Slashdot Mirror


China Hires 1 Million People To Fight Fake Products

hackingbear writes "In a sign of the Chinese Government's intention to crack down on the black market, there were about 1 million people employed to remove fake goods from Chinese streets, according to the vice-chairman of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, Wang Jinzhen. Like our War on Drugs, the chance of that succeeding is not very high. 'I don't think it will be completely corrected, but still it will be eased,' he said. 'That's good for China and the company and for everyone in the world.' One key reason why companies keep their R&D departments out side of China is because of concern over IP protection. As an engineer, should we wish their effort genuine and successful? Or as your grandma warned you, be careful what you wish for."

151 comments

  1. Laughable, given certain traditions. by sethstorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All this will be is a make-work jobs program for China. The only fake goods you'll see stopped are the ones made by people from the wrong families.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by nelson.milum · · Score: 2

      I take a less cynical view, and hope that this is an earnest effort. It would be nice I think to not ascossiate China with cheap knock-off products... I'm probably just naive though.

    2. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A million that do not have to get private jobs or go to the classic laogai system (prison labor and prison farms).
      As for fake goods for local use, the wealth/top mil/gov have their own shops so they are fine.
      If your making fakes, everything is paid for, nobody will want to see a good thing stop.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Indeed it will probably not work. Like so many attempts didn't work. Part of the reason is of course corruption, part of the reason is moral. People just don't care. I recall the story of a complete company that was faked: some Chinese businessmen set up a company using the exact logos and names etc. like some foreign company, in the same business, and were trading quite well. They were caught for trademark infringement and so. Comment from the journalist was something like: "explaining to the defendants what they did wrong will be the hardest part of the trial".

      Copying is in their blood it seems. If one is successful in a certain business, everyone else will jump on it and do the same. If a hand bag sells well, other people will start making the exact same hand bag. It is really extreme. The copies often hit the market before the original.

      But at least from the central government the will is there to do something about it. Not that they care so much about foreign copyrights and patents, they know they have to do it to protect their own companies, and to foster innovation of their own. Because that's what's currently thoroughly lacking in China: they copy, but do not improve anything of it or create their own designs based on imported designs, which is what gave the Japanese their early edge and what helped propel that country to the top of the world's economies.

    4. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please list the ten biggest examples of innovators[tm] whose efforts wilted because of copying.

      To be clear: I want ten examples of failure not because the inventor threw his toys out of the pram ("I'm not writing any more music until u guise stop downloading pirated MP3s I'm entitled to more money!!!") but because their efforts became genuinely financially unsustainable.

    5. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      That's going to be hard, as in case of rampant copying a lot of innovation isn't even begun with in the first place because no-one wants to risk investing so much. And that's now part of China's mind set too.

    6. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I want to see a ten examples of innovators[tm] whose efforts succeeded because of copying. For example, product was developed, copied, but the innovater became successful because the copies gave market penertration/advertising, but the original was stayed better because they focused on the product.

    7. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even when there is a "great idea that might actually work" it seems that people feel the urge to turn it down somehow. :P

    8. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I think it will work, because it will stop some of the more blatant fakes and move it out of the big highstreet stores. Yes there will still be fakes, but at least people will know they are buying them, and know where to go if they don't want to buy them.

    9. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony is that America could really use a "make-work jobs program" right now (like the Works Progress Administration that built so much infrastructure during the Great Depression).

      Maybe the war on drugs could be made more labor-intensive. Let's think outside the box here. Pay unemployed people $5 an hour to work as sniffer dogs? Require SWAT teams to use human shields instead of body armor? Maybe we could pay farmers not to grow poppies, and then pay armies of workers not to harvest them?

    10. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Wait, you want someone to list the companies that noone will ever have heard of because they failed? If we have heard of them, they would have been big enough to overcome such an obstacle.

    11. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please list the ten biggest examples of innovators[tm] whose efforts wilted because of copying.

      Steve Jobs. Oh no, wait, he built his entire career on copying: taking products that already existed and executing them better.

      The Mac wasn't the first personal computer - but it was better executed. The iPod wasn't the first MP3 player - but it was better executed. OS X wasn't the first GUI for Unix - but God knows, it was better executed.

      Innovation is overvalued by Western businesses relative to execution. Yes, China produces a lot of poorly made knock-offs - but what annoys consumers is not that they're knock-offs, but that they're poorly made. If China can start producing well-made knock-offs, like Apple does, then maybe Western businesses will start to understand that the fuss about "counterfeit goods" is little more than cultural prejudice.

      That prejudice has deep roots in Western culture, going back at least as far as the Renaissance and the myth of the lone creative genius - Da Vinci, Rembrandt, Newton, Edison, Einstein. Yes, those people were exceptionally creative - but they were also embedded in creative cultures where people shared, copied and built upon each other's ideas.

      We've got our heads around the idea that it takes a village to raise a child. How long before we understand that it takes a village to build a decent MP3 player?

    12. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by zorazora · · Score: 1

      "Copying is in their blood it seems." -- This sounds rather offensive. Among all the qualities that separate us from animals Patent Law is sitting at the very top. You must understand that in that country, the higher end of the infrastructure is very much lagging behind. I expect more understanding and helping hands, and at the same time less cynical opinions from people living in a well developed country.

    13. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by AlecC · · Score: 1

      Because that's what's currently thoroughly lacking in China: they copy, but do not improve anything of it or create their own designs based on imported designs, which is what gave the Japanese their early edge and what helped propel that country to the top of the world's economies.

      And Chinese companies, having copied successfully, are now starting to innovate - exactly as the Japanese did. Japan went though an early stage when "Made in Japan" meant shoddy look-alikes. From which, over thirty years, they transitions to where the same phrase meant quality advanced products. China is already embarked down that road - it won't be thirty years before they have a similar reputation. While there is still a lot of cheap tat coming out of China, companies like Huawei are producing kit that is seriously outperforming their Western competitors.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    14. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by wisty · · Score: 1

      It sounds like an earnest effort. But I really doubt that even China would employ 1 million people to do try to do this.

      There's about 2 million soldiers in China. There's about 2 million police. There's no way in *hell* that busting counterfeit handbags is going to be 1/2 as important as defence, or law and order.

      Perhaps there's 1 million chengguan - city administrators. These are basically police deputies who maintain public order, by clearing away illegal or unregistered businesses. That's a charitable definition. I expect that stopping the sale of counterfeit products has simply been added to the chengguan's duties / excuses to shake down businesses. But China is trying to make it sound much more of a crackdown.

    15. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a point to note: Japan and then South Korea's economic growth have been based on imitating first, then improving and finally innovating. As a matter of fact, wasn't USA the same when it "introduced" technologies and ideas from Europe, until its own market got enough momentum to attract talents and capital from other parts of the world?

      You need to look at the whole picture and the phase of development before you jump into conclusion. Of course it's always easier and feels better to think "I am better" or judge others from your own point of view or standpoint.

    16. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Canazza · · Score: 1

      1) Flash
      2) Photoshop

      both were easilly pirateable and crackable so they became incredibly popular.

      I admit, that's only two things, but it's a start.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    17. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Smirker · · Score: 1

      Almost LOLed when I thought you made a pun about the "wong families."

    18. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The IBM PC. Success directly attributable to the unauthorised, much cheaper and entirely compatible clones.

    19. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comments like yours get said a lot too, but it's hard to prove that either... I mean, It's hard to take it so seriously when a company like Apple complains that copying has taken away their chances to monetize on their R&D investments -- they are the most profitable technology company in the world! With regards to China, there were reports earlier this year that the highest revenue Apple stores in the world are in China. If copying was such a problem, you'd think that would not be the case...

      Basically, it all boils down to the definition of "rampant": we (as society) need to provide a some protection against copying while allowing most of it, that's how progress happens. It's just a question of drawing the line and it's not entirely clear to me that US end Europe are totally in the right in this discussion.

    20. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's right, I want assertions to be backed up with evidence. Is this going to be a problem?

    21. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd settle for one or two. They must exist, but I don't know of any. I assume you mean copying as in cloning (Trademarks, etc) and not just copying as in doing the same thing but better.

    22. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I live in the most developed part of China: Hong Kong. I may be a westerner, but that remark really echoes what many people around here say about Chinese, particularly mainlanders of course. You even hear it on the mainland.

      And have seen first-hand time and again that they love to copy things. The iPad had barely hit the shelves, and cheap Android based lookalikes were offered already (advertised as "7-inch iPad").

      Mainlanders really have a love for fake stuff, they even have a "miss plastic surgery" election: a miss election but then for women that had plastic surgery. Everything is copied there, or faked. Internationally known is of course the milk powder scandal, and probably also the char-siu-bau that were filled with cardboard - but in that case the news report itself was faked. Even fake chicken eggs have been found in Hong Kong (they can bounce after boiling them - really interesting in a way - as I understand they actually came complete with thin rigid shell and liquid content that becomes hard when boiling).

      When you buy something in a shop in mainland you'd best assume it's fake, unless you're really sure it isn't (the price is often a giveaway). Just that a shop looks like an Apple shop doesn't necessarily mean it's an Apple shop. And that's no joke. It's a disaster.

    23. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Making a similar product is not the same as a concerted effort to copy products.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    24. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. If there's another way to explain DealExtreme's free shipping and continually getting away with lying to customs on pretty much every package than government influence, I don't know what it is. As I see it, the Chinese Government is directly aiding and abetting the sale of fake goods. ($5 Foakleys... last about half as long as $100 real ones)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      It would be nice I think to not ascossiate China with cheap knock-off products... I'm probably just naive though.

      China will start pushing for and supporting stronger IP protection when it judges that it's in its own interest to do so, and that's nothing to do with being "nice". Partly for the investment reasons, but far more because they'll have their own IP which they wish to reap the benefit of.

      Nothing specifically anti-Chinese in this observation; the Americans were quite content to permit unauthorised copying of works by non-citizens during the 19th century:-

      In the 19th century publishing battles raged between Britain and the United States. A loophole in American copyright law enabled publishers to reprint British books at will. Until 1891, the intellectual property of non-citizens was up for grabs. Charles Dickens, Alfred Tennyson and other popular British writers lost untold amounts of income as American publishers profited. American writers, too, were commercial losers at home, as a book of poetry by Longfellow or Poe selling for one dollar had to compete with a 25 cent novel by Dickens or Thackeray. It was an intellectual-property war every bit as fierce as today's DVD black market in China. American publishers would send their agents to roam the wharves in New York, Philadelphia and Boston to intercept popular manuscripts coming in by ship. Across the Atlantic, English customs officials would search passenger ships coming from the States and confiscate pirated British books as contraband.

      Now that America stands to benefit much more from protection of its own IP, it's quite obviously in favour of it.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    26. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Nobody
      2) Nobody
      3) Nobody
      4) Nobody
      5) Nobody
      6) Nobody
      7) Nobody
      8) Nobody
      9) Nobody
      10) Nobody

    27. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      $5 Foakleys... last about half as long as $100 real ones

      And this is bad, why, exactly?

      If you buy 4 Foakleys for $20, they will last twice as long as the $100 "real" ones.

    28. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose someone could come up with statistical correlation or economic data, but that's not what you've asked for. You've specifically asked for ten anecdotes. And called it evidence. And signaled that you intend to "no true scotsman" the bejeezus out of anyone that attempts to respond.

    29. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by arkenian · · Score: 1

      So I was about to mark you insightful, but then I remembered . . . the IBM PC doesn't qualify. Yes "PC Compatible" became the most popular thing around because of copying, but after that, the only IBM PC of note was the thinkpad, and no one bought an ACTUAL IBM desktop. In fact, the IBM PC would arguably be exactly the case requested of an innovator whose business got destroyed by copying even though they tried desperately to keep it alive.

    30. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by tonywong · · Score: 1

      Even many Chinese are exasperated by the avalanche of fake goods. It's not just iPhones and hangbags. It's fake milk, fake eggs, fake meat, recycled cooking oil from the street. Almost everything can be adulterated and it is, and even brand name and big chains are being subverted to the point where even the rich aren't sure what they are getting. This means the ruling party is getting affected by this too so something is going to be done.

      Whether it is effective or not remains to be seen.

    31. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCO.

      I could list others, but I feel the strength of my first example is sufficient.

    32. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You must be a kid.

      Lots of fools bought IBM PCs then PC/XPs then PC/ATs. Later they bought IBM ps2s. You might remember ps2 connectors that your dad used before USB.

      There was a time when IBM ps2s were relative bargains next to Compaqs. Compaqs were tanks made of 8 gauge steel and sold at profit margins that would have made Steve Jobs blush.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    33. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Nono, its Ok, we can just play his game.

      Please name 10 grocery stores that failed due to shoplifting. You cant, Ergo, shoplifting is harmless.

      Is this how the game is played?

    34. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Yes, IBM suffered heavily. So heavily that today it's one of the most successful technology companies around, still manufactures computers and is *the* company to go to for high-performance computing.

    35. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      Statistics are the result of aggregating individual data points. If you can't give me ten data points in your favour, the implied assertion is incorrect.

    36. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      If you can't answer a question, set up a straw man, eh?

    37. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by arkenian · · Score: 1

      I remember all that (You forgot the PC JR.! My best friend had one while I still had an Apple II . . . then I got a packard Bell that beat the pants off his computer (being a packard bell it died several times, of course, but that's beside the point)) but where's the IBM PC now?

    38. Re:Laughable, given certain traditions. by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      IBM doesn't manufacture computers, they sold that to Lenovo a LONG time ago. IBM still makes Servers, but that's about all there.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  2. One million? by Kahlandad · · Score: 5, Funny

    They actually hired 1 man and 999,999 poorly made clones.

    1. Re:One million? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      In this case, it will likely just turn around and bite the marketing brands right on the butt. A lot of consumers will find the only difference between the correctly unkown brand and the branded version is the label with a 1000% markup and a whole lot of B$ advertising they now don't have to pay for.

      Hell, all I want is an honest review site where branded crap with weighed down by a crap load of advertising costs is accurately compared to the unbranded stuff coming from the same factory in China.

      Bugger the brand, I'm sick of being expected to parade around the streets like some idiot pay for the privilege billboard and having to pay for some lying celebrity who pretends to like the product.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:One million? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I buy stuff on quality and not on brand name. A $20-60 pair of slacks will hold together just as well as $800 Armani slacks. I don't need pretentiousness clinging to my balls all day.

    3. Re:One million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

  3. My thoughts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only one million? Really?

  4. Dealextreme? by adolf · · Score: 1

    How will this affect the cheap stuff I buy from Dealextreme and similar (including Ebay) sites in China, whose wares show up often properly-branded (sometimes even including hologram tags) on my doorstep quickly and inexpensively?

    1. Re:Dealextreme? by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      I assume it's a case-by-case, uh, case. In these cases. In any case, I think it's likely that some of the products may disappear from DX, if this initiative has any effect.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  5. how is this benifical to china? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    pulling 1 million workers out of the private sector and assigning them the job of discouraging trade... it's for the economy's own good!

    That's before even starting the debate of whether ip protection promotes growth.

  6. Why won't people just share? by mfaras · · Score: 2

    In the end we'll have to stop with all this industrial spying and intellectual property things. Let's just go OpenHardware by default, share our creations and then share the market strategy. This way any insight from any person can be used by anyone, doesn't it sound nice?

    1. Re:Why won't people just share? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This way any insight from any person can be used by anyone, doesn't it sound nice?

      Where is the profit motive in this economic model? Why would anyone risk time and money to launch a new product when it could be immediately and legally copied?

    2. Re:Why won't people just share? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the profit motive in this economic model? Why would anyone risk time and money to launch a new product when it could be immediately and legally copied?

      Where is the profit motive in this economic model? Why would anyone risk time and money to launch a new product when it could be immediately and legally copied?

    3. Re:Why won't people just share? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that model will be any more popular than open-source software at best.

    4. Re:Why won't people just share? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This way any insight from any person can be used by anyone, doesn't it sound nice?

      Where is the profit motive in this economic model? Why would anyone risk time and money to launch a new product when it could be immediately and legally copied?

      First Mover Advantage.

      Development is likely to be incremental (ie. cheap) so you probably won't see big splashes from anyone other than new start-ups and academia but the economics work fine.

    5. Re:Why won't people just share? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask RedHat what they have to say about CentOS. I haven't heard RedHat suing CentOS all over the world.

    6. Re:Why won't people just share? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure we're talking about the same thing. One thing is to completely reproduce quality goods. The other is selling "look-alike" goods for cheap, that demerit the brands.

      I'm all in for sharing knowledge, but what they're talking here is faked brands, which to the end user means nothing else than lack of quality.

  7. China black-banned by Wolfling1 · · Score: 2

    Our software company has already black-banned China. We flatly refuse to license any product in China due to IP concerns.

    /we know this wont stop them from copying it. It is a deterrant.

    It is one of two countries that we have black-banned for legal reasons.

    The other is the US. We're not a big software house, and we can't afford the PI insurance to sell products in America.

    1. Re:China black-banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the American way, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:China black-banned by adolf · · Score: 1

      Black-banned?

      I understand the term "black-balled."

      I also understand the term "banned"

      But "black-banned?" Please define.

    3. Re:China black-banned by Wolfling1 · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Poor English. Either term is adequate.

    4. Re:China black-banned by Psychotria · · Score: 2

      http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Where_did_the_saying_Black_Ban_originate

      Origin: Australia (Circa 1925)

      History: The Australian Labor Movement (Unions) required legal financial membership of the appropriate union. They would issue a membership card printed and signed in black ink.

      Usage: Unions would place work bans upon various employers or work sites where the employer used non-union labor/practices. They would also place bans for political reasons. The term "black ban" means Union members not allowed to work for or at an employer or work site. The term is non-racist.

    5. Re:China black-banned by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      I'm not pissed off about it and I'm an American (or a US citizen for you "sensitive PC" types). If the cost of doing business in the US is too high, then it makes sense not to do business there. I am curious about what Professional Indemnity Insurance is needed by a Software Publisher, does the GP's company produce software for SCADA systems or medical systems?

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    6. Re:China black-banned by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I think the word you're looking for is "black-listed".

    7. Re:China black-banned by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      No. I'm pretty sure he used black-banned. It is used in a few parts of the world to mark places where products aren't sold. Aussieland, Canada and India use this term.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:China black-banned by syousef · · Score: 1

      Our software company has already black-banned China. We flatly refuse to license any product in China due to IP concerns. /we know this wont stop them from copying it. It is a deterrant.

      So it's a piracy deterent to make the only way to get your product piracy?

      You don't even see the stupidity do you? Stop drinking the cool-aid. It's toxic.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    9. Re:China black-banned by syousef · · Score: 1

      Black-banned?

      I understand the term "black-balled."

      I also understand the term "banned"

      But "black-banned?" Please define.

      Did you hear what he said? He's proud his company has disallowed legitimate ownership of the software in a country to prevent piracy in that country??? I'd say more apt terms are "face palm" or perhaps "face plant".

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    10. Re:China black-banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it won't stop them from copying, by definition it won't deter that copying.

      So much for being a deterrent.

      If it were my decision, I'd go ahead and happily license it in China. The difference is that you get the income from that first license (maybe several) before a few other Chinese black-hat companies just pirate it. With your deterrent, you DON'T get the income from any Chinese licenses, and a few Chinese black-hat companies just pirate it.

    11. Re:China black-banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is refusing to let them buy the product legitimately going to prevent them from pirating it?

      If anything, it seems it may encourage it, as shops that would pay for it will now just pirate it.

      Hint: I know what I speak of. I'm Canadian, and for about a decade it was "tradition" up here to pirate American satellite, because it was not legal to pay for it (and it was difficult/impossible to get decent TV via Canadian satellite at the time). In fact, I would be bold enough to say that 1 in 10 Canadian households had pirate equipment. And no, none of us felt any compunction about it.

      Good luck! If you're right, though, you could prevent piracy 100% by refusing to sell the product everywhere.

    12. Re:China black-banned by Chapter80 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The term is non-racist.

      I thought the standard these days, to determine whether something is racist, is whether anyone is offended by the term.

      We can't name our college team the Redskins, to honor the tribe for which the school is named, since there are some who might be offended by our attempt to honor our past.

      Whites cannot use the N-word, while blacks can, because blacks aren't offended when other blacks use it.

      A term like "he gypped me." can't be used these days, because a gypsy may be offended (even though the person who uses the term never knew the origin and never intended it to be offensive or a reference to gypsies).

      I was even corrected in a business meeting by an employee of a large consumer products company (soap, paper, tampons you can rely on, and stackable potato chips), for saying "Bang for the Buck" because of the obvious implications about prostitution, and how offensive it may be to women. (Personally, I was thinking dynamite....)

      I guess mentioning the full name of major league baseball's hit leader might actually offend some women, because of the reference to an erection.

    13. Re:China black-banned by modi123 · · Score: 1

      The other is the US. We're not a big software house, and we can't afford the PI insurance to sell products in America.

      Professional Indemnity insurance?? What type of hellish software are you writing that you need protection frm bodily injury r property dmg due t r company’s negligence? I hope you are not selling in the UK either!

    14. Re:China black-banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing how Dick Trickle got away with his name for so long.

    15. Re:China black-banned by Wolfling1 · · Score: 1

      Hehehe... no. PI is not just about bodily injury.

      We make medical records software. If someone dies at the hands of the medical professional, we're next in the firing line regardless of whether our software was at fault.

      The legal costs of selling software overseas is often less about the 'level of risk' involved in the software, and more about the litigious nature of the country we're selling into. The price on PI insurance is not something we set or control. The insurance companies do that. They are the ones who have made the US an untenable market for us.

      BTW: We currently sell into 14 countries (and, yes, the UK is one of them).

    16. Re:China black-banned by Wolfling1 · · Score: 1

      You don't know much about IP laws in China, do you?

      Sorry.. that sounds inflammatory. Let me try again.

      As soon as one copy of our software exists legally in China, they can copy it ad-nauseum.

      As long as every Chinese instance of our software is illegal, we have a legal option.

      It also makes it easier for our staff - eg 'Uh.. you're in China. Sorry, we don't sell our software in China'. Therefore... why would anyone in China want our software? Therefore... piracy deterrant. Doesn't seem so stupid.

    17. Re:China black-banned by Wolfling1 · · Score: 1

      Someone else bailed me up about this too. I am notorious for mixing my metaphors, so its probably my bad. Having said that, I don't think anyone would be unclear about my intent.

    18. Re:China black-banned by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      That's bollocks (as in untrue, not incredible). And I say that from the perspective of a developer at a healthcare IT company.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    19. Re:China black-banned by Wolfling1 · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks for that. Are you a lawyer? Do the owners of your healthcare IT company include you in their meetings with their company lawyers? Do you get to read the legal advice handed to them?

      Your credibility is zip. I'd prefer to hear what the owner of your healthcare IT company says.

      I own mine.

  8. Coming very soon, world brands from China by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Knockoffs belong to an earlier stage of commerce. China is now moving into the branding era. Haier, the largest manufacturer of major appliances in the world, based in Shandong, now sells in the US under its own name. Yesterday, BYD Cars, a major automaker in China, opened their US headquarters.

    Someday, Foxconn will decide they no longer need Apple.

    1. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

      Be a little less biased. Look through this: http://www.haier.com/index.html. We have Haier Japan, Haier India, Haier Europe, Haier Russia. That doesn't mean they are branding it as American/European/Indian/Japanese/Russian/whatever. those are just marketing divisions. A lot of companies have those.

    2. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by adolf · · Score: 1

      I've seen Haier stuff for sale in the US for years -- mostly on goods that involve refrigeration of some kind. Looking at your link, I see that its available offerings have not changed much recently.

      I have a Haier chest freezer in my utility room, and it was already rather old when I got a couple of years ago.

      The BYD Cars thing is another point entirely, but I (for one) am completely satisfied at calling Bullshit on exactly 50% of your post.

      FWIW, YMMV, et cetera.

    3. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      And it's about time that they start to develop their own brands. China has been developing for several decades by now, and their manufacturers have only managed to establish a handful of brand locally, and even less internationally. For the rest it's all brand-less, no-name stuff that can compete on nothing but price.

      Brands tell who it comes from, and give an indication of quality. Be it low, mid or high quality - the important thing is that you see BMW your expectations on quality, price, etc. are different than when you see Volkswagen. This allows BMW to charge higher prices than Volkswagen. But put two no-brand cars next to one another... well everything else being the same (on the outlook) the customer will go for the cheaper one.

    4. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      So those chinese cars are the same rolling death traps that we already know and love right? Fatal crashes at 30mph.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And any American that buys either company's products should have their citizenship revoked and/or immediately deported to China. It should be that way for any Chinese made product.

    6. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both my ADSL modem and cell phone are Huawei branded. Neither has failed me yet, but I've no idea how often they "phone home".

    7. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Like.... Lenovo?

      --
      This is blinging
    8. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by stasike · · Score: 1

      Exactly like Lenovo.
      And don't forget the famous Chinese brand Hummer.

    9. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someday, Foxconn will decide they no longer need Apple.

      Kind of like how ASUS decided they didn't need Dell.

    10. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by toxonix · · Score: 1

      BYD cars are knockoffs of popular cars. So much so that some BYD dealerships were switching the logos, selling them as their much more expensive originals. BYD has apologized recently, saying the behavior of the dealerships is 'embarrassing'. http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0810/gallery.china_cars.fortune/index.html BYD, Geely and other big manufacturers in China are constantly lying about everything they do. I believe it's part of the culture unfortunately.

    11. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by toxonix · · Score: 1

      They haven't failed yet because they are duplicates of already working technology from the west. Copy, paste, re-brand!

    12. Re:Coming very soon, world brands from China by rossjudson · · Score: 1

      Haier is a former State-owned corporation, with very tight links to the top levels of government. It would be very unwise for another manufacturer to copy Haier's products and logos, within China. Some well-connected Chinese brands will enjoy western-style IP protection, within Chinese borders. Of course, the Chinese government will expect protection for its brands overseas, as well.

      Quality Fade is a concept that Westerners need to understand thoroughly.

  9. Welcome Chicoms! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soon you too can reap the benefits of American style patent hell.
    Better put another million through intellectual property law school.

  10. Beware the Christmas Lights! by RobinEggs · · Score: 2

    I love the way stupid ways companies try to discourage product copying. Like the way they insist, no matter the type of product, that knockoffs are a safety hazard.

    If you believe these idiots everything from blue jeans to DVDs will kill you unless it comes from the right factory and has a little hologram on the label.

    Not to mention that tons of illicit product out there is perfectly authentic; it's just not licensed. Just because a license gets pulled doesn't always mean the owners stop churning out the product, and even while the place is licensed there's often some after-hours manufacturing to make extra money on the black market.

    At some point we'll have to accept that intellectual property isn't a natural law; some people and some entire nations won't follow it simply because they don't believe in it, and America won't regain its economic prowess via all of this endless arm twisting, extortion, and bribery aimed at exporting our intellectual property law.

    We won't get away with basing our entire economy on licensing payments, Hollywood fantasies, and financial products. The sooner people just accept that the sooner we can start fixing shit.

    1. Re:Beware the Christmas Lights! by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      I love the way stupid ways companies try to discourage product copying. Like the way they insist, no matter the type of product, that knockoffs are a safety hazard.

      If you believe these idiots everything from blue jeans to DVDs will kill you unless it comes from the right factory and has a little hologram on the label.

      Not to mention that tons of illicit product out there is perfectly authentic; it's just not licensed. Just because a license gets pulled doesn't always mean the owners stop churning out the product, and even while the place is licensed there's often some after-hours manufacturing to make extra money on the black market.

      At some point we'll have to accept that intellectual property isn't a natural law; some people and some entire nations won't follow it simply because they don't believe in it, and America won't regain its economic prowess via all of this endless arm twisting, extortion, and bribery aimed at exporting our intellectual property law.

      We won't get away with basing our entire economy on licensing payments, Hollywood fantasies, and financial products. The sooner people just accept that the sooner we can start fixing shit.

      Right.

      Because there is nothing wrong with Chinese counterfeit bolts made of low-grade steel but marked as high strength, right? You'd want those holding your seat and seat belt to your car frame, right?

      And you wouldn't sue the car company if the bolts failed in an accident.

      If you want to buy some fake jeans or a fancy D&G bag on the black market, it'll probably be fine. But the knockoffs can a safety hazard for any product that is actually regulated for safety. Maybe your fake Chinese kid's toy is made out of cheaper hazardous materials. Or maybe it's flammable.

    2. Re:Beware the Christmas Lights! by brit74 · · Score: 1
      "At some point we'll have to accept that intellectual property isn't a natural law; some people and some entire nations won't follow it simply because they don't believe in it, and America won't regain its economic prowess via all of this endless arm twisting, extortion, and bribery aimed at exporting our intellectual property law."
      There is no such thing as "natural law". Get over it and start treating people fairly. It's the only rational basis for morality, not some pie-in-the-sky "natural law".

      "We won't get away with basing our entire economy on licensing payments, Hollywood fantasies, and financial products. The sooner people just accept that the sooner we can start fixing shit."
      The United States is still a manufacturing powerhouse - though you certainly wouldn't know it from reading slashdot. It was only last year that China surpassed the United States in manufacturing. Don't believe me? Here you go:

      March 15, 2011:
      "By measures of output, China edged by the United States to become the world's largest manufacturing country last year, ending US dominance over the last 110 years, according to a study Monday by economic research firm IHS Global Insight."
      http://www.china.org.cn/business/2011-03/15/content_22147078.htm

      I know that intellectual property is (for some bizarre reason I can't fathom) panned on Slashdot, but it takes real work to make digital media. Based on your comment, it seems that even "for profit" piracy is condoned. I suppose the ultimate result of your argument is devaluing intellectual work in favor of physical products, even when IP-based products are more important. I mean, the whole reason the US manufacturing sector is so large (despite having far fewer workers in manufacturing than China) is because of computers and software. But, no, no, go ahead and take a swing at intellectual property in favor of "real" manufactured products. And feel free to bitch about tractor based farming and fertilizer in favor of "good old muscle with a shovel and hoe".

    3. Re:Beware the Christmas Lights! by wvmarle · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem with those knock-offs is not so much product copying, but brand copying. E.g. US Superbolt produces quality and strength certified bolts, with a price tag to match. Then Chinabolt produces the same bolts, but sells them at lower price under their own brand. Fine: you know what you buy, you know there is no strength certification, so don't use these bolts when you need such a quality guarantee. That doesn't say Chinabolt's bolts are poor quality - they may be just as strong, they're just not tested and certified to be.

      The problem starts when Chinabolt starts selling their bolts in Superbolt look-alike packing, claiming to be guaranteed strong enough, just half price. And that's a problem that should be tackled head-on. You must know what you buy, and currently in China unless you're absolutely sure what you buy is the original (how to be so sure, that's another matter) you'd better assume it's a knock-off.

    4. Re:Beware the Christmas Lights! by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've seen those figures about the US being ahead in manufacturing.

      But are they really legit?

      Does buying 10 turnkey parts from China, and putting the final few bolts in the US count as "Made in the USA"?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    5. Re:Beware the Christmas Lights! by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      But buying some chips from South Korea, Japan and Taiwan, assembling them in China is called "Made in China".

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    6. Re:Beware the Christmas Lights! by scorilo · · Score: 1

      I concur. Though you have to admit: IP laws suck if you're an innovator, but they're money in the bank if you're an IP lawyer.

      --
      "One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that ones work is terribly important." -BRussell
    7. Re:Beware the Christmas Lights! by rossjudson · · Score: 1

      The problem gets distinctly worse when Chinabolt sells Superbolt look-alikes, but decides that the product is just too expensive to make. They cut the quality, but leave the packaging intact.

      Never underestimate how pervasive fake stuff is in Chinese culture. I suspect that part of the reason for this crackdown is that Chinese people themselves can't figure out what is real and what is fake. For example: "Deslon Germany" cookware. Looks like pretty good quality, claims to be a German product. The Chinese people who bought it think it's German, and paid high prices for it. Except -- there is no Deslon Germany. And why are their Chinese characters stamped into the metal?

      It's probably a knock-off of a real german design; the quality seemed high to me. But -- deliberately deceptive to the domestic Chinese customer.

    8. Re:Beware the Christmas Lights! by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      That the quality of the knock-off will be lower I didn't mention because to me that's implied already. Knock-offs tend to be lower quality than the real thing; that's why they can knock off so much of the price too. Again the problem is the knock-off producer doesn't have their own brand, so effectively no merit to compete on, only price is left. And the retailers (and consumers) will then go for the lowest priced product.

  11. This will increase inflation in China by tvlinux · · Score: 1

    Many people buy fake items because that is all they can afford. When the fakes are removed the original will cost too much for the average person. It will also be a great opportunity for off brands and local brands. In the end the average person will have to pay more for everything.

    1. Re:This will increase inflation in China by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      No, it will mean that local brands will take over. pick up your latest cPhone and cPod players. Likewise, droidCX2 is now available. The difference is that all of the tech will have been stolen/duplicated already, so having a new local brand is MUCH cheaper.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:This will increase inflation in China by nzac · · Score: 1

      Or things are cheaper because they now pay the real price for the former fake object.
      These products have been developed if they are actually useful people will continue to buy them.

    3. Re:This will increase inflation in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people buy fake items because that is all they can afford. When the fakes are removed the original will cost too much for the average person.

      Cry me a river. "I have to buy a fake Rolex since I can't buy a real one, waa waa waa."

      It will also be a great opportunity for off brands and local brands. In the end the average person will have to pay more for everything.

      OK, now you got it right, if you can't afford Armani, buy a legitimate, cheaper option. If you buy fakes because you can't afford the name brand, you're just showing everyone that you're an insecure douchebag bleater.

  12. How does this work exactly??? by Genda · · Score: 1

    ...996...997...998...999... Okay you, your job is the keep the other 999 folks honest!

  13. 1m people employed... by ushere · · Score: 1

    of which 99% are fakes

  14. Numbers don't add up by Rsriram · · Score: 1

    Seems like PRspeak. China has a working population of about 500-600 million of which probably 300 million are in the manufacturing sector (remove agriculture and services). A 1 million strong workforce means one person for every 300 workers just to check counterfeiting. Something wrong here. I guess these are just buzzword to show how much the Chinese govt is doing against piracy. It signals intent rather than actual implementation.

    --
    O this learning! What a thing it is - William Shakespeare
    1. Re:Numbers don't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake products don't just come from China. A lot of the fake stuff I run into here actually comes from Korea, Vietnam, etc. China isn't always just the manufacturer, it's also a big and growing market. In fact, non-Chinese fake stuff competing with Chinese brands may be a contributing incentive to this campaign.

    2. Re:Numbers don't add up by priceslasher · · Score: 1

      Maybe they already have a million people enforcing various things for certain people but who need an acceptable label more in tune with western values. So now China will have copyright reminderers, free speech zones, ministries of peace, insurance orginizations. Next they will have a million lawyers.

  15. Chinese Lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot boyz and grrlz, do get a grip on reality. When the Chines government tells a lie, it is an obvious whopper. It is delightful, really. Well, they have just told a whopper. Nothing to see here, move along.

  16. Might as well just finish the west by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, each one that has moved to there, has suffered from extreme theft. Generally, the stolen goods are then sold local and around the world, EXCEPT to America and EU. So, the fools that produce there get one decently sized market for a time and then accepts that. Yet, everybody that goes there loses.

    Now, if they would move the engineering there, they will find that it becomes like what happened to Google (stolen by gov. plants inside of your company). At that point, any good stockholder would fire all of the top management, press charges against them for killing the company and then sell the company to Chinese gov.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Might as well just finish the west by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From experience I can tell you that things aren't always stolen, but often sold. I've dealt with a ton of US companies who would ask me to remove identifying markers from their molds and sell them on their behalf. This looks good on the budget of their sourcing team and the rest of the US company is non the wiser.

      I can also tell you that many of these US companies come here to make fakes themselves. The only thing they do different from the local fakes is that they change just enough parameters to get away with it back in the states and then boldly slap their own brand on it.

      And no, I'm not talking small shady firms here - this is all stuff sold in Wal-Mart, Target and other major chains.

  17. Is the west buying the fakes! by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    I think this plan will not work and I think that China does not want it to work. I do not want it to work either! Fake hand bags, watches, and so on are a huge tourist draw for China.
    I have been all over China, heck my wife is from China. One thing I notices, ALL her girl friends have expensive hand bags. LV, coach, execrate and none of them have fake bags. They spends tons on the real deal.
    When ever we go back to China, we normally will buy two are three fakes for our German friends or friends back in the US. I

    If you look at the numbers, China is currently the number one buyer of luxury goods in the world. Putting 1 million people to work as IP cops will not change it. The only thing it will do is hurt so many of the low income folks who make their living selling to people like me, who, to be honest would NEVER allow the purchase of a real 1000 dollar hand bag. So, they will not gain any sales.

    I get that China wants to change their image, but China is China and I think it will always have it's own values, which are different than the corporate west.

    1. Re:Is the west buying the fakes! by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      It's not just designer hand bags that are being copied. If that was all, there wouldn't be any large scale economic problem. It's basically *everything* that's worth more with a brand tag on it. Even if it's a bad and cheap copy of a phone battery, tagging it "Nokia" will make it double in value for less than the cost of the tagging. Simple parts like high grade steel bolts for planes, cars etc. get copied a lot as well. Make something sub par, tag it to be high quality and make more profit on it.

      It's not just the west buying this stuff. China itself is a big market for these goods as well. They are starting to feel the pain in their own economy of corruption and fraud. Babies are dying because baby milk powder gets poisoned with melamine. Train safety systems fail due to inferior parts being used, causing train crashes. Chinese companies lose contracts all over the world due to bad quality products delivered, even if their own fabrication was good. If they used inferior parts that fail safety tests, they will start testing them internally and go after the companies selling them fake products. This is the stage the Chinese economy is in now. They have discovered that this large scale of fakes and frauds is hurting themselves just as much as it's hurting other countries.

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  18. The streets aren't necessarily where its happening by drnb · · Score: 1

    ... remove fake goods from Chinese streets ...

    And what about the parking garage level that is entirely reserved for a swap meet type environment with the most blatant pirated and fake goods? Some of this stuff has already been moving from high visibility areas to more "underground" venues. All the locals know where to go.

  19. One million people by Chas · · Score: 2

    Looking to get bribed to look the other way.

    Theft and copying are second nature over there.
    As is graft.

    One of my clients had their entire COMPANY cloned over there. They never produced anything there. They never outsourced anything there. They never even hired anyone from there. Someone simply set up a shadow company, expropriated all the logos, model names, etc and set themselves up in the business of building exact knockoffs.

    It ran for nearly 3 years before someone over there screwed up and tried to be creative (by putting out a product line that wasn't a perfect knockoff). One day my customer gets a service call for a product line they don't produce. They go round and round with the people and finally dispatch a technician from their nearest office (Japan).

    All that getting the authorities involved did was cause the company to simply move, change their name and continue making knockoffs. As long as someone's palm is being greased, they'll never be shut down for good.

    Anyone even considering outsourcing ANYTHING to China nowadays is a fucking idiot.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:One million people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone even considering outsourcing ANYTHING to China nowadays is a fucking idiot.

      I really do not get how you got to that conclusion from your story? It seems if your client had outsourced to China they might (or might not, it's definitely not an exact science) have got their product built with less cost, making more profit. The knockoffs would be sold in China making business there harder, sure, but that was the case without outsourcing as well so what's the downside?

    2. Re:One million people by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      One of my clients had their entire COMPANY cloned over there. They never produced anything there. They never outsourced anything there. They never even hired anyone from there. Someone simply set up a shadow company, expropriated all the logos, model names, etc and set themselves up in the business of building exact knockoffs.

      Sounds like they have not set up any presence or registered their trademark there either. So why in the hell do you think their government should care about that? Try setting a complete knock-off of some brand-named Chinese products that are not sold here (Huiyuan Juice?) and see if anybody cares. The first step for protection is to pay up to lawyers and governments.

      And the primary reasons we don't see many counterfeit products on the street stores here are

      • There aren't many (independent) street stores left over here, unlike in a 3rd world country. We only have large chain stores like WalMart, Target, Walgreens. And large chain stores are perfect targets of any kind of describable wrongdoings, because we also have...
      • A lot of lawyers. We have more lawyers than farmers. And lawyers need to eat, pay bills, get rich. But last I check, they mostly still can't just get money sitting idle. They have to look for someone to go after.
      • The level of competition (of jobs) in Western world is nothing comparing to that of 3rd world countries, even in the current state of economy. Competition drives up greed (of common people.) Greed leads to risk taking behaviors, then lower morals and ethics. if our economy continue to slide, you guss what will happen.

      China is moving along to be a developed economy -- higher income, lower competition, more lawyers, more large companies. That's why they are fixing some of the 3rd world problems and getting some 1st world ones. But it will be a long march.

    3. Re:One million people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The company I used to work for just outsourced engineering for the product I used to work on to China. Yeah, they are idiots, but you see they don't care. They make their quarterly and year over year numbers for a year or two and then move on to another executive job somewhere else where they can brag about how they made all this money for the place they used to work for by moving all the jobs to China and saved $95K per engineer. Never mind that the product is now being cloned in every other country on the planet and (at least in my case) the Chinese engineers have screwed up the product because they don't understand it. By the time the shit catches up with them the executives will be retired and the money will be in the bank. It's this kind of short term greed first thinking that has gotten the US to where it is today, the edge of the cliff.

  20. Re:The streets aren't necessarily where its happen by pablo_max · · Score: 2

    Actually, you can never buy the good fakes on the street. You have to "order" them. Normally it takes like 40 min to get the good stuff. Some times, you come with them through a maze of houses and go into one. I dont do this though unless I am with a bigger group.
    Best to go to one of the markets and discreetly inquire about a higher quality product. Really, you cant tell the difference. All marks which should be there, all the tell tails. Everything is at it should be.

  21. Screw China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A country where the public drive over (twice) then ignore babies in the street while they writhe in agony and eventually die due their injuries is a sick place and we need to not be working with them at all.

    1. Re:Screw China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because its much better with a country that in the last 10 years has killed tens of thousands of babies by bombing them to pieces, or condemned them to cancer and all sorts of issues because that depleted iranium is such a nice slug against armour?

    2. Re:Screw China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your poor English betrays you commie! :)

  22. Re:Chinese Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese culture is an oxymoron. The communists eradicated the Chinese culture and replaced it with communism.

  23. Who is kidding whom here? by LABarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    China cracking down on counterfeit goods, eh? First off despite what the article says, I doubt China is really serious about this problem. I suspect it will be just like the problem of how China is "very serious about curbing the digital information available to it's own population," i.e. the Great firewall of China. This prevents information from getting into or or even out China. (My cousin went to China last summer and could not even post to facebook or his own blog) Yet despite China claiming they police their own citizens, in reality next to nothing actually done to control their citizen's attacking my servers on a daily basis. I average 3 to 6 hacking attempts per day. Over 90 percent of that traffic comes from China. Am I supposed to be happy that the situation isn't 10x times worse?

    The Chinese government doesn't really seem to be too concerned with efforts make their citizens play nice with the rest of the world... So how are we supposed to believe they are taking the issue of black market / counterfeit goods seriously?

    Curbing counterfeit goods or stopping hackers from illegal activity is a moral ethics problem as much as anything and I just don't see the Chinese government encouraging (or enforcing) it's citizens to do the right thing. This seems like another "we're getting tough on crime" PR stunt but in reality it's just business as usual.

    1. Re:Who is kidding whom here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mom is a flight attendant. She goes to china a lot and likes the occasional knockoff. They now hide certain brands of knockoffs, in secrete rooms, vents and off-site. If these knockoffs are found they are confiscated and destroyed. I guess the store has to pay a fine, too. But only if you have knockoffs of certain brands like Chanel. They will actual leave other brand's knockoffs at the store. This tells me; that certain brands are paying the Chinese Government to go after their knockoffs.

    2. Re:Who is kidding whom here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I didn't read it as cracking down. I read it as removing fake products. So they've now hired a million people to buy fake products for the government along side the other billion who buy fake products for themselves.

  24. Which counterfeit brands? by Big+Nemo+'60 · · Score: 1

    At least some big Chinese companies are now starting to build up their own intellectual property and branding.

    I'd guess, that's what their Government is aiming to protect.

    Good luck with that.

    --
    In the long run we are all dead. - John Maynard Keynes (1883 - 1946)
  25. Not a million full-timers by AlecC · · Score: 1

    I would doubt that this means a million full-time workers. My guess is that most of that million is people paid a small fee and a commission for looking out when they go to the markets in then normal course of their lives and whistleblowing when they see counterfeits. Obviously, there will be some full time organisers, and some full-time enforcers. But that figure of a million strikes me as a PR figure to tell the world that the government is taking conterfeiting seriously.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  26. a copyright on human babies production by xaccrocheur · · Score: 0

    Where do you draw the line ? I'm sure the first baker wanted to keep making bread alone. Now you got Monsanto and others trying to patent potatoes. I don't know about you, but when I see that, it makes me want to rip apart a Nokia N900 and build it myself.

    --
    pX
  27. No, you know what's laughable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laughable is when China wants to hire a million people to fight fake products. So China makes an online application form. And a script kiddie fills in a million fake applications with different names and mug shots taken from the Internet, but his bank account details. And then fakes doing it.

    That's laughable.

  28. More likely a million more bribe recipients by LazLong · · Score: 1

    Graft and corruption is endemic in Chinese society, so this is more of an opportunity for the newly employed to line their pockets with money from bribes.

    1. Re:More likely a million more bribe recipients by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      actually it is improving, especially in the coastal cities.

  29. oh China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that number is pretty insignificant compared to China's overall population. Its like getting 100 people to clean the entire gulf coast. It isn't enough in the grand scheme of things

  30. US history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until the US signed up to global patent agreements the flouting was huge in the 19th century, then as the economy matured they joined in. China is doing the same.

  31. So your detterent to them copying your software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So your detterent to them copying your software is to give them no option to buy it?

    MPAA, is that you? Oh wait, no. Not even the MPAA is THAT stupid.

    Next, how to stop shop lifting. Close your store. Stop car theft, bring it to the crushers. I don't even want to know your method for having safe sex.

  32. It's sad that people here will be posting without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    knowing the facts of the current situation in China and assume that US priacy situation apply to China's priacy situation.

  33. Damn! I'll Have to get my fakes from Malaysia now by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    WHAT?!?!?! They're getting rid of fakes?

    Won't somebody please thing of the kids? How can I afford to buy my kids their toys?

    Sorry son, no "Rego Hally Potter" for you this christmas.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  34. I'm writing this from China by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    I am an American on vacation in China and I've got a little time to kill so I'm responding to this from my hotel room in Shanghai. Obviously the GFoC is not blocking me from reading Slashdot or responding. For the curious, I have no problems to access the following:
    Slashdot
    CNN/SI
    Yahoo including email
    Gmail
    Google - works but it redirects to Google Hong Kong and they make it kind of slow to connect
    CNN
    Fox News
    Yahoo Finance
    Wikipedia although it's well known that articles about certain "sensitive" events won't come up

    Some article redirects don't work. Some news articles off Yahoo don't work, but I don't know if that is a Yahoo problem or not. For example I wanted to read an article about a Pakistani Taliban who got killed by a drone missile and I can't read it at all. The weirdest thing of all is that I absolutely cannot get to Facebook. Really? You're going to allow Wikipedia, CNN and Fox News but Facebook is too evil to allow? Really? Ohhhhkayyyyyy....

    I do have Chinese friends and you might be surprised at how much they actually do know about the outside world and about "secret" things their government doesn't want them to know about, like the "sensitive" events I mentioned earlier. My personal feeling is that the Chinese government is playing nice with knockoffs because the US in particular just will not shut up about it. I think they've decided that there's more to gain by playing nice on the issue than turning a blind eye. I can tell you that emails are not monitored by the government unless maybe you use certain sensitive words. Maybe. One of my friends has said some very blunt things in the past to me in email about the government here and never been asked about it. You can't really monitor the emails of hundreds of millions of people in all honesty. On the subject of knockoffs, many times today I was asked if I wanted to buy a fake Rolex at places tourists go to. It got a little old. And yes, it's well known that China does hacking/espionage. However, their own citizens get victimized too. One friend said that he simply will not download anything from the internet any more because he's too afraid of computer viruses and he's actually got pretty good computer skills for a non-IT person.

  35. more anti-pirates than pirates by tildeslash · · Score: 1

    1 million to stop counterfeiting? how does this compare to the size of the UK's entire _manufacturing_ sector workforce?

  36. no we need work done on fixing old Bridges / old p by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    no we need work done on fixing old Bridges / old pipes and other stuff.

  37. I'll answer that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please list the ten biggest examples of innovators[tm] whose efforts wilted because of copying.

    You might as well say please list something no one heard of because it failed.

    Or more to the point, you might ask how many inventions were killed because investors did not invest in it out of the difficulty of protecting IP. The idea that lack of capital starves great inventions consider the following: a few years before the US revolutionary war with England, there were stock offering to develop 1) a machine gun 2) rapid steam powered trasatlantic troop transport ships. Those both failed as stock offerings due to investor flight from the stock market ( See South Sea Bubble Crisis) to understand why. Had those been funded it would have neutralized the main advantages of the colonists.

    Since you put your challenge so bold and trolllishly forward, I feel like it's not out of place to respond to it with real allegations that have been made. You may and many reasonable people might deny these but others would stand by them.

    1) Linux killing SCO
    2) Dalvik injuring Oracle Java,
    3) Android overtaking the Apple Iphone,

  38. Re:The streets aren't necessarily where its happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BS. Any "Nokia" shop I go to here will sell both real ones and fakes. They simply ask you which one you prefer. No need to go through shady mazes or houses.

  39. Easy: Light bulb, Cotton GIn , Telephone by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Please list the ten biggest examples of innovators[tm] whose efforts wilted because of copying.

    To be clear: I want ten examples of failure not because the inventor threw his toys out of the pram ("I'm not writing any more music until u guise stop downloading pirated MP3s I'm entitled to more money!!!") but because their efforts became genuinely financially unsustainable.

    Easy...

    Eli Whitney was driven to ruin after rampant copying of his patented cotton gin. He did not continue inventing.
    http://inventors.about.com/od/cstartinventions/a/cotton_gin.htm

    Edison slavishly copied Swans patented carbon filament light bulb slavishly.
    http://www.coolquiz.com/trivia/explain/docs/edison.asp

    Elisha Gray filed his patent on the telephone before Alexander Graham bell.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elisha_Gray_and_Alexander_Bell_telephone_controversy

    But I doubt anything could convince you. But in the mean time please stop using the telephone, or lights or wearing cotton.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Easy: Light bulb, Cotton GIn , Telephone by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Whitney continued to invent. As an example, a few years later he signed a contract with the government for creating rifles using standardized parts. He then went and squandered that money trying to sue those who copied the gin and lost in the Southern courts, which is why he died penniless. Yes, those who sue, rather than invent go broke - big surprise.

      Swan's lamp had a very short lifespan because his carbon filament was thick, requiring high-current and, thus, burned out quickly. Edison came across the idea of a thin filament and had a very long-lived bulb. Swan may have passed current through a carbon element causing it to glow, but Edison's refinement made it practical and was as much (or more) entitled to a patent as Swan's original device. Certainly, you do not defend the notion of someone like Swan free-riding on Edison's completed, practical invention, do you? In addition, Swan also continued to invent following this episode. He made contributions to photography following his "invention" of the electric light.

      Gray didn't file a patent for voice communication. Bell did. Gray didn't have a working model. Bell did. Bell won - end of story. Gray also continued inventing after the telephone saga, being considered the inventor of the music synthesizer.

      So, you're batting three-for-three here. None of the inventors you mentioned stopped inventing following their patent issues. Some of them might not have gotten as rich as they might have, but none of them stopped inventing. If anything, it seemed to drive them into continued invention, rather than resting on their laurels (or piles of money).

      --
      That is all.
    2. Re:Easy: Light bulb, Cotton GIn , Telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You rebuttal reminds me a a third grade schoolhouse lawyer seizing on teeny irrelevant nuances to justify hitting the other kid. The GP reply was a slam dunk set of cases where copying had a huge impact both on the success of the original invention and the inventor's ability to capitalize on it in the future.

      Basically you convince no one, expect how weak your case by persisting in such pin head dancing arguments, and then finishing it with a boast as though you made your point well.

      What I wonder is if you can see that and just like to argue like a monty python sketch or if you really think you were constructing a good response?

  40. Not useful to the rest of us? by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

    there were about 1 million people employed to remove fake goods from Chinese streets

    So, no one trying to stop the many more fake goods that are being exported then?

  41. Capitalism requires markets by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

    The Republicans and Tea Partiers who want government out of business forget that business relies on government operating the market place thru intellectual property laws and contract law and ensuring a safe, non-counterfeit money supply. When CDOs made all the money counterfeit, the rich got bailed out BY GOVERNMENT and still the Koch-sucker bros cry about too much government. Move to Somalia and try to get rich there with a government-ensured marketplace to sell your wares in.

  42. The Silk Market Test by rossjudson · · Score: 1

    Right in Beijing you've the got (in)famous Silk Market, which is packed full of every fake leather good you can possibly imagine. You can buy Hermes for a few hundred bucks, or Chanel fakes, or whatever you want. Some of the fakes are of high quality; most are crap.

    Will the Silk Market disappear?

  43. Quagmire envy by trapvector · · Score: 1

    Looks like China isn't cool with the USA cornering the market on endless, unwinnable wars.