Slashdot Mirror


Redbox Raises Its Prices To $1.20 Per Day

nixkuroi writes "Redbox, apparently not having noticed the backlash against Netflix, has decided to charge its customers 20% more per day. Though there will be a discounted grace period for the first day of rental until Nov. 30 2011, the full pricing increase will kick into effect on December 1."

232 comments

  1. Why it doesn't matter by 2.7182 · · Score: 0

    Because: I've never known a single person who uses it.

    1. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Zibodiz · · Score: 1

      You've got a good point.

    2. Re:Why it doesn't matter by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      I've only been on vacation to the U.S. and every single time I entered a Fry's or exited one - in 3 different locations - the Red Box machines had people either idly browsing, actually getting a movie, or returning one.

      I don't know any of them, though.. so you're absolutely right... it doesn't matter because I've never known a single person who uses it either.

      More on-topic.. why $1.20? People have to dig for 2 dimes now? Wouldn't $1.25 be more convenient (my wallet was bulging with quarters.. it's insane how common that coin is) which would make it a lower psychological barrier to pay for, etc.? I'm sure they had professionals figure all that out.. just seems counter-intuitive to me.
      ( of course, increasing the pricing in the first place seems counter-intuitive )

    3. Re:Why it doesn't matter by eln · · Score: 1

      Redbox is useful if you want to see recently released popular movies. Coincidentally, this is exactly the sort of movie that Netflix streaming never has.

    4. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? There are sometimes lines for the Redboxes in the residential areas around here. For the folks like me who only watch 1 or 2 movies a month (if that?), it's a great bargain. The extra 20 cents to rent a movie is a non-barrier.

    5. Re:Why it doesn't matter by chill · · Score: 1

      Considering RedBox has an estimated 35% of the DVD Rental market, which just passed NetFlix at 33% -- you're one of the few. RedBox's share has been increasing, while NetFlix's has been decreasing.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    6. Re:Why it doesn't matter by eln · · Score: 3, Informative

      Redboxes do not operate on cash, you pay with a credit card. That way, if you never return the movie, they can just charge your card for the full price and be done with it.

    7. Re:Why it doesn't matter by greghodg · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. They don't take coins, so it doesn't really matter what they charge. You have to pay with a card. Incidentally, we've found they're great on multi-day road trips with the kids, you can pick up a movie at a RedBox when you stop for lunch, the kids can watch it, and you can return it the next day 800 miles from where you rented it.

    8. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've only been on vacation to the U.S. and every single time I entered a Fry's or exited one - in 3 different locations - the Red Box machines had people either idly browsing, actually getting a movie, or returning one.

      I don't know any of them, though.. so you're absolutely right... it doesn't matter because I've never known a single person who uses it either.

      More on-topic.. why $1.20? People have to dig for 2 dimes now? Wouldn't $1.25 be more convenient (my wallet was bulging with quarters.. it's insane how common that coin is) which would make it a lower psychological barrier to pay for, etc.? I'm sure they had professionals figure all that out.. just seems counter-intuitive to me.
      ( of course, increasing the pricing in the first place seems counter-intuitive )

      Actually to get a movie with Redbox, you have to use a Credit Card. You can't get using cash. According to their site, that's part of the reason for the increase, is increasing Debit Fee charges.

    9. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      And the piratebay is useful if you want to see movies that wont be released for another 3 months and would prefer not to sit through previews. The qualities usually better as well.

    10. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full price = 25$ per movie. I've had my card used to rent two movies and whoever rented them never returned them, so I was charged 50$. Got my credit card company and redbox on the same line, and their decision was that I had to pay it. I will never use redbox.

    11. Re:Why it doesn't matter by nbetcher · · Score: 1

      $1.20 is better than $1.25 since it is a lower price and considering the RedBox doesn't take cash, it doesn't matter much where you round it to.

    12. Re:Why it doesn't matter by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it goes great with Netflix streaming, and if you don't watch DVD's very often it's a better deal than the Netflix disc-by-mail subscription. If you have a lot of Redboxes in your local area, you can go to their website and browse a bigger selection or search - and reserve the disc you want.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    13. Re:Why it doesn't matter by flibbidyfloo · · Score: 1

      AFAIK redbox doesn't take cash. You have to use a credit or debit card so they can charge you automatically if you don't return the DVD.

    14. Re:Why it doesn't matter by TheDormouse · · Score: 1

      I don't think I know anyone who uses anything other than Redbox or Netflix to pay to rent new-release movies on DVD. I know lots of people who left Netflix's DVD mail service a couple years ago when Redbox came to town. The storefront of practically every Walgreens, CVS, grocery, and convenience store has one now.

      You must live someplace with few Redbox machines.

    15. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Douchebags in the suburbs who can afford the 4 DVD plan from Netflix wouldn't know any redboxers but low income areas are all over these things. Reserving Blu rays from an iPhone app at one of the many kiosks means you don't even have to chance it anymore and waste time in these lines. A twenty cent increase != a twenty dollar increase.

    16. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he's "one of the few." Redbox has 35% of the DVD market, but how big is that market? (I'd bet small and shrinking.) I'm guessing that Redbox use is highly regional. I do see people occasionally using the Redbox at the local grocer, but not often and no one I know. In other areas there seem to be lots of users (see a poster above who mentioned 3 crowded machines in one location).

      I also think that maybe he does know some Redbox users, he just doesn't know it. People don't seem to talk about Redbox like they do/did about Netflix. Maybe because even though it's a good idea, it's not all that different than driving to Blockbuster (remember that?) and renting the latest movie there.

      I prefer Vudu for new releases. More expensive but more convenient and I don't have to have any idea I even want to watch a movie until the second I decide to watch a movie.

    17. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering RedBox has an estimated 35% of the DVD Rental market, which just passed NetFlix at 33% -- you're one of the few. RedBox's share has been increasing, while NetFlix's has been decreasing.

      Key word is DVD. Dead format being kept alive by the people of walmart.

    18. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used it some.

      I've never used Netflix. I don't like filling out forms or having another monthly bill to pay. It's much easier just to rent a video from the gas station across the street for $1.

    19. Re:Why it doesn't matter by bl968 · · Score: 1

      Because they won't license them to netflix until they have been out so many months. IMHO this should be grounds for a copyright abuse complaint.

      --
      "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 51230 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Setec Astronomy)"
    20. Re:Why it doesn't matter by stephanruby · · Score: 0

      The entire business model of RedBox is based on giving away free promo codes and then charging fraudulent late fees one or two months later. So if you (or your friends) haven't used one of their free promo codes, just consider yourself and your friends lucky.

    21. Re:Why it doesn't matter by westlake · · Score: 1

      Why it doesn't matter?

      Because: I've never known a single person who uses it.

      This deserves preservation in amber as the ultimate in geek memes.

    22. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So you agreed to the service under the terms presented to you. You disappeared two movies that likely retail for near $20, that you were responsible for. They charged you like they were supposed to, $25 for each one you lost... likely working in $5 for the amortized aggravation of having to replace lost discs.

      So you proceeded to harass them and your credit card company about it, they told you you're responsible for what you agreed to be responsible for, and you're pissed at redbox?

      I must be missing an important detail here.

    23. Re:Why it doesn't matter by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Well obviously you don't know me, but I've tried it out. I think I was interested in using a curious vending machine more than the movies themselves.

      It's pretty slick. I have no interest in returning to the model where I have to shuffle physical media around town in a timely manner or pay late fees... but if you want something newer than what you'll find on Netflix, and you want it now, they're a neat option.

    24. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the part about not being the one that rented them, nor agreeing to any terms.
      Not that it explained how this could have happened.

    25. Re:Why it doesn't matter by rabun_bike · · Score: 1

      I am one who uses Redbox but I don't know you so in your mind I don't count. My Redbox is literally a short walk from my house. I can rent from one kiosk and return to any other. I also have an antenna on my roof and don't have cable TV or satellite. Instead I have a TV hooked to an extremely (60+ Mbps) fast internet connection subsidized by my employer and have been streaming to the TV with HDMI cabling from a computer for several years (before Boxy Box was hip). I started renting movies from Amazon Unbox years ago but they are simply too expensive and after getting cut off by the 24 hr viewing limit from Amazon video streaming (literally skipping sections of the movie to beat the clock) I have given up on Amazon unless I am really lazy or can't find the movie on Redbox. Netflix was the most promising disruptive technology but until they work out their issues I am sticking to Redbox and direct streaming from NBC, CBS, FOX, Hulu, etc. So, call me nuts but compared to my co-workers I save on the order of about $200/month by kicking pay TV to the curb and using Redbox to rent DVDs. I have a free, no monthly fee, DVR for recording from my free HD TV signal as well at 480 dpi (low res). That was an extremely difficult thing to find by the way. Tivo was the only thing at the time that would do above 480. I live Tivo but I am not going to pay for a monthly subscription. And my cheapo DVR has a 1TB SAS drive in it.

    26. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The important detail you're missing is your reading comprehension.
      " I've had my card used[fraudulently by someone else] to rent two movies and whoever rented them never returned them"

    27. Re:Why it doesn't matter by antdude · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people who used it in my area. Blockbuster, Hollywood Videos, etc. are dead over here. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    28. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Full price" in this case is actually $25. I've actually bought two DVDs from them that way. They just charge you the daily rental fee until you hit that mark, and then they just close the thing out. It's all right there in their website, actually.

      An entirely refreshing change from the tender mercies of certain other organizations.

    29. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full price = 25$ per movie. I've had my card used to rent two movies and whoever rented them never returned them, so I was charged 50$. Got my credit card company and redbox on the same line, and their decision was that I had to pay it. I will never use redbox.

      It's Redbox's fault you lost your credit card and didn't report it missing before it was used by someone else? If you want someone to blame for that little fuckup, you can start by pointing a thumb instead of a finger.

    30. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS. I imagine you're leaving out the details where you allowed your card to be used, intentionally or not. If I'm wrong, your beef is with your credit card company.

    31. Re:Why it doesn't matter by PNutts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The entire business model of RedBox is based on giving away free promo codes and then charging fraudulent late fees one or two months later. So if you (or your friends) haven't used one of their free promo codes, just consider yourself and your friends lucky.

      No.

    32. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      $1.20 is better than $1.25 since it is a lower price and considering the RedBox doesn't take cash, it doesn't matter much where you round it to.

      Well, it does unless they want Richard Pryor driving to their office in a Ferrari. That would make for an interesting Halloween I suppose...

    33. Re:Why it doesn't matter by PNutts · · Score: 1

      I don't know anyone who uses it except me. I became a stream-only Netflix subscriber when they split their business. I would have to rent about 6 Redbox movies a month to meet Netflix's fee (IIRC). I don't rent 6 movies a month so I'm good. Also our library has a good selection of DVDs.

    34. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame redbox. Blame your shit credit card company, who won't even stand behind you. Where's the signature to prove you used the card? Oh that's right...there is no signature, and no proof it was you. I hope you dumped that credit card company instantly, while you were still on the phone with them.

    35. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      If you lent your card to someone to rent them, it's your own fault and you should pay. If someone stole or cloned your card, then it's fraud and so it's your credit card company that is wrong for not reversing the charge. Either way, it wasn't redbox's fault.

    36. Re:Why it doesn't matter by kyrio · · Score: 1

      You don't really know what copyright is, do you?

    37. Re:Why it doesn't matter by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Needs more details...

      Was the card stolen? Was he aware it was going to be used for such a purpose?
      Its not hard to build a duplicator and when you hand your card off to a waiter he could easily swipe it on the duplicator and clone it onto a blank.

    38. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      According to their site, that's part of the reason for the increase, is increasing Debit Fee charges.

      Yeah, the new "debit card fee" changes intended to decrease debit card costs to retailers in fact results in large increase in debit costs for small transactions.

      Instead of $0.04 + 1.55% per transaction max, it's $0.21 + %0.05 per transaction... that means for anything less than about $12, they get *more* money now. And of course the banks know that the trend of using debit cards for small/micro transactions instead of cash means their revenues are just going to go up.

      Your corrupt and/or incompetent Congresspeople hard at work...

    39. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      and 1.20$ still being less than half what the local 'brick and mortar' video rental place charges per day, I see myself still using redbox to watch a few new releases. (and grab traveling movies)

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    40. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      what? late fees? you use the service, and agree to 1$ per day that the movie is not returned. You fail to return it, you get a 25$ dollar DVD without the case.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    41. Re:Why it doesn't matter by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You're liable for $50 on nearly every credit card agreement, even if you report it stolen.

    42. Re:Why it doesn't matter by hawguy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Full price = 25$ per movie. I've had my card used to rent two movies and whoever rented them never returned them, so I was charged 50$. Got my credit card company and redbox on the same line, and their decision was that I had to pay it. I will never use redbox.

      It's Redbox's fault you lost your credit card and didn't report it missing before it was used by someone else? If you want someone to blame for that little fuckup, you can start by pointing a thumb instead of a finger.

      If his card was indeed lost or stolen and someone used it fraudulently, then yes, it is Redbox's fault for accepting it without verification. I understand that their business model doesn't allow for someone to personally check each card, but it's not my fault if their business model allows for easy fraud.

      Though I suspect that's not what happened in this case, or the CC company would have just done a chargeback against Redbox. The law limits your liability to $50 for a lost/stolen card, but I've never had a card company enforce the $50 - and it's happened to me 3 times. (once because I lost my card, twice because an online merchant had a data breach)

    43. Re:Why it doesn't matter by tweak13 · · Score: 1

      There was a time when this was true, but for at least the last 5-10 years $0 liability agreements have become much more common. None of my cards require me to pay anything for fraud.

    44. Re:Why it doesn't matter by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      A surprising number of people haven't changed cards in the last 5-10 years. I'm still using a nearly 20-year-old card. I have, however, recently realized that I was leaving all sorts of benefits on the table and have started mile-collecting.

    45. Re:Why it doesn't matter by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      Redboxes do not operate on cash, you pay with a credit card.

      Well go figure.. that explains that, then - thanks :)

      ( No, I never observed one of those machines in detail, nor bothered to check wikipedia - I figured it was some membership code thing you had to enter and pay by cash or out of an account linked to whatever. )

    46. Re:Why it doesn't matter by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Chargeback. Are you an idiot or something?

    47. Re:Why it doesn't matter by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then you are an idiot. "This is a fraudulent charge" and you are not going to pay for it. Legally capped at $50, but I've never had a card from a company who had a cap above $0. "I've had my card used." Who used it, and did they have your permission to use it? If so, yes, it's your fault for lending your card to idiots. If not, then your card was stolen and you failed to exercise your rights, making you the idiot.

    48. Re:Why it doesn't matter by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I've never been liable for more than $0. It's $50 maximum by law. I've had dozens of cards and all were $0. With so many cards out there wanting to give credit, why would you use one with bad terms? Quit getting your car repo'd and you'd not have these types of problems.

    49. Re:Why it doesn't matter by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I also know what a monopoly is. Buena Vista is an abusive monopoly. Disney gets a monopoly on Disney movies (granted statutorily via copyright, as opposed to actually earning a monopoly through sound business practices, like the rest of them), and abuses that monopoly in vertical integration by incestuous relationships with distributorship and such. They should be declared illegal and have the practice of ESPN bundling banned (where you have to pay for Disney and ESPN2 if you want to buy ESPN only), and the abuses their movie distribution effects on the industry should be stopped. You do know what a monopoly is, right? I agree there is no such thing as "copyright abuse" but requiring that Buena Vista DVD distribution make $1,000,000 before allowing "competitors" like Netflix to carry it is traditional anti-trust violation.

    50. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      It's $1.20, not $1.2005347809

    51. Re:Why it doesn't matter by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      I don't know of a single credit card issuer who does not send updated cardholder agreements when they change policy. Whether or not you've actually read it... I strongly doubt your original agreement from 20 years ago is what they have you beholden to today. In fact, if you're in the US I can guarantee your agreement changed because the government passed laws about fees and minimum payments in the last 3 years that *ALL* credit card companies doing business in the US were forced to implement.

    52. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      It has BlueRay and games as well.

    53. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      For what its worth thy ask for zip codes to do avs verification. Signatures aren't very good proof either, I mean when was the last time anyone checked yours?

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    54. Re:Why it doesn't matter by drb226 · · Score: 1

      I've never known a single person who uses it.

      So...you don't get out much?

    55. Re:Why it doesn't matter by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Because: I've never known a single person who uses it.

      Pauline Kael infamously said she didn't know anyone who voted for Nixon. How'd that work out for her?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    56. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you must know few people. I use it since I've switched to the Netflix streaming only. In fact, I had used it even before the Netflix since it worked better for us (never knew when We'd actually get a chance to watch a movie with our son, work, etc). So redbox made it easy to pick up a movie for the night and return the next day for a dollar (or no charge if you had a coupon code). The catch is you have to remember *and not be lazy* and take the movie back. I'm guilty of putting it off for a couple days which made my $1 rental become $4.

      Also, its nice for longer road trips. Get a movie for the kid(s) when you first set out, and when its over and you need gas or to pee etc, chances are a redbox is close by.. drop the watched movie off and grab another.

      As I said in the first section, I use it to fill in what the Netflix streaming is lacking as well when it comes to new(er) releases

    57. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Fritzed · · Score: 1

      If a studio does it and bl968 doesn't like it, it must be copyright abuse.

      --
      Spooooon!!!!!
    58. Re:Why it doesn't matter by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because: I've never known a single person who uses it.

      Given their insanely high revenue figures I can only conclude that you don't know a single person period.

    59. Re:Why it doesn't matter by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      You have to physically swipe the card at Redbox kiosks. So how would "somebody" use the card but you not report it stolen?

      I could see how the credit card company would leave you on the hook even if the card was stolen because there's no way to PROVE you don't have the items, the charge is recurring, and the total is just under the $50 liability limit so it's not their problem.

    60. Re:Why it doesn't matter by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      It was abuse because Redbox and Netflix bought the DVDs on the same OPEN market lots of other video rental places use. Right up until the studios asserted rights over the end market that they didn't have... And told OPEN markets not to sell product to them.

      Their business uses DVDs "just like a book" so there is no "copyright" issue... First sale was clearly interfered with, enen when Redbox and Netflix were buying the properly labeled "rental" versions.

    61. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really interesting seeing as he's been dead for quite a few years now!

    62. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes no sense. If it was card fraud he should have reported it as such, and the credit card company wouldn't have had a chat with the rental company, they would have reimbursed the amount of the fraud. I agree with GP, it sounds like the guy was at fault and just didn't want to pay up, or he let a friend use his card and the friend lost the disks or maybe he tried to claim it was fraud but Redbox could show a pattern of the guy renting two DVDs every two weeks for the last six months which made it highly unlikely that the very last rental was a fraud and the CC company agreed (my money is on that explanation).

    63. Re:Why it doesn't matter by sodul · · Score: 1

      My wife ATM card was 'used' twice in less than 24h and a few hundred $ got withdrawn each time, all the while her card was actually at home.
      It was probably copied by someone at a 7/11. Fake readers on top of real ATMs is unfortunately common and sometimes very well done. In short your ATM or credit card can be copied easily without you ever knowing ... until the bank calls you or until you get your monthly statement.

      The bank actually called my wife on the second transaction and returned all her money. The police never got the bad guys.

    64. Re:Why it doesn't matter by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      I think they are just trying to account for the 10-20% 'naive' inflation that most of us lower income people have noticed in the past years or two on food and most basic goods. That's exactly what I have noticed on products that I actually buy: 10% at the low end and 20% at the high end. Yes, I know that the government statistics deny it, but I can see the prices with my own eyes. I think the reason a lot of people haven't noticed it is that they are rich enough not to bother looking at prices too closely or remembering them. I make just over minimum wage. So I remember. I think it also takes a while for the inflation to fully propagate through the economy. Gradually it affects more and more products as companies realize they have no choice but to raise prices if they want to maintain the same profit margins in terms of actual goods. Or at least they will try.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    65. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      So do they keep only the top 50 movies or something? Actual pressed discs?

      Or do they custom-burn a CD-R on demand?

      If the former, it seems like they'd have to constantly be restocking stuff.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    66. Re:Why it doesn't matter by zephvark · · Score: 1

      This is true. Some people are still using little plastic platters to transfer data? No respect, granny, get an intertubes already. The whole outrage against Netflix is from people who still think plastic platters sent by snailmail are a pretty good idea. Funky.

    67. Re:Why it doesn't matter by whoda · · Score: 1

      It's the actual DVD or BD, with a generic case.

      Yes, they are restocked regularly, just like any other vending machine you see.

    68. Re:Why it doesn't matter by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      I used it to rent Tron Legacy.

      The movie sucked, and then after I returned it redbox sent me like 12 emails in the next two weeks. It was like some creepy girl I went on a date with, but never called back.

    69. Re:Why it doesn't matter by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      So you pass them in all your grocery megachain stores (and what not) and you have never seen people using it?

      Where do you live? Highbrowville?

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    70. Re:Why it doesn't matter by tazan · · Score: 1

      I quit using them for a different reason. I rented a movie and couldn't return it because the box was full. I drove all over town for 3 days trying to return the stupid thing.

    71. Re:Why it doesn't matter by vaporland · · Score: 1

      Not to mention TV shows (how can it be "piracy" to download them when they are free to record over the air?) in HD, with commercials stripped out.

      Demonoid is better IMHO. + iPredator, priceless, literally!

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    72. Re:Why it doesn't matter by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      That's pretty stupid, and probably more true than "omg they're trying to screw you with the promo codes!" They should let you mail it to them without late fees if you can't return it to the same box from which you got it (and provide postage). It would be easy to record that you tried to return it too since (I believe) all those boxes have internet.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    73. Re:Why it doesn't matter by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Kinda like red light cameras - doesn't matter if it was you who ran the light, you're responsible for who drives the car registered in your name.

    74. Re:Why it doesn't matter by stdarg · · Score: 1

      If you only pay $1/night for a girl you're going to be hitting the bottom of the barrel.

    75. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Unadjusted 12-month CPI for food period ending Sept. 2011 is 4.7%. But that also counts restaurants, and a lot of places have absorbed the recent price increase rather than raise prices to consumers. For "food at home", it's 6.3%. Dairy is above 10%, as are fats and oils.

      If you move the lookback period to December 2009, it's 7.7% for all "food at home".

    76. Re:Why it doesn't matter by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Because: I've never known a single person who uses it.

      Because you knowing or not knowing someone is a valid measure of... what was your point again?

    77. Re:Why it doesn't matter by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      You have to physically swipe the card at Redbox kiosks. So how would "somebody" use the card but you not report it stolen?

      I could see how the credit card company would leave you on the hook even if the card was stolen because there's no way to PROVE you don't have the items, the charge is recurring, and the total is just under the $50 liability limit so it's not their problem.

      Fake readers. Despite their appearances in sci-fi movies like Terminator 2, they do actually exist. One would think /. posters would know about these things.

    78. Re:Why it doesn't matter by godefroi · · Score: 1

      My card has a picture of me on the back. Verifying my signature is somewhat redundant.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    79. Re:Why it doesn't matter by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      For what its worth thy ask for zip codes to do avs verification. Signatures aren't very good proof either, I mean when was the last time anyone checked yours?

      Zip codes are a shitty way to do avs verification. Personalized PIN codes, thought not un-shitty themselves, are less shitty than zip codes (ergo better.)

    80. Re:Why it doesn't matter by godefroi · · Score: 1

      ... but not so useful if you prefer to be a law-abiding citizen, and you're mature enough to have developed some willpower.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    81. Re:Why it doesn't matter by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You also have the added hassle of having to have an account with Redbox and have the card associated with it. That makes fraud even less likely.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    82. Re:Why it doesn't matter by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Their business model does check with the credit card company to insure that the charge will go through. If the card was reported as stolen, then it would not have worked. Also, I am not sure that you can use just any old card with Redbox. At least in my case, it always wants the one associated with my account.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    83. Re:Why it doesn't matter by gauauu · · Score: 1

      I quit using them for a different reason. I rented a movie and couldn't return it because the box was full. I drove all over town for 3 days trying to return the stupid thing.

      You know, there's a phone number on the DVD case they give you, and if you call them about a problem, they actually have really good customer service. I'm pretty sure they would have waived any fees if you told them the box was full. I had an issue with accidentally double-renting a DVD (I somehow managed to rent 2 copies) -- I called and explained, and they completely refunded one of them without a hassle.

    84. Re:Why it doesn't matter by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I also say don't blame Redbox, but unfortunately, the way the laws are written, the accepting company is almost always the loser in a battle over a credit card charge. It is a wonder that any businesses take credit cards at all.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    85. Re:Why it doesn't matter by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You are not the only one that notices. I make well above minimum wage, and yet I have noticed that in the last 10 years, the price of staple items has risen from as low as 100% to in some cases, 400% or more. It is difficult to believe that there is a constant 0% to 3% inflation rate when 10 years later the price is 100% to 400% more.
      I do however believe that there has been no WAGE inflation, since my salary is about half what it was 10 years ago, and I work a lot harder.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    86. Re:Why it doesn't matter by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      There are sometimes lines for the Redboxes in the residential areas around here.
      That's because people are idiots or their time is worthless. I always rent my movie online and then just go pick it up, but I will not pick up at McDonald's or Walgreens. At those places, idiots take 5 to 10 minutes each to browse through the selections available. usually the ones INSIDE the grocery stores are relatively safe from this idiocy.
      Redbox really needs to provide a separate kiosk for browsing the selection, and then those people can move over to the machine to pick up their selection. This would cost more, but would recover the lost revenue of millions of people getting tired of waiting and leaving.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    87. Re:Why it doesn't matter by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      And $1.20 per movie is still about $60 per year less than I would spend if I had Netflix. But then I understand that other people have nothing better to do but watch TV and Movies all day, and so therefore Netflix is understandably a better deal.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    88. Re:Why it doesn't matter by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I rented a movie and couldn't return it because the box was full.
      This is the ultimate in idiocy. if the machines available slots are full and an additional movie comes in, it needs to accept the movie and drop it into an overflow bin where the local representative can manually deal with it as punishment for not understanding the need for empty slots in the machine.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    89. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need an account. Your account is linked to the card number.

    90. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I like Red Box. It's the cheapest rental around and the dispensers are everywhere -- where I shop for food, electronics, etc... But, they've got to follow McDonald's pricing model and base their profits on volume.

    91. Re:Why it doesn't matter by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Which is a bit ironic, since they're owned by Coinstar

    92. Re:Why it doesn't matter by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      IIRC*, the card holder is still responsible for the first $50 of any fraudulent charge. As the charge was $50, even if the credit card company accepted it as fraudulent, they are only responsible for the amount past $50. Then there are other issues as we are lacking details. If it was done by a family member or other person that was given the card in good faith, or might have given the card in good faith, then the card holder is still responsible for those charges.

      *My father worked in the credit card department of a large company his entire life. I got to hear lots of stories about this sort of thing (and still do on the holidays).

    93. Re:Why it doesn't matter by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      Fake readers. Despite their appearances in sci-fi movies like Terminator 2, they do actually exist.

      Not only do they exist, you can find them for sale in those checkout line displays at Frys, convenient, relatively cheap, impulse items.

    94. Re:Why it doesn't matter by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      Its not hard to build a duplicator and when you hand your card off to a waiter he could easily swipe it on the duplicator and clone it onto a blank.

      Doesn't need to be a blank. In fact if it were the perps who got my info (as you suppose, most likely a restaurant server) couldn't have used it in three separate big-box stores within a half hour of each other. Card Fraud department caught it, but not because anyone checked name/address/anything, but rather because it was used in two separate checkout lines of one big-box store, within a minute of each other.

    95. Re:Why it doesn't matter by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      recently realized that I was leaving all sorts of benefits on the table and have started mile-collecting.

      As long as you realize those miles are being paid for by a higher commission rate charged the accepting merchant. I'm not saying you shouldn't use it, but you might consider using a non-rewards card at that local indepenent store down the street; to them the rate difference could be important.

    96. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You recall incorrectly. That has not been true at least a decade, probably longer.

    97. Re:Why it doesn't matter by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      You can return any Redbox movie to any Redbox kiosk anywhere.

    98. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, legally it's still true.

      Virtually all credit card companies waive the $50, but I don't know if all do.

    99. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For time spent renting/watching a movie that you've paid to rent, your time is less than worthless. Your time is actually costing you money.

      At least from a bittorrent site, your time is only worthless.

    100. Re:Why it doesn't matter by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      I live someplace that has...one Redbox machine and...one Blockbuster machine....for approximately 30 miles in any direction.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    101. Re:Why it doesn't matter by kyrio · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing I never mentioned anything about monopolies in my comment. If I had, I might have to care about your retarded comment.

    102. Re:Why it doesn't matter by kyrio · · Score: 1

      You really, really don't know what copyright is, do you?

    103. Re:Why it doesn't matter by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      The $25 fee must be something new because I've heard of people getting charged $60 for a single movie.

      The problem with the red kiosks is that they're not all "owned" by RedBox. They're all the exact same machines (they have the same manufacturers), they're the same red color, their signage are almost identical, the cartridges for their DVDs are also the same and work in both, and they're even both operated by the same exact third party company to service and refill them.

      But if you rent one movie from one kiosk and return it to what seems like an identical kiosk next to it (except that one doesn't have the brand "RedBox" on it, but some generic brand name like DVD Rentals or something like that), then your movie is lost and good luck getting it back. And despite the fact that RedBox has your email address, they don't even notify you that your DVD hasn't come back yet (so that you can try to mitigate your fees, or try to rectify your mistake), They just automatically bill you without any warning after two months of extra rental fees.

      And the same exact thing happens when you rent a movie from one of those red kiosk lookalikes and return it to a RedBox by mistake. The two companies do not even communicate with each other. And yet, the customer service at both companies knows there is a real problem, but won't do anything to address it. And why should they stop it anyway? Both companies, assuming we accept their claim that they're both indeed different companies, are currently making money from this simple misunderstanding. And they're probably not pissing off real customers anyway, they're just pissing off a fraction of the millions of people that got free promo codes and used them (and unless their selection gets better anytime soon, it's not like those people would have become real customers anyway).

    104. Re:Why it doesn't matter by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      the trick there is to not be totally incompetent at observing your surroundings i suppose.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    105. Re:Why it doesn't matter by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Ah, you are too stupid to even know what you are saying, let alone anyone else. Got it. Copyright is nothing other than a statutory monopoly. Any mention of copyright is, by definition, a comment on monopoly. And the person you were responding to mentioned "copyright abuse" something that obviously doesn't exist. But rather than trying to understand what they mean, or take the comments as possibly holding a meaning you don't understand, you presume the worst and toss out useless flippant comments that add nothing. I was at least discussing the topic. Though, since you don't want a discussion, just to insult others, you refuse to address the topic you commented on, copyright and the artificial monopoly it creates.

      Or are you too stupid to understand copyright?

    106. Re:Why it doesn't matter by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      Zip code verification for credit card transactions are market research being sold as a security feature.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    107. Re:Why it doesn't matter by kyrio · · Score: 1

      Wow, it's 2011 and morons like you are still allowed to continue living.

    108. Re:Why it doesn't matter by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'll take that as a concession that you were wrong on all points, since you ignore proof you are wrong and just drop into instant ad hominem, without any other comment. That's a tactic of an idiot who knows he's wrong but would never admit it.

    109. Re:Why it doesn't matter by kyrio · · Score: 1

      You are truly mentally challenged.

    110. Re:Why it doesn't matter by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You are the one that can't make a post that actually responds to anything anyone else says. "The sky is blue" "you are dumb." Ooooh, so good at those comebacks. Did you learn them all in kindergarten?

  2. Oh yay. by Zibodiz · · Score: 1

    Maybe Netflix payed them to send people back into the fold?

  3. Yeah, because it's such a ripoff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20% of 1 dollar. Or 20 cents. Less than a quarter.

    If anybody expresses outrage over that, I'm going to punch them then make them buy me a tank of gas.

  4. Yay! More backlash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like backlash. It's good for making investments.

  5. Great, TFS is a troll by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Informative

    The price of everything else is up 20% in the past few years (other than salaries), so why not Redbox? Netflix raised their base price 60%, and fumbled with Qwickster - different story.

    It would be great if the value of the dollar were stable, but it's not, so prices rise. Thanks, Helicopter Ben.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      The price of everything else is up 20% in the past few years (other than salaries), so why not Redbox? Netflix raised their base price 60%, and fumbled with Qwickster - different story.

      It would be great if the value of the dollar were stable, but it's not, so prices rise. Thanks, Helicopter Ben.

      Agreed. This is an example of a price being raised a small amount that won't affect the overall demand for the product (and yet isn't on a critical product or service that puts strain on a family's budget).

      Well played, Redbox, well played.

    2. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by fermion · · Score: 1
      Netflix raised prices, but also gave customers an out if they were extremely sensitive to prices. One could go just streaming or just delivery and pay less. Netflix has understood that movie rental is extremely sensitive to pricing, and has done a ok job maintaining value.

      Redbox OTOH, now that it has banished most of the Blockbuster and all the Hollywood video stores, seems to be taking advantage of the situation. There is no acknowledgement that some customers might have trouble with the extra cents and have to cut back. A more reasonable way to do this would be a dolar for the first day and then $1.20 for each additional day, or even a dollar if you get it back within 10 hours. As it is, it is just charging more money because the market will bear, which is fine, but certainly much more of a screw up than netflix. I already though $1 a day was too much and seldom use Redbox. Now I will even be more hesistant.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      There is no acknowledgement that some customers might have trouble with the extra cents and have to cut back.

      That's implicit with every price rise, especially when costs are rising faster than salaries (yay, depressions).

      Redbox probably will do fewer rentals (though I guess less than 20%) but they can't operate at a loss either or there's no Redbox.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      This is an example of a price being raised a small amount that won't affect the overall demand for the product

      I'm not sure about that. People like nice round numbers. $1.20 is kind of a weird price point.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    5. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People like nice round numbers. $1.20 is kind of a weird price point"

      In that case, they should have made it $1.28.

    6. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Oh in the inanity in your post.

      5 years it would have cost you $5 which was more in both absolute AND real dollars.

      Now it's a $1, going to $1.20, and you feel it's too much.

      The mind, it boggles.

    7. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      [snort]

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    8. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet... those people that like nice round numbers buy 0.99 and 1.20 drinks, so it isn't that weird a price point.

    9. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by BarefootClown · · Score: 1

      Redbox OTOH, now that it has banished most of the Blockbuster and all the Hollywood video stores, seems to be taking advantage of the situation. There is no acknowledgement that some customers might have trouble with the extra cents and have to cut back.

      $DEITY forfend! Somebody might have to cut back from six movie rentals per week to five! Next thing you know, Redbox will be making its clients sell their children at discount prices just to heat their cardboard boxes!

      Perspective. Get some.

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    10. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix raised their base price 60%

      No they didn't. Netflix was just DVDs until a few years ago, when they started throwing in streaming for free for a bit while they got the service off the ground and turned it into a viable product of it's own. Now it's no longer free, so it's back to the original DVD service, which actually happens to be cheaper now than it was years ago. I don't personally see that as a price increase. Company's routinely give away a service for free temporarily while they launch and refine it.

    11. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Netflix not only raised their prices more, they did so shortly after an earlier price increase, effectively doubling the rate in about a year.

      And then tried to spin it as "new lower prices".

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    12. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so you are the idiot Netflix was targetting with the spin that the new service/pricing structure was a deal for the customers.

    13. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Not really. They actually said if you didn't use both services you could end up paying less, which is true. They tried to spin it as "what we need to do to continue offering high quality service to renters and streamers". However, it appears some people are more interested in being upset...

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    14. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, the prices are lower. DVD plans are cheaper now than they were in 2005. As for the streaming...yes, it was previously included. You were helping netflix test, grow, and launch a new service, and you got it free for a while. Now back to reality...free things don't always stay free forever.

    15. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd argue netflix didn't raise their base price since I, and most people I know, use the streaming only service, which is, and has been for a LONG time, $7.99/month

      The price on their premium streaming+dvd service we

    16. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Just because you didn't see the adverts about "LOWER PRICES" doesn't mean they didn't exist.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    17. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      The streaming was presented as part of the deal when I signed up. By your "logic", they could have stopped including DVDs in the envelopes and said that the inclusion of DVDs was just a test of a new service, and they were just going to send me envelopes now.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    18. Re:Great, TFS is a troll by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      I've always felt redbox was overpriced. I could get DVDs for a dollar a day at blockbuster who actually maintained a full store with employees. The $1/day was a simple formula which is why I tolerated it. But, considering I can't get my wife to return a movie in anything under a few days. I think I'm probably better off just getting a 48hr streaming license from amazon or waiting for the in-mail DVD from netflix.

      --
      I do security
  6. The Pirate Bay, $0 a Day! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EOM

  7. I fail to be outraged by JeremyMorgan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just like with Netflix, I understand there is a cost of doing business. The costs for these companies to pay for content is rising, and the means to deliver it is getting more expensive. I am willing to pay for it until it reaches a price I feel is too high, then I'm free to cancel. Why get angry?

    It's a luxury item, if you can't afford it don't do it. That simple.

    1. Re:I fail to be outraged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What luxury? I pay an anonymous proxy and very large private streaming service so I can download what I want to watch when I want to watch it. If fucking hollyweird can't fucking let me watch their fucking ads and watch what I want when I want then they can die.

      They both support Linux.

    2. Re:I fail to be outraged by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Why get angry? If you're seeing anger it's just you reading emotion into it. People raise prices, people comment on that fact. You seem to be aiming for a world where nobody is ever allowed to voice opinion on anything or comment on their actions in relation to what's going on in the world.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    3. Re:I fail to be outraged by hjf · · Score: 1

      You've never been to the netflix blog, haven't you?

      You can see some pretty angry comments there.

    4. Re:I fail to be outraged by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      The problem with Netflix was that they tried to spin it as doing the customer a favor. If the email they sent me had said "Sorry Mr. Demonlapin, we have to raise prices because streaming bandwidth and streaming rights are costing us a lot of money" I'd have been perfectly satisfied - not happy, of course, I don't like a rise in rates, but satisfied. Instead they tried to tell me how they were going to save me $1 a month by taking away either streaming or the DVDs.

    5. Re:I fail to be outraged by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Price of content is rising? Since when? DVDs are cheaper than ever.

    6. Re:I fail to be outraged by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Anybody got a Demonoid invite?

    7. Re:I fail to be outraged by tombeard · · Score: 1

      So exactly why would the cost of viewing Startrek 3 need to go up? Is it costing extra to maintain it?

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    8. Re:I fail to be outraged by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the price just went up to $1.20.

      Your credit card number, sir?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    9. Re:I fail to be outraged by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I don't know why businesses feel they need to lie to people. I guess it is because they imagine that most people are too dumb to know better and assume that the smart ones won't tell the dumb ones what is really going on. It's like the sign in the bathroom at the hotel that says "Out of concern for the environment, we will only launder your towels every other day unless you specifically ask us for new towels every day." In fact, they don't care about the environment at all. They are saving money by not laundering your towels, but they lie and tell you that their motivation was the environment.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    10. Re:I fail to be outraged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I wasn't happy about the RedBox price increase, but at least they didn't try to blow smoke up my ass. Although I'm not entirely sure they're being fully truthful. Why didn't BlueRay prices go up to? Those should also be effected by debit card fees. Oh, and I pay with a credit card. They didn't say those fees increased. *sigh*

    11. Re:I fail to be outraged by makomk · · Score: 1

      Where do you think that extra money is going to? I'll give you a hint.

  8. Orrrrrrr by hipp5 · · Score: 1

    Redbox realizes that there are few other options and since Netflix has raised prices they can get away with it too because there is nowhere else for customers to go.

  9. Unlike netflix by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    They didn't drastic increase their price and did not insult their customers by assuming that they are fucking stupid at the same time.

    1. Re:Unlike netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike Netflix, it's still more expensive to rent out movies by the day and they still don't have 0.01% of the selection. Thank you. Have a nice day.

  10. amazon rental prices by haberb · · Score: 1

    The closer to amazon rental prices, the less I'll be going to redbox.

    1. Re:amazon rental prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to factor in gas prices - that may kick you over. I'm considering Amazon rentals over NetFlix DVDs, at $8/month plus taxes and fees for a single DVD and I can get roughly 2 DVDs in a week if I watch and return that's over $1/DVD by mail. A far cry from $4 a pop at Amazon but catching up.

    2. Re:amazon rental prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use Redbox, chances are you're picking the movies up on the way home from work or something, and so you're hardly using any more gas than you would have otherwise (assuming the nearest one isn't several miles out of your way). Factoring gas into Redbox usage is a bit like factoring your ISP cost into Amazon/Netflix.

  11. They Learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you mean? They obviously learned that a significant number of customers will take a 60% price increase, so 20% is nothing!

  12. Don't use inflation by Mean+Variance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see this as an inflation response, nor is it a fair comparison to Netflix. Redbox is a la carte. You subscribe to nothing. Use it a little, a lot, or not at all.

    As they built out their system $1 was a simple price point, easy to advertise and a good entry point. Now they have a business model and usage metrics. $1.20 is a price point that they probably think is sustainable and will generate revenue and profit.

    I like Redbox and probably use it 3-5 times a month. It's easy to grab something for the family and just as easy to return to about 10 different boxes within 2 miles of my home and shopping areas.

    1. Re:Don't use inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure this is a result of the Durbin Interchange Fee Cap. To make up for the caps on larger transactions, banks have raised the fees on low-end transactions like the $1-a-day for a DVD rental. Where it used to be something like 4 cents it is now somewhere around 20 cents per transaction.

  13. As you approach market saturation by Revek · · Score: 1

    There is nothing left to do but raise your price. All hail our lord increased profits.

    1. Re:As you approach market saturation by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      What do you expect them to do, not raise them just so people who aren't their shareholders can keep more money in their pockets? They're not exactly selling anti-retrovirals, if you don't think $1.20 is a good deal, don't rent a DVD from them, no problem.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  14. It has to be FREE! by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 0

    I want everything to be free! Information wants to be free! Music wants to be free! Movies want to be free! Why do these bastards charge us money for Art! Don't they get it? It wants to be free! Since it's digital and can be distributed for nearly zero marginal cost, it should always be free! OK, so you actually rent a physical disk at the supermarket. Big fucking deal! If not free, they should at least never ever raise the price!

    Goddamn Luddites! Stuck in the 20th century. Fucking old economy... [mumble mumble, gripe gripe]

    Full disclosure: I kept my Netflix account intact in spite of their changes. It's still a convenient bargain with a huge library compared to other sources.

    1. Re:It has to be FREE! by TimHunter · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'd rent from Redbox if they charged a fair price. Say $0.10 a movie, but only if I get to watch it first and then decide if it was good enough to pay for. All the movies I torrent suck.

      Besides, if I had to pay for a movie I wouldn't so it's not like I'm stealing anything. I mean, the only movies I torrent are movies based on comic book characters, or movies made by indie filmmakers.

      The movie distributors are ripping off the artist anyway. I'd pay $1.20 for a movie but only if I could pay it directly into the hands of the writer and actors and director and people who really make the movie.

    2. Re:It has to be FREE! by audiomagi · · Score: 1

      All the movies I torrent suck.....I mean, the only movies I torrent are movies based on comic book characters, or movies made by indie filmmakers.

      Well, there's your problem!

    3. Re:It has to be FREE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information wants to be anthropomorphised!

    4. Re:It has to be FREE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop stealing my bandwidth with your crappy movie torrents, loser.

    5. Re:It has to be FREE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just torrent without the guilt. Period.

    6. Re:It has to be FREE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent post I can tell it's sarcasm. OTOH, I'm not sure if you're being serious or not.

    7. Re:It has to be FREE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Information wants to be free!

      Oh, someone else who doesn't understand the etymology of that phrase.

      It's free-as-in-freedom, not beer.

      Try this derivation of it instead: "information will tend to move towards a source of release"

    8. Re:It has to be FREE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information wants to be free!

      Don't anthropomorphize information, it doesn't like when you do that.

    9. Re:It has to be FREE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't feel the cost is fair market value then you do without. You don't torrent--which is pirating and in the USA is a felony ($250,000 fine/5 years in prison).

      So tired of this entitlement mentality--steal what they want if they don't want to pay for it. Just like the idiots in Occupy Wall Street, as they protest while using their corporate owned devices and their corporate owned food/drink. (Would really like to see the cops just start randomly swinging batons, pepper spraying, and tear gassing--whoever gets hit, who cares--all nonstop until the crowds go away for good.)

      And yes, copyright violation is stealing. In the digital domain, ripping and replicating is losing a sale per copy. Get over it if anyone thinks otherwise--digital media pirates are theives.

  15. Nope. by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    That's not how supply and demand works. Prices are set to what will make the most money, NOT what will cover the costs.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Prices are set to what the market will bear. That is it. See HP Touchpad firesale.

    2. Re:Nope. by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      Further, I don't see the costs for content rising given that they are a DVD rental business. There might be value in a partnership with the studios, but unlike Netflix and other streaming places, they don't need the studios to play ball so if costs rise from content issues they can tell the studios to take a hike and just keep buying and renting the DVDs.

      That's not to say the GP's main point isn't correct. Don't like the price hike, spend your dollars elsewhere (or don't).

    3. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case, the rising cost is the cost of restocking the RedBox machines with new disks every week. That's payroll, fuel, vehicle maintenance, etc.

    4. Re:Nope. by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      I was referring specifically to "...costs for these companies to pay for content is rising..."

    5. Re:Nope. by Fned · · Score: 1

      Or much higher than the market will bear. See movies, music.

    6. Re:Nope. by grumling · · Score: 1

      No, they can't just buy DVDs and rent them out. Back in the VHS days that was possible, but now there's a bunch of copyright laws that won't allow it. Depending on how the laws are interpreted, public libraries could be in violation.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    7. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to cite these laws that have been passed in the last 20 years that changed how rentals are done?

    8. Re:Nope. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      No, first sale applies just fine to DVDs. I suppose there is a colorable argument that it wouldn't, but it's never been tried and might well fail.

      The reason that they do deals with studios however is 1) so that they can buy at a discount, and 2) so that they can buy discs early via a distributor so as to get them all loaded in machines in time for the day they hit the public market, as opposed to having to scramble to find a retailer that has umpty million discs, buy them, bring them back to a warehouse, open them, keep the disc, attach inventory control labels, put them in new cases, ship them to local distribution points, truck them to the machines, and add them to the stock.

      Of course, with a 4 week window, it ought to be doable, which suggests that the issue is wholesale v. retail prices and availability at a retailer that's willing to jeopardize it's own relationship with the studios and it's own sales to help a rental operation.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    9. Re:Nope. by BadERA · · Score: 1

      Actually First Sale doctrine is still in effect and would allow retail purchasing; some entities have refused to sell via retail channels to redbox in the past, but there are of course numerous ways to sidestep that.

      Disclaimer, I'm currently on a software contract at redbox. I'm an uninformed tech monkey who has little information and no decision making power when it comes to business decisions. These statements are my own opinions and do not reflect past, current or intended behaviors on the part of redbox, its owner Coinstar, or any employees, contractors or vendors of either entity.

      --
      I am, therefore you think.
    10. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is true but what is wierd about this particular increase is that a while back Blockbuster started putting their boxes in the general vicinity of RedBox. It was $1 while there was no competition but $1.20 when there is competition. I don't undestand what is going on.

    11. Re:Nope. by JayWilmont · · Score: 1

      In most industries the profit margins are pretty similar across businesses that market to the same niche. This is because of competition - if you price your product at a 60% markup and somebody else is happy to sell a similar product for a 30% markup, you aren't going to do well for very long.

      So while you are technically correct, usually a company's profit margin stays fixed while prices and costs of doing business fluctuate. Businesses do sometimes bite the bullet during temporary spikes in costs, but the costs of doing business can only increase so much before a price increase is necessary for doing business.

    12. Re:Nope. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Redbox used to do exactly that. In the beginning the studios hated them. I think Redbox ran on a franchise model where the local owner would run out to Walmart or whatever and buy umpteen copies of the latest release at 9AM and load them in their machine. Then they'd start paying people to buy just a few copies and load them in machines when Walmart decided to refuse to sell to them (basically adopting the same tactics as people buying pseudoephedrine).

      Eventually they worked out a deal and I think they actually get delayed access to some titles, but probably a much simpler supply chain and lower costs. The studios were trying to prop up Blockbuster since a chain renting movies for $5 was more attractive to them than their competitor who typically rented them for $1-2.

      The bottom line is that you can't get around first sale...

    13. Re:Nope. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Pirates are not considered to be part of "the market". Movies and music are still priced at the point that maximizes profit from the purchasing public. If they could lower prices 25% and sell twice as many, believe me, they would do it. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Ability to pirate music and movies has made the price curve inelastic, and so lowering the price doesn't affect demand as much as it would if there was no ability to obtain them illegally.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    14. Re:Nope. by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Prices are set to what will make the most money,

      Nope. Prices are set to what the market will bear.

      Those are the same thing. Raising prices over what the market bears will make less money.

  16. What will the market bear by Doofus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Redbox pricing change and Netflix erstwhile split are not really in the same league.

    Netflix customers would have had to pay two membership fees monthly with the new Qwikster arrangement, a 60% increase over the prior setup. The key here is that the "service" that customers were paying for and to which they were accustomed, was being substantially modified - into two new services.

    Redbox is simply raising their price, by a marginal $0.20 per rental. For heavy renters, this may be significant over the course of a month. But for most normal renters, this increase is tolerable.

    Even at one rental per day, the difference over a month is only $6. If this is too much for you, perhaps you shouldn't be renting 30 DVDs a month.

    --
    If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
    1. Re:What will the market bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix increased prices 60% before they announced Qwikster. I assume that's the reference and not the second backlash when Qwikster was announced.

    2. Re:What will the market bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *GASP* 6 BUCKS!??!
       
        Damn and I won't be able to get my 30 dvd's a month and that hamburger!

    3. Re:What will the market bear by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The Netflix "worst case" went up, but if you didn't use streaming before or after (the DVD delivery people think of with Netflix), then your costs went down, not up. It was a price drop, not an increase.

    4. Re:What will the market bear by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      6 extra bucks gets you 2 movies a month unless your up the ass of a netflix hub, along with shitty poor quality online streaming with dick selection that doesnt work with anything thats not giving them a kickback

      I quit netflix long before this all started, why pay for something that hulu beats for streaming, and if you do get a DVD 9 out of 10 times its fucking busted so it takes a week to see some garbage movie, then it gets lost in the mail and you have to argue with them.

      I sometimes rent from redbox, that started when my niece was in town and my wife wanted her to spend the night (they live cross country) but it sure beats getting reamed for 6 bucks on a 2 day rental at captain jackoff & tanning salon, and if I tried renting it from netflix it would have been a week late + I would have have to dig though their shitty website, re-arrange a list and pray that the data side of the dvd did not look like glitter.

    5. Re:What will the market bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...one rental per day at $1.20 is ok because its only $36. How much is it to get 30 DVDs from Netflix in a month? I have the 3 DVD plan, which is $20. So I would save $16...since there is no Qwikster arrangement. And I don't have to go out of my way using gas/electricity to get the DVDs.

      What is the problem? Both companies have to pay more for content. Netflix handled their increase VERY badly. Redbox is testing the waters with a nominal increase since people are all riled up at Netflix. See how many more people start using their service, it will probably go to $1.50 within a year. They are companies and it is capitalism...they have to make $$$ somehow.

    6. Re:What will the market bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never used one, do you have to pay in cash? If so, does the box give change?

    7. Re:What will the market bear by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      No, you have to use a credit card, which they then charge again for subsequent nights. If you keep a DVD for 25 days then you've bought it, you don't need to return it, and they stop charging you for it (not sure if this will change any with the price change).

    8. Re:What will the market bear by krinderlin · · Score: 1

      It seems that people's feelings about Netflix's streaming library are very binary. I'm an adventurous movie watcher, so I love the recommendation engine and the weird "Powerful Lead Woman Killing Zombies in New Zealand" categories that show up on my XBox 360.

      Other people who have a very set and narrow movie preference tend to get frustrated with the recommendations and burn through movies fitting his or her preference in a matter of weeks.

      But speaking in absolutes, the selection on streaming is a pittance compared to the DVD library.

  17. Cost of doing business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, its 20% price increase if you want to cause some outrage among readers. Or if you are more sensible, its just $0.20 cents extra. I am not outraged at this, and in one of their recent surveys I said I wouldn't mind paying a slight increase if it meant more/better movies available to rent. I also see it as a necessity. As a regular Redbox renter, I can't imagine how they stay in business with all the piracy going on and theft. Constantly I rent a movie where someone has returned a fake dvd back just by swapping the barcode label. There have been times as well, where they system says I never returned a movie and would charge me $25 for keeping it past 25 days. A quick call, they see 90% of the time I return my movies on time, and they credit the loss as a system error.

    Posted as A/C as I don't have an account yet.

  18. Whew. I thought you said RedTube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Panic over
    Nothing to see, here

  19. Blu-ray, Game Prices the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA:

    "Are you raising prices on Blu-ray Discs and Video Games, too?
    No, Blu-ray Discs and Video Games will stay at their current daily rates ($1.50 a day for Blu-ray Discs and $2 a day for games)."

    1. Re:Blu-ray, Game Prices the same by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

      Nice find! This is all that really matters.

      I've always thought the $0.50 surcharge for HD was low enough to make the choice obvious. I never even looked at what DVDs they had.

      Now that it is only a $0.30 difference, hopefully more of their customers will be using Blu-ray. And, hopefully that means that more of the stock in the machines will also be Blu-ray. For the first time ever, I'm a customer that is pleased with an increase in prices!

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
  20. I still rent from Blockbuster... by mynis01 · · Score: 0

    or I actually buy movies, in order to support artists who's income depends on it. Even better, you can go see something in the theater! I don't know what it's like in other areas, but here in NC there's plenty of theaters that show movies a little bit later than others and charge between $1.50 and $3 per person per showing. I'd rather rent new movies than stream old ones. Redbox never has anything I haven't all ready watched. Sometimes I stream random B horror movies and foreign ones on Netflix, but even then the selection is pretty limited.

    1. Re:I still rent from Blockbuster... by krinderlin · · Score: 1

      or I actually buy movies, in order to support artists who's income depends on it. Even better, you can go see something in the theater!

      I can't convince myself to drop $20 for any movies in recent memory. The last DVD I bought was Repo: The Genetic Opera. I bought the DVD and soundtrack off Amazon brand new. That was like...a year ago. But I have bought Dr. Who off of Zune.

      Every time I go to the theater, it's like $40 and I end up getting to the end and saying, "I really would've just liked to watch this at home." People have no respect for the movie watching experience. I've been kicked out for chucking popcorn at some ass hat narrating the movie over his cell phone.

      I don't know what it's like in other areas, but here in NC there's plenty of theaters that show movies a little bit later than others and charge between $1.50 and $3 per person per showing.

      There are no cheap theaters around Atlanta I know of. There are a few "artsy" theaters, but I can't convince my partner to watch anything subtitled or without explosions. :-P

      I'd rather rent new movies than stream old ones. Redbox never has anything I haven't all ready watched. Sometimes I stream random B horror movies and foreign ones on Netflix, but even then the selection is pretty limited.

      I beg to differ. I love some old movies and I think a bottle of wine, some friends, and a horrible 70's grind house flick is an awesome time with friends. It takes all strokes for different folks, I guess.

  21. News and sports by tepples · · Score: 1

    I have given up on Amazon unless I am really lazy or can't find the movie on Redbox.

    Such as any movie first released more than about 18 months ago.

    compared to my co-workers I save on the order of about $200/month by kicking pay TV to the curb

    What do you do if someone wants to watch live political commentary (e.g. the morning or prime-time lineup of MSNBC, CNN, or Fox News) or live sports? News and sports are the things keeping households in my extended family watching pay TV.

    1. Re:News and sports by artor3 · · Score: 1

      You can get a lot of live sports direct from the league (e.g. MLB.tv). The only major sport that requires cable/satellite is the NFL, which has few enough games that you can watch it at someone else's place.

      And honestly, you'll be happier and better informed if you drop the cable news. Fox is propaganda and the other networks aren't much better.

    2. Re:News and sports by tepples · · Score: 1

      ou can get a lot of live sports direct from the league (e.g. MLB.tv). The only major sport that requires cable/satellite is the NFL, which has few enough games that you can watch it at someone else's place.

      My aunt's husband likes NFL and NHL, and his house ends up being the "someone else's place" that others visit.

      And honestly, you'll be happier and better informed if you drop the cable news. Fox is propaganda and the other networks aren't much better.

      Another relative hates Fox News with a passion. She wants political commentary that she can listen to while getting ready for work in the morning, and she has hooked the cable box up to an FM transmitter so that she can blare MSNBC's Morning Joe Brewed by Starbucks over a radio in every room, even in the bathroom while she takes a shower.

    3. Re:News and sports by Politburo · · Score: 1

      "What do you do if someone wants to watch live political commentary?"

      Put them out of their misery.

    4. Re:News and sports by rabun_bike · · Score: 1

      "What do you do if someone wants to watch live political commentary (e.g. the morning or prime-time lineup of MSNBC, CNN, or Fox News) or live sports? News and sports are the things keeping households in my extended family watching pay TV."

      That's a valid question and one I had to get used to. My answer is one that will not work for everyone. I listen to a lot of NPR both in the car and streaming. My wife watches tons of stuff on her laptop. I also watch a lot of PBS due to having kids. So, I have basically substituted CNN (the video portion) for NPR. Otherwise I read a lot of CNN, MSNBC, Faux News (although I don't care for the bias slant I still read it to keep current with the Fox side of the story), and even my local news online. I also read the WSJ online and watch the Market Watch news segment from time to time which appeals to me a lot more than talking heads screaming at me on the various other cable options. Google news takes me all over the place as well. When I work out I occasionally tune into CNBC or MSNBC which is provided for free to me at my company gym. Once my kids are older this will most likely start to be harder to do - they will start demanding more options. We shall see. For the time being it is working out just fine since my kids favorite shows include Elmo and Cat and the Hat.

      For sports...well I don't really keep up with sports and probably watch maybe 4 college football games, 10 baseball games and a few hockey games per year. This will not work for everyone. I know and understand that there are a lot of people that simply can not give up sports in this way. I sympathize and would not ask them to give up something they love to watch. My wife does miss the hockey but not enough to make me get digital cable again and start paying another monthly subscription. Believe me we have talking and it many times but it always comes down to cost. So, for someone who truly likes watching sports I think there is really no substitute for pay TV at this time. For the average Joe, there are options if you are willing to try out new ways of consuming information and you can save some serious money over the long haul but it is not the "easy" way to go about it.

    5. Re:News and sports by krinderlin · · Score: 1

      Another relative hates Fox News with a passion. She wants political commentary that she can listen to while getting ready for work in the morning, and she has hooked the cable box up to an FM transmitter so that she can blare MSNBC's Morning Joe Brewed by Starbucks over a radio in every room, even in the bathroom while she takes a shower.

      Why doesn't she just listen to NPR? Morning Edition is so much more awesome, more intelligent, and a lot less slanted though still pretty Liberal. Oh wait...

  22. My local library offers dvd's for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My local library (Baltimore County Public Library) offers new movies for $1 a night. TV series, classic films, foreign films are free.

  23. Blockbuster the sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Blockbuster opened they were fairly priced but they slowly went up over time until they were expensive. They killed off the mom and pop stores so you didn't have a lot of choice. Then Redbox pulls the ole dumping scheme where you come up with a service so cheap the other guy can't compete. I doubt it's a coincidence that they only started raising prices once Blockbuster was on the rails. Give it a few years and they'll have Blockbuster level pricing without all the nasty selection or overhead. A buck a film wasn't because they were nice people it was a strategy to run Blockbuster out of business. My now dead local blockbuster happens to have a pair of Redbox machines a 100' away in front of a Wallgreens. I doubt the placement was a coincidence either.

    1. Re:Blockbuster the sequel by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Blockbusters new releases were originally about $3 for a VHS tape. That is about $6 in today's money for a VHS and not a DVD. And they made you pay a fee if you didn't rewind it. Sure they got more expensive over time, but they were never a cheap option. They had decent prices on stuff that was not new release, but their categorization of new releases meant that basically anything filmed in color was considered a new release.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  24. Why it may/may not matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all a price/value equation
    Where I live (SE MI), new movies at Ball$buster are $2.99, and unless you get there when they open, getting a new BD rental is nearly impossible (I'm told stores typically get only 5 BD's). 99cent for everything else. Meanwhile WoW OnDemand is $2.99 for SD, and $5.99 for HD. And now RedBox just got 20cents more
    expensive than Ball$buster for older movies. Ohs no.
    The choice is going to vary per person. For me, you learn to forget dollars and cents and order the value as "I-don't-have-to-leave-my-cave-for-OnDemand > Redbox-online-says-it-has-it-but-I'm-half-drunk-and-drunk-driving-is-bad-mkay > Ball$Buster-may-or-may-not-have-it > NetFlix-wont-have-it-for-28days-thanks-to-Ball$buster".
    Doubly so with a 100" projector screen ;)

  25. Netflix wasn't just about price. by justin12345 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Netflix exodus wasn't just because of the price increase. People understand price increases. It was about the non-chalent contempt that they showed their customers by wording their email "don't you dare complain, the increase is less then the cost of that fancy coffee you're sucking on". The price increase was of course a big factor, but compared to renting at Blockbuster in the 90s, even with the increase Netflix is a steal. The Quickster thing was just icing, the cake was baked and burned.

    It was the sort of dumbass move only someone with a job title that abbreviates to a three letter acronym could make. Speaking as the CEO of a small company, I'd say that the brass had their heads so far up their own asses that they honestly couldn't see what was going to happen. My advice: if you're the CEO, you owe it to the company to spend at least 3 hours a day doing customer service or tech support, so that you know what the people you are serving want. Even if you can't give it to them, you know what to shoot for. Otherwise, you can let a singe sentence slide (the latte thing in Netflix case) and ruin a business hundreds or thousands of people have worked tirelessly on.

    --
    Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    1. Re:Netflix wasn't just about price. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yup, I'm amazed at stupid things executives do because they are out of touch. I knew a guy who worked close to sales and they managed to work out a major deal to sell a ton of equipment to a major customer, which would also get them in the door for lots of repeat business down the road/etc. The thing was huge, and because the customer was happy with their products and services they didn't require competitive bids/etc on the deal.

      They sent the deal to their VP for approval/etc, and the VP decided that they needed to add some value, which basically meant trying to squeeze an extra 10% or whatever out of the customer. Suddenly the customer is ticked off and has a sour taste in what previously was a happy engagement. Now the customer is talking about soliciting competitive bids and the whole things is in jeopardy, and even if it goes through it becomes a strained relationship. The company making the sale REALLY needed the sale too since they were in hard times and this was one of their biggest deals to date - and apparently the sale was done at typical rates/etc.

      Too many managers at too many companies are just out of touch with what is going on at the ground level. A CEO really does need to understand the business a company is in. Now, the CEO of Walmart doesn't need to visit every store annually or know every product they sell, but they do need to understand why it is that people go to Walmart vs someplace else and what it takes to maintain that advantage. The CEO of a company that sells products needs to understand why people buy those products and how they can be improved upon and not just that they spend money on ads and R&D and manufacturing and sales. Officers need to get away from the spreadsheets and understand the realities of the business they are in.

    2. Re:Netflix wasn't just about price. by tbannist · · Score: 0

      It was about the non-chalent contempt that they showed their customers by wording their email "don't you dare complain, the increase is less then the cost of that fancy coffee you're sucking on".

      Of course that didn't happen. What the CEO did was reply to a reporter's question about the price increase by saying it was less than a cup of coffee a month, and thus he didn't think it would have a large impact on the number subscribers they have. Make of that what you will, but you'd look more reasonable if you didn't lie about what actually happened.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    3. Re:Netflix wasn't just about price. by justin12345 · · Score: 1
      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Netflix wasn't just about price. by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Don't pretend your hyperbole is a quotation, it just makes you look like an ass.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    5. Re:Netflix wasn't just about price. by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      whoosh

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
  26. OMG I WILL NEVER USE REDBOX AGAIN!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    AHHHH! OMG!!! I CAN'T BELIEVE THEY RAISED THEIR PRICES!!!

    I have been using redbox for 10 years without a price increase, now all the sudden they are going to raise it by 20c?

    This is an outrage!! I will never rent another movie from a redbox, and the ones I have right now I am going to smash them and do something really, really satanic to them(to the dvds I mean, to express my uncontrollable rage)!!!

    I am also going straight to my facebook page and denouncing their idiocy to the whole world! /makefunofcrazyangrynetflixoutrage-off

  27. A lot of NFL broadcasts are on over-the-air TV by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    many NFL games are on over-the-air TV: the Sunday evening game on NBC, various Sunday afternoon games on CBS and FOX.
    Do they often want the Monday night game (ESPN)? Do the local stations tend to not broadcast the Sunday afternoon games they want?

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  28. if that happened... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    "YouPorn, where the only thing we're raising is your dick."

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  29. College ball too by tepples · · Score: 1

    Do they often want the Monday night game (ESPN)?

    Yes.

    Do the local stations tend to not broadcast the Sunday afternoon games they want?

    Correct. If you're following the team of the city where you grew up before moving hundreds of miles to a different regional market, or you're following the team to which your favorite player was traded, your team's games might not be available OTA. And at this point I feel the need to mention Saturday games in NCAA FBS. Good luck finding the team of the school from which you graduated or which your college-age child attends OTA.

    1. Re:College ball too by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clarifying.
      I follow the local team so it isn't an issue for me, but I understand it may be an issue for other fans for whatever reason.
      I figured some folks may get cable/satellite whether or not it's really necessary for them.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  30. Reasons for raising by Chelstad · · Score: 1

    One of the reasons Redbox gives is "higher debit card fees that went into effect October 1." Anyone find this strange? The debit card fees were actually reduced for merchants, and as far as I know, the only fees were the ones affecting consumers. (a good reference here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204138204576600800330404330.html) Should I guess that RedBox/Coinstar lost a sweet deal they had with a bank and had to raise prices, or are they just shielding their move behind something not many consumers are aware of?

    1. Re:Reasons for raising by pdhenry · · Score: 1

      The debit card fee structure was changed to make it less expensive for larger transactions but more expensive for smaller transactions (e.g., those on the order of a dollar or so). This was discussed earlier.

  31. Re:Whew. I thought you said RedTube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do believe RedTube has some Red Boxes on it.

  32. This is news? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    They did this where I live several months ago.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:This is news? by pdhenry · · Score: 1

      I agree. 2 or 3 years ago the local Redboxes raised their first night fee to $2. Then the Blockbuster Express kiosks came to town and the rate hike was rescinded.

    2. Re:This is news? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I still have the email receipts, they made this change here back in May.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  33. Not entirely correct at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first day will be $1.20. The subsequent days are still $1.00. Moreover, the price for games and blu-rays will remain unchanged. So, their initial charge was raised 20%, but not for everything, and all other pricing aside from the initial day are still the same as well.

  34. speculation by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    That makes no sense. If it was card fraud he should have reported it as such, and the credit card company wouldn't have had a chat with the rental company, they would have reimbursed the amount of the fraud. I agree with GP, it sounds like the guy was at fault and just didn't want to pay up, or he let a friend use his card and the friend lost the disks or maybe he tried to claim it was fraud but Redbox could show a pattern of the guy renting two DVDs every two weeks for the last six months which made it highly unlikely that the very last rental was a fraud and the CC company agreed (my money is on that explanation).

    Well, he kinda tried and got the cold shoulder. I inferred that much from reading his post (which I think that's was the idea, to read it.)

    Also, don't assume too much who is at fault. You are making a lot of assumptions, but in reality you don't know anything about the case. It could go either way independently of how you imagine the facts to have taken place.

    Crap happens. Once I got charged a PPV by Blockbusters, specifically a boxing match with Mayweather (or whatever his name is). I certainly didn't order it since I don't watch boxing (I did order UFC PPV events at the time.) But I specifically know that I didn't order that PPV because I simply don't watch boxing and it was at a time that I just came back to the country, extremely jet-lagged (but with a shitload of work to do regardless). Boxing isn't my interest, specifically when I'm overworked and jet-lagged.

    Regardless, Comcast customer service claimed that they had evidence that the order was made from the setbox in my living room. I suggested that fraud/wiretapping of some type occurred, but that didn't go anywhere. I was too tired to continue fighting, and I simply let the payment take place. And I didn't cancel Comcast because I had (and still do) my internet and phone services with them (and I need those to do work.)

    Fighting it out and make a fraud report (and fight for it) sometimes is simply not worth it. Let the $50-something to get lost and get back to shit that is more important (and more expensive) at that particular time. Time passes, and then it's months, years and you do not get an incident like that (maybe never again.)

    Could something like that happened to the AC with his usage of redbox? Maybe, maybe not, maybe he's lying, maybe he's confused, or maybe he's telling the truth. But I would not imagine it impossible or even unlikely (as something similar happened to me as I just described.) Don't assume online sales/rental/payment systems are infallible, they are not (I've worked on them.) Put on top of that a layer of customer service, typically populated by people who don't give a shit or who think they are at a career dead-end and display it in their behavior, and strange things happen.

    On another note, I've been using RedBox for a while, mostly to rent Disney movies for my toddler. Cannot complain about the service itself, and I like the idea of paying per day (and keeping the dvd after paying something close to retail after x number of days... not that I would do that.) I'd be pretty pissed, though, if something like what the AC described were to happen to me.

  35. False Advertisment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, it will cost them an arm/leg to change all those $1 signs on the kiosks. Otherwise we can all sue for false advertisement...

  36. Apparently they didn't learn before... by srees · · Score: 1

    Redbox tried the $2 rental a while ago, what 1 or 2 years back? They lost so much business they put it back to $1. Added Blu-ray for $1.50, I have no idea how that's going for them. I like renting for a buck from them. I haven't used them much since signing up for Netflix streaming only, unless I really want to see an almost new release, since they have to wait a month to rent them (lame!). Will I spend $1.20 to preview a movie before buying it? Probably. Will I spend it as often? No.

  37. why not a round number? by GregNorc · · Score: 1

    Why not make it a round 1.25? Delays the next raise, and allows you to not get stuck with a useless nickel that will probably get lost.

  38. 20 cents, whoopee... by mprindle · · Score: 1

    The extra .20 doesn't matter to me. It's still cheaper than going to a big box store to rent a movie and there's only been once when I didn't the movie returned by the next day.

  39. Collector Value by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    It is probably more valuable than either its face value, or it's bullion value. Considering that the production rate is 1/year, that makes it as rare as any collector coin that exists -- provided that they date each one properly.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  40. Change the dollar, not the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to change the dollar to be worth $1.20, and then we could still just pay a dollar.