Slashdot Mirror


German Satellite To Fall From Sky

BBC News reports that a German satellite is soon to fall from sky. According to the article: "The Roentgen Satellite (Rosat) is due to come back to Earth at some stage over the weekend - possibly Sunday. Just as for NASA's UARS satellite, which plunged into the atmosphere in September, no one can say precisely when and where Rosat will come in. What makes the redundant German craft's return interesting is that much more debris this time is likely to survive all the way to the Earth's surface. Experts calculate that perhaps as much as 1.6 tonnes of wreckage - more than half the spacecraft's launch mass - could ride out the destructive forces of re-entry and hit the planet."

107 comments

  1. The sky is falling! by felipekk · · Score: 2

    Finally all those people running around saying "The sky is falling" are going to be right!

    1. Re:The sky is falling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isn't it obvious where it's going to fall? London!

    2. Re:The sky is falling! by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Snicker...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:The sky is falling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By Toutatis! Something is gonna fall from the sky on our heads.

    4. Re:The sky is falling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tagged "revenge" because of this.

      There's some fuel left in the retrorockets to make one last correction.

      Now apologize for Dresden. Quick!

    5. Re:The sky is falling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ach, Hans! Fifty marks says you can't hit ze children's hospital again zis time.

  2. This means war! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    OK, one satellite falling down every once in a while might be chalked up to physics. This must be a directed attack!

    Where is Bruce Willis when we need him?\

    (Did I get that right?)

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:This means war! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      war against the earth, about damn time.

  3. What's the risk per unit area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as a function of latitude?

    1. Re:What's the risk per unit area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      50/50 per square meter - either it hits it, or it doesn't.

    2. Re:What's the risk per unit area by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      So half of the square meters will be hit by it?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:What's the risk per unit area by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      Assuming the circle meters don't get hit first, yes.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    4. Re:What's the risk per unit area by JustOK · · Score: 1

      speaking as a triangle, you must give squares AND circles AND triangles a 50/50 chance!

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:What's the risk per unit area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nice math problem.
      I think the answer is c / sqrt(1 - (sin(latitude) / sin(53 degrees))^2) where c is the risk at the equator.
      What do I win?

    6. Re:What's the risk per unit area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50/50 per square meter - either it hits it, or it doesn't.

      So what's that come to in feet?

    7. Re:What's the risk per unit area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm tired of you people not paying equal respect to spaces with greater than two dimensions. If they could talk, small stellated dodecahedrons would demand equal representation in your flat world. Some can, but they fail to make such complex statements.

    8. Re:What's the risk per unit area by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      Nice math problem. I think the answer is c / sqrt(1 - (sin(latitude) / sin(53 degrees))^2) where c is the risk at the equator. What do I win?

      Part of a satellite...

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    9. Re:What's the risk per unit area by Pence128 · · Score: 1

      Two, one on each leg.

      --
      404: sig not found.
  4. Wait... by guybrush3pwood · · Score: 1

    That's no satellite!

    --
    Perhaps I'm trolling, perhaps I'm not.
  5. I thought they stopped doing that in 1945? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or have I got that wrong?

  6. It would be neat... by bryan1945 · · Score: 3, Funny

    (Now remember, I'm saying no loss of life here) if it fell into an American football stadium at halftime. Can you imagine the special that NFL Films would make out of that. Steve Sabol: "Ohhhhhhh, and the satellite falls incomplete on the thirty yard line!" I wonder if that would make SportsCenter's Top 10 Plays of the week? Or would that be the Not Top 10 Plays of the Week? Official box score- "Game cancelled due to severe satellite weather conditions. Attendance: 54,321, plus 1 hunk of metal and a Martian." Would the home team get a Delay of Game penalty? You know how sometimes kids can run the baseball bases before/after a game? They could have an impromptu Run Around the Crater. Have the mascots do a tug of war with it? So many opportunities.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    1. Re:It would be neat... by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How about if it fell on some holy site that the 3 major religions are fighting over, and obliterated it completely, leaving nothing to fight over except a big smoking hole in the ground? "An act of God Allah | FSM".

    2. Re:It would be neat... by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      If it was FSM there would be sauce for all to be enjoyed. But you need to bring your own pasta.
      On a more serious side, can you imagine the 14 trillion interpretations that would come with that disaster?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:It would be neat... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I forgot - the world ended Friday.

      "It's not a lie or a scam, it's religion!"

    4. Re:It would be neat... by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      Then they'd just fight over another hunk of dirt. Hell, we could all live atop an infinite plane of uniform density and there'd still be folks insisting that this patch of nothingness sacred because it has a p-brane shadow of Jesus. Or Mohamed. Or a Dirichlet function. They all look the same.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    5. Re:It would be neat... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      Well, it ended because someone found out what it is for and why it is there. Therefore it was replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:It would be neat... by isorox · · Score: 1

      How about if it fell on some holy site that the 3 major religions are fighting over, and obliterated it completely, leaving nothing to fight over except a big smoking hole in the ground? "An act of God
        Allah | FSM".

      Nice idea, but I'll have to pass on that as I'm in Jerusalem at the moment, hotel's a stone's throw from the Western Wall/Dome of rock/Church of the sepulchre.

      If it can hold off until Tuesday I'll watch from a safe distance :)

    7. Re:It would be neat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P-brane... I see what you did there

    8. Re:It would be neat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Intentional grounding (offense). 10 yards."

    9. Re:It would be neat... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      You buffoon. How could you forget the sweat stains of Elvis? It's a serious group of people. They make a pilgrimage to their own Mecca every year, Graceland.

    10. Re:It would be neat... by Rei · · Score: 1

      This whole thing seems so unavoidable. I'd think a couple hundred grams of well-placed high explosive could shred it up enough that it all breaks up in the atmosphere. Launch costs to LEO average around 10k per kg (give or take a factor of two), so it's not like that would be an absurd additional launch cost.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    11. Re:It would be neat... by Slashdot+Assistant · · Score: 2

      They'll just fight for control of their holy smoking crater. These people are deranged.

    12. Re:It would be neat... by Slashdot+Assistant · · Score: 1

      On a more serious side, can you imagine the 14 trillion interpretations that would come with that disaster?

      Heh, very good point. I suspect most interpretations will be oddly supportive of the views of the person in question. Hardly surprising when what they're worshiping must simultaneously be Ultimate Santa and the Ultimate Cancer Fairy (and everything else in between). Small wonder it's difficult to interpret his actions.

    13. Re:It would be neat... by wisty · · Score: 2

      There's some theory on the intertubes about the "evaporative cooling" of religions - if something discredits a religion (i.e. the "imortal" founder dies), then the moderates start leaving, and only the real nutters remain, so the religion becomes even *more* extreme.

    14. Re:It would be neat... by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 1

      Is it you, Mr. Westerwelle?

      --
      Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
    15. Re:It would be neat... by feufeu · · Score: 1

      You are aware that this is a german satellite, right ? I'd expect quite a lot of fuss being made about that fact by you know who...

  7. Great...just when the geese left for the winter... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

    I way didn't want to trade ounces of geese crap for tons of space crap on my car.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  8. And you laughed at my TinFoil Hat by rueger · · Score: 1

    Actually we're developing one from super high tensile strength aluminum that should able to protect us from both satellite space radio waves AND falling space satellite debris!

    1. Re:And you laughed at my TinFoil Hat by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Actually we're developing one from super high tensile strength aluminum that should able to protect us from both satellite space radio waves AND falling space satellite debris!

      What about the government brain control parasites they put in the water supply as eggs?

    2. Re:And you laughed at my TinFoil Hat by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Cool. Unfortunately your spine will be a noodle after you get hit. Bonk!

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:And you laughed at my TinFoil Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:And you laughed at my TinFoil Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's the tensile strength you'll be needing...

    5. Re:And you laughed at my TinFoil Hat by JustOK · · Score: 1

      The Eggricultural Dept stopped that. They privatized and outsourced that particular function yonks ago.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    6. Re:And you laughed at my TinFoil Hat by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      For just $19.95 more you can have my matching accessorized *little* high-tensile strength hat to protect your other head and related bits. Think of the future children! Don't let the mind control rays or deliberate space debris flinging harm your plumbing or little swimmers!

  9. Back of the envelope calculation by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Relevant comic: http://www.askdreldritch.com/comic687.html. More substantially, there's now a twitter feed with regular updates http://twitter.com/#!/ROSAT_Reentry. The rate of descent is pretty fast. One thing to keep in mind is that although the chance of someone being hit by debris is around 1 in 3000 or so, the chance of a specific person being hit is much lower. It is extremely unlikely that two people will be hit so by a rough approximation, if someone is hit there is a 1 in 6 billion chance that it is you. So the chance is about 1/(3000 * 10^9)= 1 in 3 trillion. Even if one assumes a fairly high probability that when one person gets hit multiple people will get hit, the chance is still on the order of 1 in a trillion. That said, this sort of uncontrolled reentry is not ideal. But most satellites are either in higher orbits or are small enough such that everything will burn up when they reenter. Large satellites entering in an uncontrolled fashion is pretty rare.

    1. Re:Back of the envelope calculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can only hope the satellite hits whoever created that comic!

    2. Re:Back of the envelope calculation by shinglehouse · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting the twitter feed for others. I was about to do so as well as it seems like the only way to stay up to date with this.

    3. Re:Back of the envelope calculation by jittles · · Score: 2

      I RTFA and it said that the satellite may fall anywhere between the UK and the tip of south America. I was going to say your math was way off because there are a lot of people that could never be in the path of the falling satellite. Unfortunately, I was wrong about how much area this thing will cover. Of course there are still people that cannot possibly be hit, including anyone who is currently working in the Antarctic area. Possibly people in parts of the former USSR countries too, I don't know. I am too lazy to look at exactly how far north some of those areas are.

    4. Re:Back of the envelope calculation by PPH · · Score: 2

      It is extremely unlikely that two people will be hit

      Which is why I plan on spending the next few days underneath your girlfriend.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Back of the envelope calculation by Peristaltic · · Score: 2

      Considering her mass, you'd fare better with the satellite.

    6. Re:Back of the envelope calculation by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      Given how frequently people are close to other people, it's not unlikely that more than one person will be directly or indirectly hit if anybody is hit.

      For example, if it lands on a moving car, it could kill everybody in the car, plus people in other cars behind it that slam into the wreckage. Even if it lands on the road without directly striking a car, it could cause a multi-car pileup.

      Or it could land on a classroom, killing a half-dozen children inside. Or it lands on top of an apartment building, ramming through 3 or 4 floors and killing multiple people along the way plus more people getting killed by the rubble. Or any of a thousand other scenarios where people gather in numbers.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  10. Re:Great...just when the geese left for the winter by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    I way didn't want to trade ounces of geese crap for tons of space crap on my car.

    I tell you what. You can have your stupid fucking geese back. We'll take the satellite.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  11. Small news by jamesl · · Score: 1

    German Satellite to Fall From Sky.

    Don't they all?

    1. Re:Small news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      German Satellite to Fall From Sky.

      Don't they all?

      Well I hope Luna doesn't or it's going to make quite a splash.

    2. Re:Small news by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Well I hope Luna doesn't or it's going to make quite a splash.

      The moon's orbit is actually increasing it's distance from Earth.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:Small news by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "The moon's orbit is actually increasing it's distance from Earth."

      Hummm... maybe she's taking a step back for a run-up.

    4. Re:Small news by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      German Satellite to Fall From Sky.

      Don't they all?

      Well I hope Luna doesn't or it's going to make quite a splash.

      Since when is the Moon German?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Small news by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      The moon's orbit is actually increasing it's distance from Earth.

      ...and Bill O'Reilly probably thinks you can't explain that.

      rj

    6. Re:Small news by Nutria · · Score: 1

      and Bill O'Reilly probably thinks you can't explain that.

      He'd be correct.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  12. Once zee rockets go up... by bosef1 · · Score: 0

    I don't care where they come down.
    Zat's not my department,
    says Werner von Braun.

  13. More Data Please! by Grindalf · · Score: 0

    It would have been nice to know the orbit's eccentricity, appoapsis and periapsis etc. I couldn't find the information, other than sample data that shows a rough 45 degree angle orbit (planetary projection) with 25 degree precession (again against our planet), so it's a game of pin the tail on the donkey for most people ...

    --
    The purpose of existence is to make money.
  14. Damn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a lot of great times with Rosat back in the 90s. If you happen to be in the impact zone, grab me a souvenir.

  15. Re:Great...just when the geese left for the winter by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

    If we're talking about the Canadian space agency, those are the same things.

    --
    I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
  16. Wat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That comic was GARBAGE! I don't even know what the Kardashians are.

    1. Re:Wat? by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

      Google it, and put a kim before,hoo ,and pick only images. its good culture

    2. Re:Wat? by broggyr · · Score: 1

      Yes you do, or you would simply have said "Kardashians" instead of "the Kardashians" ^^

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
  17. Vorsprung durch Technik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1.6 tones of wreckage to make it to the ground? That's quality German craftsmanship for ya, those crappy Yankee satellites just fall to bits! ;)

    1. Re:Vorsprung durch Technik by Hentes · · Score: 1

      It's heatshielded to prevent temperature changes messing with the image, not to survive reentry.

    2. Re:Vorsprung durch Technik by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      1.6 tones of wreckage

      That sounds horrible!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    3. Re:Vorsprung durch Technik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh.

  18. Re:Great...just when the geese left for the winter by JustOK · · Score: 1

    yeah? well, we have space canoes!

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  19. I hope it hits my house! by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

    I could sure use some sweet sweet settlement money!

    1. Re:I hope it hits my house! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      good luck suing sovereign governments, they don't pay up

    2. Re:I hope it hits my house! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is your head worth, (that object that sits on your shoulders and occupies very little space?)

    3. Re:I hope it hits my house! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to? Irktusk?

    4. Re:I hope it hits my house! by QuasiSteve · · Score: 2

      No need to sue, though;
      Read up on the 1972 Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Liability_Convention

      The only problem is - it has never actually been tested as far as damages go. Esperance's 'littering' claim (of Skylab pieces falling on a bit of Australia) was cute but more as part of marketing than a serious claim.

      Still, one could invoke that, rather than suing from the get-go.

    5. Re:I hope it hits my house! by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      If they have assets within the jurisdiction of the court they do.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:I hope it hits my house! by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Only governments can bring claims under that treaty. You'd have to convince your government to file a claim on your behalf (and they might still need to go to the "world court" over it).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  20. Satellites dropping due to events of October 2nd? by approachingZero+ · · Score: 1

    A bright comet fell into the sun on October 2, 2011 in synch with a coronal mass ejection bursting out on the other side. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/news/comet-cme.html Just wondering. Solar wind and all.

    --
    'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
  21. Re:Satellites dropping due to events of October 2n by Theaetetus · · Score: 2

    A bright comet fell into the sun on October 2, 2011 in synch with a coronal mass ejection bursting out on the other side.

    FUD:

    While it looks to the casual observer that the comet triggered the ejection, the apparent relationship between an incoming comet and a CME is only a coincidence. At this stage of the solar cycle, the sun is producing many mass ejections -- in fact there were several earlier in the day

  22. Re:Satellites dropping due to events of October 2n by Theaetetus · · Score: 2

    A bright comet fell into the sun on October 2, 2011 in synch with a coronal mass ejection bursting out on the other side.

    FUD:

    While it looks to the casual observer that the comet triggered the ejection, the apparent relationship between an incoming comet and a CME is only a coincidence. At this stage of the solar cycle, the sun is producing many mass ejections -- in fact there were several earlier in the day

    Consider, it would take light over 4 seconds to cross from one side of the sun to the other (if it were crossing vacuum and the sun weren't in the way)... That tiny comet hitting one side couldn't possibly cause a CME to blow off the other side in less than a second.

  23. Re:Great...just when the geese left for the winter by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

    I tell you what. You can have your stupid fucking geese back. We'll take the satellite.

    Ain't up to me - although I've met many a goose that was happy to provide me with their opinion (and bites), I've never met one that would listen to mine. Although I'm thinking they should have geese guiding the satellite to a safe splashdown; after all, the geese could routinely crap on my car right dead in the middle of the driver side windshield from an altitude of hundreds of feet without even looking.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  24. Iron Sky? by SteveFoerster · · Score: 0

    That's no satellite, that's the Nazis returning!

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  25. Re:Satellites dropping due to events of October 2n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider, each frame in that video is 12 minutes, so not "less than a second" -- of course it's coincidence, but that's the wrong argument to prove it.

  26. There are some places it CAN'T come down. by Technician · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Another news story totally lacking facts.. Why can't any news organization list the ground track of any of these? Knowing if it geosynchronous, geostationary, Polar, or other orbit can list the maximum latitudes this craft will reach. They make me do the research myself. The ground track is listed here;
    http://www.heavens-above.com/orbit.aspx?satid=20638&lat=50.733&lng=7.100&loc=Bonn&alt=57&tz=CET

    Northern Siberia, parts of Alaska, Greenland and Antarctica can't be hit by this. Saying it can come down anywhere is FALSE.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
    1. Re:There are some places it CAN'T come down. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Northern Siberia, parts of Alaska, Greenland and Antarctica can't be hit by this. Saying it can come down anywhere is FALSE.

      So, it can only land in places not composed primarily of snow and ice?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:There are some places it CAN'T come down. by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      It can only land in places between 53 degrees north and south latitude, because it's in a 53 degree inclined orbit...so, yes, that leaves out mostly chilly places.

      rj

    3. Re:There are some places it CAN'T come down. by jittles · · Score: 1

      But those areas are all very low population areas, so most of the world could potentially be hit by this. As the article mentions, it's most likely it will hit water anyway.

  27. WHA.....?? by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    May God help them if that thing carried the Spice Channel!

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  28. I know what you're thinking... by Pence128 · · Score: 1

    How much would that fetch on eBay?

    --
    404: sig not found.
  29. the ultimate deorbiting machine by mbkennel · · Score: 1

    "Experts calculate that perhaps as much as 1.6 tonnes of wreckage - more than half the spacecraft's launch mass - could ride out the destructive forces of re-entry and hit the planet."

    Freaking German engineering. Do they do that just to show off? Thank god for that land war in winter.

  30. It would be funny if it fell on central London by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, not really.

  31. Why this isn't a troll by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

    Troll, huh? Hardly. You see, O benighted moderator, it's a reference to the plot of a movie that's coming out next year that some people think is interesting in part because it's being released under a Creative Commons license. Of course, if you'd clicked the link before modding me down, you'd have known that.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    1. Re:Why this isn't a troll by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Or if you're a geek of the board game variety you've seen the matching board game demoed at Essen.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  32. In Seattle ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    .. we are concerned that a chunk of this might hit the Alaskan Way Viaduct.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  33. ROSAT is now down. by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1
    1. Re:ROSAT is now down. by einyen · · Score: 1

      It hit either the Indian Ocean or in China / Myanmar: http://www.spaceflight101.com/rosat-re-entry-information.html

  34. Re:Satellites dropping due to events of October 2n by dotancohen · · Score: 1

    Consider, it would take light over 4 seconds to cross from one side of the sun to the other (if it were crossing vacuum and the sun weren't in the way)... That tiny comet hitting one side couldn't possibly cause a CME to blow off the other side in less than a second.

    From the scale of the image, then either the comet was traveling at faster than C or the video was sped up. The CME occurs a slight delay after where the comet would be had the Sun not been in the way, accounting for scale and video speed.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  35. German engineering at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if a satellite falls out of the sky, more than half of the wreckage survives.

  36. ROSAT was brought down by a 1998 cyber-attack by mage7 · · Score: 1
    According to this Business Week article , ROSAT's failure was brought about (accidentally or otherwise) by a cyber attack on NASA allegedly originating from Russia,

    In 1998 a U.S.-German satellite known as ROSAT, used for peering into deep space, was rendered useless after it turned suddenly toward the sun. NASA investigators later determined that the accident was linked to a cyber-intrusion at the Goddard Space Flight Center in the Maryland suburbs of Washington. The interloper sent information to computers in Moscow, NASA documents show. U.S. investigators fear the data ended up in the hands of a Russian spy agency.

    And i used to laugh at that satellite "hacking" scene in "Antitrust".

  37. Why the name? by lazlo · · Score: 1

    Does it worry anyone else that this satellite shares a name with a unit of ionizing radiation?

    I mean, sure, probably the sat was named after WIlhelm just like the unit, but this is definitely a case where absorbing just one roentgen would almost certainly be fatal.

    --
    Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?
    1. Re:Why the name? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Germans call X rays Röntgen rays.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  38. It's down by einyen · · Score: 1

    It re-entered sunday 23rd between 1:45 and 2:15 am UTC (22nd 9:45 - 10:15 pm EDT): http://www.spaceflight101.com/rosat-re-entry-information.html

  39. Fear by optymizer · · Score: 1

    "falling satellites from the sky" is the new thing to be afraid of. So long, "terrorism".