Slashdot Mirror


3D Printer For Your Kids

kkleiner writes "Two developers from Shapeways and i.materialise have designed a 3D printer for your ten-year-old. The prototype, named Origo, would allow children to easily design objects in 3Dtin and then print them safely in their home with minimal adult supervision. Could it be the last toy you ever have to buy for your kids?"

195 comments

  1. I don't get it by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I already have a 10-year old kid, why would I want to print more of them? And what's wrong with the old fashioned way, even if I wanted more?

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lol what?

      This is about a printer, presumably printing toys. Thus the reason for "could be the last toy you ever have to buy for your kids?"

    2. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh? Their post was a joke.

    3. Re:I don't get it by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Maybe some people don't like getting screwed?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    4. Re:I don't get it by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Someone's doing it wrong then.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    5. Re:I don't get it by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with the old fashioned way

      Mine's broken down.

    6. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is physically impossible to print a kid so either the poster is really stupid or they made a joke. I'd say they did the latter.

    7. Re:I don't get it by artor3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      These new kids are made entirely of plastic! No screaming, no crying, no fighting, no diapers, no vomiting, no bizarre illnesses, no asking "why" fifty times in quick succession, and best of all - no turning into teenagers when you're not looking!

    8. Re:I don't get it by mikael · · Score: 1

      It might well be - if they choke on it ... "hey dude, let's make a fake popsicle and see how many try to take a bite"

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    9. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which part of "Microsoft product" did you not understand?

    10. Re:I don't get it by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Lol what?

      This is about a printer, presumably printing toys. Thus the reason for "could be the last toy you ever have to buy for your kids?"

      There is treatments now for Asperger's that will make your life easier. Just saying.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    11. Re:I don't get it by Walkingshark · · Score: 2

      It is physically impossible to print a kid so either the poster is really stupid or they made a joke. I'd say they did the latter.

      Really? Most women I know have a 3D human printer that comes factory installed. Most of them even work, theoretically. I haven't tested this theory, which is why I can actually afford the toy printer discussed in the article.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    12. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got it...

      Of course, using a 3D printer to make devices that make the traditional way more fun, now That I'd go for.

    13. Re:I don't get it by OQuotes · · Score: 1

      Just waht we need...Another gadget in the house! I think we have about 8 printers already!

    14. Re:I don't get it by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      This one won't display "Load letter" while it's told to accept regular A4.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    15. Re:I don't get it by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Lol what?

      This is about a printer, presumably printing toys. Thus the reason for "could be the last toy you ever have to buy for your kids?"

      So the kids could die from this?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    16. Re:I don't get it by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the old-fashioned Mk-1 "Kid" completely blown out of the game. Where do I order my first batch?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    17. Re:I don't get it by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If I already have a 10-year old kid, why would I want to print more of them? And what's wrong with the old fashioned way, even if I wanted more?

      No, no, no,

      The 3D printer is in exchange for your crotchspawn, a fair swap if you ask me.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    18. Re:I don't get it by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Question marks mark questions, not statements. /childish excuse making in 3... 2... 1....

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    19. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the worst thing is that even if you are looking, they turn into teenagers.

    20. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why is it called Assburgers?

    21. Re:I don't get it by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 1

      I am issuing a blanket "double-whoosh alert" for this and all other replies.

      --

      --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
    22. Re:I don't get it by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with the old fashioned way, even if I wanted more?

      Dude, /rapid/ prototyping.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    23. Re:I don't get it by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      (citation needed)

      I have heard of none, I would be quite interested in learning of this new treatment.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    24. Re:I don't get it by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      It will run out of "ink" though...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. For my kids? by jedo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want one for myself!

    1. Re:For my kids? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0
      From the summary:

      Could be[sic] the last toy you ever have to buy for your kids?"

      Sure, when your kid chokes on whatever crap the machine spits out. Not too good for the kids, but it will work wonders for your social lives and insurance payouts.

    2. Re:For my kids? by EdZ · · Score: 1

      Build a RepRap/Repstrap, it'll be cheaper and more fun, and not be encased in an ugly translucent purple bubble. Or maybe it could be; print your very own ugly plastic bubble in whatever colour you want!

    3. Re:For my kids? by pla · · Score: 2

      I enjoy DIY projects, don't get me wrong; and as a cheap bastard, I would far rather build it myself than pay twice as much for the same thing as an OEM.

      That said, I know my limits. I would prefer to have a 3d printer that "just works", than spending dozens of hours trying to put together a finicky pile of junk that can sorta produce one crude design per run before it jams or self destructs and needs a major overhaul. :)

    4. Re:For my kids? by bjwest · · Score: 1

      From the summary:

      Could be[sic] the last toy you ever have to buy for your kids?"

      Sure, when your kid chokes on whatever crap the machine spits out. Not too good for the kids, but it will work wonders for your social lives and insurance payouts.

      Did you miss the part where they mentioned 10 year olds? If you kid is 10 or older and still putting things other than food in their mouth, then it's your fault for buying your mentally disabled child this toy.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    5. Re:For my kids? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Agreed, me too.

      This toy could be like legos. My son started playing with legos when he was about 2 yo (before that it was the bigger version, Duplo), and over past few years his designs really start to look like more than just a bigger brick or so. As an adult likely he still enjoys it, I know I do. It's a toy for all ages.

      This printer sounds very much the same. At 10yo they may start making simple designs, adults possibly using more sophisticated software can make virtually anything with it. If the material it's printed with is somewhat strong I can imagine using it to create custom parts for other projects, for example. Or even replacement parts for broken bits of other toys.

      Possibilities are endless of course. Non-toxic material not just makes it safe for kids, it makes it safe for normal homes to begin with. A price of US$800 may be cheap for a 3D printer, it's still a hefty chunk of money. Likely to get cheaper in time fast if they're successful in making it, and starting to mass produce it. The material is another matter: TFA talked about US$40-400/kg for the plastic, that's very expensive of course, and must become much cheaper for this to seriously become a toy. But then again when volume goes up, manufacturing cost goes down.

    6. Re:For my kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So build a better one.

      I use a reprap extruder on an XYZ platform I built similar to contraptor.org.
      If your XYZ can do light-duty metal/wood router work, it can push around an extruder.

    7. Re:For my kids? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Replacement spare parts, now that's cool. Now all we need to do is force manufacturers to supply full digital details and specs for all the parts in the devices so that we can repair them ourselves. Don't you just hate when that tiny plastic dohicky breaks and paying for it to be replaced cost near the same price of replacing the whole product.

      The copy rightists will go nut's, so would you steal a car, hmm, but now be honest would you download it and 3d print it out.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:For my kids? by daid303 · · Score: 1

      Then build one. There are many options out there, to name a few RepRap, Up!, MakerBot, Ultimaker.

      I got an Ultimaker myself, which is a great machine. Expensive, but great. And 3D printing isn't as easy as marketing wants it to look. Seeing how flimsy this toy is build I don't think it will be fast, nor accurate. Which might be good, as I see no place for the plasic reel, so you cannot print large things. Also they say it's "safe", I see no doors that are kept shut while the extruder is hot. And a 200C extruder end is not safe. (I've burned myself a few times already)

      http://daid2.mine.nu/~daid/IMG_20111008_121041.small.jpeg - in the background you can see my ultimaker, the black circle on the side is a 2kg reel of plastic.

    9. Re:For my kids? by daid303 · · Score: 1

      The plastic used in other 3D printers is about 20-28 euro's per kg. These are material cost, and I don't think these prices are driven by 3D printer demands, as the reels look industrial.

      If you want to see what people are using 3D printers for, take a look on http://www.thingiverse.com/ you'll find everything from toys to replacement parts for washing machines.

    10. Re:For my kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Deland's site for some nice pictures with an exploded view. The mechanical assmebly isn't too bad, but watch the thermocouple. If you get it backwards, you'll cook the print head.

    11. Re:For my kids? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      spending dozens of hours trying to put together a finicky pile of junk that can sorta produce one crude design per run before it jams or self destructs and needs a major overhaul

      Oh, you've used a MakerBot? Hey, the FX-80 buzzing is sorta nostalgic, though.

      The problem I see here is that 100 $2,000 Makerbot/scanners aren't better than 1 $200,000 3d rapid prototyper, for somebody who uses it a few times a week.

      The service bureaus charge an arm and a leg, but some sort of geek/maker coop/timeshare must be feasible (and already exists?).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  3. Print me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Print me a six-foot blonde chick.

    Copies: 3

    1. Re:Print me by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      "My polyester girl... so fine..."

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:Print me by arielCo · · Score: 1

      Tim Minchin would approve: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOuqEzmg304

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    3. Re:Print me by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      No no..

      Should be:

      "I love, I love, I love, I love my polymer girl..."

    4. Re:Print me by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      She looks like the real thing
      She tastes like the real thing
      My fake plastic love....

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    5. Re:Print me by NoseyNick · · Score: 1

      No, no! "Your plastic pal who's fun to be with!" :-)

      --
      Nick Waterman, Sr Tech Director, #include <stddisclaimer>
  4. A toy that makes other toys... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    That is absolutely brilliant.

    I have a mental picture, though, of the really smart geek in grade school... you know the one, stays in at recess to draw pictures of soldier robots...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:A toy that makes other toys... by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Now you know what happened to him :)

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  5. Forget the kids! by socz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can finally make those pieces I've always needed to finish my lego builds!

    --
    My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    1. Re:Forget the kids! by arielCo · · Score: 2

      I know you're (mostly) kidding, but the bricks would basically suck. I learned recently that Lego parts are molded out of ABS at ~150 PSI, and the tolerance is ~ 2 micrometers. That's why they fit so well and "Lego compatible" bricks don't.

      But yes, as a kid I dreamed up custom Lego parts myself :)

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    2. Re:Forget the kids! by arielCo · · Score: 1
      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    3. Re:Forget the kids! by metlin · · Score: 1

      But yes, as a kid I dreamed up custom Lego parts myself :)

      That's unfortunate, because that implies you stopped dreaming up custom Lego parts when you grew up.

      Anyway, as an adult, I continue to dream up custom Lego parts, and even design some of them. And I wouldn't change it for anything.

    4. Re:Forget the kids! by arielCo · · Score: 1

      naw, I just started dreaming up non-Lego stuff in abs/steel/aluminium. One day imma get a cnc mill :D

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    5. Re:Forget the kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A custom lego part... are you both serious... where the frag was your imagination ? ?

    6. Re:Forget the kids! by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      FWIW we've printed our own LEGO bricks on a Stratasys and they've worked pretty well. We needed a rapid mechanical prototyping system and LEGO bricks are perfect, so we built some custom baseplates that are basically LEGO-covered c-clamps and they've done an awesome job.

      When I was a kid I lived in a town that had the first LEGO manufacturing facility outside Denmark (brief franchise with Samsonite) and I knew some of the people doing the plastic injection molding there. They said the LEGO manufacturing tolerances were higher than American companies making medical equipment: it took forever to meet LEGO specs even though they were using the LEGO molds.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    7. Re:Forget the kids! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Don't just get a CNC mill. Build one yourself.

    8. Re:Forget the kids! by arielCo · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I was aware of other projects but this looks very nice.

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  6. Last Toy by DeeEff · · Score: 1

    Of course it'd be the last toy. You'd never be able to afford more after HP gets into this 3D ink business.

    For that matter, who wants their kid printing off shit without supervision. I never let anyone get near my 2D printer, much less a 3D one that could produce velociraptors.

    1. Re:Last Toy by DrXym · · Score: 1

      It'd be the last toy because after the kid has his fingers chopped off and his face decorated with spurts of molten plastic, the courts will put a supervision order around your access to him.

  7. Cost? by quangdog · · Score: 2
    From the manufacturer's website:

    Right now, I am just an idea. I will be as easy to use as an Xbox or Wii. I’ll be as big as three Xbox 360s and as expensive as three Xbox 360s. I will sit on your desk and quietly build your ideas, drawings and dreams.

    So, now we are measuring dreams in XBoxen?

    1. Re:Cost? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      If you're a parent, just be glad it's not cars.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redneck math for measuring length:

      Width of Texas > Air craft carrier > Football field > NEW! Xbox

    3. Re:Cost? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Yes, please... in terms we can all understand: How many libraries of congress will it cost?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    4. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -es

    5. Re:Cost? by daid303 · · Score: 1

      It's an idea without real life knowledge. 3D printers are not quiet (not loud, but not quiet), and they need high quality components and quite a bit of tweaking.

      I'm an owner of an Ultimaker 3D printer. So I kinda have an idea what I'm talking about.

    6. Re:Cost? by spider256 · · Score: 0

      At least we're not measuring them in Wii-Wii's

  8. 3D printed choking hazard by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

    What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:3D printed choking hazard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me? "Oh no, someone might use this to MAKE something that someone could choke on! Think of the children!"

      While your kids are locked in their air-filtered bubble rooms for safety, my kids will be creating, learning, and experiencing.

    2. Re:3D printed choking hazard by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If a ten year old hasn't yet figured out how to not swallow and choke on a toy, maybe they don't need to be around anymore.

    3. Re:3D printed choking hazard by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      Toys stop being choking hazards when kids are about 3(-ish?) and stop trying to put everything into their mouths. That's why happy meal toys are different for the really really small kids. This device is for older kids.

    4. Re:3D printed choking hazard by EdZ · · Score: 1

      I wonder how they intend to prevent children from putting their hand inside and grabbing the 180+C extruder head, or embedding semimolten plastic into their skin?

    5. Re:3D printed choking hazard by artor3 · · Score: 2

      Probably with the same safety features that are on the professional versions, minus all the manual overrides. Besides, if your ten year old is that desperate to burn themselves, they'll just use the stovetop.

    6. Re:3D printed choking hazard by jackbird · · Score: 1

      As a kid, I had a GI Joe-themed woodburning set. It was basically a cheapass soldering iron (with a GI Joe sticker on it) and some sheets of balsa wood in a cardboard box. It was very obvious that touching something capable of burning designs into wood on contact would hurt. So I didn't.

      (Less obviously dangerous was the piece of still-soft glass I picked up from the floor of the glassblowing studio tour at age 10, but I came away from the experience with nothing more than a blister and a lifelong respect for items of unknown temperature.)

    7. Re:3D printed choking hazard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By NOT using a 180+C extruder.
      and by using safety features, the same kind hot molten Crayola CrayonMaker uses.

  9. 3D Printer for my kids? by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like a fair trade.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  10. Limits by frisket · · Score: 1

    Could be the last toy you ever have to buy for your kids?

    Close, but no cigar. Not until it can make something with wheels that turn :-)

    1. Re:Limits by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      This looks like a low cost "binder + powder" type printer. If so, then such printed objects could be possible.

      See for instance the tech demo for zcorp's printers, where they print an entire bearing race assemby, including the bearings, then demonstrate such rotation. If that wouldn't be sexy enough, you can look at this product demo video.

      3d printers can do some fancy shit.

    2. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean: "Not until it can make an iPod touch"...

    3. Re:Limits by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1
      It's a puzzling question to begin with. It's not as though many kids do not have means available to them to make toys. Having the materials to make toys never stopped kids from wanting more. The author needs to read some Augustine, or even Freud, and understand that enough is never enough for human beings. Otherwise, communism would work. Otherwise, I would stop at one good beer. The suggestion that the shiny gloss wouldn't quickly wear off of this too is shortsighted.

      In my day, we would play with several artistic media, clay, and even wood (using my dad's tools). Sometimes, we even enjoyed Lego or homemade Play-Doh. I would build catapults out of trees in the woods and devise other ways to cause myself potentially severe trauma. If a kid can't be satisfied to use his or her imagination (though most can to some extent, given the chance), then a new piece of technology isn't going to make a difference. /nowgetoffmylawn

    4. Re:Limits by internerdj · · Score: 1

      Actually, if this were to really take off, we would probably still buy toys, except they would be DRM print limited model files that we printed our own selves. Toy manufacturers would have the same cow that every other IP owner had 5 years ago and will start clamping down on sharing non-licensed 3d models of their IP.

  11. screw buying for kids... by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even if it is expensive, this would be a very awesome thing to have.

    I sculpt on occasion, and being able to fast sculpt a primitive form digitally, then finish up with hand tools would greatly expedite the process.

    Throw in a 3d stereoscopic scanner, and keep the pricetag under 2k, and I'm sold.

    1. Re:screw buying for kids... by nomel · · Score: 1

      What materials would you want it to work with?

    2. Re:screw buying for kids... by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Powder and resin might be brittle, but it is also soft enough to hand sculpt with hand tools, and toothy enough to hold miniature 2part epoxy putty, if you need to handwork some extra material on.

      The big one is the 3c stereoscopic scanner. One of those, and I could use digital archival (I have cats. They knock things over), and could make iterative changes, and rapid reproductions of mold plugs for spincasting purposes, should a mishap happen during mold creation. (I hate losing work that way.)

      I don't need huge print volumes, so something tiny like that would work great. But the scanner is a must have.

    3. Re:screw buying for kids... by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Check out makerbot.com's 3D scanner and printers, based on the RepRap projects mostly. For $2K you could build the printer and scanner - and the frostruder can extrude frosting-consistency stuff. Some guys are using clay, some are doing lost-wax type casting. thingiverse.com has many thousands of designs for download (free). As one of the guys on the makerbot discussion group says, "The future is already here, it's just not very evenly distributed."

    4. Re:screw buying for kids... by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

      The key is to build using one of these printers that outputs resin or plastic, then take to a caster (or even a high-end jewelry studio) and have them (re)cast the output in your metal of choice. Make a mold around the output, burn it out in the kiln, and presto!

    5. Re:screw buying for kids... by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      You can do this part yourself.

      A spincaster is just a centrifuge.

      High temperature RTV gasket sealer (the stuff at autozone in the red metal tube) can stand up to melted bismuth. Lead and gold have lower melting points, iirc, but silver his higher? Anyhow, it is cheap and can make a high temp mold liner. For something undercut like a mini, you need to reinforce it, which you can pour around the high temp silicone with ordinary silicone mold builder like you would use for resin.

      Fill with melted bismuth shot, spin.

    6. Re:screw buying for kids... by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Right, the water soluble plastics that the Makerbot heated extruder uses would be great for lost-wax type casting, I'd think. I just mentioned the frostruder as an example of working in clay type stuff directly.

    7. Re:screw buying for kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do that today.

      Go get yourself a MakerBot Thing-O-Matic and one of their 3D scanners. Heck throw in the Gen4 interface kit and you are still only talking about $1,500.

    8. Re:screw buying for kids... by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      I don't want to blow a weekend putting together a contraption big enough for one of my cats to crawl into and meet a hot and sticky end.

      The preassembled units cost 2x as much.

    9. Re:screw buying for kids... by daid303 · · Score: 1

      Under 2k? DONE! (It will need assembly for that price)
      https://shop.ultimaker.com/
      http://store.makerbot.com/

      FYI: I got an ultimaker, my first print was done after 8 hours of receiving the kit. However, fast is relative, http://daid2.mine.nu/~daid/IMG_20110929_235158.small.jpeg this print took 3 hours (I was printing on slow speed, normally printing at double that speed, and experimenting with 4x speed)

    10. Re:screw buying for kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the 3D printer to make more 3D printers and sell them on eBay :-)

    11. Re:screw buying for kids... by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      I sculpt on occasion, and being able to fast sculpt a primitive form digitally, then finish up with hand tools would greatly expedite the process.

      3D printers have been accused of a lot of things, but being fast is not one of them.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    12. Re:screw buying for kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. Don't leave any holes or you'll have molten metal spraying across the room!

    13. Re:screw buying for kids... by nomel · · Score: 1

      What kind of resolution would you need for a scanner?

      I see some others mentioned them, but I personally think the rep rap and makerbot are a joke, although, clay printers have been made with slight success.

    14. Re:screw buying for kids... by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Well... yeah. Lol

      You are supposed to use the gasket sealer as the high temperature interface skin, and reinforce it with some other mold material. Since we are talking minis, you should use an evertable mold material, like silicone. (You can use the cheap silicone for the support mold. Cheap silicone doesn't handle the temperatures needed for the interface layer, but makes great support.)

  12. Can it make Lego? by a.koepke · · Score: 1

    Can you use it to replace that one lost Lego block (most likely went up the vacuum cleaner) that you need in order to complete your masterpiece?

    --


    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
    1. Re:Can it make Lego? by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

      Can you use it to replace that one lost Lego block (most likely went up the vacuum cleaner) that you need in order to complete your masterpiece?

      Yes, of course. See for example http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:591.

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    2. Re:Can it make Lego? by gknoy · · Score: 1

      It might be better to just buy more of those specific pieces from Lego directly.

    3. Re:Can it make Lego? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "DMCA takedown, motherfucker!"

      Seriously, I am just waiting for the impending IP trainwreck this technology will cause. "Local boy sued for 13 million dollars by toy manufacturer in infringement suit"

      Maybe these printers can make pirate eyepatches for kids to wear while they use it. Then again, Disney might protest due to their PotC franchise...

    4. Re:Can it make Lego? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be better to just buy more of those specific pieces from Lego directly.

      Buying on bricklink is a lot easier, and you can actually get that 30yr old part.
      Lego themselves aren't that helpful with individual parts.

    5. Re:Can it make Lego? by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Don't even buy them, LEGO CS is good enough that they will send you the necessary brick for free if you give them a call. At least they used to. My future wife was the one who took the calls and grappled with ancient instructions to identify the brick in question. Great days, I've never worked for a better company...

    6. Re:Can it make Lego? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or www.bricklink.com

  13. Good Luck by MBCook · · Score: 1

    This is pretty neat, but I'm not sure this is even down in FAO Schwartz kid territory. I've got a MakerBot, and while it's fun, it's complicated. Designing things isn't going to be easy. You have to take things into account like the angles of overhangs. Printing is fun to watch, but it can take a LONG time. The smaller the object, the faster it is, but it's still never going to be a 5 minute process. It's going to take 30-90.

    Good luck, they'll have a LOT of challenges.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Good Luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you pay 1300$ for a silly toy when you could have gotten a real milling machine instead?

    2. Re:Good Luck by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

      It's complicated to make, but it's not complicated to use -- any ten-year-old playing games like DND or Warhammer 30000 can use it easily to make any pieces they want -- and they can find thousands of them online. Saves more than the cost of the machine just in stupid pewter models.

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    3. Re:Good Luck by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

      Please point to an add for a computer controlled multi-axis milling machine for 1300$ Not a manual one that requires a skilled machinist to calibrate, maintain and operate, but an automated one that accepts at least G-code.

    4. Re:Good Luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, considering a child of 10 can enjoy programming or building a single-board PC from components (YASBEC in my case) as a recreational activity, why would they be incapable of mechanical design? Sure, I would have made mistakes I wouldn't make at this point (we do have engineering degrees for a reason), resulting in failed parts and going back, fixing the design and reprinting, but that doesn't keep a kid from eventually succeeding, or having fun overall.

    5. Re:Good Luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      An "add"? Like an addition?

      Here ya go: http://www.ebay.com/itm/4axis-cnc-router-engraver-DRILLING-MILLING-mahcine-/220835081127?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item336acbeba7 OK, so it's an actual machine and it doesn't have a cutesy-pie PT Barnum vibe to it. Sorry, you'll have to actually learn something. But isn't Slashdot the place of the DYI open source geek? Make everytihng yourself?

    6. Re:Good Luck by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      "Daddy, my toy won't print. I need help finding which of my vertexes' normal vector is non-manifold."

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:Good Luck by Zerth · · Score: 1

      in the same realm as a makerbot: zentoolworks.com sells a CNC kit for either $800(7x7x2) or $1200(12x12x2) with everything except the computer.

  14. so when by mbkennel · · Score: 1

    how long until little Bart and his odd friend Beavis makes models of

    a) explosives
    b) dildos
    c) guns

    and brings them to the first school day after Christmas?

    and then the think-of-the-chillren lobby gets all versions---not just for children----but every device in the category banned? They might include 5-axis milling machines.

    1. Re:so when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      hahaha!

      That 3Dtin program should have a Clippy-like helper widget.
      "I see you are trying to make a dildo! I'll color it black and add some balls for you. Click me to chose your balls."

    2. Re:so when by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      "Daddy, there's no option for "mega elephant" size!"

    3. Re:so when by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      b) dildos

      I doubt Bart and Beavis will be crafting one of these, but their mothers might. Talk about a choking hazard...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:so when by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      "Daddy, there's no option for "mega elephant" size!"

      You sir owe me a new laptop screen...

      Oh and I award you an internets. :-)

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    5. Re:so when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and then the think-of-the-chillren lobby gets all versions---not just for children----but every device in the category banned?

      No worries. The day the "think of the children" crowd finds out they can print dildos at home, we'll never hear from any of them again unless the LUBE runs out...

    6. Re:so when by zanian · · Score: 1

      b) dildos

      I doubt Bart and Beavis will be crafting one of these, but their mothers might. Talk about a choking hazard...

      I think Cartman's mom is most likely to want that.

    7. Re:so when by Jiro · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering about the potential for copyright and trademark violations. How long until the manufacturer gets sued because kids are downloading and printing Pikachu, Mickey Mouse, GI Joe, or one of a zillion other designs that you have to pay the big bucks to legally license?

  15. Toy? by anubi · · Score: 2

    I can't tell you how many times I have had to throw away something because some little plastic part broke.

    If this thing can print out decently strong parts, I'll want one too.

    Hopefully, I can make more of that little nylon clutch that broke in every one of my Gardner-Denver wirewrap guns. I threw all the broken guns in a drawer hoping one day I would be able to bring them back to life. They were damm handy little tools, and I haven't seen anyone else make them that had the right feel to 'em.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    1. Re:Toy? by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Indeed. If someone would print up some replacements for the gears in a front loading Sega CD, he'd save a lot of consoles from the landfill.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Toy? by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Gears are pretty easy, actually, to a point. How small are the teeth? http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3575 is a year or more old, but a good overview of what's possible, http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:10955 is a current design, you can see from the photo how the print quality is. The spiral gear is about 1.5" in diameter, for scale. Are the Sega gears near this size?

  16. Moving Parts, no problem [Re:Limits] by BlueF · · Score: 3, Informative
  17. This Will Mean A World of Trouble by sehlat · · Score: 2

    When kids start making little plastic replicas of their favorite cartoon heroes, the copyright and trademark thugs will be all over this thing. I can already see Disney's lawyers salivating.

    1. Re:This Will Mean A World of Trouble by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Only if they distribute them, or (in some cases) the plans they used to make them. You cannot be accused of trademark, copyright, or patent infringement on something that you created yourself, for your own enjoyment, even if what you made was protected by IP law.

    2. Re:This Will Mean A World of Trouble by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Oh no! My kid printed out a photo of Superman the other day, should I expect a lawsuit from DC? /swoosh

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    3. Re:This Will Mean A World of Trouble by sehlat · · Score: 1

      You cannot be accused of trademark, copyright, or patent infringement on something that you created yourself, for your own enjoyment, even if what you made was protected by IP law.

      For now. See Wikipedia in re: DMCA(1996), Copyright Term Extension Act(1998), ACTA(2011)

      Laws are code, and code can always be changed, not necessarily for the better.

    4. Re:This Will Mean A World of Trouble by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Ever. The logistics of enforcing it would be completely unmanageable without some super technology not altogether unlike the "instrument of obedience"in the ST:TOS episode "For the World is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky". The technological difficulties, coupled with philosophical implications of something like that make it something that won't happen anytime while human beings value personal liberty.

    5. Re:This Will Mean A World of Trouble by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      But the DMCA thiefs only value their own personal liberty. Not yours. They value their liberty to take what's not rightfully theirs far beyond your liberty to do what you should be allowed to do.
      Disclaimer: I feel some of the people they handled have broken the boundaries of what should be allowed. However they are only an statistically insignificant part of the lives they have attempted to destroy.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    6. Re:This Will Mean A World of Trouble by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      When kids start making little plastic replicas of their favorite cartoon heroes, the copyright and trademark thugs will be all over this thing. I can already see Disney's lawyers salivating.

      Yeah.. Like the way they banned paper and pencils from sale as copyright infringement tools.. And then banned 2D printers because of all the colouring book revenue they lost..
      (looks over beside monitor at cup of pencils sitting on a sheaf of printer paper beside my printer)

      Oh wait..

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    7. Re:This Will Mean A World of Trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet.

    8. Re:This Will Mean A World of Trouble by mark-t · · Score: 1

      My point is that EVERYONE values personal liberty... and the philosophical implications of invading every person's private thoughts and determining whether or not they are doing something inappropriate or illegal, 24 hours a day, every day, would mean that something like that would never happen... and as I said above, the logistics of enforcing it would be completely impossible without the aforementioned super technology.

    9. Re:This Will Mean A World of Trouble by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Ever. The logistics of enforcement alone would prohibit it.

      They may as well pass a law that it is illegal to remember any movie you ever saw, because remembering it constitutes unauthorized reproduction.

      Even if such laws are part of media companies' wet dreams, the technological barriers, (as well as the undeniable philosophical ramifications of the invasion of every person's private thoughts, even if it were technologically possible) make it something that is wholly infeasible.

  18. So this is better than a MakerBot why? by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

    My three pre-teenish kids are totally able to use our MakerBot Thing-o-Matic to do this already. It's only slightly over 1K$ and can print anything (almost) from thingiverse.com or things they make themselves in Google Sketchup.

    So what makes this new thing better?

    --
    No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    1. Re:So this is better than a MakerBot why? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      "No assembly required" maybe?

      Last I checked on makerbot, you have to assemble quite a few things. This system looks self contained in a plastic shell, so possibly no assembly requirements.

      A big deal at christmas time.

    2. Re:So this is better than a MakerBot why? by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

      Well it's true that if you want a MakerBot assembled instead of a kit the price doubles ($2499 vs. $1299). And the kit is not for beginners, nor do they guarantee anything at all if you choose the kit option. Nevertheless, it's a pretty impressive device.

      But I do admit that if I didn't use for 3D prototypes in my job, it would probably just be infrequently used for toys / game bits and the occasional novelty item.

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    3. Re:So this is better than a MakerBot why? by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Personally I would prefer this because it's a lot smaller. I live in a single room and there's no way a MakerBot will fit anywhere. This, though, this could be stored in any number of places when not in use, and when I want to use it I can just pull it out. Sure, the size also means you can't produce things that are as big as MakerBot can, but I'm willing to sacrifice that for the ease of storage and the portability.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  19. Looks interesting, but by giorgist · · Score: 1

    Looks interesting, but isn't lego a faster means to express their imagination
    with less mess ?

    1. Re:Looks interesting, but by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      You've never had kids with legos before have you (Well in truth, neither have I, but I've BEEN one)? The little pieces go EVERYWHERE. This appears to be pretty self-contained, so I doubt there's that much of a mess.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  20. Where to start? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    This is new, cool and has creative possibility. An MIT Open Courseware entry for architecture had this:

    "Students will learn various methods of representation for their ideas, and will work in model form and both freehand and hard-line drawings. Students will be encouraged to remain away from digital means of representation until late in the semester."

    Playing with Tinker Toys and Legos seems like a good first step before paying for a 3D printer.

  21. THINGMAKER (tm) by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  22. Scifi Trope by PAPPP · · Score: 1

    The implications of individuals, especially kids, having access to 3D printing is a pretty well-explored scifi trope. Cory Doctrow's Makers, and Bruce Sterling's Kiosk are both based on the concept, reasonably good, and make a solid starting point for implications.

  23. If they're so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technically, you sell one 3D printer and it's pretty much over. Kid #1 prints out two printers, gives them to two other kids, and so on. Since this isn't happening, I have to assume 3D printers are nothing but scams that print out misshappen globs of cheap plastic that can not be used for much besides cursing yourself for being so gullible.

    1. Re:If they're so great by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      I see, so either it's completely worthless or it's equivalent to a fully self-replicating von Neumann machine.

      Have you always been this stupid?

    2. Re:If they're so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only after reading your post. It's 1300$. 1300$. You can get FAR more capable devices for that price.

    3. Re:If they're so great by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      The GP claims quite explicitly that all 3D printers are "nothing but scams" because they aren't full von Neumann machines, which is stupid. Whether you can get a better deal than a Makerbot has nothing to do with that.

    4. Re:If they're so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are scams. Poor copies of Reprap, an open source project, and sold for an outrageous markup, and surrounded by hype that would make PT Barnum blush. 1300$ for something that makes wobbly pieces of crappy plastic? That's not a scam to you? Do you have any idea what kind of capable REAL machinery you can buy for 1300$? Or are you content to be Bre Pettis' bitch?

  24. Im not a father by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

    I want to be a father some day, and I think this is a reasonable way to get kids involved in Mechanics and Computer Science.

    --
    That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    1. Re:Im not a father by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      I want to be a father some day, and I think this is a reasonable way to get kids involved in Mechanics and Computer Science.

      I am sure the Mechanics and Computer Science involvement option will be reasonably priced for any kids made with this process.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  25. D&D miniatures? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Could this be a cost effective way to supplement my miniature fantasy figure collection? I suspect not, but it can't hurt to ask.

    1. Re:D&D miniatures? by artor3 · · Score: 1

      I think it could be, though the printed figures probably wouldn't be as detailed as the ones you can buy. I've often thought it would be great if artistically gifted people could share/sell 3D designs for figures that could then be printed out by the rest of us. Of course, Games Workshop would go out of business within a year.

    2. Re:D&D miniatures? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      I have often wondered if I could get into the miniature business as a hobby side project....

      The obstacles I have are time and materials. Casting a good miniature CAN be done, and even with reasonably cheap mold materials.. (RTV silicone gasket maker for high temp engines can stand up to molten bismuth, fyi, but needs reinforcement to keep from tearing ot stretching.)

      The materials costs are too prohibitive, and I don't know any dnd nerds personally, so I would have a hard time outside of something like ebay... (the only way I can get bismuth in large quantities is bismuth shot for hand loaders, and that is super expensive.)

      To use something like this to make minuatures, you will need to coat the original with silicone mold release, gently paint the original with rtv silicone gasket maker, then mold in flexible rtv silicone mold maker to give it body. Wait 36 hours, unmold the original, then melt and spincast the mold with some molten bismuth. (Melt temps are a little hotter than lead,, but is much safer chemically.)

      One miniature, start to finish, takes a week of time to do right, not counting sculpting.

      I doubt the 3d objects made with this prototype system would be strong enough to hold up to heavy use. I know the supersculpey+miniature epoxy minis I have made for fun wouldn't withstand a 3ft drop, let alone a heated pen and paper session.

      But if you want to make the original for metal cast ones, that would work great.

    3. Re:D&D miniatures? by jackbird · · Score: 1

      I looked into offering some game pieces on shapeways (not minis, just meeples and tokens for eurogames - I'm more of an inorganic modeler) and concluded that it would be very hard to offer something compelling. The materials that hold good detail come in a pretty limited range of colors, and I'm not sure how well the surface would take a coat of paint if one were printing of miniatures.

      Also, if you think GW stuff is expensive, wait till you see priced-per-cc Shapeways.

    4. Re:D&D miniatures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they could perfectly sell the plans and industrial high definition "prints".

    5. Re:D&D miniatures? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      That is what the 2-part mini epoxy putty is for. It holds tooling marks very cleanly, and sticks to pretty much any rough surface. It is intended to be used to repair out of production pewter minis that get broken from mishandling. I have used it in the past with supersculpey to make a 4inch werewolf mini for a friend of mine as a hobby project. (He still has it. Has had offers from people wanting to buy it. He did a bang up job painting it.) He just keeps it in a curio, so the weak sculpey isn't an issue.

    6. Re:D&D miniatures? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, cast metal can hold far finer detail than anything that modern 3d printers are yet capable of... exquisitely capturing the texture of fine details even at 25mm scale, like individual chain links in armor, loose strands of hair, or the rings on a figure's hand.

      GW has nothing to fear for the time being as long as people are willing to pay them for good workmanship. Existing 3d technology just can't compete yet on that front.

      In about 5 to 10 years, however.... maybe.

    7. Re:D&D miniatures? by daid303 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. It largely depends on the level of detail you want. I've been designing and printing a few props for DnD, which works great. Example: http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:11777
      (I still need to upload a few others on Thingiverse)

      But full miniatures would be hard. Maybe a dragon could be done: http://daid2.mine.nu/~daid/IMG_20110929_235158.small.jpeg (about 7cm in length)
      Or if you are in to Warhammer 40k http://daid2.mine.nu/~daid/IMG_20111007_010722.small.jpeg (5cm long)

      I'm still tweaking my machine, but I think if you print slow and make a good design, you can make miniatures that work with some sanding and a layer of paint.

    8. Re:D&D miniatures? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      GW has nothing to fear for the time being as long as people are willing to pay them for good workmanship. Existing 3d technology just can't compete yet on that front.

      In about 5 to 10 years, however.... maybe.

      Indeed, although it might be more than 5 or 10 years. I remember when inkjet printers posed no threat to film-based photographic reproduction shops.

  26. Thing Maker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid we had the Thing Maker. It is nice to see something that truly advances that concept.

  27. No it wont be by Killer+Instinct · · Score: 1

    "Could be the last toy you ever have to buy for your kids?"

    No. they'll probably want the 4D printer coming out in two years......

    --
    #include bier;
  28. Playdough? by WPIDalamar · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to playdough?

    1. Re:Playdough? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      The kids ate it all.

  29. The killer feature.... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    Would be the ability to melt down previously-created toys back into feedstock material, so that they can be re-used to create new toys.

    Otherwise, either the parents get tired of buying more toy-making plastic (at which point the toymaker machine is no longer usable), or the house fills up with endless piles of old toy-printouts as the kids experiment and refine their designs.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:The killer feature.... by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      That's why it should be powder + resin.

      Powder = "any inert and absorbant powder"
      (Like talc, which you can get in uber quantities at the dollar store in the form of discount foot powder.)

      And resin.

      The resin is going to be the expensive part of the deal there.

  30. riiight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then when puberty hits, they'll be using them to print dildos...

  31. Makerbot for kids? by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    I was thinking of buying from Makerbot and had realized my kid would probably like it more than me. Then I started to wonder what they'll do with that $10M investment - probably make a better thing-o-matic. So it seems I should wait a year or two and now there is yet another player to watch.

    On another note, has anyone tried doing this using a delta-bot instead of an xyz system?

  32. Did that a year and a half ago by dbc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Built a Makerbot Cupcake with my daughter, now age 12. We print a lot of stuff. I do robot parts. She learned the basics of Solidworks, and does doll house furniture, cookie cutters, gift boxes, and parts for robots that we build together. A 3D printer is great for kids in many ways. Since she was little, I've always told her: "The best toys are the ones you build yourself." and I'll spend much more freely on supplies at the craft store than crap from Toys-R-Us. 3D printers are just an extension of that theme.

    1. Re:Did that a year and a half ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 12-year-old that knows solidworks? You may have a rich daughter in about a decade or so...

    2. Re:Did that a year and a half ago by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Wow. Out of curiosity: how durable these objects are? Can they survive a kid?

    3. Re:Did that a year and a half ago by dbc · · Score: 1

      Depends on their design. All of our printing so far has been with ABS -- the stuff Lego is made of. Of course, there are a zillion formulations of ABS, since it is a blend of three polymers (acrylic: strong but brittle, butadiene: rubbery and adds resilience, styrene: cheap filler that doesn't screw it up to badly in modest amounts). But basically, the strength depends on the design. Bad designs don't survive. Which is actually an excellent learning experience -- I love it when my daughter has to iterate her Solidworks designs 2 or 3 times to get what she wants. Good designs are very strong.

  33. Add a Kinnect by EEPROMS · · Score: 2

    Add 2 x Microsoft Kinnects and you can not only scan the subject/item in 3D but make a copy of it and you can do all this with FOSS software.

    Imagine in 10 years you break your car wing mirror, no worries scan it in and print a new one for $2 using recycled bottles with no shipping fees.

    1. Re:Add a Kinnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine in 10 years you break your car wing mirror, no worries scan it in and print a new one for $2 using recycled bottles with no shipping fees.

      Might be more than 10... We were printing SLAs in the late 1990s, a part the size of a car wing mirror would have been about $2K, and it would have been much more brittle than the original, might work if nothing ever bumped it, but a passing bicyclist leaning on it would snap it off. Some 15 years later, you might print up a part that size for about what the mass produced one costs through the dealer parts window ($200? if you have your own printer, which runs in the 10-100K price range lately), but it still has structural deficiencies, and the stronger materials are more expensive, and require the more expensive machines to print them.

    2. Re:Add a Kinnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would beat the $400 a kilo plastic that the Origo 3D printer uses today.

  34. Okay, illuminate me by greentshirt · · Score: 1

    Explain to me the capabilities and limitations of 3d printers, relevant patent holders, and why these stories aren't front-page news? As far as I can tell, 3d-printing technology completely revolutionizes manufacturing, no?

    1. Re:Okay, illuminate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Stereolithography has been around for decades. And what do you mean "completely revolutionizes manufacturing"? Such hyperbole deserves at least a bit of clarification.

      Look, for 1/4 the price of the makerbot, you can buy this:

      http://www.ebay.com/itm/6-in1-MINI-Jigsaw-Grinder-Driller-Metal-wood-lathe-Mill-/220800591813?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3368bda7c5

      It's much more useful. And you just need to google a bit and the price can be even lower.

  35. Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who could seriously consider making a kids job of cutting up paper all over the floor automated?

  36. Because my child... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 0

    Nothing says I love you like the second hand vapor of air hardening plastic spray. Sleep Tight! I won't let any one of those horrible cigarette smokers near you my love.

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    1. Re:Because my child... by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      I've read the MSDSs, have you?

    2. Re:Because my child... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      Yup - I have, in fact by law I have to keep them for the next 30 years. Do you? Let us not pretend this is mothers milk shall we? And despite the ridiculous down mod, pretending there is no back spray from this is like pretending Easy-Bake-Ovens never make things that smell good.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  37. It's all fun and games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until some kid prints a sharp object and impales himself.

  38. The video is bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shows no results of the printer. And no workflow either.

    It presents a kid playing around with an intuos 4 magically gifted with a screen, wirelessly connected to nothing. Intuos4 tablets lack a screen, and when connected connected to nothing, they DO nothing. They don't even have a power source.

    I don't know if this is a "how it could be" video or what, but what it shows, is false. If I gave this people money, what the video shows would still be impossible.

  39. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get a reprap mendel for $500. It has a much larger build volume and it's cheaper.

  40. Build your own 3d printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With about 6 years development behind it the RepRap is a self-replicating 3d printer that has it's design released under GPL.
    Checkout reprap.org to get instructions.

  41. I want it NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Origo printer creates it in an hour or so". Kids have to wait an HOUR?!

  42. 10 Year Olds Looking Up Naughty Dictionary Words by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Will be replaced by 10 year olds using up Dad's entire 3D printer cartridge in a single afternoon to print dildos.

  43. Garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if it's the last toy I ever have to buy for my kids, but I do know that it'll be the last thing needed to insure that the planet's landfills will swell to bursting with 3D "coasters" that'll be here long after the human race is extinct.

  44. Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I’ll be as big as three Xbox 360s and as expensive as three Xbox 360s.

    Worst. Marketing. Ever.

  45. Let's make a deal... by rts008 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they will take my kids as trade-ins?

    "Get in the car, kids. We're going to town now!"

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  46. Disney in a Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else reminded of the "Disney in a Box" 3d printer from Cory Doctorow's book Makers?

  47. Or just one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinects don't play well together because of their projected pattern. Just use one.

  48. short attention span by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

    It says it takes an hour to print something. I doubt most kids would wait that long

    1. Re:short attention span by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      It says it takes an hour to print something. I doubt most kids would wait that long

      Add a DVD player and a a Beany & Cecil DVD and the time will fly by. Ya-Ah-Ah.or is it Eeeeee?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  49. Why do kids need a device to make things? by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    What happened to:

      - knotting / macrame --- a few lengths of small stuff, some beads (which can easily be whittled, see below) and one can make all sorts of things --- http://www.amazon.com/Ashley-Book-Knots-Clifford-W/dp/0385040253
      - whittling / carving / carpentry --- I used to make all manner of things w/a pocket knife (and saws, planes and drills from my father's tool box) when I was a kid --- http://www.amazon.com/Carving-Kids-Robin-Edward-Trudel/dp/1933502029 / http://www.amazon.com/Carpentry-Children-Lester-R-Walker/dp/0879519908
      - making ceramic pots and other items --- I built a small kiln in the backyard so that I could fire the things which I made of a natural clay deposit in the field next to my house --- modern materials like Sculpey mean that one needs nothing more than a toaster oven (if that, some are air-drying)
      - solutions &c. for basic chemistry --- made black powder using saltpeter collected from under the cow manure in local farmer's fields, sulfur from sulfur candles purchased at a local store and charcoal which I made in the afore-mentioned kiln --- http://chemistry.about.com/library/goldenchem.pdf
      - basic metalworking --- used to grind basic tools --- a teacher actually took one of my screwdrivers, heat treated it (and kept it ::grr::) --- still furious w/ my father that he sold his anvil. Next project at home is a lathe (since it's the one tool in a metal shop which can reproduce itself and be used to make other tools: http://www.backyardmetalcasting.com/lathe1.html / http://www.amazon.com/Charcoal-Foundry-Build-Metal-Working/dp/1878087002/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1318508452&sr=8-2 )

    That kids don't do these things is a arguably a big part of why manufacturing jobs are going overseas.

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  50. Could be the last toy you ever have to buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope because no doubt some scumbag will simply say it has to print these approved designs and each one costs $5!

    Just like dealers, the first hit's free, the rest and the good stuff is gonna cost ya!

  51. Dude by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  52. economic payout (was Re:Add a Kinnect) by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    We'll know that these things make economic sense when car companies start purchasing them, placing them in every dealer's service department, and instead of shipping a replacement part to the dealership, the dealer will download the CAD file for the part, and 3D print it (loading the 3D printer w/ the right pigments to match the customer's car).

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  53. there is no prototype by toxonix · · Score: 1

    This is just a concept, which the 'inventor' is trying to sell before any prototype exists. This came up about a month ago on BoingBoing or something. It's not a bad idea, but it's just an idea: a 3D printer ----- for kids!

  54. It'll remove your upper lip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently the kid on the right got caught in the machine, seared her upper lip right off

  55. Re:10 Year Olds Looking Up Naughty Dictionary Word by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

    Meh. It will save on cheap plastic/foam sword expenses ... and the home blackmail videos that you can show to their future significant others will be much more entertaining.