Slashdot Mirror


OpenOffice Is Dying (And IBM Won't Help)

jfruhlinger writes "OpenOffice.org, now separate both from corporate sponsor Oracle and the Document Foundation's LibreOffice, is in trouble, with its team putting out a dramatic press release detailing the organization's trouble. One missing player in all this is IBM, who has backed OpenOffice.org in the past. One possible reason for Big Blue's silence is that it might be a prelude to the killing of Lotus Symphony, its OpenOffice-based suite." The Apache Software Foundation, on the other hand, insists OpenOffice.org is not at risk.

5 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. Dropping Lotus Symphony? Says who? by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This article links to another article whose authour is just SPECULATING that IBM may be dropping Lotus Symphony. I can find no evidence that IBM has said any such thing, nor can I even find any leaked information to support this.

    Conclusion? Yet another unsubstantiated blog post promoted to the front page of Slashdot with no fact checking. And people wonder why the readership of /. is in decline....

  2. Conflating two different organizations by Palestrina · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article is conflating the Team OpenOffice, e.V. non profit with the OpenOffice.org open source project.

    Team OpenOffice, e.V, was the fundraising arm of the OpenOffice.org project, set up as a non profit so they could legally raise funds for things like conferences. It was always independent of the open source project.

    The OpenOffice.org open source project, the code, the trademarks, the domain name and the website, have moved to Apache, where work continues: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/

    It looks like the Team OpenOffice, e.V. guys are publishing alarmist material in order to raise money. That is a standard fundraising technique. What about the children, the baby seals, the environment? Who will save them now that the big bad oil companies/loggers/tech corporations that are out to get them. Send money now or the kitten dies.

  3. Re:So? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The first thing that LibreOffice did was import all of Novell's patches that OpenOffice rejected because of their dubious legal status (they were written with documentation provided by Microsoft under their patent agreement with Novell). So it has better support for a lot of MS Office things than OO.o.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Re:Ah. Ok. by RogerWilco · · Score: 4, Informative

    My main problem with OpenOffice dying, and continued development on LibreOffice, is that it took years to get the name of OpenOffice recognized and somewhat widely used. With LibreOffice you throw that brand recognition away, which will make it a much more niche product.

    --
    RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  5. Re:So? by Dynetrekk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually Fortran is alive and well and still has no real rivals in the high performance computing scene.