Slashdot Mirror


LibreOffice Going Online and Mobile

itwbennett writes "News from the LibreOffice Conference in Paris is trickling out. Blogger Brian Proffitt has a roundup of the conference announcements thus far. Notably included are plans for a browser-based version of LibreOffice called LibreOffice Online; and ports of LibreOffice to the Android and iOS platforms."

114 comments

  1. Or... by soupbowl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Or they could just make the desktop version not suck and do something about its terrible interface.

    1. Re:Or... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you tried it recently? It's really very good.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no.

    3. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true. I begrudgingly use LibreOffice. Challenging interface. Not a big fan of the random bugs. With the last two versions I used, clicking "Print preview" guarantees a crash. It's very unfortunate. I try to live with hope.

    4. Re:Or... by westyvw · · Score: 2

      I havent had any problem with it. I use it at home exclusively, but I also use it at work when MS Office can't do the job. Just the other day I started writing a VB script for Excel (office version 10) got halfway through and remembered that the functionality I wanted was in Calc by default. But crashes? I just dont have them, could be I only use Linux versions.

    5. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you wish.

    6. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, it really needs a ribbon thing so that one can hide all the menu items behind huge icons and 'mouse over' moves. It is important to have huge icons, since people who use a word processor obviously cannot read and therefore cannot use menus...

    7. Re:Or... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Challenging interface.

      Right. The Open/LibreOffice developers have gone to some trouble to make their suite pretty much idiot-proof. But I guess the trouble, as they say, with that is that idiots are becoming so ingenious... :-|

    8. Re:Or... by Ihmhi · · Score: 2

      This is true. I begrudgingly use $PROGRAM. Challenging interface. Not a big fan of the random bugs. With the last two versions I used, $USING_FEATURE_X guarantees a crash. It's very unfortunate. I try to live with hope.

      Look everyone, it's standard boilerplate to talk about any piece of FOSS you want!

    9. Re:Or... by MrNthDegree · · Score: 1

      This is true. I begrudgingly use Windows. Challenging interface. Not a big fan of the random bugs. With the last two versions I used, using any of my old hardware guarantees a crash. It's very unfortunate. I try to live with hope.

    10. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say it needs huge icons, but the icons in LibreOffice seem to be a step backwards from those used in the OpenOffice which it forked from. As a person with a background in graphics, I'll just say that they're more ambiguous in appearance and don't "read" well. Small icons are fine if it's pretty easy to tell them apart and make sense of them at first glimpse without waiting for a tooltip to tell you what they are.

      Not that it's anything that couldn't be fixed by something like user themes and re-skinning. But I really haven't dug in to see if the program supports such features. (I have seen such features implemented in other FOSS projects and stuff like browsers, so it's not too far-fetched to consider in terms of features relating to improved usability from a UI perspective.)

    11. Re:Or... by Teun · · Score: 2
      Hmm, crashing on print preview?

      Out of curiosity I just tried on the last two versions but sorry to spoil your rant, no crashes.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    12. Re:Or... by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen any bugs in the Windows version, on the other hand it loads a bit slow, and the scripting API is just horribly convoluted, and underdocumented.

    13. Re:Or... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Yes, i second the call for a skinnable interface...
      Some people prefer the current interface, some prefer the ms2k7 style ribbon etc. You can't suit everyone with the defaults, so make the interface flexible, let users choose the skin and provide a handful of sensible defaults to choose from.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    14. Re:Or... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      I've had OpenOffice crash on me with two (I think) different documents, both written in Word for Mac. Both documents also crashed Word 2003 for Windows. Perfect compatibility with a rubbish document format aside, it's been very stable.

    15. Re:Or... by lastx33 · · Score: 2

      You can change the icons quite easily and there are a number of sets available online. To change the icon set go to Tools>Options>View and you will see an option for Icon Size and Style. Select a style from the drop down menu. BTW I find the LibreOffice interface infinitely preferable to the mess that MS Office now uses. I used to be a fan of MS Office and thought it was their best product but switched OpenOffice long ago after having suffered more and more bugs and the interface becoming more convoluted and less productive. Having switched again to LibreOffice I have found the improvements over OOo very well executed and had no bug problems. The project seems to be moving along nicely and MS Office file support is excellent.

      --
      "You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead!" - Stan Laurel
    16. Re:Or... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I have and its stil sloooooooooow as hell. While I give it out on new builds simply because its "free as in beer" after trying to use it for a month it pissed me off enough I went ahead and loaded the MS Office 2K7 I had sitting in a drawer, although honestly I have yet to see any version beat my beloved Office 2K. That to me was the best version ever,light and nimble. I have that one loaded onto my netbook as its light weight saves battery life.

      I'm sorry but while LO has many things going for it lightweight and nimble ain't among them. I don't blame the LO guys though, they've only had a year and we are talking some seriously NASTY code. Has anyone here looked at the OO.o code? I have, wow talk about a big bloated mess! The LO guys probably need to chunk a good portion of it and go modular to fix the bloat, and that will take time. I say give them another year to two years and see where they are then. By that time we should know whether they are gonna be able to pull it off.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    17. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open Office and Libre Office are slow - very slow - and not dependable. Occasional format headaches (with Microsoft Office) is a given. These are great for the correct market - people who dont use Office suites often. But for the mainstream - these are as useful as Linux desktops are. In the US - find me a LO or Open office user - and I will show you someone who is irrational.

    18. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with the interface? It's a lot better than recent versions of ms-office, IMO.

      I'm fine with the LibreOffice interface, I just wish LibreOffice were faster.

    19. Re:Or... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      Writer opens in less than a second on my very ordinary Dell laptop.

      Maybe you should look at fixing your computer.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    20. Re:Or... by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      Writer opens in less than a second on my very ordinary Dell laptop.

      Maybe you should look at fixing your computer.

      I second that. It opens up faster than Office '08 on my several year old MacBook in OS X and similarly fast in Ubuntu. There are no performance issues while it runs. Of all the OpenOffice variants I have installed - OOo, Symphony, KOffice, LibreOffice, and NeoOffice - Libre runs the best.

      Like the parent I would prefer them to focus on the desktop version but that's mainly because I have no interest in a mobile version. Having said that, I can understand why having a mobile version may be important for the community. The big hurdle with LibreOffice is getting businesses to accept it. Having a mobile version is a bullet point that some suits may care about despite the fact they may never use it. So it's probably a worthwhile endeavor.

      As far as a word processor, LibreOffice is there. It's good enough. Once the spreadsheet and presentation parts can match the quality of the word processor (i.e. good enough to replace MS Office), MS Office will be on the way out.

      Oops, I kind of went off topic there: If your computer can't run LibreOffice smoothly, it's your computer. It's either time to get rid of the malware or upgrade.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  2. LibreOffice Online... by Zibodiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would that be hosted with cloud storage? If not, I'm not sure what the benefit would be. If it will be, then who will be carrying the tab?

    1. Re:LibreOffice Online... by gman003 · · Score: 1

      If it's GPL, you can always just host it on your own server. Or maybe just run it on localhost - being run in a browser solves most of your platform-compatibility issues (assuming you don't give a shit about IE).

    2. Re:LibreOffice Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be hosted with cloud storage? If not, I'm not sure what the benefit would be. If it will be, then who will be carrying the tab?

      they could always sync it with google docs, you can do that now with a plug-in

    3. Re:LibreOffice Online... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I missed that, I'll have to give that a whirl. I assume this is the one you mean: http://code.google.com/p/ooo2gd/

    4. Re:LibreOffice Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be tied to Dropbox or any other cloud provider.

    5. Re:LibreOffice Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not true. With the GPL, you don't have any rights or access to the source code unless they distribute something to you. With a website, you may use the software, but there is no distribution. They need to release it under a truly FREE license (such as the AGPL) so that everyone will have access to the source code without distribution.

    6. Re:LibreOffice Online... by TechLA · · Score: 1

      That's bullshit. There's many open source software, especially security and crypto stuff, that only has open source client but they've never given away the server software. And it's fully within GPL license.

    7. Re:LibreOffice Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiight... because all the people working on LibreOffice would start development on a web version with no intention of distribution, donating their time and effort to a closed, hosted-only product.

      I'm gunna go out on a limb and guess you're being a little too paranoid. Even for slashdot.

    8. Re:LibreOffice Online... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      That's bullshit. There's many open source software, especially security and crypto stuff, that only has open source client but they've never given away the server software. And it's fully within GPL license.

      All true, but one would hope that the people behind LibreOffice would release the server-side code under some form of OS license.

      A good open-source online/collaborative office suite that let people run their own servers could be really, really useful - and addresses one of the main worries (Google Can Haz Ur Data) about cloud computing.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    9. Re:LibreOffice Online... by ciantic · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about cloud service providers at this stage when the product doesn't even exist. Taken the fact how sucky the existing commercial office suites are it might be a while until it works... They should first develop it so that everyone can run it like in own servers etc?

      When it works (in words real meaning) there will be no shortage of cloud service providers, I'm sure.

    10. Re:LibreOffice Online... by g4b · · Score: 1

      I think you all are missing the point here.

      You fear they do it to serve a closed version as a service. I don't see that scenario. Why? it is too expensive.

      What you see there is LO binary running on a server transmitting its looks through an engine which uses GTK internal redraws to transmit the changes to a client with websockets, which in turn has a canvas capturing input and an engine which knows how to draw the deltas into place. Funny nobody yet thought of doing that with VNC.

      Imagine a service where everybody can start any amount of instances of this software (for free) on your servers as a successful business solution.

      There is none. Because with all respect, You will need to have to run the whole thing on your server still.
      So, while using the software to power some lucrative services for the company, releasing the source is even better on the long run.

      This is a very nice hack, however, and would be a nice add-on, but it is no mass solution for the "office online public $$$" service. and i think suse/novell knows that very well. Also, the techniques they are using are afaik open, too.

    11. Re:LibreOffice Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's the GTK drawing going to work with non-Linux operating systems like Windows?

    12. Re:LibreOffice Online... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Simple, to make money. That isn't a dirty word folks. They can make money hosting services for companies that don't want run their own infrastructure. No different than all the ISPs around the planet that sell web hosting and entire websites that run on Apache, Linux, PHP, Perl and so on.
      That can support paying programers to make the software better. If they make the software available to under GPL as well so people can host it locally then no one has any room to complain about the concept.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:LibreOffice Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a prototype but it only really shows off what GTK Broadway can do. Any users that actually wanted this functionality would more likely use something VNC.

    14. Re:LibreOffice Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny nobody yet thought of doing that with VNC.

      butbutbut !: http://kanaka.github.com/noVNC/screenshots.html

    15. Re:LibreOffice Online... by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      Bimbo Newton Crosby, because if they are using GTK its already fucked as it won't work on Windows without installing the GTK crap which means NO libraries, NO schools, NO offices, NO places where users aren't allowed to run as admin and install whatever they want.

      If they are using GTK (haven't looked at the roadmap so I don't know for sure) then I label this epic fail and a waste of time. the whole point of web based is that it will work with any modern browser and THAT'S IT. If I have to install a bunch of crap to make it work? Its not web based, its just bullshit.

      Make it to where it works in a browser that has standard features like Firefox/Opera/Chrome (not counting IE as those guys tend to be pretty far behind the curve and when they do implement its the "IE version" that rarely works 100% correctly) and THEN you'll have something worth noting. But nobody is gonna let users just dump GTK on everything just so LO web edition will work. Sorry but that is just a bad idea and a hack way to do it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    16. Re:LibreOffice Online... by arielCo · · Score: 1

      (Libre|Open)Office is well known to be a bit heavy for most office PCs. I'd be quite happy to move that load to a medium-sized server of my own, with the benefits that derive from shared libraries loaded once for all instances/threads, and that CPU load in a office app is impulsive so a few cores can serve a large number of seats.

      OTOH, I expect to lose some functionality in areas such as graphs, at least in not-quite-HTML5-compliant browsers. * looks at IE9 >_> *

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    17. Re:LibreOffice Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you reed the article? (I suppose this is slashdot so the answer is obvious...)
      GTK has an output method that allows it to write to a HTML canvas over the web, rather than to the normal windowing system, so yes they are using GTK on the server but that still does not mean you need it installed on your client machine. personally I prefer the portable apps version when I do have to use windows, but this works on anything with a new web browser.

    18. Re:LibreOffice Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is too heavy for office PC maybe it is time for that company to upgrade. It isn't to heavy for my shitty single core Atom-based netbook, so it shouldn't be to heavy for most office PCs.

  3. Improved visibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Libreoffice is ported to Android, then it will become more visible. This will help Libreoffice step out of Openoffices shadow.

    1. Re:Improved visibility by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I'd be surprised if it happens anytime soon. Libreoffice is still a fairly hefty download, and space on hand helds is still somewhat limited.

    2. Re:Improved visibility by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      It is indeed pretty hefty (as is any office suite), but I imagine it would most likely be pared down for handheld use. I find it hard to even imagine anyone trying to use the more complex features in any meaningful way on a phone, or possibly even on a tablet device. But a decent document viewer is definitely much needed.

    3. Re:Improved visibility by deniable · · Score: 1

      If they pare it down for mobiles, I'd love to see it built back up from that for a desktop version. Same base build with extra modules. Done right, it should address a lot of the speed / size concerns.

    4. Re:Improved visibility by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      not really my tablet has 8gb of flash with around 6.3 GB free to use as you wish + another 8gb mini sd
      my netbook has an 8gb sdd and i run libre office on that everyday. The bigger question would be how much ram is needed/ available to run libre office.

  4. This by TennCasey · · Score: 2

    This is exactly what they need. Otherwise, Google Docs and Office 365 might end up making LibreOffice irrelevent.

  5. Make it functionally complete! by unixisc · · Score: 0

    It's port needs to be on par, if not directly file compatible w/ Excel and other Office programs. In other words, one should be able to do on their spreadsheet exactly what one can do in Excel - formulas, pivot tables, autofills and so on. Similarly, in their presentation programs, one should be able to make good use of special effects. An Access like database in the package would also be good.

    It's not always just the license it's under, or merely the ports that exist

    1. Re:Make it functionally complete! by MrNthDegree · · Score: 2

      Which LibreOffice has had since day one. Even Base has an Access-like database.

      I can't see why that wouldn't be in the port.

    2. Re:Make it functionally complete! by bogaboga · · Score: 2

      'Functionally complete' as a goal is a good end in itself...but equally important is the fact that it must be a pleasure to use by first being a pleasure to look at.

      I haven't looked at the latest version but my memory of earlier ones planted a bias in look and feel that will be hard to erase. On Windows XP, the 'beast' took forever to load and once it did, you wouldn't admire its interface.

      An Access-like module actually exists but is very clunky to the extent of being unsealable. These folks should borrow a leaf from Microsoft, where the entire office suite, even with its bugs works 'flawlessly' 99% of the time for 99% of users.

    3. Re:Make it functionally complete! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      List of missing features:
      * Pivot tables in Cals
      * Polynomial regression in Calc
      * Importing formulas reliably from Word
      * Exporting formulas reliably to word

    4. Re:Make it functionally complete! by Rastor · · Score: 1

      Have you even used it?

      LibreOffice has had pivot tables since day one, they call the feature DataPilot. And you can do a polynomial regression with the LINEST function. And the import/export gets better with every release.

    5. Re:Make it functionally complete! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      equally important is the fact that it must be a pleasure to use by first being a pleasure to look at.

      Bull... shit...

      When contractors are shopping for tools, they don't buy the one that's pretty, they buy the one that fucking works the best. Asthetics be dammed.

      Give me black and white icons, I don't care. Mac OS was beloved with its primitive scheme for years. Put me in front of a Windows 7 system, and Office 2007 with it's god-dammed awful ribbon that makes it hard to do the basics, and impossible to do anything remotely advanced, and I'll throw the fucking thing out the window, no matter how pretty it might be.

      Worst of all, I think there are a number of people that bought the same feaux Jobsian bullship mantra as you, which is why Gnome and Kde are slashing and burning their base, and XFce grows in popularity despite absolutely never improving in any way... (in fact XFce3 was better all-around).

      Hell, I'd switch back to text-mode if the text-only apps were developing a bit better (links is dead and rotting).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  6. It's not me it's you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    sorry to others but OO did suck, and unusable for instance when setting up the margins your told to use that styles thingy which has never laid out the header correctly and never will. I have visited this open office on and off for years and they never fixed such a simple thing that has kept an untold number of students from working with it. if the school says the lay out the paper a certain way that is what you do otherwise you no grade

    1. Re:It's not me it's you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to say but Libreoffice with Zotero plugin handles all my chem paper requirements (post grad ) so its probably more attributable to pebkac.

    2. Re:It's not me it's you. by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Is this an attempt at making a false argument irrefutable through poor grammar?

    3. Re:It's not me it's you. by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      I can has kitty cats.

  7. About time by gaelfx · · Score: 1

    It's about time we get a real document app for mobiles. I'm surprised it took them this long to announce it, but I guess they've been busy with all the other drama. I hope the web version allows collaborative document creation/editing as well, otherwise, I don't really see the point of pursuing BOTH of these projects.

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MS Office in Windows Phones is an impressive Office Suite for Mobile.

    2. Re:About time by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      No it's not.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    3. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, bitch. Nobody gives a fuck what a part switcher like you thinks. Go back to fucking little old ladies out of their social security checks with your "system optimizer" services bullshit.

    4. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mental image of you is a fat greasy 5' 5" tall troll-esque greasy piece of shit sitting in his "man cave" in his droopy shit-stained drawers wacking it to hentai porn with a 10 year old 21 inch monitor with cigarette ashes everwhere. When you're done, you probably beat your wife/girlfriend/boyfriend and steal 20 dollars out of his/her purse to go sit at the corner store in your piece of shit Hyundai waiting for your crack dealer to come sell you a rock. When you get back home after smoking the rock in your car, you plop your fat ass back down in front of the computer to troll some more and yell at your wife/whatever telling her to bring your dinner of microwave hotwings. When she brings it, you grope her banana titties and she shies away (who wouldn't), you get offended and slap her. Then she runs off and cries while you eat your nasty ass chicken and lick your little pointy fingers not giving a shit how she feels. Then you probably play some Everquest since you have multiple level 80 characters and "6 box". This fulfills you as you have no real friends but you "Da Man" in a raid with 6 characters, amiright? Fucking piece of shit motherfucker. How far off am I?

    5. Re:About time by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Nice answer fucknuts, no proof, not even any experience with the product, just "nu uh!".

      Sigh...

      I own an HD7. Office on it is just another cut down mobile Office-a-like that has a small fraction of the features of its desktop counterpart. Editing documents on it is torture on a tiny screen, you can't even switch fonts. Nobody cared about Office on Windows Mobile judging by its dismal performance in the marketplace and it's not a compelling selling point on wp7 because if it was, the damned things would be selling. In short, nobody cares about Office anywhere except on their desktops. Next.

      Now let us see what he is AFRAID TO SHOW YOU because it is the TRUTH. The CORRECT quote is "As far as the user is concerned there is NO CLI in windows"

      As far as the user is concerned, there's not a lot of things in a lot of things. Newsflash: advanced functionality is for advanced users. Duh. All you are illustrating is the typical Windows user is clueless about the features embedded in their OS of choice. They probably don't know much about "Administrative Tools" either. But for advanced uses, like, oh, I don't know, Goup Policy editing, it is a must. So, to follow your logic, there is no such thing as "Group Policy Editor" in Windows. You are a myopic trollish fool.

      Linux? Puts the terminal on the desktop

      You are a fucking liar. Ubuntu which is the distro in use by half of Linux desktop users does not put anything on the desktop. To access the terminal, you have make multiple clicks through the menu. It is well hidden. So not only are you a troll but you are an ignorant liar.

      walk up to 100 people in the street and ask them "How do you call up command line in Windows" and you know what you are gonna get? "Whats a command line"

      Why don't you do that? Because you are talking completely out of your ass? Thought so. Think about it, if you can. Out of the total population of Windows users, a certain percentage is going to know what the command prompt is. What percentage that is, I don't know but I guarantee you it is above zero. And you know it. So not only are you ignorant and a liar but you are also intellectually dishonest.

      I don't want to blow your teeny tiny little pea brain but let's put the situation another way since you are so fond of "statistics". By definition, more technically literate people are going to be using Ubuntu because it takes a willful choice to install it on your hardware in the first place. So, we are already talking about people with above average aptitude with computers. What percentage of the pop uses Linux? About 1-2 percent depending on who you ask. What percentage of people can probably tell you what the command prompt is on windows? Probably the same 1-2 percent. Think about it, simpleton.

      if your driver model isn't shit then why does Dell have to run their own repos

      The same reason they have their own support area where you can download their drivers for hardware running Windows. And that driver model that you call "shit" --as if a pathetic piece of shit like you could even begin to recognize driver code if it slapped you in the face-- is the reason the Linux kernel runs on everything from embedded gumstick sized arm boards all the way up to supercomputers and everything in between. It's called portability, stupid. It's the reason Google chose to keep Dalvik for Android. So that I can install Android on my netbook and actually use the apps. One of the main reasons the Linux kernel is so portable and fills so many niches is because many of the drivers are in the kernel and can be compiled right along with it. So my USB 3G dongle that works on my x86 laptop also works on my Asus Transformer. Thank you, Linus Torvalds. Fuck you bassbeast.

      How about how a decade old Windows beat the shit out of Linux on netbooks or how ASUS

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  8. LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by the_other_chewey · · Score: 3, Funny

    "LibreOffice Online"... seriously? LOO?

    I assume it will be accessed via a series of pipes?

    1. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by MrNthDegree · · Score: 1

      LibreOffice.org

      Now we go full circle ;)

    2. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by ukemike · · Score: 0

      Why make fun of the acronym? The name itself sucks even more. Is it Lee-bray Office or Lee-burr Office? One is the sound a donkey makes, the other is what gets stuck in your socks when you walk through a bunch of weeds . At least when I told people to try Open Office I didn't have to apologize for the name.

      --
      -- QED
    3. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by Teun · · Score: 1
      When that's your opinion on the name LibreOffice then you suffer a serious lack of culture and language skills.

      English inherited even more than other European languages words and expressions from Latin and Libre is a widely understood example of such.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a LibreOffice Lite version for embedded use? LOL

    5. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      Lee-bruh

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    6. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      When that's your opinion on the name LibreOffice then you suffer a serious lack of culture and language skills.

      Sadly, when choosing a name for a product, if you want success you have to win the hearts and minds of people with small hearts and even smaller minds. Intellectually, Software Libre is a much better term than "Free Software" but out in the real world, "FreeOffice" would probably shift more copies than "LibreOffice".

      ...and its important to remember that, whether software is Free-as-in-speech or Free-as-in-beer, if you want impact you still have to market it as if it cost money.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    7. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      "Where did you put that TPS report?"

      "It's in the LOO!"

      Reminds me of the time when we were naming our servers after planets, and I made the mistake of naming a file server Uranus. The jokes were going on for months.

    8. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by Megane · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for LuchaLibreOffice Online. Or would that be LuchaOfficeLibre?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by ukemike · · Score: 1

      Well perhaps your high and mighty superiority complex needs a nice lecture on the history of the english language. How it has a few remnants of p-celt but is mostly a flavor of German that was brought to the island by the Angles and the Saxons during the 6th century. Much later, after the Norman invasion when most of the nobility was French speaking lots of new words were introduced into the language. This explains why we have two words for most sorts of meat (sheep/mutton cows/beef etc) and it also explains why so many words don't follow easy to learn spelling rules of thumb. We have elements of Germanic and Romance languages which are fairly different branches of the indo-european language family tree. English has certainly NOT inherited a disproportionate amount of Latin. French, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese are almost all Latin in origin. English gets almost all of it's Latin through the French. Though to be fair we do have more Latin bits than German, Dutch, and the Scandinavian languages. But so much for the highly simplified history of the language. The fact that Libre means free and comes from Latin (ooh it's Latin it's sooo sophisticated) is fine and is well understood by all but the most uneducated, but it doesn't change my opinion that the name is clunky and utterly fails to have a nice ring to it. It's exactly the sort of name that a committee of programers would come up with. So perhaps if you pulled your head out of your highly cultured ass you might realize that I was expressing my opinion that has nothing to do with etymology and everything to do with my opinion that the name sounds like crap.

      --
      -- QED
    10. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by Teun · · Score: 1
      I respect your opinion that Libre has a negative ring to you.

      But your writing doesn't match etymological facts. Of the languages based on Germanic grammar the English has with in excess of 50% by a good margin incorporated the most vocabulary of Latin origin.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    11. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet is, after all, a series of tubes.

    12. Re:LibreOffice Online - now with free seats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will it be paperless?

  9. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOW I am convinced that I should be using libreoffice, not openoffice.

  10. Are you serious?? by jampola · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have recently moved 50 computers from Windows to Linux here in Thailand and the most comments I get related to the move is how much better Libreoffice is than MSO 2k7. This might have something to do with a far more simplistic interface than what 2k7 has and also the brilliant Thai translation for LO. Apart from the odd formatting issues when sharing documents between Libreoffice and MS office (usually font mismatches), it has been a successful move. I would welcome an open source mobile version of Libreoffice to use on my Galaxy Tab and Android phone.

  11. I love LibreOffice by ihasdiggs · · Score: 0

    I am a big fan of open source software

    1. Re:I love LibreOffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you have against people who suck geek cock? Are you just jealous that it isn't yours beings sucked?

  12. What's the competition? by itsdapead · · Score: 2

    I've used both MS Office and Open/Neo Office - and my impression is that OO was about as annoying as Microsoft Office (pre-ribbon).

    I think the introduction of the abomination that is the Office Ribbon has left it ahead of the game (OK, some people like the ribbon, but then I know one person who liked Windows Vista, and another who liked the Apple hockey-puck mouse...)

    One possible criticism of OO/LO is that the style system, though flexible, can be a bit hard to get your head around. OTOH, there again MS have been happily screwing up the style system in Word to the point where it is now pretty unusable.

    So, what's the easy-to-use but flexible opposition that LibreOffice should be competing with?

    I'll concede the point that LaTeX/LyX is probably still king for technical writing, and that there are other products aimed at people writing "pure text" - but what is a good role-model in the realm of general purpose WP/DTP-crossover?

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    1. Re:What's the competition? by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      So, what's the easy-to-use but flexible opposition that LibreOffice should be competing with?

      I'll concede the point that LaTeX/LyX is probably still king for technical writing, and that there are other products aimed at people writing "pure text" - but what is a good role-model in the realm of general purpose WP/DTP-crossover?

      LaTeX/LyX is a nice project, but 'king for technical writing'? Technical writing generally means user guides and other product manuals, and LaTeX is a niche player at best in that market. FrameMaker is popular, and content management systems like AuthorIT are gaining traction. This market is all about reuse of content, and LaTeX doesn't offer that, as far as I know. LaTeX is aimed more at academic publishing.

      For a good role model WP/DTP package, look no further than FrameMaker:

      • Proper support for styles, but still accepts style overrides if need be.
      • A good combination of DTP (flexible page layout) and automation options for formatting.
      • Stability (no crashing when the document gets large).
      • A properly documented readable-text file format (MIF) that is the exact equivalent of its default binary file format.
      • Formatting that changes only when YOU want it to (Word bullets and numbering, I'm looking at you).
      • Templates that actually work (allowing you to copy styles from one document to another).
      • Exports to everything.
    2. Re:What's the competition? by ksd1337 · · Score: 2

      LaTeX/LyX is a nice project, but 'king for technical writing'? Technical writing generally means user guides and other product manuals, and LaTeX is a niche player at best in that market.

      Several publishers produce technical and user manuals with LaTeX.

    3. Re:What's the competition? by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Interesting. In about 13 years in the industry I've never come across a client who used it. Then again, most of our clients do very small print runs (all the way down to custom manuals for every individual machine) for large numbers of related machines. That's when you need reuse facilities.

    4. Re:What's the competition? by Dynetrekk · · Score: 1

      LaTeX/LyX is a nice project, but 'king for technical writing'? Technical writing generally means user guides and other product manuals, and LaTeX is a niche player at best in that market. FrameMaker is popular, and content management systems like AuthorIT are gaining traction. This market is all about reuse of content, and LaTeX doesn't offer that, as far as I know. LaTeX is aimed more at academic publishing.

      It may be true that LaTeX is more used in academic publishing, but how is LaTeX not about reuse of content? Define your own commands to write similar equations, easily and portably generate documents from a simple script or program, \include{subdocument}, and a thousand other ways of reuse content makes LaTeX the working environment which allows the MOST reuse, as far as I can tell. Auto-generation of all sorts of references, an index, and so forth also reduces manual labor to an extent I have never seen Word (or whatever) even approach. Please, do correct me if I am wrong, because if something exists that is even better than LaTeX, I'll want to know!

    5. Re:What's the competition? by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Is \include{subdocument} workable when that subdocument is one paragraph long and you have 1000 subdocuments in your book?

      In FrameMaker, you have 'conditional text' which allows you to tag text with a condition. During publishing, you select the conditions you want shown or hidden. This allows you to have one master document to describe a series of related machines (or what have you). All WYSIWYG. Autogeneration of all sorts of lists, and a scripting language are available.

      AuthorIT and other document management systems use a database. Each of your text fragments (a section or part of a section, down to a single sentence if you want) is a record in a database, and the system allows you to string these together arbitrarily.
      AuthorIT can output XML which allows for extensive postprocessing.

      The problem I see with \include{subdocument} is that you're relying on the file system to manage your subdocuments. You can open the subdocs as separate files, but the system doesn't organize them for you on-screen, which makes it more difficult to see them in context.

    6. Re:What's the competition? by Dynetrekk · · Score: 1

      Is \include{subdocument} workable when that subdocument is one paragraph long and you have 1000 subdocuments in your book?

      I've never tried, but why shouldn't it? LaTeX is a compiler; surely a project of 1000 files could be compiled. Also, there are other ways, such as defining 1000 macros in a single file.

      In FrameMaker, you have 'conditional text' which allows you to tag text with a condition. During publishing, you select the conditions you want shown or hidden. This allows you to have one master document to describe a series of related machines (or what have you). All WYSIWYG. Autogeneration of all sorts of lists, and a scripting language are available.

      WYSIWYG is a downside IMHO. The UNIX philosophy says "use text, it is a general interface". Also, you can have conditionals in LaTeX code. Oh well, people and their preferences differ, so secretaries probably disagree with me. Of course you could chuck text strings in a database if you wanted to avoid files in a filesystem, too. Heck, you can probably even awk | grep | sed | latex, if you want to - as I said, text is universal, there's a million ways of working with it.

    7. Re:What's the competition? by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      WYSIWYG is a downside IMHO. The UNIX philosophy says "use text, it is a general interface".

      It's a general interface, but it's also one that doesn't use a large chunk of the available bandwidth of your information channel (a bitmapped display). Text that use visual cues to convey formatting information is more readable than text that uses [emphasis]textual[/emphasis] cues to convey the same information.
      WYSIWYG has a bad name because of the likes of Word, where formatting is just that: formatting. In FrameMaker and AuthorIT, each paragraph is assigned a functional tag. That tag is visualized using text formatting but it is independent of that formatting: with a single command you can assign new formatting. This isn't much different to what LyX does.

      The main difference between LaTeX and FM/AIT is context: As far as I understand, LaTeX uses a programming approach where you call subdocuments in the same way you can call a subroutine. That works well for subroutines where you only need to know about the input, function and output of the subroutine to use it.
      For text I prefer having the subroutine expand in place so I can see it in context (vital for a manual that has to have a consistent text flow). Unlike a subroutine, the exact wording of a subdocument is important and I'd rather not have to find and open the subdocument manually.

  13. LibreOffice Online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LibreOffice Online is a bit misleading, the article is just talking about a prototype that uses the GTK Broadway with HTML5 backend to make a remote connection to LibreOffice. An impressive demo but sure but hardly the most practical.

  14. More like a recompile [was Re:About time] by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

    A developer got it to compile successfully, on different hardware. There are no intereface changes and the article makes it clear they are more targeting tablets anyway than mobile devices with really small specialised interefaces. It is techincally a "port" but that is misleading and suggests a lot more than has really happened.

  15. iOS Version? I thought that didn't work by omnichad · · Score: 2

    If you use proprietary Apple API's, I don't believe they allow you to release your source code. It wouldn't be open source. They would have to release that version closed source, which they can't do if they don't own the code.

  16. Child by onezeta · · Score: 0

    I have used open office so If this is the 'child' of open office, I'm sure can use it comfortably.

  17. Mobile Viewer by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I would welcome an iOS version of LibreOffice some day, what I really want in the near future is a viewer for its native file formats.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:Mobile Viewer by impaledsunset · · Score: 1

      FreOffice does a good job for that on my Nokia N900.

  18. Re:iOS Version? I thought that didn't work by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is LGPL, so they can use their existing code as a library and write a closed source iOS UI.

  19. Re:iOS Version? I thought that didn't work by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Can't believe I never noticed that. Thanks for clarifying.

  20. Mobile LibreOffice: it's far from a reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was at the announcement, and I remain sceptical. This was more or less only an announcement of an intention, not an announcement of something that actually exists. Nothing was shown, and if you have followed the LibreOffice mailing lists, you have seen that so far it is only a build of the standard UI on Android. Before we will see a touch based interface, the developers will first have to separate the UI from the engine which is an enormous task.

    If you want to have a free office suite on Android, I recommend starting with the Calligra suite instead. They already have two touch based interfaces (Calligra Mobile for smartphones with MeeGo and Calligra Active for tablets using Plasma Active).

  21. Re:LibreOffice by petit_robert · · Score: 1

    I, for one, really enjoy that name. It really conveys the right feeling, as seems to be confirmed by the onslaught of the schills against it.

    Disclaimer : I'm a French programmer

  22. What About Android in the Browser? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I know I'm talking about kinda the reverse of this story.

    But is there a way to run all of Android in a browser? With apps embedded in it. So all of the apps I have installed on my Android phone I can also install on my (or someone else's) server. I'd just hit my webpage with Android and its apps embedded in the page, and use the same apps. I'd use apps that all save their state to a DB on my server (or through my server to a cloud). I could flip between phone and other machines at will.

    I could use "my phone" anywhere, even when there's only wired networking (eg. inside big buildings) or where I had better/cheaper bandwidth, or a better keyboard/screen, or my battery was low. I couldn't use the phone to talk over the PSTN, but even that limit will eventually go away (Google voice, etc).

    Android is a largish Java program in bytecode running on a Dalvik JVM, that was originally written in Java source and compiled to target Dalvik. Browsers have a JVM (Sun or other) that Android might be recompiled to target running on. The hard part is getting Android's hardware abstraction to map to the browser's hardware abstraction. But is it doable? Is it already done?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  23. I live Libre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love LibreOffice. I hope this is competitive with Google Docs.

  24. Officelibre supporter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using OfficeLibre since their release and I support their projects. Everything coming from their 3rd party progs have helped build the freeware movements.

  25. Re:Or... LO still sucks after all these years. by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 2
    I really want to like it, and I still use it on Linux (what choice do I have?) and have done so since giving up on applixware a decade ago. But even now, it still really, really sucks for normal people. I tried to get people to use it, but you know what? People I know and respect gave it a good try and rejected it as unusable.

    This past week, as an English speaker, with an English OS, I had to write a five page document in French libreoffice. Should be straight-forward. It crashed four times before I figured out that pasting an image that is too big can do that, shrank the image and it was OK. Disabled the spell checking because I had no time to figure out how to add a French Dictionary, but later on, I have taken the time, here is the sad story:

    My area and family are very multi-lingual (Canadian English, Canadian French, Spanish from Spain & German from Germany and Austria (depending who you are dealing with), and Russian.) LO comes out of the box English, and adding languages is hell. The method used to be one kind of hell, something with five steps and some finger crossing and dancing on certain toes, now it is a different hell. Go ahead, find the French dictionary for libreoffice on ubuntu 11.10:

    -- Google for how to install dictionaries on libre office. Enjoy.

    -- Go to Tools/Language ... More Languages Online... Enjoy.

    -- go to Software Centre, and search for libre office or dictionaries. Enjoy.

    After you have given up there. I did apt-get install libreoffice-l10n-fr and saw that there was a recommends for hunspell-fr or myspell-fr. ok... which one? tried both, noticed that one removes the other, flipped a coin and went with hunspell. so then apt-cache search, and find all the appropriate ones (hint, there is no regularity, you just have to look at the list, and pick the ones that seem ok.) and nothing happens... until you restart LO, at which point they will be there.

    Sure, I can put up a web page, and explain this crap, but really... you lose 99% of people when you ask them to open a terminal. And I know it was completely different the last time I did this, about two years ago. I and understand why it is that way (independent groups, people working for free, yada, yada, yada...) I get it, I just cannot recommend the result to someone who doesn't inhale bits until 2am every morning. The result sucks for ordinary people.

  26. Re:Or... LO still sucks after all these years. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
    Just tried it.

    Opened LO Writer, clicked "Tools/Language/More Dictionaries Online".

    Clicked "Afrikaans spell checker" from the list of plugins, clicked "Get it" from the explanatory page, then "Open with Libre Office" from the popup.

    My conclusion: Simple, obvious and unchallenging.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  27. Re:Or... LO still sucks after all these years. by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 2

    Do you realize that package is dated 2008? Did you look for any of the languages I actually mentioned, because none of them are there. You went to the list, you found the second thing in the list. Do you actually speak Africaans? My conclusion: you are an asshole who wants to show people up without actually helping.

  28. Re:Or... LO still sucks after all these years. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
    I used it as an example. Most language packs are already installed by default, and available using "Tools/Language/For (Selection, Paragraph or All Text)", including those you mentioned.

    I suspect you're trolling here.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  29. Re:Or... LO still sucks after all these years. by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

    Are you using ubuntu 11.10? It has only English installed by default. Over many years, I have done the same exercise on multiple different versions of Linux, and the other languages were never installed by default.

  30. Re:Or... LO still sucks after all these years. by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1
    actually, it's worse than that. I succeeded in finding the modules, but Libreoffice still doesn't show them to me. For example, I select Tools/Language/For All Text and I am presented with the choice of English (Canada), English (US), and French (France). If I click on 'More Dictionaries Online' it takes me to the extensions page, which as I said, has no dictionaries for any of the languages I need. If you are fortunate enough need Afrikaans good for you. I have another option, I can go to Tools/Languages/For All Text/More... in which case I am led to a preferences dialog. No normal person would assume that this is to set application wide preferences, but a careful reading will tell you that that is what it is. So you pick the first dialog with a language in it, and it changes the language of the interface... fabulous... natural... intuitive...

    I keep looking... Ah, there is a writing aids section on the left. Click that. It shows me that the hunspell checker is enabled, click edit. It brings up an ''Options'' dialog, which the first field is "Language"... What that language is for, I have no idea, but it is set to English (Canada.) I set it to French (Canada) and click ok and go back to the document. I click Tools/Language/For All Text and guess what? French (Canada) isn't in the list. I have no fucking idea how to get the dictionary to be used, and I have used OOO for ten years, and linux for >20 years. a lot. I just never bothered with a spell checker. I just took it for granted that it works.

    Ordinary people, one of the first things they do, is look for that. Lots of ordinary people use multiple languages. Language settings in LO (and OOO) are deeply convoluted and totally confusing.

  31. Just the Components for Android? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Can we get right now the LibreOffice components to run in Android apps we write?

    Embed Writer features like the text editing pane and file format import/export, and Calc features like Excel format formula calculation and at least .XLSX import/export.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  32. Re:Or... LO still sucks after all these years. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
    As I have said before, the default install of LO includes all the languages you mentioned, INCLUDING fort the default install on Ubuntu. You have to specifically select NOT to have all languages installed (eg, if you were short on space).

    Why don't you try reinstalling LO? When you get to the bit where you can choose to drop multi-language support, change your setting.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  33. Re:Or... LO still sucks after all these years. by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1
    What do you mean by "the languages are included" ? When I click on Tools/Options/Language Settings, the user interface languages tab gives me a half-dozen choices... various Englishes, and French from France (but not Canada) The next Dialog offers me "Locale Settings" (I know what those are, but does someone without 15 years of linux bruises know?) There are a hundred odd choices there, I could change those all day long, and not affect a single dictionary. Then we have: "Default Languages for Documents" ... Interesting... It says "languages" so it ought to be plural, but you can only choose Western one, and the other choices are greyed out. No idea why. Does this activate a Dictionary? why No! it doesn't! Then we can proceed to the helpful sounding ''Writing Aids"... Where it helpfully points out that there is a hunspell checker, and if you click Edit there, you will be given the choice of "Language" there also. Does that allow you to pick the language in the document? Nope.

    So I can document five different places in the application that ordinary people would expect to change the language of the text, but none of them actually do it. Instead they present the user with five different sets of languages/locales/etc... being installed, but because none of the lists agree, the user has no idea whether any particular language is actually installed or not.

    So You may very well be right. Perhaps the languages are installed, but no mortal human will be able to find them. Even If I did as you say, and installed less than all the languagaes, which I don't recall doing months ago, but it could have happenned. It should not be this difficult to add them later.

    Next... What do you mean by "default install" ?

    When I say default install I mean use the packaging system, and thus the LO that came with the OS when it was installed. By default, languages are not installed. Even though LO icons are all over the unity launcher on the left, and even though writer comes up when I click on a odt document, I decided to go and check if, for some strange reason, LO is not actually installed. so I go to the Ubuntu Software Centre, I search for libreoffice, and low and behold, it offers to install it for me! Full of hope (desperation?) I click install, and authenticate, and then let it trundle for ten minutes or so. Finally it is done.

    I fire up the file manager, click on an opendocument, and try to spell check in Canadian French. Nope, no difference whatsoever... So I go back to the software centre, and hit "Remove" so it trundles for a while preparing to remove, and then crashes. I start-up the software centre again, and it offers to install it again. I do dpkg -l | grep libreoffice, and all the libreoffice packages are there, except for the language packs. wtf does ''Remove" from software Centre do if it doesn't even remove it? oth, it is likely consistent, since it worked before it was "installed" and it still worked after it was "Removed"

    Starting to see a pattern? Stuff is pretty, it looks like it ought to work, it looks like it should be simple. There are ten different easy ways to do things. But if you actually see it through, all the simple obvious stuff doesn't work. broken, horribly mangled, user hostile. btw... a relevant a bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/875850