Slashdot Mirror


UAE Police Claim BlackBerry Outage Made Roads Safer

An anonymous reader writes "Road traffic accidents in Abu Dhabi and Dubai plummeted last week — and the local police have a theory as to why: drivers' BlackBerrys weren't working. Police in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have claimed that last week's worldwide BlackBerry outage, which frustrated business people around the world who were unable to communicate with their colleagues, had one positive result — less texting and reading of emails by people who should have been concentrating on driving instead. There could be other factors at play, however. For instance, popular UAE soccer player Theyab Awana was killed in a high speed crash near Abu Dhabi in September, amid claims that he was sending a message on his BlackBerry when he hit a lorry. The football star's father, Awana Ahmad Al Mosabi, made an emotional plea to people not to use smartphones while driving, and a Facebook campaign against the use of BlackBerry Messenger while driving has grown in popularity."

30 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. "campaign against the use of ... while driving" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, blame BlackBerries and their incredibly difficult to type on keyboards.

    In all seriousness, though, why isn't it a campaign against texting while driving?

    1. Re:"campaign against the use of ... while driving" by jhoegl · · Score: 2

      It is, the Blackberry outage is a proof of concept as it were.

      Much like guns... Blackberries dont kill people, idiots who text while driving do.

    2. Re:"campaign against the use of ... while driving" by the+linux+geek · · Score: 2

      You've never used a full-sized Blackberry (Bold, Tour), have you? The keyboard on my Bold is the best of any cell phone I've ever used, including Droid2, N810, and various virtual ones.

    3. Re:"campaign against the use of ... while driving" by tqk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You've never used a full-sized Blackberry (Bold, Tour), have you?

      So, it was the fault of them not using full-sized keyboard BBs that was the problem? And you now feel safe texting while driving?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:"campaign against the use of ... while driving" by squizzar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because as someone who also uses the roads I'd prefer not to be selected out of the gene pool by some cunt who has some desperate need to send texts and make calls whilst in the middle of dense, fast moving rush hour traffic. Not all rules are there to protect you from yourself...

    5. Re:"campaign against the use of ... while driving" by delinear · · Score: 2

      That's true, but you can only go so far before it potentially becomes counter-productive. Fiddling with radios, for instance, might lead to accidents. The obvious answer is to ban radios, but how many lives does the radio save by keeping people awake and alert on long, boring road journeys? The answer is to make the interface less obtrusive - I can change volume and station without my hands leaving the steering wheel now. Something like Siri/Google voice controls might eventually do more to save lives than a blanket ban that people just ignore because they feel it too intrusive (we have such a ban on using a phone here in the UK, yet I frequently see bad driving from people who turn out to be using a mobile).

    6. Re:"campaign against the use of ... while driving" by tinkerton · · Score: 2

      This is why drinking improves road safety: when you're drunk it's much too hard to use those little buttons so at least you have your eyes on the road.

      Hey I have the right to have an opinion!

    7. Re:"campaign against the use of ... while driving" by N0Man74 · · Score: 2

      Why stop there? There are other many things that have been proven to be distractions as well.

      We should outlaw children riding in the car, talking to other passengers, and attractive members of the opposite sex sitting in the passenger seat.

      In fact, it's been shown that there is a rise in accidents from male drivers during spring and summer months, which is believed to be due to the increase of females wearing more shorts or other more revealing clothing. We should ban female pedestrians too, to prevent accidents.

      Then we should outlaw scenic routes. You are driving to get somewhere, not for scenery. Scenery is just a distractions.

      Driving in to sunrises or sunsets can cause problems too. We should outlaw the movement of the sun in the sky.

      What else am I missing?

  2. Pay attention to the road! by msobkow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having seen people swerving from lane to lane while talking or texting, there's no doubt in my mind cell usage while driving should be banned.

    But I'm amazed that Abu Dhabi and Dubai have such a high penetration of Blackberries in their country that the outage could actually make a difference in road safety statistics. That's just amazing to me.

    I wonder what would happen to the safety stats if all cell phones were disabled for a day as an experiment? (Not that it'll ever happen.)

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Pay attention to the road! by LurkerXXX · · Score: 3, Informative

      I once, swear to god, was passed on the highway by a guy playing a clarinet while driving. Freaked me out. And I'm a driver who is usually going faster than most folks, so he was hauling. There are some nutters out there. I'm sure he'll end up killing someone.

    2. Re:Pay attention to the road! by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      I have seen people swerving from lane to lane while not talking or texting. I will agree that trying to read, whether that is a phone, a book, or a newspaper is a bad idea. The phone rage is just a symptom of neo-ludditism though.

    3. Re:Pay attention to the road! by tqk · · Score: 2

      It happened ...

      Please, learn to quote. I had to page up five times just to find out what you were referring to. <quote>blah blah blah</quote>

      Thanks. Much appreciated.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Pay attention to the road! by tqk · · Score: 2

      I will agree that trying to read, whether that is a phone, a book, or a newspaper is a bad idea. The phone rage is just a symptom of neo-ludditism though.

      Here, it's called distracted driving. You're sharing a road with hundreds of other people all moving at high velocity in multi-ton vehicles. You need all your wits and attention to do that safely, for all involved. Check out the death while driving statistics if you don't believe me. It's far more dangerous than anything else we do.

      You using a cell phone for anything while driving isn't anything we need. Just fscking pull over!

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:Pay attention to the road! by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      I am well aware that driving is the most dangerous activity that we do. As soon as I meet a single driver that uses "all their wits and attention" while driving, I will give your argument weight. At this point, I have not met a single one. I also highly doubt that YOU use all your wits and attention to drive safely. More likely, you like most drivers have passengers in your car, drive early in the morning, drive late at night, or the most hypocritical of actions, use your car stereo while driving.

      You don't need to listen to the radio for anything while driving. Just fscking pull over!

    6. Re:Pay attention to the road! by idji · · Score: 2

      Blackberry usage there is very high because you could buy a blackberry easily at any supermarket checkout because the telcos were pushing it hard, and because everyone knew that Blackberry Messaging was "uncrackable", and so people felt safer from being watched.
      There are MANY foreigners working there and 11% of mobile phone users where using blackberries to communicate - it was also a cheap and secure way to communicate back to family and friends in India.
      Also remember that Dubai was where the whole fuss started about Blackberry Messaging being accessible by the authorities started after the killing of Hamas' Mahmoud al-Mabhouh where allegedly the killers used blackberries to communicate with each other.

    7. Re:Pay attention to the road! by Stormthirst · · Score: 2

      The purpose of traffic laws in the developed world is essentially as an extra tax. Therefore no road laws will ever be sufficiently enforced to significantly discourage the activity they purport to prohibit.

      This is clearly rubbish. In the Canada and most of Europe (both of which most definitely count as developed) have a system of penalty points or demerit points. Accrue too many points and you lose your license. You also get a fine. It could be argued that if you do get a fine then you're paying for them to prosecute you because you're so much of an incompetent fool as to not be able to control your vehicle responsibly.

      I suggest you learn the meaning of the phrase "developed world". If your country doesn't have a system of demerit points, I suggest you are NOT in the developed world.

  3. Banninate it. by FyberOptic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people accept that texting and cellphones cause accidents. But, most people also think they're better drivers than everyone else, and therefore it's okay for them to do it. Even cops do it. I see them all the time.

    The only solution is making it illegal internationally. But considering the U.S. alone only bans it in a handful of states, we have a long way to go of convincing people that their ego doesn't make it okay.

    1. Re:Banninate it. by dark_requiem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a quick aside, cops in general seem to be pretty shitty drivers. Had a couple incidents where cops who were simply talking to their partners nearly swerved in to me.

      But, more to the point, it's a slippery slope issue. Eating in your car is also distracting. Do you solve it by banning drive-throughs? Reading in your car is a distraction. Do cops issue tickets if they see an atlas or a copy of the local newspaper on the seat when they pull you over? How about if you jotted down directions to where you're going, and a cop sees you check the paper to see if your exit is coming up? How about unruly kids in the back seat? Quite distracting, but you don't hear calls for kids to be anesthetized before getting in a car (although...).

      Point is, if the government takes it upon themselves to enact a new rule, regulation, or prohibition for every danger in the world, then there's nothing you can do freely. There are laws against swerving dangerously from lane to lane in traffic. There are laws against running people over, or slamming blindly headlong into a telephone poll. Some people can multitask to the point where they can talk on the phone and drive. Some people need a hands-free device to achieve the same result. Some people (and I'm in this category) would rather stammer through a conversation and lose their train of thought because their primary focus is on driving, not talking. Some people just can't pull it off at all. You, like most statists, are proposing a one-size-fits-all solution to a problem that doesn't have one. At its core, what you suggest is no different than solving alcoholism or other forms of drug abuse through prohibition.

    2. Re:Banninate it. by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      But, more to the point, it's a slippery slope issue. Eating in your car is also distracting. Do you solve it by banning drive-throughs? Reading in your car is a distraction. [blah blah blah]

      It really isn't a slippery slope though.
      Your asinine argument seems to ignore the reality that we haven't already banned those things since Henry Ford brought cheap cars to the masses 97 years ago.

      And yet here we are, with safety experts and organizations consistently endorsing legislation that singles out cell phones.

      You, like most statists, are proposing a one-size-fits-all solution to a problem that doesn't have one.

      Oh please. 99% of us are statists.
      The only difference is how and where we think think the state should be acting.

      P.S. Banning *anything* while driving is not the same thing as a general prohibition. You're dumb for making that argument.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Banninate it. by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To add to the last post:

      Some people can multitask to the point where they can talk on the phone and drive. Some people need a hands-free device to achieve the same result.

      A lot less than many people think. Most overestimate their abilities:
      http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95256794

      Which is a very American trait, I noticed:
      http://desicritics.org/2006/10/20/012720.php

      Kind of like how those people who "work" 12 hours a day, brag about it, and lag behind people who work an honest 8 hours a day in productive because they spend most of the time at the watercooler or on the internet. Seriously, when you're driving, please drive - stop overestimating your abilities when they really get reduced by not paying attention. If you don't want to do that, either carpool with someone who doesn't have that problem and is willing to drive, or use mass transit.

      But stfu because you can't stop diddling with your smartphone for 30 seconds and want to bullshit the rest of us that you're just as good with it as without it.

    4. Re:Banninate it. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Agreed, many people think they have super human abilities, especially young men. Turning ones eyes upward while thinking is a very common behaviour that basically shuts out whatever else is going on, most (if not all) people do it unconsciously. When mobile phones first became popular in the 90's I would talk on mine while driving with no apparent problems, however one day I realised that I was turning my eyes upward to think about the answer to a question the caller had asked. I suddenly realised what I was doing and it scared the shit out of me, I haven't used a mobile while driving since that realization.

      As a 35yr vetran of the road, my advice is that if your mobile rings while your driving either pull over or (heaven forbid) ignore it.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:Banninate it. by RustyShackleford007 · · Score: 2

      Point is, if the government takes it upon themselves to enact a new rule, regulation, or prohibition for every danger in the world, then there's nothing you can do freely.

      This is the main problem, yes. This is why I quit trying to improve the system by voting. In the end, natural selection occurs and natural evolution corrects issues. With our laws limiting so much, there is really no solution in sight. Not everyone will agree on what should and shouldn't happen; bans and regulations inspire more opposition than they do safety.

      --
      Guns don't kill people, regulation does.

  4. Easily settled... by Ed+Peepers · · Score: 2

    Duh, just look to see if accidents increased again when service was restored.

  5. Re:Don't Ban the whole US by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's still dangerous even if you are in rural Nebraska, even if it isn't as dangerous as it is in the cities and there's ultimately no reason why one should be talking on the phone without at least a headset.

  6. Re:Don't Ban the whole US by sitkill · · Score: 4, Informative

    False sense of security.

    There have been studies, and more well known, mythbusters did an episode on something very similar (is talking on a cellphone while driving just as bad as drinking and driving), and while mythbusters is a bit hollywood science at times, they confirmed the myth. Texting isn't that far off. And in other studies, is just as bad.

    But don't take my word for it, take a look at all the studies and materials.

    There's a reason why texting/talking on the phone is rapidly becoming illegal while driving. But hey! Maybe in Nebraska, facts and truths aren't the norm!

  7. Re:Don't Ban the whole US by rolfwind · · Score: 2

    The headset is nearly useless. Talking over the phone is more distracting than a car passenger, because passengers realize when to stfu because of situational cues, and you aren't pressured to keep the conversation going when the situation demands all your attention since a passenger realizes this, but a phone participant doesn't and keeps on going.

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002374605_cellphones12.html

  8. Playing violin on interstate by jbov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My family and I were traveling on I-95 in the US and saw a woman playing a violin while driving. No joke. Presumably, she was steering with her knees. In disbelief, I wanted to get a better look, but I wouldn't risk being in the lane adjacent to her. I think we need a campaign to ban playing musical instruments while driving.

  9. Blackberry is evil! by metalmaster · · Score: 2

    Remember folks, this is the same RIM/Blackberry that wouldn't grant UAE and a few other countries a private BBM server so they got pissed and shut down the service. This article holds a little more than bias. The summary could read "The evil blackberry services were shutdown and our country is safer for it" and the overall message would remain the same.

  10. Yes, I believe it by jaweekes · · Score: 2

    Yes, the drivers here (in Abu Dhabi) really are that bad. Blackberry's are not illegal here as other posts have said; they have huge billboards advertising the latest ones all over the place (Blackberry's were banned at one point, but RIM have let the UAE government to see the traffic, as has happened in many countries recently). The cars are also heavily tinted because of the sun, so it's almost impossible to tell what people are doing in their cars.

    You also have a good mix of Indian, Pakistani, Arab, European and African drivers who all have different ideas about driving. It is not unusual for the middle lane on a 5 lane road to turn left in front of everyone else going straight.

    But the most common accident is being rear-ended by drivers using their phones and not looking at the road. And I can say that over the last week I have seen less accidents, so the numbers actually sound right.

  11. The phone & text services were not affected by lostdistance · · Score: 2

    ... BlackBerry outage, which frustrated business people around the world who were unable to communicate with their colleagues, ...

    Unable to communicate? Despite the fact that the phone & text services were not affected?