: 4, Informative

    The right thing to do with something that isn't yours is not to pick it up and sell it. Duh. He will learn a lesson from this.

    1. Re:Justice is served by WilyCoder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Please let me know where you abandon, I mean park your car each day. Thanks.

    2. Re:Justice is served by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The right thing to do with something that isn't yours is not to pick it up and sell it. Duh. He will learn a lesson from this.

      Well, did he pick it up, remove the SIM card so the owner couldn't just call it and ask about it? Or did he keep it at home waiting for the owner to call and after a few days decided to sell it?

      Completely not the point. (make way for the car analogy!) Hey I found this sweet car, and the owner never once showed up in the few days that I waited for him to claim it. It's totally mine. I wonder why so many people abandon cars at the airport, anyway? Oh well, finders keepers!

      Most jurisdictions require public notification of found goods, as well as a 6 month waiting period. Neither of which this guy even came close to adhering to.

    3. Re:Justice is served by Missing.Matter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What ever happened to finders keepers?

      Do you apply kindergarten playground law to all of your moral dilemmas? Shoving people when they're mean to you, crying when you don't get your way? In adult land, we try to hold ourselves to a higher standard than 6 year olds.

    4. Re:Justice is served by bell.colin · · Score: 3, Informative

      You haven't watched politicians on the house/senate floor (or debates in general) have you? They behave exactly like 5 year olds. (kindergarten age is 5, not 6)

  2. Here let me fix that for you. by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you find a cell phone that doesn't belong to you in a bar and you turn it in to the bar owner, or you turn it into the police, or you turn it into a carrier store that the phone came from you are a finder.
    If you find cell phone that doesn't belong to you and you sell it you are a thief.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Here let me fix that for you. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So I get to suffer in the rain instead of them... how dishonorable.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Here let me fix that for you. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you need to actually review a lot of the understanding you are basing your comment on...

      One who finds lost property under circumstances which give him knowledge of or means of inquiry as to the true owner, and who appropriates such property to his own use, or to the use of another person not entitled thereto, without first making reasonable and just efforts to find the owner and to restore the property to him, is guilty of theft.

      CAL. PEN. CODE 485 : California Code - Section 485

      http://www.shouselaw.com/appropriation-lost-property.html

    3. Re:Here let me fix that for you. by Revotron · · Score: 3, Informative

      I highly doubt you're educated in any form of law, but luckily I am, so let me break it down for you.

      "Unlawful taking" is actually a crime and is exactly what it sounds like - taking something that you don't own, with the intention of making it yours. And it stands quite well legally that his intent to sell the device constituted him making it his own property. Therefore, the selling of the unlawfully taken phone to a third party (a crime in and of itself) signifies the lack of intent to return the device to its owner.

      Oh, by the way, even if you're going to assume that the Apple employee left it there specifically so someone would find it, the fact that somebody did pick it up and take it as their own property to sell counts as Conversion, the legal definition of which is taking sole possession of something you have been given control over with no intent to return it. It's like embezzlement, but without money.

      The courts DO have rules. They're called laws. And everything I just explained to you IS the law.

  3. Will anyone at Gizmodo be charged? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For buying and destroying goods that were obviously not the property of the person selling them?

    1. Re:Will anyone at Gizmodo be charged? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Informative

      The DA has said no. Their contention is that Gizmodo crossed a line but they were in a very grey area in terms of journalistic rights because they did technically report on it. I think the DA would have won but the battle wasn't worth it.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  4. Re:and in china loseing a prototype = faked suicid by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And you have evidence of this? In the same vein, how do we know you didn't rape and murder a young girl in 1990? I'm not saying you did but I find it interesting that you never denied it either. I'm just asking questions, that's all.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  5. Gizmodo: Handling stolen goods by bool2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The whole thing seems a bit one sided. Given that Gizmodo knowingly paid for stolen goods, where is their equivalent fine, community service and probation?

  6. A man walks into a bar by Tsingi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A man walks into a bar in Cupertino, has a drink, and gets up to leave.
    On leaving the bartender notices that he has left his iPhone on the table.
    Bartender: "Charlie, you left your iPhone again."
    Customer: "sorry Phil, but it's cheaper than buying commercials."
    Bartender: "Maybe, but my customers customers keep ending up in jail."

  7. Re:not a felony by Revotron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is legally false.

    Leaving something in a location does not mean it's no longer your property. Even if he did trust it to the hands of a "tech junky", it's still Apple's property. By selling the device, the "finder" illegally converted the phone to HIS sole possession and control. Why? Because you can't sell something that's not yours, so obviously he took the phone to be his own property.

    When you maintain control over something that is not your property and you make it your property with no intent to return it to the owner, that is a crime, and it's called "conversion". It's like embezzlement, but without money - you've been trusted with something and you misappropriated it. The fact that he then SOLD the goods that were unlawfully converted constitutes a second crime, the sale of stolen property.

    Nice attempt at spinning it into a harmless "finders-keepers" bit, but you failed miserably. Don't believe me? Ask a lawyer.

  8. Prototype MacBook Pro 3G dude gets some gear back by QuasiSteve · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Quick summary timeline...

    Dude sees an old MacBook Pro on Craigslist listed by Seller as broken.
    Dude buys it thinking maybe he can fix it.
    Dude does indeed fix it, requiring reflowing of parts, adding parts (ram, HDD, etc.), chronicles it at Anandech, noting that it seems to be no ordinary MBP.
    http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2165252&highlight=macbook+antenna - Prototype Macbook Pro with 3G: In my shop now!

    Dude then sells it on Craigslist himself as he has no use for it and doesn't yet realize its uniqueness.
    Buyer takes it to an Apple Store for some service, Apple Store Genius bar says "This is not an Apple product." on account of weird things in there.
    http://www.macrumors.com/2011/08/30/apple-genius-bar-didnt-recognize-macbook-pro-3g-prototype-apple-now-wants-it-back/ - Apple Genius Bar Didn't Recognize MacBook Pro 3G Prototype

    Buyer sues Dude, wins (in part based on Apple Store findings), Dude is out moneys.
    Dude thinks 'wtf', though, and takes a closer look at the MacBook Pro, asking around on forums.
    Dude learns that the red motherboard implies it's a prototype.
    Weeks pass and Dude does what anybody who isn't a fanboy would do - puts it up for sale on e-bay.
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-27076_3-20092180-248/3g-equipped-macbook-prototype-pops-up-on-ebay/ - 3G-equipped MacBook prototype pops up on eBay

    e-bay bids go up to $70k, listing is pulled due to request from Apple.
    Dude then hears nothing, sits around waiting for some manner of official explanation for days on end.
    CNet, however, now wants to know what happened, so arrange an interview, in which they of course also call Apple.

    Apple suddenly takes very keen notice.
    http://m.cnet.com/Article.rbml?nid=20099494&cid=null&bcid=&bid=-248 - Apple wants its 3G MacBook prototype back

    Dude gets call - Apple wants their hardware back and they can have somebody stop by Dude's private residence that evening.
    Dude says 'I think not, my lawyer will be in touch'.

    Lawyer says Apple have no case.
    Lawyer and Apple chit chat.
    Lawyer says having no case matters shit all when you're Apple, so give up or incur huge costs.

    Apple thus sends over a PI to pick up Prototype MBP.
    Dude hands over the MBP.
    Dude then sits around again wondering wtf just happened while waiting to see if he gets compensated in any way at all.
    Apple does nothing.
    Dude then petitions to Apple to get his shit back.
    Apple says nothing, but does send an unmarked FedEx box with parts back.
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-27076_3-20117512-248/prototype-3g-macbook-buyer-gets-parts-back - Prototype 3G MacBook buyer gets parts back

    Dude now left with little option but either go "oh well", or sue the original Seller for incurred costs. Seller however says he received the MBP in earnest.

    It would have been nice of Apple if they had arranged an exchange for a shiny new MBP and cover Dude's costs, as there's no reason to believe that this prototype was stolen and - as of the latest reports - Apple never filed it as such either.

    The 'best' part? Being on IRC, watching a guy go from not being a fanboy but certainly an admirer of Apple, to being completely disenchanted.

  9. Re:Here's the lesson by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you spot a lost cell phone, ignore it. Don't touch it, don't look at it, don't ponder it, and above all, don't be the one who calls attention to it. Just keep moving. In today's environment of runaway government, chances are high you will be punished for trying to do right, rather than rewarded as one should be.

    Holy tinfoil hat... Michelle Bachmann, is that you? This case is not even remotely about someone trying to do the "right thing", by any stretch of the imagination. A guy found some lost property and immediately tried to sell it, which in almost every sane, law abiding nation, is a CRIME. He got punished. I think the protest down at the Crymeafuckin river is missing you sorely, why don't you get back to it?

  10. Re:Prototype MacBook Pro 3G dude gets some gear ba by QuasiSteve · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dude should have contacted Apple as soon as he knew what he had, and told them what happened.

    why? Keep in mind that this was an old prototype from years ago. Not a prototype of a model not yet released (like the case in TFA). I have several prototype things, ebay is also full of them. There isn't a law saying you can't own or sell prototype things. There may have been such a stipulation in an agreement between Apple and the original Seller (or whoever they got it from) but that's something Dude couldn't possibly know.

    He also couldn't have suspected the Seller of being a fence (and I'm not saying Seller was) as it wasn't being sold in a shady way or well below market price. In fact, Dude didn't know what it exactly was at the time of purchase.

    Dude chose to be a doofas and attempts to cash in.

    No actually he repaired it, because that's what he does. He chronicles this, and it's reported on several mac-centric sites.
    He doesn't really want to keep it, so he sells it on, himself, on Craigslist. He gets a few hundred dollars for it.
    That could well have been the end of the story right there if not for the fact that the Buyer took the thing to an Apple Store who then stated that it's not an Apple product.
    Yes, later on, once he learns it may have some value to collectors, he puts it up on e-bay. However he only expected to get maybe $2000 - never in a million years would he have thought it'd go up to $70k.

    He wasn't trying to 'cash in'.

    Dude is an insignificant individual, bought something that wasn't legally for sale,

    Matter of contention and certainly wouldn't have been known to him.

    and was clearly going to be crushed by the biggest and most secretive IT company on the planet.

    Except that he wasn't, not even after the ebay listing got pulled. Only once Apple heard from cnet did they start taking a closer look.

    Dude gets a lesson in life.

    Apple don't miss his fanboyism or loss of his purchases.

    Those two are obvious, yes.

  11. Re:For contrast. by NFN_NLN · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In China, these are called hero's of the people.

    In early America they were called heroes as well. In fact, Samuel Slater is known as the the "Father of the American Industrial Revolution" because he illegally smuggled in textile plans from the textile leader of the time: Britain.

    "Stitched into the lining of his clothing were his indenture papers, which would prove to any prospective employer that he knew his job. More importantly, in his head he carried all the secrets of the water frame and the continuous spinning process that Arkwright and Strutt had perfected."

    Oh... and by today's standard the forefathers of America were also dirty terrorists.