Is Perl Better Than a Randomly Generated Programming Language?
First time accepted submitter QuantumMist writes "Researchers from Southern Illinois University have published a paper comparing Perl to Quorum(PDF) (their own statistically informed programming language) and Randomo (a programming language whose syntax is partially randomly generated). From the paper: 'Perl users were unable to write programs more accurately than those using a language designed by chance.' Reactions have been enthusiastic, and the authors have responded."
Better? How about we start with distinguishable?
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
I always thought Perl was a randomly generated programming language.
There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
How does C++ fair?
Farely average.
Donate free food here
How does C++ fair? LOL
#%@$&#@^UGSOWDYRO&F@#L(EGFGP*$TW
This Script written in Perl computes the answer.
Fortran is interesting, theologically - it considers God to be real unless declared integer.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
I dunno. Since it's a comment on Perl, starting with a # would seem to be entirely accurate according to the syntax.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)